Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Comparing our fellow mammals and humans

I think most of you know that humans and every animal specie came from one source, one animal. That's the reason we have two eyes and nose between our eyes and mouth. So let's not deny that we're any different than animals especially mammals because we still are controlled by our instincts MUCH MORE than you think, we just don't obviously notice our instincts in action.

EVERY and I shit you not EVERY mammal specie choose their partners over LOOKS. So why would a human by any different from mammals even tho we're mammals ourselves? A normie might say "well we have IQ, we've got logic therefore we develop 'stronger' personality", shut the fuck up. Most of our 'logic' is run by our emotions especially the sex market.
http://bigthink.com/experts-corner/...gical-the-neuroscience-behind-decision-making
A few years ago, neuroscientist Antonio Damasio made a groundbreaking discovery. He studied people with damage in the part of the brain where emotions are generated. He found that they seemed normal, except that they were not able to feel emotions. But they all had something peculiar in common: they couldn’t make decisions. They could describe what they should be doing in logical terms, yet they found it very difficult to make even simple decisions, such as what to eat. Many decisions have pros and cons on both sides—shall I have the chicken or the turkey? With no rational way to decide, these test subjects were unable to arrive at a decision.

Here's another study https://people.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/Ec101/JudgementUncertainty.pdf
In the 1970s, two psychologists proved, once and for all, that humans are not rational creatures. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky discovered “cognitive biases,” showing that that humans systematically make choices that defy clear logic.

So why do some normies still think that in sexual market women make "logical" decisions? No, they make emotional and instinctual decisions for BETTER REPRODUCTION for THEIR OWN OFFSPRING. Why would they want a baby from some 5 inch wristed small skulled with recessed chin to reproduce with when they can get a way better partner to pass on "better" genes? It's not like "oh this guy has a great personality, I will have a baby from him and it's gonna be strong", no, women want alpha male because "oh this guy looks so strong, our baby will be so beautiful".


Now let's do REAL comparision between animals in the wild and humans..

Here's a video of an alpha wolf and beta/omega wolf


It's so obvious who is the dominant male, heck it would be even obvious EVEN without that dominance display. Observe the strength and bones of those two wolfs.
One wolf looks way bigger, "wider"(fwhr for humans), bigger paws and legs(wrists and frame for humans).
Now would a female wolf reproduce with this beta/omega wolf or alpha? Obviously alpha, every female in that pack wants that Alpha D.. Even if beta tries to do something, alpha instantly puts him down(bullies and femoids in human situation).

Also I would like to mention that the "fight" and "dominance display" started because of FEMALE. The scent of the wolf rolled on a FEMALE and that alpha male got mad that this beta cunt is trying to do something like being confident and roll scents around.

https://www.quora.com/What-animals-have-appearance-based-preferences-in-mating another proof animals choose over looks
When the male does the choosing, physical features favor size and weaponry. When the female does the choosing, however, extravagant coloring and oversized appendages are the norm. A number of studies on different species indicate that when females choose mates, they nearly always go for brighter, larger, longer, etc.

"When the male does the choosing, physical features favor size" - We as males look for a skinny or at least not a landwhale girl to reproduce with
" When the female does the choosing, however, extravagant coloring and oversized appendages are the norm" - Females go for LOOKS like coloring

Another is strength of genetics; that is, if an organism is able to divert resources to energetically expensive physical features while remaining healthy, it is a sign of good genetic stock. A third is parasite tolerance - robust designs are indicative of being able to tolerate developmental and environmental stress.

Also it's not MALES that CHOOSE, FEMALES CHOOSE. https://www.shmoop.com/animal-behavior/finding-mate.html
There are two main ways that animals find a mate:
  • females choose male partners
  • males compete over access to females

Intersexual selection is more than just females deciding which guy is the sexiest. Females want their offspring to survive and prosper, so they want to pick a mate with good genes. By selecting a mate, the females are also picking which males get to pass on their genes. The males that get to pass on their genes are "fittest" in the sense of genetic fitness; their genes will continue on to the next generation.

So do normies really think FEMALES would CHOOSE US? BETAS? SUBHUMANS? LOL @ THEM


TL;DR Animals are not different than humans, animals choose partners over looks, humans are no different because we're controlled by our instincts and no being most intelligent animal specie on the planet does not help us forget those instincts, even in the sexual market.

