Occured to me that there´s so much discussion about "rape culture" and harrasment issues and such with little progress being made towards understanding because men and foids think of two very different concepts when they talk about rape. Foids talk about rape and mean having unpleasant sex, men talk about rape and mean being violated.
Its actually kind of obvious where this comes from, foids are the receptive part of any sexual encounter bar a few exceptions of sexual practices, they are the ones getting dicked in a heterosexual context. You could go along the lines of a few feminists and say that all sex is rape and you wouldnt be completely wrong, intercourse is at large engaged by the male counterparts and contains most often an element of forcing themselves on the foid in some way. Its okay if chad does it of course, then its hot, but if an unattractive guy does it, it becomes unpleasant and therefore rape.
Its very different for men though. Normally no single foid would force herself on you in a sexual encounter (hah), difficult even from a physical perspective. So if a man finds a foid so abhorrent that he actually choses to be volcel for her, he simply doesnt engage. The only possibility for a man to have an unpleasant sexual encounter is when another man forces him physically to play the receptive part, thereby also undermining the individual agency inherent to his character. Its traumatic and its resolved through violence.
Now foids could also be forced physically into sex, more easily actually, but its not inherent to their definition of it and sadly due to the muddying of the term there probably is no data on how often foids are actually violated than just "raped", Id wager that it doesnt even happen more often to them than to men, number of things that would speak for that but I wont go off on that.
What you are left with is the sorry state of relations between the sexes that you have now, foids cry about a rape epidemic and as I assume knowingly use men´s indignation to the concept of being violated, as that is what rape is to us, to drive home their point and make demands, although it means something very different for them.
Its actually kind of obvious where this comes from, foids are the receptive part of any sexual encounter bar a few exceptions of sexual practices, they are the ones getting dicked in a heterosexual context. You could go along the lines of a few feminists and say that all sex is rape and you wouldnt be completely wrong, intercourse is at large engaged by the male counterparts and contains most often an element of forcing themselves on the foid in some way. Its okay if chad does it of course, then its hot, but if an unattractive guy does it, it becomes unpleasant and therefore rape.
Its very different for men though. Normally no single foid would force herself on you in a sexual encounter (hah), difficult even from a physical perspective. So if a man finds a foid so abhorrent that he actually choses to be volcel for her, he simply doesnt engage. The only possibility for a man to have an unpleasant sexual encounter is when another man forces him physically to play the receptive part, thereby also undermining the individual agency inherent to his character. Its traumatic and its resolved through violence.
Now foids could also be forced physically into sex, more easily actually, but its not inherent to their definition of it and sadly due to the muddying of the term there probably is no data on how often foids are actually violated than just "raped", Id wager that it doesnt even happen more often to them than to men, number of things that would speak for that but I wont go off on that.
What you are left with is the sorry state of relations between the sexes that you have now, foids cry about a rape epidemic and as I assume knowingly use men´s indignation to the concept of being violated, as that is what rape is to us, to drive home their point and make demands, although it means something very different for them.
