deleted fren
Everything burns
-
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2022
- Posts
- 43,112
- Online time
- 5h 14m
There's this ridiculous idea that modern women are empowered because women have broken free from the shackles of the patriarchy and proved they're just as good as men! This is ironic because "female empowerment" is entirely the result of a society built by men with excess resources. The reason women weren't "empowered" in the past is because it was in their nature to avoid manual labor and use men for resources. Despite whatever feminists tell you, women were capable of getting jobs in the past.
greenpill.net
They opted to get married instead because, again, they didn't want to work hard manual labor.
"BUT MEN HAD NICE JOBS"
Most men worked miserable manual labor as well. It was only the elite and privileged men who were allowed higher-paying jobs that didn't require physical effort.
"Women's empowerment" today results from equity programs and affirmative action that have created easily accessible, cozy jobs for women that pay good wages. Note, that most of these jobs could easily be replaced by AI due to how simple they are. https://www.reuters.com/business/wo...womens-work-than-mens-says-report-2025-05-20/
If we lived in a society where these companies operated purely on what was cost-effective, most women would not have such jobs.
We can see that men are still unable to get such jobs and have to work lowly physical jobs. Even if they get degrees men will struggle to be hired because the same programs that exist to ensure women do well don't exist for men
phillywnc.org
As we can see, female empowerment does not naturally exist. If society were to collapse, women would return to leeching off men for resources.
It's always so funny when women boast about their achievements, when they wouldn't even have such achievements without programs created by men
In 1833 Britain, women made up 57% – the majority – of factory workers.
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
greenpill.net
"BUT MEN HAD NICE JOBS"
Most men worked miserable manual labor as well. It was only the elite and privileged men who were allowed higher-paying jobs that didn't require physical effort.
However, by 1851 the proportion of married women who worked had dropped to 30%.
"Women's empowerment" today results from equity programs and affirmative action that have created easily accessible, cozy jobs for women that pay good wages. Note, that most of these jobs could easily be replaced by AI due to how simple they are. https://www.reuters.com/business/wo...womens-work-than-mens-says-report-2025-05-20/
If we lived in a society where these companies operated purely on what was cost-effective, most women would not have such jobs.
We can see that men are still unable to get such jobs and have to work lowly physical jobs. Even if they get degrees men will struggle to be hired because the same programs that exist to ensure women do well don't exist for men
Why DEI Matters in America—and Who Benefits the Most
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have become a major focal point in corporate America, educational institutions, and government programs.
As we can see, female empowerment does not naturally exist. If society were to collapse, women would return to leeching off men for resources.
It's always so funny when women boast about their achievements, when they wouldn't even have such achievements without programs created by men