You can look up dominance display on youtube https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dominance+display You will see every "dominant" animal is larger and looks more alpha obviously, it's not like their personality made them become alphas. Also you can look up how females choose partners in animal kingdom, simply by googling https://www.google.co.uk/search?ei=...1k1j0i67k1j0i20i263k1j0i22i30k1.0.TVGJwNJz198 and you will see that it's ALL ABOUT LOOKS.0



tbhtbh
 
Last edited:
I've been telling for a long time how mares are extremely picky over a stallion but not at all picky when accepting a human male for sexual intercourse. Maybe on an innate level the mare 'realises' we can't have offspring. Women who let their dog fuck them aren't so picky about the dog's looks either (seen women french kiss ultra ugly dogs) while being extremely selective in their human mate choices.
 
How do blind animals choose their mate? Checkmate, good sir.
 
How do blind animals choose their mate? Checkmate, good sir.
Chad always smells good, even if he smells like shit, it's still good for females because it got that "chaddy shit smell" tbh tbh
 
High IQ post as always, Lord Hamolussus
 
Chad always smells good, even if he smells like shit, it's still good for females because it got that "chaddy shit smell" tbh tbh
"JUST SHOWER BRO"
 
A post by Weed in the must read content
 
Mammalossus IQ
 
Ah, so this is what weed is like under the lossus posts
 
I think most of you know that humans and every animal specie came from one source, one animal. That's the reason we have two eyes and nose between our eyes and mouth. So let's not deny that we're any different than animals especially mammals because we still are controlled by our instincts MUCH MORE than you think, we just don't obviously notice our instincts in action.

EVERY and I shit you not EVERY mammal specie choose their partners over LOOKS. So why would a human by any different from mammals even tho we're mammals ourselves? A normie might say "well we have IQ, we've got logic therefore we develop 'stronger' personality", shut the fuck up. Most of our 'logic' is run by our emotions especially the sex market.
http://bigthink.com/experts-corner/...gical-the-neuroscience-behind-decision-making


Here's another study https://people.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/Ec101/JudgementUncertainty.pdf


So why do some normies still think that in sexual market women make "logical" decisions? No, they make emotional and instinctual decisions for BETTER REPRODUCTION for THEIR OWN OFFSPRING. Why would they want a baby from some 5 inch wristed small skulled with recessed chin to reproduce with when they can get a way better partner to pass on "better" genes? It's not like "oh this guy has a great personality, I will have a baby from him and it's gonna be strong", no, women want alpha male because "oh this guy looks so strong, our baby will be so beautiful".


Now let's do REAL comparision between animals in the wild and humans..

Here's a video of an alpha wolf and beta/omega wolf


It's so obvious who is the dominant male, heck it would be even obvious EVEN without that dominance display. Observe the strength and bones of those two wolfs.
One wolf looks way bigger, "wider"(fwhr for humans), bigger paws and legs(wrists and frame for humans).
Now would a female wolf reproduce with this beta/omega wolf or alpha? Obviously alpha, every female in that pack wants that Alpha D.. Even if beta tries to do something, alpha instantly puts him down(bullies and femoids in human situation).

Also I would like to mention that the "fight" and "dominance display" started because of FEMALE. The scent of the wolf rolled on a FEMALE and that alpha male got mad that this beta cunt is trying to do something like being confident and roll scents around.

https://www.quora.com/What-animals-have-appearance-based-preferences-in-mating another proof animals choose over looks


"When the male does the choosing, physical features favor size" - We as males look for a skinny or at least not a landwhale girl to reproduce with
" When the female does the choosing, however, extravagant coloring and oversized appendages are the norm" - Females go for LOOKS like coloring



Also it's not MALES that CHOOSE, FEMALES CHOOSE. https://www.shmoop.com/animal-behavior/finding-mate.html




So do normies really think FEMALES would CHOOSE US? BETAS? SUBHUMANS? LOL @ THEM


TL;DR Animals are not different than humans, animals choose partners over looks, humans are no different because we're controlled by our instincts and no being most intelligent animal specie on the planet does not help us forget those instincts, even in the sexual market.

You can look up dominance display on youtube https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dominance+display You will see every "dominant" animal is larger and looks more alpha obviously, it's not like their personality made them become alphas. Also you can look up how females choose partners in animal kingdom, simply by googling https://www.google.co.uk/search?ei=...1k1j0i67k1j0i20i263k1j0i22i30k1.0.TVGJwNJz198 and you will see that it's ALL ABOUT LOOKS.0



tbhtbh


So hamlossuscel when a Beta male goes ER that's natural. Look at that elephant.

I've been telling for a long time how mares are extremely picky over a stallion but not at all picky when accepting a human male for sexual intercourse. Maybe on an innate level the mare 'realises' we can't have offspring. Women who let their dog fuck them aren't so picky about the dog's looks either (seen women french kiss ultra ugly dogs) while being extremely selective in their human mate choices.

Based horsefuckercel... New meaning to saying we "rode the women & raped the horses"... unless they "neighed" at you to stop.
 
So let's not deny that we're any different than animals especially mammals because we still are controlled by our instincts MUCH MORE than you think, we just don't obviously notice our instincts in action.
Yet some retards here think we are something else. Saying we aren't animals is denying the blackpill
 
Saying we aren't animals is denying the blackpill
Indeed, we are not above our primal instincts and desires. We are animals at our core and the theory of evolution is direct proof of the blackpill. Humans like to think they are special, that they are not the same as the animals. But this is just cope. The irony is—more often than not, it's those same people who don't believe we are animals that are the most susceptible to their biological instincts.
 
Indeed, we are not above our primal instincts and desires. We are animals at our core and the theory of evolution is direct proof of the blackpill. Humans like to think they are special, that they are not the same as the animals. But this is just cope. The irony is—more often than not, it's those same people who don't believe we are animals that are the most susceptible to their biological instincts.
:bigbrain: :blackpill:
 
So do normies really think FEMALES would CHOOSE US? BETAS? SUBHUMANS? LOL @ THEM
Make girls fall in love with your betabuxx-gym-jester-maxx. :soy::soy::bluepill:

Personality is not transferred to the genes.

It's over.
 
Is there any animal, mammal or not where the female doesnt choose her partner based on looks ?
 
I found out that one way of coping in Mental Hospitals was interacting with wildlife. Often there are lots of things smaller than me: ants, birds and so on. So I decided to devote myself to helping little creatures. Maybe I would walk carefully so as not to injure or destroy little ants below me. I could leave some breadcrumbs for ants too.
I found I could give food and water to birds and other small animals. As I did this, I found some meaning to my life and my anger towards the Staff became less toxic.
So my goal in life was to walk to and around the grounds without stepping on any ants. Mission accomplished. It was my "kiss" to life.
So many things in life depend on others in order to be successful. But I could be kind all by myself. Success here was totally within my power. Giving some breadcrumbs to ants is totally doable.
 
More people need to realize this.
 
I've been telling for a long time how mares are extremely picky over a stallion but not at all picky when accepting a human male for sexual intercourse. Maybe on an innate level the mare 'realises' we can't have offspring. Women who let their dog fuck them aren't so picky about the dog's looks either (seen women french kiss ultra ugly dogs) while being extremely selective in their human mate choices.
R u alive dude?
 
R u alive dude?
Yes i did but tragically my best buddies didn't. When they locked me up they left my possessions in authorities hands. Included was pet Gerbils.
I believe small furries are extremely loyal little creatures and there time with us is often so very short in comparison to most other animals.
Are gerbil hard to care for? I only will say that gerbils are amazingly complex with their care requirements, especially once they've contracted upper respiratory infection which happens to be a reoccurring issue sadly .
Pore little mites as if their lives aren't short enough, they get cut even shorter by U.R.I and they're quite prone to cancer also.
They said they died of natural causes but i suspect they died of neglect bordering on animal abuse.
 
brutal brutal
 
brutal brutal brutal
 
brutal brutal brutal brutal
 
Brutal, but real, i already knew from when i was 16 years old, i looked at animals and i saw that not all animales lives, they are on a daily fight of survival for the fittest, no animal gets to live their whole life, unlike humans who die from old age!
So i came to the conclusion that as animals, humans never deserved to live till they died of old age, just like animals leaves the weak animals behind, i came to the conclusion that just like them, humans leaves behind the weak humans!
Its just this world that tells u that all humans deserve to live!
No, they don t, if 2025 was the same period as the one in which we had only rocks and spikes, only the best humans would survive aka tall chads!
From birth we were destined to lose, and the chads to survive!
U can blame ur ancestors for not finding someone with good genes and for keeping this bloodline that made u today, u can say it s a curse that s given from birth to birth, who is cursed now, US!
 

Similar threads

Incel_Doomer
Replies
4
Views
502
Incel_Doomer
Incel_Doomer
Lifeisbullshit95
Replies
127
Views
8K
Blackpill Monk
Blackpill Monk
Fat Chink
Replies
2
Views
175
poorenglishcel
P
Homegrownman326
Replies
11
Views
930
SyrianSchizoSage
SyrianSchizoSage
F
Replies
19
Views
385
Brainy
Brainy

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top