Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Do curries count as western Eurasians ?

R

ryhan

Julias dracul romanov the 2 eyed abyss
★★★★★
Joined
May 20, 2019
Posts
4,459
1622072011366



I mean they fall just out side of the ''caucasoid'' cluster however in terms of genetic distace they are closest to other iranians near easterns tbqh and skull wise the main differences is minute when compared to other races it's mainly the shape of the jaw and the height and projection of the cranium
 
We wuzz aryans n shiet
10351A72 8F6C 4851 A86A 4C5D8D3AFB96
FBD0EDF1 3B25 4DF8 9B42 A9C816629981
 
Probably depends what kind of curry you are.

@RREEEEEEEEE thoughts?
 
Not aryans the aryans were mulatoos from eastern neolethic farmer from europe and 50 percent iranian farmers from the chalcolethic indians are descandants of farmers from iran that came during the neolethic
Not exactly descendants the indo iranian farmers are regarded as an ancestral population now but they admixed heavily with the population(s) native to the Indians which are closer to aboriginal (think of the people of sentinel island) and depending one where you come from you will have differing levels of indo-Aryan or Native Indian admixture
 
Probably depends what kind of curry you are.

@RREEEEEEEEE thoughts?

I mean the dravdians are significantly more ethnic than your typical pasthun or kalash yet even they are closest to west asian's this exists after using 6 different gene charts this 1 is a much more recent one made in 2009 a 2012 study found curries to be of sibling trees
 
I mean the dravdians are significantly more ethnic than your typical pasthun or kalash yet even they are closest to west asian's this exists after using 6 different gene charts this 1 is a much more recent one made in 2009 a 2012 study found curries to be of sibling trees
What is west asian?
 
Not exactly descendants the indo iranian farmers are regarded as an ancestral population now but they admixed heavily with the population(s) native to the Indians which are closer to aboriginal (think of the people of sentinel island) and depending one where you come from you will have differing levels of indo-Aryan or Native Indian admixture

This is incorrect on a few accounts tbqh.

1 Haplogroup d a haplogroup found solely in africa and the andaman islands is not present in the majority of modern day indians haplogroup R1A AND J2 both middle eastern, european haplogroups are found very commonly among curries.

2 the ASI based genes are around 40 percent for south 80 percent for north even despite that though there still closest overall to west Asians.

3 The Aryan admixture is next to 0 in most south asian's majority is from the indic farmers that left iran and settled in modern day afghanistan and balouchi it's because of ASI most curries don't look like balouch people
 
South Asians are South Asians. Nothing else.

Yeah off course bhai but what i'm trying to say is that in terms of genetic distance were closest to iranians and middle easterns that's it every other population that isn't in the caucasoid group is no way near as realted that's it
 
Yeah off course bhai but what i'm trying to say is that in terms of genetic distance were closest to iranians and middle easterns that's it every other population that isn't in the caucasoid group is no way near as realted that's it
South Asians (specifically modern-day Pakistan with some of it in Afghanistan and India) created the first civilization of the world. We descend from people so ancient we don't know a single thing about them except for mere speculations. As for genetics, you would need to do some kind of DNA testing but even that is not reliable for South Asians since our origins are unknown, unlike those of Iranians and other ethnic groups.
 
South Asians (specifically modern-day Pakistan with some of it in Afghanistan and India) created the first civilization of the world. We descend from people so ancient we don't know a single thing about them except for mere speculations. As for genetics, you would need to do some kind of DNA testing but even that is not reliable for South Asians since our origins are unknown, unlike those of Iranians and other ethnic groups.

Wasn't it the sumerians that made the first civilizations and i don't care about culture just based of the data at hand indians phenotypiclly and genetically are closest to indian west asians guys
 
Curries are just darkskinned low IQ whites with shitty frames, prove me wrong :feelsdevil:
 
south Asian natives are a distinct group seperated from mongoloid and caucasoid very early, they are very remotely related to other east eurasian groups, this "race" is called AASI(ancestral ancient south indian)
indus valley civilisation people are predominantly iranian farmer ancestry with significant AASI admixture
when indus valley civilisation began to decline, people moved furthur south, intermixed more with natives and a component ASI(ancestral south indian) rose,ASI component can comprise 75% AASI
then people from central Asia (aryans) began to move south and mixed with indus valley people, rose the component of ANI(ancestral north indian)
then ANI and ASI began mix thoroughly, now all populations of india are a mixture of these two component
so the ancestry of India is:
1. AASI the natives distinctively related to other east eurasian groups
2. iranian farmer
3. central Asian(maybe the so called aryans), this ancestry is mostly limited to the north and upper castes

the indians AASI admixture average nearly 40%, there is a north-south cline,with southerners average more AASI, but not that different. even northernmost provinces > 20%AASI
 
Why do you guys bother with this genetics bullshit. human perception and intuition are better when judging people of different races.
 
Why do you guys bother with this genetics bullshit. human perception and intuition are better when judging people of different races.


Few reasons 1 cause whites have better phenotypes this isn't even argueable.

2 Being closer to whites feels good in my opinion.

3 I'VE DONE many simulations with my drawing and the ideal face is a white guy the closer you are genetically to a white guy the more handsome your genetic potential is
 
Wasn't it the sumerians that made the first civilizations and i don't care about culture just based of the data at hand indians phenotypiclly and genetically are closest to indian west asians guys
The Indus Valley Civilization predates any other civilization. It's funny that the country we called India is called India, when the Indus River doesn't even run through that country but Pakistan instead.
 
The Indus Valley Civilization predates any other civilization. It's funny that the country we called India is called India, when the Indus River doesn't even run through that country but Pakistan instead.

Your right i'm just talking about the IVC people as mainly genetic concordants
 
Aren't you a poster on looksmax?
 
Your right i'm just talking about the IVC people as mainly genetic concordants
IVC is so ancient we don't know anything about them. Funnily enough Indians want to pretend that Hindus were the oldest civilization to discredit Islamic people but that's not true. Thank God.
 
why are curries so obsessed with anthropology? It's just not the kind of subject normal people are into tbh

IVC is so ancient we don't know anything about them. Funnily enough Indians want to pretend that Hindus were the oldest civilization to discredit Islamic people but that's not true. Thank God.
why does that matter so much?

You seem to get quite invested on these indian-related ethinicity discussions?
 
why are curries so obsessed with anthropology? It's just not the kind of subject normal people are into tbh


why does that matter so much?

You seem to get quite invested on these indian-related ethinicity discussions?
Because Indians keep trying to say that Hindus are the original people in the region, when it's not even remotely true. Why do you care?
 
As a curry I don’t really care but that circle look arbitary
 
IVC is so ancient we don't know anything about them. Funnily enough Indians want to pretend that Hindus were the oldest civilization to discredit Islamic people but that's not true. Thank God.

Bhai you know me i prefer Pakistan to hindu land any day but we can still say genetically there very close to eastern iranans
 
Bhai you know me i prefer Pakistan to hindu land any day but we can still say genetically there very close to eastern iranans
You should read about the Indus periphery. It's an interesting theory. And well, funnily enough, the terms hindu and India are all hijacked. It stems from the Indus River which flows through Pakistan only and Kashmir. It doesn't even apply to the country that lies east of Pakistan. I guess they know deep down and that's why they call their country bharat instead of India.
 
Depends. Northern Indians, bordering Pakistan, I believe are Indo-Arabian. Southern and Eastern there are some Indo-Caucasians and others. I am probably goofing some of the terminology, but curries are closer to Europeans than most Arabs, and much closer than Asians, but there's still some distance.
 
Because Indians keep trying to say that Hindus are the original people in the region, when it's not even remotely true. Why do you care?
I just have an interest in anthropology, not specifically in the indian subcontinent

by hindus you mean religiously speaking? I don't think there must be that of a genetic differenciation between hindus and muslim curries. Isn't islam a recent religion compared to hinduism anyways? It just would make more sense that an older religion was more widespread in the region before the arrival of muslins. idk, just guessing.
 
I just have an interest in anthropology, not specifically in the indian subcontinent

by hindus you mean religiously speaking? I don't think there must be that of a genetic differenciation between hindus and muslim curries. Isn't islam a recent religion compared to hinduism anyways? It just would make more sense that an older religion was more widespread in the region before the arrival of muslins. idk, just guessing.
Yes, religious group. And that's not true. There is definitely genetic variety between Hindus and Islamic people in South Asia. We have lived side by side for each other for centuries and we have never mixed with each other. Our cultures, rules and values are entirely different. Lumping them in the same category is just illogical.
 
Yes, religious group. And that's not true. There is definitely genetic variety between Hindus and Islamic people in South Asia. We have lived side by side for each other for centuries and we have never mixed with each other. Our cultures, rules and values are entirely different. Lumping them in the same category is just illogical.
I'd have to look that up. Well, there's definitely a genetic variety between every single human, not exactly how we measure that tbh, but "we have never mixed" is quite of a nonsense statement by all means, this is just not how different humans populations tend to interact with each other, not even in way less diverse regions like east asia. That's just very unlikely given the proximity.

I agree that "lumping" them in the same category since we're talking about different cultures, values and so on but I'd say most of the differences will stop there, not like we really have a clear definition of ethnicities genetically speaking, it's more a way of humans classify each other, not a real scientifical concept.
 
I'd have to look that up. Well, there's definitely a genetic variety between every single human, not exactly how we measure that tbh, but "we have never mixed" is quite of a nonsense statement by all means, this is just not how different humans populations tend to interact with each other, not even in way less diverse regions like east asia. That's just very unlikely given the proximity.

I agree that "lumping" them in the same category since we're talking about different cultures, values and so on but I'd say most of the differences will stop there, not like we really have a clear definition of ethnicities genetically speaking, it's more a way of humans classify each other, not a real scientifical concept.
I am talking about since the arrival of Islam, we have never mixed. Didn't think I'd have to spell it out for you.
 
I thought you were dead OP :feelsmage:
 
Yes, religious group. And that's not true. There is definitely genetic variety between Hindus and Islamic people in South Asia. We have lived side by side for each other for centuries and we have never mixed with each other. Our cultures, rules and values are entirely different. Lumping them in the same category is just illogical.

I'd disagree here mixture has been a common theme any where there is regional proximity it's why majority of south asians all cluster together oviously there distinct but you can still class them as the same race southern asians are southern Eurasians I guess
 

Similar threads

FarangInDaNang
Replies
4
Views
864
nihilum
nihilum
FarangInDaNang
Replies
26
Views
1K
friedrllyudidntknow
friedrllyudidntknow
grimlockcel
Replies
18
Views
619
Firefighter
Firefighter
AsiaCel
Replies
14
Views
2K
AsiaCel
AsiaCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top