Contribute, contribute, contribute... Towards what?
Even when normies talk about contributing to society, only a good 20% does anything meaningful/productive in the sense of progressing our day-to-day lives, in what context are you exactly "contributing" exactly?
Contributing in terms of service? The market of physical service is oversaturated, filled with households looking and a lack of quantity supplied in terms of actual jobs to the point of the number of service workers far exceeds the minimum for effective business, creating scarcity in more important sectors such as medicine and data programming; it's to the point of companies practically creating stationary roles where you basically do NOTHING to artificially inflate the job market.
Contributing in terms of GDP? That 20% of workers produce vast majority of the GDP when you exclude the ultra wealthy, the rest produce a little through sheer quantity but it's hardly anywhere close to being truly meaningful.
It leads to massive job turnovers whenever new technology comes around simply because most jobs are simply... Redundant in terms of workforce size. I'm not saying all 80% are useless as we absolutely need a baseline/minimum flooring on the number of people in work such as transportation, staff and in general keep a high velocity of money but a MASSIVE chunk, if taken out, would hardly impact society at all. Could you really then turn around and say these normies were "contributing"?
Anyways i'm going to cope with placements.
Even when normies talk about contributing to society, only a good 20% does anything meaningful/productive in the sense of progressing our day-to-day lives, in what context are you exactly "contributing" exactly?
Contributing in terms of service? The market of physical service is oversaturated, filled with households looking and a lack of quantity supplied in terms of actual jobs to the point of the number of service workers far exceeds the minimum for effective business, creating scarcity in more important sectors such as medicine and data programming; it's to the point of companies practically creating stationary roles where you basically do NOTHING to artificially inflate the job market.
Contributing in terms of GDP? That 20% of workers produce vast majority of the GDP when you exclude the ultra wealthy, the rest produce a little through sheer quantity but it's hardly anywhere close to being truly meaningful.
It leads to massive job turnovers whenever new technology comes around simply because most jobs are simply... Redundant in terms of workforce size. I'm not saying all 80% are useless as we absolutely need a baseline/minimum flooring on the number of people in work such as transportation, staff and in general keep a high velocity of money but a MASSIVE chunk, if taken out, would hardly impact society at all. Could you really then turn around and say these normies were "contributing"?
Anyways i'm going to cope with placements.
