Those that deny the existence of a racial hierarchy tend to have a “Chad or death” type mentality, and thus think that the existence of chads within all races makes race a non-factor. Now, it is very possible that at some point in the future hypergamy will have accelerated to the point in which even High Tier Normie/Chadlite men will be rendered incel, but unironically believing that this is the case right now is pure autism. The reality is that, while sub5 is sub5 no matter what race you belong to, certain ethnicities do have a smaller sexual middle class of males that can manage to get by than others. There is no denying that, for example, Curry and Asian men have more neotenous facial features and smaller frames on average than white men. There is a reason why these men are often saddled with the stigma of being creepy and socially isolated, and it’s not mere media indoctrination, it’s because the majority of these men simply lack enough sexually dimorphic traits for women to be attracted to them. I don’t think it’s very fair to tell an ethnic that has inherited these attributes that their issue is specifically that they aren’t chad, because it’s essentially gaslighting and it also implies that their fortunes wouldn’t change at all if they were somewhere within the sexual middle class. However, it’s also not fair to say that being white will fix all your problems, because that’s gaslighting towards white incels, and implies that the myth of literal 2/10 white men slaying right and centre in Asia is true. Ultimately, race matters. Not to the extent that some here claim, but to deny that there is a racial hierarchy with regards to the Western sexual marketplace is willful ignorance.
