Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Crazy how the height requirement increases every year

R

rejectedbyrejects

Recruit
★★
Joined
Jul 25, 2025
Posts
142
Online time
1h 9m
In the 1980s 6'2 used to be seen as a giant, now it's average height or seen as short, a couple years back 6'5 was considered really tall, now it's 6'8, what next 7'0 jfl
 
6'2 is basically the new 6 foot
 
For 31/08/2025 is 7'5
 
In the 1980s 6'2 used to be seen as a giant, now it's average height or seen as short, a couple years back 6'5 was considered really tall, now it's 6'8, what next 7'0 jfl
It’s brutal
 
None of these foids respect or appreciate violence. It's just foid brain rot and internet/hollywood induced fried brains
 
None of these foids respect or appreciate violence. It's just foid brain rot and internet/hollywood induced fried brains
What do you mean
 
What do you mean
Foids are on ig all day and comparing men to those male models. They think they need one of those men so they can show off to their dad or post their bf online
 
its all so tiresome
 
In the 1980s 6'2 used to be seen as a giant, now it's average height or seen as short, a couple years back 6'5 was considered really tall, now it's 6'8, what next 7'0 jfl
If 6'2 is considered short then I'm a literal fucking dwarf :feelsUnreal: It never began for me
 
Foids are on ig all day and comparing men to those male models. They think they need one of those men so they can show off to their dad or post their bf online
Agreed, ig increases their hypergamy, but remember foids are hivemind and get manipulated easily by those who run society
 
:bluepill:
can't manipulate genuine sexual attraction
very true, but what I'm saying is that foids can now see that they don't need to settle for that htn or normie they know irl, they see the really tall gigachads and try to go for them
 
We will witness man made horrors when the average height is 6’8
 
The heightpill can easily be disproven by frauding your height on OLD. If you increase it so you're 6'5 and you'll still get zero matches which disproves the heightpill. Looks > height.
 
We will witness man made horrors when the average height is 6’8
I Wonder if humans will evolve to counter back pain for taller heights, normies cope by saying taller people will experience back pain when they're older, but I'd rather experience that then being short
 
The heightpill can easily be disproven by frauding your height on OLD. If you increase it so you're 6'5 and you'll still get zero matches which disproves the heightpill. Looks > height.
online yes, in-person if you have a large frame and tall, you would mog most males as they have to look up at you and if they are significantly shorter they will be at your chest, my point being, height is power
 
just like St Hamudi said, in some years, the 7ft will become the old 6ft, it was already over from birth!
 
I Wonder if humans will evolve to counter back pain for taller heights, normies cope by saying taller people will experience back pain when they're older, but I'd rather experience that then being short
Tallest basketball players seem pretty healthy
 
LL or death I'm 5'6 and really considering
 
Tallest basketball players seem pretty healthy
you have to remember they have the best doctors avaliable because of their wealth, but still, it's better being tall than short
 
I wouldn't be surprised that if the trend keeps happening, that the average guy will eventually be so tall that it will tank our average life expectancy to be back in the 40s or 50s like it was like 200 years ago, and the average guy will also be in a wheelchair before then. Once you surpass a certain height, it causes lots of medical problems (especially cardiovascular) and will lead to an early death. Kind of like what sexual selection did to male deer.

Though it is mainly short women who cause the average male height to be shorter than what it would be. If women truly want some tall ass sons then short women should just weed themselves out from the gene pool.
 
I wouldn't be surprised that if the trend keeps happening, that the average guy will eventually be so tall that it will tank our average life expectancy to be back in the 40s or 50s like it was like 200 years ago, and the average guy will also be in a wheelchair before then. Once you surpass a certain height, it causes lots of medical problems (especially cardiovascular) and will lead to an early death. Kind of like what sexual selection did to male deer.

Though it is mainly short women who cause the average male height to be shorter than what it would be. If women truly want some tall ass sons then short women should just weed themselves out from the gene pool.
They're too self absorbed to know that the reason manlets exist is because they themselves are short, then they will say to their manlet son that height doesn't matter meanwhile their husband is taller than them and their son
 
No way 6,2 is average height mang
Im fucked
 
It will continue to worsen until female hypergamy is contained.
 
You can't 'contain' it the only way to get rid of it is genome editing or extinction.
Containment of female hypergamy is certainly feasible and tangible, as there are plenty of ways one could restrain it, set limits, and prevent any further amplification; of course, within our current modern, decadent society, it is largely unrealistic for any of these measures to be enacted; regardless, I wouldn't say "you can't contain" it, as containment does not necessarily entail utter annihilation of a certain thing or behavior.
 
Containment of female hypergamy is certainly feasible and tangible, as there are plenty of ways one could restrain it, set limits, and prevent any further amplification; of course, within our current modern, decadent society, it is largely unrealistic for any of these measures to be enacted; regardless, I wouldn't say "you can't contain" it, as containment does not necessarily entail utter annihilation of a certain thing or behavior.
you are ok with forcing foids to pretend to like you even though they'd stab you and take your shit without a care if they could?
 
soon king kong's height will be short
 
you are ok with forcing foids to pretend to like you even though they'd stab you and take your shit without a care if they could?
I would say my position is in favor of eradicating subversive ideologies, often being secular and adjacent ones—which inevitably lead to atomization, hedonism, and isolation—strongly linked to the amplification of hypergamy and modern decadence; you would have to eliminate feminism, dating apps, detrimental cultural values, and a myriad of other consumerist hedonistic nonsense that has commodified human connection and exacerbated harmful natural behaviors. You would have to promote monogamy and bring back more traditional values—not in the cuckservative sense—and it would likely entail religion because secularism seems to be incompatible with such values on a grand scale (though I do like idealistic secular values like individualism, which is, at its core, about autonomy and self-responsibility. What happened in the West is that individualism got corrupted into consumerist hedonism like “do whatever feels good” instead of “forge your own path with discipline.” True individualism requires restraint and meaning, but modern society reduced it to selfish indulgence. It inevitably leads to hedonism in most cases).

Forcing women to "like" me would be hollow and unsatisfying—though still better than the current state—so it's more of a last resort, and in such a case preventative measures should be taken to avoid the scenarios you described.

Of course, most of this is intangible at the moment, but it would be a more efficient way to contain these problems long-term, hence containment is technically possible.
 
Last edited:
I would say my position is in favor of eradicating subversive ideologies, often being secular and adjacent ones—which inevitably lead to atomization, hedonism, and isolation—strongly linked to the amplification of hypergamy and modern decadence; you would have to eliminate feminism, dating apps, detrimental cultural values, and a myriad of other consumerist hedonistic nonsense that has commodified human connection and exacerbated harmful natural behaviors. You would have to promote monogamy and bring back more traditional values—not in the cuckservative sense—and it would likely entail religion because secularism seems to be incompatible with such values on a grand scale (though I do like idealistic secular values like individualism, which is, at its core, about autonomy and self-responsibility. What happened in the West is that individualism got corrupted into consumerist hedonism like “do whatever feels good” instead of “forge your own path with discipline.” True individualism requires restraint and meaning, but modern society reduced it to selfish indulgence. It inevitably leads to hedonism in most cases).

Forcing women to "like" me would be hollow and unsatisfying—though still better than the current state—so it's more of a last resort, and in such a case preventative measures should be taken to avoid the scenarios you described.

Of course, most of this is intangible at the moment, but it would be a more efficient way to contain these problems long-term, hence containment is technically possible.
What I'm getting from this is that you believe the behaviour of foids is a function of societal conditioning and not their nature, I strongly, strongly disagree.
 
What are you trying to say then? Not trying to be a dickhead.
I explained it in detail in my reply; containment of hypergamy is theoretically possible without the need for gene editing (though I agree that would be preferable if possible).
 
I explained it in detail in my reply; containment of hypergamy is theoretically possible without the need for gene editing (though I agree that would be preferable if possible).
I'm confused though do you mean containment as in forcing them to not act hypergamously against their will or mentally correcting to be inately non-hypergamous?
 
I'm confused though do you mean containment as in forcing them to not act hypergamously against their will or mentally correcting to be inately non-hypergamous?
Taking measures to minimize and restrain it.
 
Social media and dating app gaslighted women into beleiving that tall guy is and should be a standard.

Also i noticed that maybe because for the last decades women have been choosing mainly tall guy, we seen indeed more tall guy, when i go to the gym i get mog by teenager all the time.
 
In the 1980s 6'2 used to be seen as a giant, now it's average height or seen as short, a couple years back 6'5 was considered really tall, now it's 6'8, what next 7'0 jfl
What's that in cm?
 
I wouldn't be surprised that if the trend keeps happening, that the average guy will eventually be so tall that it will tank our average life expectancy to be back in the 40s or 50s like it was like 200 years ago, and the average guy will also be in a wheelchair before then. Once you surpass a certain height, it causes lots of medical problems (especially cardiovascular) and will lead to an early death. Kind of like what sexual selection did to male deer.

Though it is mainly short women who cause the average male height to be shorter than what it would be. If women truly want some tall ass sons then short women should just weed themselves out from the gene pool.
this won't happen for the reasons stated, short men are almost always created by short mothers.
 

Similar threads

Grodd
Replies
23
Views
2K
Scandi_Incel
Scandi_Incel
Esoteric7
Replies
10
Views
1K
RandomGuy
RandomGuy
R
Replies
8
Views
819
ragnaa_444
R
Lilwonkycliffy53
Replies
13
Views
1K
Super Nigger Boy
Super Nigger Boy

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top