Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Debunking the myth of modern female empowerment | "women are out achieving men!"

deleted fren

deleted fren

Everything burns
-
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
43,112
Online time
5h 16m
There's this ridiculous idea that modern women are empowered because women have broken free from the shackles of the patriarchy and proved they're just as good as men! This is ironic because "female empowerment" is entirely the result of a society built by men with excess resources. The reason women weren't "empowered" in the past is because it was in their nature to avoid manual labor and use men for resources. Despite whatever feminists tell you, women were capable of getting jobs in the past.

In 1833 Britain, women made up 57% – the majority – of factory workers.
They opted to get married instead because, again, they didn't want to work hard manual labor.
"BUT MEN HAD NICE JOBS"
Most men worked miserable manual labor as well. It was only the elite and privileged men who were allowed higher-paying jobs that didn't require physical effort.
However, by 1851 the proportion of married women who worked had dropped to 30%.

"Women's empowerment" today results from equity programs and affirmative action that have created easily accessible, cozy jobs for women that pay good wages. Note, that most of these jobs could easily be replaced by AI due to how simple they are. https://www.reuters.com/business/wo...womens-work-than-mens-says-report-2025-05-20/
If we lived in a society where these companies operated purely on what was cost-effective, most women would not have such jobs.


We can see that men are still unable to get such jobs and have to work lowly physical jobs. Even if they get degrees men will struggle to be hired because the same programs that exist to ensure women do well don't exist for men

1000020617




1000020765



1000020766




As we can see, female empowerment does not naturally exist. If society were to collapse, women would return to leeching off men for resources.
It's always so funny when women boast about their achievements, when they wouldn't even have such achievements without programs created by men
 
Yep the feminist mythos is built on many lies of this sort. It's just like when they talk about muh vote ignoring that at the time of the suffragettes in Britain something like 60% of men couldnt vote and only did so by paying the price of mass deaths in the trenches during ww1 while women got it without sacrificing anything. Not to even mention all the rest of history where 99% of men weren't invited to vote neither.
 
Yep the feminist mythos is built on many lies of this sort. It's just like when they talk about muh vote ignoring that at the time of the suffragettes in Britain something like 60% of men couldnt vote and only did so by paying the price of mass deaths in the trenches during ww1 while women got it without sacrificing anything. Not to even mention all the rest of history where 99% of men weren't invited to vote neither.
Exactly. The same is true for America. Men couldn't vote without getting thrown into the meat grinders. "Female suffering" has always been women demanding privileges that the majority of men do not have. They look at the top ten percent and demand they get the same.
 
They learned the hard way when troons beat the shit out of them in sports, sometimes literally.
 
As we can see, female empowerment does not naturally exist. If society were to collapse, women would return to leeching off men for resources.
Water.
All toilets want is a simp's money.
 
They learned the hard way when troons beat the shit out of them in sports, sometimes literally.
they hate troons because they're a threat to their privileges
 
Yep the feminist mythos is built on many lies of this sort. It's just like when they talk about muh vote ignoring that at the time of the suffragettes in Britain something like 60% of men couldnt vote and only did so by paying the price of mass deaths in the trenches during ww1 while women got it without sacrificing anything. Not to even mention all the rest of history where 99% of men weren't invited to vote neither.
And not to mention that right now, 30-40% of people don't even bother to vote in most countries' elections:feelshaha:. I've been planning a thread on this for some time, how funny it is that something close to half of people in most countries don't care about is used as a yardstick of whether a society "oppresses women" (or anyone really), or not:feelshaha:.

"Female suffering" has always been women demanding privileges that the majority of men do not have. They look at the top ten percent and demand they get the same.
 
And not to mention that right now, 30-40% of people don't even bother to vote in most countries' elections:feelshaha:. I've been planning a thread on this for some time, how funny it is that something close to half of people in most countries don't care about is used as a yardstick of whether a society "oppresses women" (or anyone really), or not:feelshaha:.
Yeah i'm not even in favor of voting rights for myself if a truly respectable intergenerational regime like a monarchy assumes that responsability lmao. When you're not a matrixed golem those modernistic sanctified concepts are really unimpressive.
 
There's this ridiculous idea that modern women are empowered because women have broken free from the shackles of the patriarchy and proved they're just as good as men! This is ironic because "female empowerment" is entirely the result of a society built by men with excess resources. The reason women weren't "empowered" in the past is because it was in their nature to avoid manual labor and use men for resources. Despite whatever feminists tell you, women were capable of getting jobs in the past.


They opted to get married instead because, again, they didn't want to work hard manual labor.
"BUT MEN HAD NICE JOBS"
Most men worked miserable manual labor as well. It was only the elite and privileged men who were allowed higher-paying jobs that didn't require physical effort.


"Women's empowerment" today results from equity programs and affirmative action that have created easily accessible, cozy jobs for women that pay good wages. Note, that most of these jobs could easily be replaced by AI due to how simple they are. https://www.reuters.com/business/wo...womens-work-than-mens-says-report-2025-05-20/
If we lived in a society where these companies operated purely on what was cost-effective, most women would not have such jobs.


We can see that men are still unable to get such jobs and have to work lowly physical jobs. Even if they get degrees men will struggle to be hired because the same programs that exist to ensure women do well don't exist for men

View attachment 1497886



View attachment 1497888


View attachment 1497889



As we can see, female empowerment does not naturally exist. If society were to collapse, women would return to leeching off men for resources.
It's always so funny when women boast about their achievements, when they wouldn't even have such achievements without programs created by men
Rare W post
 
And not to mention that right now, 30-40% of people don't even bother to vote in most countries' elections:feelshaha:.
Its well over 50% in some countries. So high that in france, if I remember correctly, the government stop counting the empty/blank votes, to avoid admitting that the president is often elected by a small minority (maybe 20% ?) of the population.
Democracy is a joke.
 
matrixed golem
that's good :feelsYall:
i'm not even in favor of voting rights for myself if a truly respectable intergenerational regime like a monarchy assumes that responsability
idk democracy doesn't work because retards will just vote for oversocialized feminist cuck gibs oppressive shit and wonder why they're eventually enslaved but I wouldn't want some retard for life calling all the shots either and live the high life, taking everything the plebs have. there really isn't a good solution is there.
Its well over 50% in some countries. So high that in france, if I remember correctly, the government stop counting the empty/blank votes, to avoid admitting that the president is often elected by a small minority (maybe 20% ?) of the population.
Democracy is a joke.
better the retards recognize themselves as such and not voting than having some populist nigger assume office and nuke everything
 
Most of jobs that women have are either cleaning or fake jobs like psychologist or social media manager so I don't see what are they doing for society that they didn't do before, they're doing even less
 
These Elites are destroying society, the hegemony of World banking federations such as the Rothschilds, these mfs are always 10 steps ahead,they fund projects for female suffrage and deter any problems men have, foids are semi conscientious beings and shall be subjugated
 
Foids empowerment is porn/Onlyfans/And sucking dick
 
foids dont even want to work. they're still being a leech
 
57% of foids might have worked in factories but 100% of men worked in mines to ensure factories ran. In fact, factory jobs were so low skilled that even children as young as 8 year olds were employed. Nothing's changed. It's all relative.
 
Women want what elite men have and want to enslave the other men.
 

Similar threads

Exalted Monarch
Replies
10
Views
1K
no love found
N
hatepilledandrich
Replies
5
Views
721
hatepilledandrich
hatepilledandrich
sultryloser
Replies
27
Views
2K
Thaway
Thaway
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
11
Views
2K
Poopless One
Poopless One
Animecel2D
Replies
9
Views
2K
cathuluelitist
cathuluelitist

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →