The three precepts of the vaginocracy are:
DENY: Denies the existence of the vaginocracy
ATTACK: Attacks all opposition of the vaginocracy and its victims
REVERSE VICTIM: Reverses the morality blowhorn and claims to be the victim
OFFENDER: Accuses victim of being the offender
This reason this line of strategy works is because whenever a group's status becomes invisible and is seen as normal rather than what they are, which is privileged, it becomes culturally centered and viewed as morally superior over time. And, all of it just brews into unintentional entitlement of the victim group and worsens and worsens. This is what happened with the Catholic papacy in the pornoracy era and the popes allowed themselves to be subdued by this exact thing.
Modern Westerners are building their whole value system and morality on the conjugal bond. This is of course in contrast to every other serious civilization before us. The worship bond between husband and wife has invaded industrial Western nations. You'll see in most other societies, it isn't worshipped like in the West. In Russia for example, the parent-child relationships are the most significant and marriages come in second. When the opposite is the case and you put the marriage first, the pressure to have children is then of course lessened because of the greater kinship ties and the parent-child relationships are substituted for the husband-wife bond which basically culminates as gynoworship. And, because of this, in the West, children have become a luxury rather than a need because the couple is already materially self-sufficient. This means they can't actually reach self-actualization. This exacerbates inceldom because it makes women work and when women work they sideline the traditional prerequisites for mating and aggressively increase the amount because mating is no longer even necessary.
The whole push for the strengthening of the husband–wife bond is onanistic and apart of the greater Davos elite stratagem to destroy men and lower virility. High input-output civilizations that have strict pre-nuptial and post-nuptial chastity actually end up winning this game because they actually use their libido. The libido just can't be used as a source of energy if it's privatized. This is just an objective fact that can't be changed.
I wonder if the main reason why MENA is such a shithole is because they worship the conjugal bond? I remember Caldwell talking about this so it probably has some merit.
I'll actually end this thread with a quote from Caldwell himself that basically summarizes this whole thread:
DENY: Denies the existence of the vaginocracy
ATTACK: Attacks all opposition of the vaginocracy and its victims
REVERSE VICTIM: Reverses the morality blowhorn and claims to be the victim
OFFENDER: Accuses victim of being the offender
This reason this line of strategy works is because whenever a group's status becomes invisible and is seen as normal rather than what they are, which is privileged, it becomes culturally centered and viewed as morally superior over time. And, all of it just brews into unintentional entitlement of the victim group and worsens and worsens. This is what happened with the Catholic papacy in the pornoracy era and the popes allowed themselves to be subdued by this exact thing.
Modern Westerners are building their whole value system and morality on the conjugal bond. This is of course in contrast to every other serious civilization before us. The worship bond between husband and wife has invaded industrial Western nations. You'll see in most other societies, it isn't worshipped like in the West. In Russia for example, the parent-child relationships are the most significant and marriages come in second. When the opposite is the case and you put the marriage first, the pressure to have children is then of course lessened because of the greater kinship ties and the parent-child relationships are substituted for the husband-wife bond which basically culminates as gynoworship. And, because of this, in the West, children have become a luxury rather than a need because the couple is already materially self-sufficient. This means they can't actually reach self-actualization. This exacerbates inceldom because it makes women work and when women work they sideline the traditional prerequisites for mating and aggressively increase the amount because mating is no longer even necessary.
The whole push for the strengthening of the husband–wife bond is onanistic and apart of the greater Davos elite stratagem to destroy men and lower virility. High input-output civilizations that have strict pre-nuptial and post-nuptial chastity actually end up winning this game because they actually use their libido. The libido just can't be used as a source of energy if it's privatized. This is just an objective fact that can't be changed.
I wonder if the main reason why MENA is such a shithole is because they worship the conjugal bond? I remember Caldwell talking about this so it probably has some merit.
I'll actually end this thread with a quote from Caldwell himself that basically summarizes this whole thread:
