Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Concealed ovulation - Women's evolutionary adaptation to cheat on men with chads and fraud paternity

Gymcelled

Gymcelled

Genetically shackled to hell
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Posts
11,131
tl;dr Concealed ovulation is an evolutionary adaptation that occurs among female humans (and that is rather rare in nature) that allows them to cheat, have sex with Chad and fraud paternity. This adaptation was partly driven by women prostituting themselves for food and other goods/advantages. This straight up comes from a wikipedia article citing scientific studies

:feelsstudy: I will by mostly just quoting the wikipedia article, I can't believe this article is even up on such a mainstream platform.
See this post as a form of archive for this article


Concealed ovulation or hidden estrus in a species is the lack of any perceptible change in an adult female (for instance, a change in appearance or scent) when she is fertile and near ovulation. Some examples of perceptible changes are swelling and redness of the genitalia in baboons and bonobos, and pheromone release in the feline family. In contrast, the females of humans and a few other species[1] that undergo hidden estrus have few external signs of fecundity, making it difficult for a mate to consciously deduce, by means of external signs only, whether or not a female is near ovulation.

:blackpill: Concealed ovulation allows women to breed with genetically superior men (aka chads)
Schroder in his review writes that Benshoof and Thornhill hypothesized that estrus became hidden after monogamous relationships became the norm in Homo erectus.[14] Concealed ovulation allowed the woman to mate secretly at times with a genetically superior man, and thus gain the benefit of his genes for her offspring, while still retaining the benefits of the pair bond with her usual sexual partner. Her usual sexual partner would have little reason to doubt her fidelity, because of the concealed ovulation, and would have high, albeit unfounded, paternity confidence in her offspring. His confidence would encourage him to invest his time and energy in assisting her to care for the child, even though it was not his own. Again, the idea of a man's investment being vital to the child's survival is a central fixture of a hypothesis regarding concealed ovulation, even as the evolutionary benefits accrue to the child, the woman, and her clandestine partner, and not to her regular sexual partner.

:blackpill: Concealed ovulation stops men from realizing they were cucked and from killing the bastard kids
This hypothesis suggests the adaptive advantage for women who had hidden estrus would be a reduction in the possibility of infanticide by men, as they would be unable to reliably identify, and kill, their rivals' offspring.[14] This hypothesis is supported by recent studies of wild Hanuman langurs, documenting concealed ovulation, and frequent matings with males outside their fertile ovulatory period.[21] Heistermann et al. hypothesize that concealed ovulation is used by women to confuse paternity and thus reduce infanticide in primates. He explains that as ovulation is always concealed in women, men can only determine paternity (and thus decide on whether to kill the woman's child) probabilistically, based on his previous mating frequency with her, and so he would be unable to escape the possibility that the child might be his own, even if he were aware of promiscuous matings on the woman's part.

:blackpill: Concealed ovulation was partly born out of prostitution
Schoroder[14] reviews a hypothesis by Symons and Hill, that after hunting, men exchanged meat for sex with women. Women who continuously mimicked estrus may have benefited from more meat than those that did not. If this occurred with enough frequency, then a definite period of estrus would have been lost, and with it sexual signaling specific to ovulation would have disappeared.

:feelsstudy: Women LARPed as ovulating to get what they wanted. They LARPed so much it altered their genetics through evolution and gave birth to concealed ovulation

This isn't much different from modern women who LARP as ovulating through the use of make up

Lastly I would like to point out that concealed ovulation goes hand in hand with other things such as: women having the brain structure of compulsive liars and the fact that 10% of children nowadays are the result of cuckoldry (frauded paternity).


:blackpill: It's absolutely undeniable that women have evolutionary adaptations geared towards cheating, which also shows how prevalent cheating was throughout history (and still is)

:feelsStudy: The last 2 hypothesis are less interesting but still worth reading imo, check the next spoiler if you're interested

Paternal investment hypothesis​

The paternal investment hypothesis is strongly supported by many evolutionary biologists.[14] Several hypotheses regarding human evolution integrate the idea that women increasingly required supplemental paternal investment in their offspring. The shared reliance on this idea across several hypotheses concerning human evolution increases its significance in terms of this specific phenomenon.

This hypothesis suggests that women concealed ovulation to obtain men's aid in rearing offspring. Schoroder[14] summarizes this hypothesis outlined in Alexander and Noonan's 1979 paper: if women no longer signaled the time of ovulation, men would be unable to detect the exact period in which they were fecund. This led to a change in men's mating strategy: rather than mating with multiple women in the hope that some of them, at least, were fecund during that period, men instead chose to mate with a particular woman repeatedly throughout her menstrual cycle. A mating would be successful in resulting in conception when it occurred during ovulation, and thus, frequent matings, necessitated by the effects of concealed ovulation, would be most evolutionarily successful. A similar hypothesis was proposed by Lovejoy in 1981 that argued that concealed ovulation, reduced canines and bipedalism evolved from a reproductive strategy where males provisioned food resources to his paired female and dependent offspring.[17][18]

Continuous female sexual receptivity suggests human sexuality is not solely defined by reproduction; a large part of it revolves around conjugal love and communication between partners. Copulations between partners while the woman is pregnant or in the infertile period of her menstrual cycle do not achieve conception, but do strengthen the bond between these partners. Therefore, the increased frequency of copulations due to concealed ovulation are thought to have played a role in fostering pair bonds in humans.
:feelsstudy: It's funny that they say that a woman having repeated sex with you makes you like her more and strengthens your bonds with her yet we're told to be happy to be treated as sexless drones by every woman we interact.

Schroder[14] presents the idea of a "gradual diminution of mid-cycle estrus and concomitant continuous sexual receptivity in human women" because it facilitated orderly social relationships throughout the menstrual cycle by eliminating the periodic intensification of male–male aggressiveness in competition for mates.[14] The extended estrous period of the bonobo (reproductive-age females are in heat for 75% of their menstrual cycle) has been said to have a similar effect to the lack of a "heat" in women. While concealed human ovulation may have evolved in this fashion, extending estrus until it was no longer a distinct period, as paralleled in the bonobo, this theory of why concealed ovulation evolved has frequently been rejected. Schroder outlines the two objections to this hypothesis: (1) natural selection would need to work at a level above the individual, which is difficult to prove; and (2) selection, because it acts on the individuals with the most reproductive success, would thus favor greater reproductive success over social integration at the expense of reproductive success.


@SergeantIncel @Master

@soymonkcel @BPJ @ReturnOfSaddam @D3X @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO @Edmund_Kemper
 
Last edited:
It is really better to be depressed and blackpilled than being bluepilled and cucked nowdays, like holy fuck, im honestly questioning if the female body is even capable of getting impregnated by non-chad semen
 
 
Another interesting part of the wikipedia article about women

Human females​

In humans, an adult woman's fertility peaks for a few days during each roughly monthly cycle. The frequency and length of fertility (the time when a woman can become pregnant) is highly variable between women, and can slightly change for each woman over the course of her lifespan. Humans are considered to have concealed ovulation because there is no outward physiological sign, either to a woman herself or to others, that ovulation, or biological fertility, is occurring. Knowledge of the fertility cycle, learned through experience or from educational sources, can allow a woman to estimate her own level of fertility at a given time (fertility awareness). Whether other humans, potential reproductive partners in particular, can detect fertility in women through behavioral or invisible biological cues is highly debated. Scientists and laypersons are interested in this question because it has implications for human social behavior, and could theoretically offer biological explanations for some human sexual behavior. However, the science here is weak, due to a relatively small number of studies.

Several small studies have found that fertile women appear more attractive to men than women during infertile portions of her menstrual cycle, or women using hormonal contraception.[2][3] It has also been suggested that a woman's voice may become more attractive to men during this time.[4] Two small studies of monogamous human couples found that women initiated sex significantly more frequently when fertile, but male-initiated sex occurred at a constant rate, without regard to the woman's phase of menstrual cycle.[5] It may be that a woman's awareness of men's courtship signals[6] increases during her highly fertile phase due to an enhanced olfactory awareness of chemicals specifically found in men's body odor.[7][8]

Analyses of data provided by the post-1998 U.S. Demographic and Health Surveys found no variation in the occurrence of coitus in the menstrual phases (except during menstruation itself).[9] This is contrary to other studies, which have found female sexual desire and extra-pair copulations (EPCs) to increase during the midfollicular to ovulatory phases (that is, the highly fertile phase).[10] These findings of differences in woman-initiated versus man-initiated sex are likely caused by the woman's subconscious awareness of her ovulation cycle (because of hormonal changes causing her to feel increased sexual desire), contrasting with the man's inability to detect ovulation because of its being "hidden".

In 2008, researchers announced the discovery in human semen of hormones usually found in ovulating women. They theorized that follicle stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, and estradiol may encourage ovulation in women exposed to semen. These hormones are not found in the semen of chimpanzees, suggesting this phenomenon may be a human male counter-strategy to concealed ovulation in human females. Other researchers are skeptical that the low levels of hormones found in semen could have any effect on ovulation.[11] One group of authors has theorized that concealed ovulation and menstruation were key factors in the development of symbolic culture in early human society.[12][13]
 
genetically superior men (aka chads)

Careful about Chad worship :banhammer:

Ask yourself : if their husband is a good provider, why can't the females be satisfied with that ? Why didn't female sexual desire evolve towards the ability of a man to succeed socially and gather resources ? I guess to some degree it did, but why does attraction to seemingly archaic traits (height, frame, jaw, dick size...) persist ?

My explanation in one word : koinophilia.


Chad is only "genetically superior" in the sense that he is more "average" :


Koinophilia is especially important for the female of our species because of how risky parturition is for her. Notice also that it is not nearly as important for the father that the mother survives parturition. Not only for the obvious reason that it's not his life which is at stake, but also because there is always a possibility that the offspring does survive even if the mother doesn't.

This possibly also explains why Chad seemingly transmits his looks to his daughters, not to his sons :

Considering female beauty is generally associated with the ability to bear children, when women select Chad, they merely optimize their chances of surviving childbirth and of having pretty daughters.

So please stop with the "genetically superior Chad" meme. He is only superior from the female side of evolutionary pressure.
 
Last edited:
good morning.

another strong and potent scientific blackpill.
 
Careful about Chad worship :banhammer:

Ask yourself : if their husband is a good provider, why can't the females be satisfied with that ? Why didn't female sexual desire evolve towards the ability of a man to succeed socially and gather resources ? I guess to some degree it did, but why does attraction to seemingly archaic traits (height, frame, jaw, dick size...) persist ?

My explanation in one word : koinophilia.


Chad is only "genetically superior" in the sense that he is more "average" :


Koinophilia is especially important for the female of our species because of how risky parturition is for her.

This possibly also explains why Chad seemingly transmits his looks to his daughters, not to his sons :

Considering female beauty is generally associated with the ability to bear children, when women select Chad, they merely optimize their chances of surviving childbirth and of having pretty children.

So please stop with the "genetically superior Chad" meme. He is only superior from the female side of evolutionary pressure.
I know what you mean. In the grand scale of civilizations Chad isn't necessarily superior, since Chad's life is too easy, Chad is too prone to hedonism, low impulse control, dark triad etc. The hard working "betas" are the backbone of civilizations, harnessing their focus and energy is what builds empires

When I say genetically superior I mean in the eyes of foids. And since they're the ones doing the picking it's what matters sadly. A homeless person or a poorfag doesn't get to decide what a nice house/car is, the people with money get to decide that, they have the buying power to influence the market.

In less hypergamous, gynocentric societies the hard working "beta" is more appreciated than in today's society
 
And since they're the ones doing the picking it's what matters sadly.
That is relatively recent and won't last.

Women have always tried to pick who would be the real father of their kids, but under patriarchal structures they had limited success.
 
This is a hard pill to swallow. Even if you ascend, she will still look for Chad.
 
Let's see IT's retarded and empty snarky response to this one
 
That is relatively recent and won't last.

Women have always tried to pick who would be the real father of their kids, but under patriarchal structures they had limited success.
Of course, feminized societies are doomed to fail as we've seen countless times in history.

