Sending dick pics to a woman is bad, unless you're her boyfriend, which means that the restriction of "don't send dick pics to me" is not for everyone, it's not universal, otherwise nobody would send dick pics and have consensual sex. They teach us about these kinds of restrictions as though they were universal, but they aren't, if they were universal nobody would send dick pics to anyone, the fact that there are men sending dick pics to their partners and their partners like it shows that the restriction isn't universal, those restrictions are just for us ugly people.
Consent is not what makes the difference, it can't be, because asking for consent is also harassment, if you interrupt a stranger and ask her for consent to touch her boobs you could go to jail, asking for consent requires consent, which is a paradox and shows consent doesn't make sense logically speaking. Consent is not what makes the difference between harassment and good sex, it can't be, something else has to be what makes the difference, I don't know what makes that difference but I'm going to assume it's physical attractiveness.
If a sexhaver reads this and says I lack common sense I don't care, common sense is something genetical and I was born without it. I will never have the same level of intuición an NT sexhaver has and that's why I hate them.
There are feminists trying to build a society where harassment is subjective: if the woman feels harassed, she was harassed. We have to stop them, because laws shouldn't depend on people's feelings and subjective perceptions, they should depend on OBJECTIVE facts and evidence, subjective laws allow manipulation and many evil women out there Will take advantage of that. This is how feminism vulnerates human rights and institutionality.
Sex is illegal for ugly people like us, this is how they exclude us from the party, consent is just am excuse to get rid of ugly men like us.
Consent is not what makes the difference, it can't be, because asking for consent is also harassment, if you interrupt a stranger and ask her for consent to touch her boobs you could go to jail, asking for consent requires consent, which is a paradox and shows consent doesn't make sense logically speaking. Consent is not what makes the difference between harassment and good sex, it can't be, something else has to be what makes the difference, I don't know what makes that difference but I'm going to assume it's physical attractiveness.
If a sexhaver reads this and says I lack common sense I don't care, common sense is something genetical and I was born without it. I will never have the same level of intuición an NT sexhaver has and that's why I hate them.
There are feminists trying to build a society where harassment is subjective: if the woman feels harassed, she was harassed. We have to stop them, because laws shouldn't depend on people's feelings and subjective perceptions, they should depend on OBJECTIVE facts and evidence, subjective laws allow manipulation and many evil women out there Will take advantage of that. This is how feminism vulnerates human rights and institutionality.
Sex is illegal for ugly people like us, this is how they exclude us from the party, consent is just am excuse to get rid of ugly men like us.
Last edited:
