Whenever someone does a mass shooting, terrorism, beating up foids, etc. people always call them a coward. I don't consider them cowards at all. I don't praise these criminals and what they're doing is bad but they aren't cowardly. What they're doing takes a lot of guts to do. Bill Maher got in big trouble when he said the 9/11 hijackers aren't cowardly but he's right. It takes a lot of guts to fly a plane into a building.
For example, when a man beats up a foid, he's called a coward and called a woman beater. Beating up a woman isn't cowardly. If you're beating up a woman BECAUSE she's a lot weaker then you do have a cowardly reason for beating her, but i doubt woman beaters attack women because they're vulnerable. Nonetheless, if a man beats up a foid but it is NOT because she's weaker and he did because she was annoying him or he just was mad at her, and he doesn't mind beating up someone his own size, then he isn't cowardly. Cowardly means he'd be afraid of danger or pain, which he wasn't. Beating up a woman takes a lot of guts to do. If you attack a woman, everyone will hate you your entire life and you'll never be forgiven by society, and people will want to beat you up or even murder you. If you beat up someone bigger than you, you just get beaten up and that's it. That's less scary than being hated by everyone for the rest of your life. Most people would prefer receiving a temporary beating over being hated by everyone for the rest of life. Refusing to attack a woman because you're afraid of being called a woman beater is actually what is cowardly. I also find it funny how I can beat up a smaller man and nobody will care but I simply just hit a foid, everyone wants me hung in public. If I beat up a smaller man because he was annoying me, people will say the smaller man deserved it. If I simply just hit a woman because she's annoying me, I am considered "evil" by society.
I also don't consider mass shooters cowards. Many people will say "BuT tHeY'rE sHoOtInG uNaRmEd PeOpLe InStEaD oF SoMe MiLiTaRy sO tHeY ArE aCtUaLLy CoWaRdLy". The reason why mass shooters shoot unarmed people instead of heavily armed people is NOT because they're afraid of being shot dead. A mass shooter's mission is to kill a bunch of people. If they shoot a bunch of unarmed people, their mission will likely fail. The reason they won't shoot up armed people is NOT because they're afraid to or because they're afraid of being shot dead. In fact, many mass shooters will shoot police who start shooting at them. If mass shooters are scared of being shot dead, then why do a lot of them know that they could get shot by a cop who arrives? A lot of them do get shot dead by a cop. A lot of them might even commit suicide, which shows they aren't afraid of death. Some mass shooters don't commit suicide which shows they aren't afraid of being in prison. Suicide is pretty brave because it takes guts to end your life. Doing a mass shooting takes A LOT of guts to do. If you do a mass shooting, everyone will sadistically hate you and you will be the most violently hated person in the country. Everyone will want you tortured, raped, experimented on and hung in public. Having that type of reputation is WAY more terrifying than death. Most people would rather die than have a reputation like that. Also, if you do a mass shooting, you either are shot dead by a cop, given the death penalty or are forced to be in prison for your whole life (and prison is a horrible place). Mass shooters aren't afraid of those consequences. Many crazy people would love to go ER but won't do it because they're afraid to do it, so it's obvious that going ER takes lots of balls to do. If you do a mass shooting, you end your chances of living a normal life, so therefore going ER (aka doing mass shootings) takes lots of guts.
I also don't consider armed robbers cowardly either. They don't use weapons because they're afraid of being attacked by the person they're robbing. An armed robber's mission is to get the money. The person they rob will definitely give them the money if threatened with a weapon. This means that they use a weapon so they can receive the money and accomplish their mission. They don't use a weapon because they're afraid of being attacked or afraid of using their fists. If you do armed robbery, you'll be given a long time in prison, and being in prison for a long time is WAY more terrifying than being beaten up by a person you rob. Prison is a horrible place and even the most respected people in prison hate it in there just as much as people who are targeted in prison. Every inmate in the world would wanna leave prison.
Also, just because some criminal is trying to get away with their crime (like murder) and is making sure they don't get arrested doesn't make them cowardly. Osama bin Laden didn't hide from the military because he's scared. These people try to get away with their crime or try to avoid being arrested because walking free and being able to do what you want is something we'd all prefer over being arrested. It doesn't mean we're afraid of being arrested. The hero who goes into a burning house to save someone would still rather stay away from a burning house and do something fun instead, but they went in there because they don't want someone to die in a fire. Anyone who does turn themselves in is only doing it because they are repentant or because they feel it's helpful for them or something. It isn't because they're brave enough to turn themselves in. A person who tries to get away with murder or who hides from police isn't necessarily scared of being executed or put in prison. Their crime already takes lots of guts to do. They just would rather walk free. It's simple. The crime they committed already prevents them from living a normal life, so their crime already requires courage.
Raping and killing some toddler (which is an extremely evil crime) isn't cowardly either. It's actually really brave. It still is an extremely evil crime and people who commit this crime are a bunch of cunts. but they aren't cowardly. if they attack toddlers because toddlers are extremely defenseless then their reason for attacking toddlers is cowardly but i doubt they attack toddlers because toddlers are vulnerable. They probably attack toddlers because they want to be as evil as possible or they want to do something shocking or because they're curious. I doubt they do it because toddlers are vulnerable. Raping a toddler is a horrible crime but it is brave. It takes lots of guts to do. If you rape a toddler, you'll forever be sadistically hated by everyone on Earth. everyone will want you tortured, killed, experimented on and brutally raped. They'll want you hung in public. even inmates will try to kill you if you're in the general population of a high-security prison. you might end up all over the news and everyone will know what you did. Those consequences are WAY more scary than attempting to kill a much bigger person who then beats you up or kills you. Just because something is evil doesn't mean it's cowardly and just because something is good doesn't mean it's brave. When you decide whether someone is brave or cowardly, whether or not they are good or evil has NOTHING to do with how brave or cowardly they are. You can be evil and be brave and you can be a cowardly hero. You can also be a cowardly villain or a brave hero. It depends on the situation.
People need to learn that committing these crimes requires way more bravery than cowardliness. I am NOT condoning any of the crimes i mentioned so I don't need to be banned for this. Crimes like murder and armed robbery and raping toddlers are very evil crimes but they do take a lot of guts. I'm just being a free-thinker. Some cowards are good and some brave people are evil cunts.
Society calls these people cowards only because the word coward is an insult. The word brave is a compliment. That's why society won't admit criminals are brave. They call criminals cowards to insult them or to make them feel ashamed of themselves because nobody wants to be called a coward
For example, when a man beats up a foid, he's called a coward and called a woman beater. Beating up a woman isn't cowardly. If you're beating up a woman BECAUSE she's a lot weaker then you do have a cowardly reason for beating her, but i doubt woman beaters attack women because they're vulnerable. Nonetheless, if a man beats up a foid but it is NOT because she's weaker and he did because she was annoying him or he just was mad at her, and he doesn't mind beating up someone his own size, then he isn't cowardly. Cowardly means he'd be afraid of danger or pain, which he wasn't. Beating up a woman takes a lot of guts to do. If you attack a woman, everyone will hate you your entire life and you'll never be forgiven by society, and people will want to beat you up or even murder you. If you beat up someone bigger than you, you just get beaten up and that's it. That's less scary than being hated by everyone for the rest of your life. Most people would prefer receiving a temporary beating over being hated by everyone for the rest of life. Refusing to attack a woman because you're afraid of being called a woman beater is actually what is cowardly. I also find it funny how I can beat up a smaller man and nobody will care but I simply just hit a foid, everyone wants me hung in public. If I beat up a smaller man because he was annoying me, people will say the smaller man deserved it. If I simply just hit a woman because she's annoying me, I am considered "evil" by society.
I also don't consider mass shooters cowards. Many people will say "BuT tHeY'rE sHoOtInG uNaRmEd PeOpLe InStEaD oF SoMe MiLiTaRy sO tHeY ArE aCtUaLLy CoWaRdLy". The reason why mass shooters shoot unarmed people instead of heavily armed people is NOT because they're afraid of being shot dead. A mass shooter's mission is to kill a bunch of people. If they shoot a bunch of unarmed people, their mission will likely fail. The reason they won't shoot up armed people is NOT because they're afraid to or because they're afraid of being shot dead. In fact, many mass shooters will shoot police who start shooting at them. If mass shooters are scared of being shot dead, then why do a lot of them know that they could get shot by a cop who arrives? A lot of them do get shot dead by a cop. A lot of them might even commit suicide, which shows they aren't afraid of death. Some mass shooters don't commit suicide which shows they aren't afraid of being in prison. Suicide is pretty brave because it takes guts to end your life. Doing a mass shooting takes A LOT of guts to do. If you do a mass shooting, everyone will sadistically hate you and you will be the most violently hated person in the country. Everyone will want you tortured, raped, experimented on and hung in public. Having that type of reputation is WAY more terrifying than death. Most people would rather die than have a reputation like that. Also, if you do a mass shooting, you either are shot dead by a cop, given the death penalty or are forced to be in prison for your whole life (and prison is a horrible place). Mass shooters aren't afraid of those consequences. Many crazy people would love to go ER but won't do it because they're afraid to do it, so it's obvious that going ER takes lots of balls to do. If you do a mass shooting, you end your chances of living a normal life, so therefore going ER (aka doing mass shootings) takes lots of guts.
I also don't consider armed robbers cowardly either. They don't use weapons because they're afraid of being attacked by the person they're robbing. An armed robber's mission is to get the money. The person they rob will definitely give them the money if threatened with a weapon. This means that they use a weapon so they can receive the money and accomplish their mission. They don't use a weapon because they're afraid of being attacked or afraid of using their fists. If you do armed robbery, you'll be given a long time in prison, and being in prison for a long time is WAY more terrifying than being beaten up by a person you rob. Prison is a horrible place and even the most respected people in prison hate it in there just as much as people who are targeted in prison. Every inmate in the world would wanna leave prison.
Also, just because some criminal is trying to get away with their crime (like murder) and is making sure they don't get arrested doesn't make them cowardly. Osama bin Laden didn't hide from the military because he's scared. These people try to get away with their crime or try to avoid being arrested because walking free and being able to do what you want is something we'd all prefer over being arrested. It doesn't mean we're afraid of being arrested. The hero who goes into a burning house to save someone would still rather stay away from a burning house and do something fun instead, but they went in there because they don't want someone to die in a fire. Anyone who does turn themselves in is only doing it because they are repentant or because they feel it's helpful for them or something. It isn't because they're brave enough to turn themselves in. A person who tries to get away with murder or who hides from police isn't necessarily scared of being executed or put in prison. Their crime already takes lots of guts to do. They just would rather walk free. It's simple. The crime they committed already prevents them from living a normal life, so their crime already requires courage.
Raping and killing some toddler (which is an extremely evil crime) isn't cowardly either. It's actually really brave. It still is an extremely evil crime and people who commit this crime are a bunch of cunts. but they aren't cowardly. if they attack toddlers because toddlers are extremely defenseless then their reason for attacking toddlers is cowardly but i doubt they attack toddlers because toddlers are vulnerable. They probably attack toddlers because they want to be as evil as possible or they want to do something shocking or because they're curious. I doubt they do it because toddlers are vulnerable. Raping a toddler is a horrible crime but it is brave. It takes lots of guts to do. If you rape a toddler, you'll forever be sadistically hated by everyone on Earth. everyone will want you tortured, killed, experimented on and brutally raped. They'll want you hung in public. even inmates will try to kill you if you're in the general population of a high-security prison. you might end up all over the news and everyone will know what you did. Those consequences are WAY more scary than attempting to kill a much bigger person who then beats you up or kills you. Just because something is evil doesn't mean it's cowardly and just because something is good doesn't mean it's brave. When you decide whether someone is brave or cowardly, whether or not they are good or evil has NOTHING to do with how brave or cowardly they are. You can be evil and be brave and you can be a cowardly hero. You can also be a cowardly villain or a brave hero. It depends on the situation.
People need to learn that committing these crimes requires way more bravery than cowardliness. I am NOT condoning any of the crimes i mentioned so I don't need to be banned for this. Crimes like murder and armed robbery and raping toddlers are very evil crimes but they do take a lot of guts. I'm just being a free-thinker. Some cowards are good and some brave people are evil cunts.
Society calls these people cowards only because the word coward is an insult. The word brave is a compliment. That's why society won't admit criminals are brave. They call criminals cowards to insult them or to make them feel ashamed of themselves because nobody wants to be called a coward