Sexually we're devolving to very tribal times where only a select few males get most of the women, you can't maintain a strong society with that, men need to be motivated with women/sex/love/prospects of children or a family

Let's see IT's retarded and empty snarky response to this one
Tbh they'll either ignore it or say we can't speak on that because we don't have a PhD in whatever field this is.

I find it hilarious that a wikipedia article is saying things that sound like posts from a blackpilled forum lmao

"Concealed ovulation allowed the woman to mate secretly at times with a genetically superior man" I went full cage gif reading this on wikipedia
 
I find it hilarious that a wikipedia article is saying things that sound like posts from a blackpilled forum lmao
wikipedia.co

This is a hard pill to swallow. Even if you ascend, she will still look for Chad.
It's all about cheating and/or dead bedroom. Inceldom is a symptom of being genetically inferior. Ascension is a meme. There is no ascension for your genetics.
 
you can't maintain a strong society with that, men need to be motivated with women/sex/love/prospects of children or a family
It's not just that. We did not become the most intelligent species on the planet by selecting our males on their looks. If we start doing that, our species will regress into beautiful, yet sex-obsessed and stupid apes.

Arguably, the very reason attractive men are so much rarer than attractive women, that is the 80/20 rule and why we're here, is precisely that men were not selected for their looks, or at least not nearly as much as women were.
 
Last edited:
Schroder in his review writes that Benshoof and Thornhill hypothesized that estrus became hidden after monogamous relationships became the norm in Homo erectus.[14]
I don't fully agree with that guy. There's contrary evidence in academia, most of pointing it was only about 12.000-18.000 years ago (agricultural revolution) when monogamy became the norm.
Again, the idea of a man's investment being vital to the child's survival is a central fixture of a hypothesis regarding concealed ovulation, even as the evolutionary benefits accrue to the child, the woman, and her clandestine partner, and not to her regular sexual partner.
Women most probably lived with the tribe, not with a "husband"/sex partner. Most aboriginal tribes around the globe don't have a marital structure and the children are/were taken care of mostly by women alone (I feel too lazy to look for the references) and/or her family, and there's where they could get their "supplementary paternal assitance". Homo erectus didn't have nuclear families, but matrilineal families instead.
:feelsstudy: It's funny that they say that a woman having repeated sex with you makes you like her more and strengthens your bonds with her yet we're told to be happy to be treated as sexless drones by every woman we interact.
That's a theory made by men. In other words: It's a lie, inkler :soy:

Aside form my disagreements... interesting read. We're becoming true @foidologist s
 
Brutal evolutionpill as always from you
 
I don't fully agree with that guy. There's contrary evidence in academia, most of pointing it was only about 12.000-18.000 years ago (agricultural revolution) when monogamy became the norm.

Women most probably lived with the tribe, not with a "husband"/sex partner. Most aboriginal tribes around the globe don't have a marital structure and the children are/were taken care of mostly by women alone (I feel too lazy to look for the references) and/or her family, and there's where they could get their "supplementary paternal assitance". Homo erectus didn't have nuclear families, but matrilineal families instead.

Intresting point sees legit that way everyone got sex sometimes as well

And jfl thinking chad isnt superior genes
All those "looks" features are meant for destroying the competion
And i am sure avg chad iq is higher than incels one
Its just incels reading alot of things and overthink since no pussy no gf so alot of ftee time
While chad goes out and chill
And advances in career due to looks and the whole package called being a chad

Basement dweller chad will postmog 90% of this forum izi
 
tl;dr Concealed ovulation is an evolutionary adaptation that occurs among female humans (and that is rather rare in nature) that allows them to cheat, have sex with Chad and fraud paternity. This adaptation was partly driven by women prostituting themselves for food and other goods/advantages. This straight up comes from a wikipedia article citing scientific studies

:feelsstudy: I will by mostly just quoting the wikipedia article, I can't believe this article is even up on such a mainstream platform.
See this post as a form of archive for this article



:blackpill: Concealed ovulation allows women to breed with genetically superior men (aka chads)



:blackpill: Concealed ovulation stops men from realizing they were cucked and from killing the bastard kids



:blackpill: Concealed ovulation was partly born out of prostitution



:feelsstudy: Women LARPed as ovulating to get what they wanted. They LARPed so much it altered their genetics through evolution and gave birth to concealed ovulation

This isn't much different from modern women who LARP as ovulating through the use of make up

Lastly I would like to point out that concealed ovulation goes hand in hand with other things such as: women having the brain structure of compulsive liars and the fact that 10% of children nowadays are the result of cuckoldry (frauded paternity).


:blackpill: It's absolutely undeniable that women have evolutionary adaptations geared towards cheating, which also shows how prevalent cheating was throughout history (and still is)

:feelsStudy: The last 2 hypothesis are less interesting but still worth reading imo, check the next spoiler if you're interested

Paternal investment hypothesis​




:feelsstudy: It's funny that they say that a woman having repeated sex with you makes you like her more and strengthens your bonds with her yet we're told to be happy to be treated as sexless drones by every woman we interact.


@SergeantIncel @Master

@soymonkcel @BPJ @ReturnOfSaddam @D3X @cvh1991 @FastBananaCEO @Edmund_Kemper
Exceptional work as usual mate — always enjoy your analysis/citations.
 
It may be that a woman's awareness of men's courtship signals[6] increases during her highly fertile phase due to an enhanced olfactory awareness of chemicals specifically found in men's body odor
jfl if you aren't pheromonemaxxing :feelzez:
 
High IQ thread. Further proves that foids are brainless primates that can't control their biological behaviour that could lead to other people suffering from their actions. This is why they shouldn't be allowed to control society or else this world will go to shit.
 
nature is cruel tbh
 
Now that you bought up this being on Jewpedia, IT cucks will now try to have this taken down or edit it in a way that blames men
 
Now that you bought up this being on Jewpedia, IT cucks will now try to have this taken down or edit it in a way that blames men
I felt like this would be taken down or modified at some point so i should archive it in some way tbh

@ReturnOfSaddam
 
Think about how this trait would need to evolve.
Women literally couldn't help themselves from cheating to badly that there was evolutionary pressure and that women who could hide it survived because the ones who couldn't would rather cheat and get killed than be loyal.
 
Think about how this trait would need to evolve.
Women literally couldn't help themselves from cheating to badly that there was evolutionary pressure and that women who could hide it survived because the ones who couldn't would rather cheat and get killed than be loyal.
It's a disturbing thought. Blackpill is brutal
 
Let's see IT's retarded and empty snarky response to this one
won't touch this hiroshima and nagasaki blackpill
Think about how this trait would need to evolve.
Women literally couldn't help themselves from cheating to badly that there was evolutionary pressure and that women who could hide it survived because the ones who couldn't would rather cheat and get killed than be loyal.
Women are absolute scum
 
Women get on their feet whenever paternity tests are mentioned. It seems to be an instinct reaction for them to attack and kill any discussion about it. I have often seen women demand weekly STD test results from men if they want a paternity test for their child. It's not women care about STD tests or cheating, it's just an insanely high price to pay for a paternity test making it not worth knowing whether the child is yours or not.
 
Women get on their feet whenever paternity tests are mentioned. It seems to be an instinct reaction for them to attack and kill any discussion about it. I have often seen women demand weekly STD test results from men if they want a paternity test for their child. It's not women care about STD tests or cheating, it's just an insanely high price to pay for a paternity test making it not worth knowing whether the child is yours or not.
1615725827517
 
I felt like this would be taken down or modified at some point so i should archive it in some way tbh

@ReturnOfSaddam
Yeah I legit couldn't believe this article was on wikipedia. We'll check it in a few months and I guarantee it'll be heavily edited if not downright removed. Most other blackpill content gets censored. It's hilarious as often these articles will straight up present proven concepts as if they're conspiracies. Like the article will open with "X is a false theory that states" JFL.
 
It is really better to be depressed and blackpilled than being bluepilled and cucked nowdays, like holy fuck, im honestly questioning if the female body is even capable of getting impregnated by non-chad semen
 
Careful about Chad worship :banhammer:

Ask yourself : if their husband is a good provider, why can't the females be satisfied with that ? Why didn't female sexual desire evolve towards the ability of a man to succeed socially and gather resources ? I guess to some degree it did, but why does attraction to seemingly archaic traits (height, frame, jaw, dick size...) persist ?

My explanation in one word : koinophilia.


Chad is only "genetically superior" in the sense that he is more "average" :


Koinophilia is especially important for the female of our species because of how risky parturition is for her. Notice also that it is not nearly as important for the father that the mother survives parturition. Not only for the obvious reason that it's not his life which is at stake, but also because there is always a possibility that the offspring does survive even if the mother doesn't.

This possibly also explains why Chad seemingly transmits his looks to his daughters, not to his sons :

Considering female beauty is generally associated with the ability to bear children, when women select Chad, they merely optimize their chances of surviving childbirth and of having pretty daughters.

So please stop with the "genetically superior Chad" meme. He is only superior from the female side of evolutionary pressure.
If it's about average why do women find about 1 in 10 men attractive with 80% being considered ugly? That ain't average. The part about wanting those with minimal flaws or mutations I agree with.

The Chad men all have the same handful of common ancestors & features that are evidently not feminine at all, they're attracted to these guys as they're bigger, stronger looking & exude an aura of high value due to status given to those with that kind of face. Women want the expensive item.
 
If it's about average why do women find about 1 in 10 men attractive with 80% being considered ugly? That ain't average. The part about wanting those with minimal flaws or mutations I agree with.

I understand how it can be confusing, but as explained in the article, here "average" is to be understood as the geometric mean.

If you want, consider a game whose goal is to hit the middle of a target, and let's imagine it is one dimensional for the sake of simplicity.

So if you hit the far left, the measure of your hit is say -5, and your score is 5 (the distance from the center, less being better).
If you hit the far right, the measure is 5, and your score is 5 too.

If you hit the center, the measure is 0 and so is your score (perfect since as mentioned, less is better).

The average value for the scores of a bunch of players will always be some positive number, depending on the statistical distribution. For a so-called normal distribution I think it will be what is called the standard deviation.

Anyway this average score is far from the perfect one no matter how many players there are.

The perfect score is the score corresponding to the average of the measures. It is not the average of the scores.

Now if that helps think about what a perfect nose is. It must be neither too big, nor too small. Neither too wide, nor too narrow. Mathematically it is not hard to define the average shape of a bunch of noses and what the averageness theory states, is that this average shape is the most beautiful, even if such shape is actually rare.
 
Last edited:
Now if that helps think about what a perfect nose is. It must be neither too big, nor too small. Neither too wide, nor too narrow. Mathematically it is not hard to define the average shape of a bunch of noses and what the averageness theory states, is that this average shape is the most beautiful, even if such shape is actually rare.
If the variance/standard deviation is very large, the mean is not representative of most of the population since the data is spread so wide, the variations are so large that any specific combination is very distinct from the majority.

In a symmetric distribution the mean is always in the center, so here with this gaussian (?, most likely) distribution in the left case the mean is very similar to the majority of the population. The spread is small so only the tail end differs largely from the mean.

In the second distribution the mean is already much less representative.

Tbh that's why statisticians always use more than just the mean. The mean and SD are the very minimum that's acceptable to meaningfully represent a distribution. Adding things like the median would also help as that's much less sensitive to extreme values (and typos in the data as well)

1615996835525


1615996956283
 
Please stick in at least one concealed ovulation threat you find in the forum anytime @Master @SergeantIncel
 
Toilets are pure evil and deserve eternal damnation.
 
It is really better to be depressed and blackpilled than being bluepilled and cucked nowdays, like holy fuck, im honestly questioning if the female body is even capable of getting impregnated by non-chad semen
I know how you feel mate
 

Similar threads

sociology blackpill
Replies
15
Views
196
SupremeSaint
SupremeSaint
Better Off Alone
Replies
54
Views
1K
Better Off Alone
Better Off Alone
Logic55
Replies
24
Views
515
nakolas
nakolas
NeverEvenBegan
Replies
9
Views
134
NeverEvenBegan
NeverEvenBegan
Efiliste
Replies
14
Views
452
lazy_gamer_423
lazy_gamer_423

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top