This was this r/Braincels post:
As the original comment is unavailable, we must then look at it like this, while both posts are still fresh:
This IT post was submitted 11 hours ago from 9:54 PM May 21, 2018 by https://old.reddit.com/user/Propelerate, and from his/her perspective, (s)/he took the photo 3 hours ago from the Braincels post's inception.
This is the only post that matches the timing factor, and we can see that it has already been downvoted into oblivion and deleted, and the user has deleted their account.
But Wait!
Couldn't have been IT users down-voting it?
While there is not direct proof of WHO may have been downvoting it (for all we know the members of https://www.reddit.com/r/bakchodi/ and https://www.reddit.com/r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns/ may have both taken it upon themselves to downvote it to the stone age because of the blood type of the person who wrote that comment), I have some theoretical proof as to who it may have been.
Let's look at cases similar to this, where instead of Pedophilia, Female Genocide and going ER were not only the main thread but the bulk of the comments as well, we hadn't seen such downvoting occurring from ANY side, and IT just uses as cannon fodder. (PS Female Genocide and ER are 1000% Justified. That's the truth)
But in this case, when pedophilia is mentioned, everyone gangs up on that comments and downvotes it. If IT legitimately did this, they would have also downvoted the female genocide and ER parts as well. But no, It's only this one. Only this one.
What's more likley? Braincels users (the majority of the forum) downvoted an out-lier in their forum or Cuckqueers (a minority of the forum) downvoted this as a part of all the deviancy instances from total Cuckhood, which would be 99% of the forum content (which has not been done yet)? You decide!
But what about the person in the pic who downvoted it?
Even out of all the people who downvoted it, (s)/he's just one person. We need more info than just one person.
GOOD YARD!
INCELISTAN ZINDABAD!
Last edited:
