JFL Colvin76 necro'd a thread of a user bragging about having fucked 3 different girls

[1680]

Yeah I broke the rules I will be smited soon. Didn't mean to brag rules might have been different back then which is why the thread is up. Explaining myself any further will insult you guys more. I liked this community because my views aligned with them. I don't like lookmaxxx for reasons Atavistic wrote. I liked a lot of the users here and made friends. It's over now, time to take the long sleep.

If the rules were different back when you made that thread you would probably be fine in that regard, at least in the mods' eyes. The problem then comes with how you chose not to lay low and stay silent until this blew over, you instead decided to LARP and make blatant lies. If the mods don't ban you at this point they'd better at least give a damn good explanation.

Post proof. I've never made such a post

JFL, you obviously know about the thread given that Colvin gave you a notif for it. Even if you just happened to miss it, the fact that this thread is singling out you in particular means you have no excuse to play dumb. You don't need to act like an unfairly punished victim who had no chances.

 

[GoffSystemQB]

Besides @Futurecel2.0 (tfu tfu), another example of one is LastGerman.

You should check my posting history today for another.

Yeah I broke the rules I will be smited soon. Didn't mean to brag rules might have been different back then which is why the thread is up. Explaining myself any further will insult you guys more. I liked this community because my views aligned with them. I don't like lookmaxxx for reasons Atavistic wrote. I liked a lot of the users here and made friends. It's over now, time to take the long sleep.

I reported your thread, a mod went to at first, did nothing, then Colvin necro'd it, and then they just deleted it.

I doubt you'll get banned. It would seem like they're giving into pressure to do it now.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

If the rules were different back when you made that thread you would probably be fine in that regard, at least in the mods' eyes. The problem then comes with how you chose not to lay low and stay silent until this blew over, you instead decided to LARP and make blatant lies. If the mods don't ban you at this point they'd better at least give a damn good explanation.

JFL, you obviously know about the thread given that Colvin gave you a notif for it. Even if you just happened to miss it, the fact that this thread is singling out you in particular means you have no excuse to play dumb. You don't need to act like an unfairly punished victim who had no chances.

I do feel sympathy for @Futurecel2.0, all things considered. He made the .co into his tribe, and to be exiled from one's tribe naturally leads to suicidal ideation.

The mods can make things right by applying consistent standards, and, say, unbanning @Grotesque while allowing @Futurecel2.0 to stay.

This would be a worthy compromise imo, but what certainly doesn't work is selective enforcement of the rules.


The idea that Futurecel's thread could be "grandfathered in" as not being against the rules is absurd when you consider the fact that @Grotesque was banned over his antics from other websites deep into the past, a giga truecel who has shown his subhuman visage and autism for everyone to see, which speaks for itself as to his veracity.

 

[Deleted member 20811]

I do feel sympathy for @Futurecel2.0, all things considered. He made the .co into his tribe, and to be exiled from one's tribe naturally leads to suicidal ideation.

The mods can make things right by applying consistent standards, and, say, unbanning @Grotesque while allowing @Futurecel2.0 to stay.

This would be a worthy compromise imo, but what certainly doesn't work is selective enforcement of the rules.


The idea that Futurecel's thread could be "grandfathered in" as not being against the rules is absurd when you consider the fact that @Grotesque was banned over his antics from other websites deep into the past, a giga truecel who has shown his subhuman visage and autism for everyone to see, which speaks for itself as to his veracity.

Sorry @Atavistic Autist but I disagree. PERMABAN ALL SEXHAVERS & FAKECELS. NO EXCUSES. I WILL NOT BACK DOWN FROM MY STANCE.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

Sorry @Atavistic Autist but I disagree. PERMABAN ALL SEXHAVERS & FAKECELS. NO EXCUSES. I WILL NOT BACK DOWN FROM MY STANCE.

I guess I know how it's like to be exiled from an internet space, and it feels just as bad as one of our ancestors being exiled from their tribe. Ded srs. The same neurology is at work. And I think you've experienced this yourself with the bullying you've went through here.

I don't want @Futurecel2.0 to rope over his ostracization or even spiral into depression over it, because he does not appear to be truly malevolent to me, and if he is not banned, at the very least his case should spur an amnesty of @Grotesque. He was a quality, subhuman autistcel poster who was accused of being a fakecel over nonsense, motivated by personal enmities vis-a-vis the mods, and we should get "something for something."

 

[GoffSystemQB]

I guess I know how it's like to be exiled from an internet space, and it feels just as bad as one of our ancestors being exiled from their tribe. Ded srs. The same neurology is at work. And I think you've experienced this yourself with the bullying you've went through here.

I don't want @Futurecel2.0 to rope over his ostracization or even spiral into depression over it, because he does not appear to be malevolent to me, and if he is not banned, at the very least his case should spur an amnesty of @Grotesque. He was a quality, subhuman autistcel poster who was accused of being a fakecel over nonsense, motivated by personal enmities with the mods, and we should get "something for something."

I do feel sympathy for @Futurecel2.0, all things considered. He made the .co into his tribe, and to be exiled from one's tribe naturally leads to suicidal ideation.

The mods can make things right by applying consistent standards, and, say, unbanning @Grotesque while allowing @Futurecel2.0 to stay.

This would be a worthy compromise imo, but what certainly doesn't work is selective enforcement of the rules.


The idea that Futurecel's thread could be "grandfathered in" as not being against the rules is absurd when you consider the fact that @Grotesque was banned over his antics from other websites deep into the past, a giga truecel who has shown his subhuman visage and autism for everyone to see, which speaks for itself as to his veracity.

I wonder about this rule:

Blackpilled (Conditional): [Person who is not currently incel, but agrees to respect the views portrayed on the forum. The user should be indistinguishable from other incel members, mentioning they aren't incel is an instant ban.

What does "indistinguishable" mean here? Well, Zyros never even tried to be indistinguishable and he was allowed here for a long time. Is it when people start going into all of their threads/posts and bringing up their past sexual encounters? Well, that happens for a certain very popular user here.

Even though it's not fully of their doing clearly they're not indistinguishable on the site and it's brought up constantly.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

What does "indistinguishable" mean here? Well, Zyros never even tried to be indistinguishable and he was allowed here for a long time. Is it when people start going into all of their threads/posts and bringing up their past sexual encounters? Well, that happens for a certain very popular user here.

Even though it's not fully of their doing clearly they're not indistinguishable on the site and it's brought up constantly.

Not being indistinguishable from other users becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy once you've been exposed as a fakecel.

And the fact that this rule is so loosely applied shows that it's at the arbitrary personal discretion of the mods.


@BlkPillPres had to repeatedly spread the message that @Zyros was a Chad sex-haver until he was actually banned.

And in @Futurecel2.0's case, he literally said "I am not an incel" in contravention of the rule that "mentioning you're not incel is an instant ban," yet we are similarly having troubles with him. Even if that rule was not around when he said that, we know the truth about him now, which makes it effectively the same thing.


Compare all this difficulty in getting obvious fakecels banned with how the mods took it upon themselves to ban @Grotesque on spurious evidence of fakeceldom that they took the initiative in seeking out over a personal spat with him. A veritable subhuman who belongs here with his brothers!

Perhaps a compromise can be reached, in which everybody is appeased, but it would require transparency and clarity on the part of the mods.

 

[GoffSystemQB]

Not being indistinguishable from other users becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy once you've been exposed as a fakecel.

I agree. It's unfortunate but it seems like people will have to continue making threads or following him around about it for the mods to take action.

I don't have any insight in the @Grotesque ordeal.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

I don't have any insight in the @Grotesque ordeal.

He is congenitally autistic, physically subhuman, and developed an unrequited oneitis for his female therapist.

This is the description of a giga truecel, but because he publicly criticized the mods, they actually took some initiative for a change and found arbitrary "evidence" to ban him for.

One the one hand, the mods are reluctant to ban Chads who boast about having sex like @Zyros, but on the other hand, they are highly motivated to ban truecels like @Grotesque who become too assertive for their own good.

This is a "fakecel" (@Grotesque) who is rightfully permabanned because of his benign LARPing off-site, according to the mods:

But the person who said this on-site (@Futurecel2.0) deserves the benefit of the doubt, according to the mods:

And the person who looks like this (@Zyros) deserves to remain on this site until the very last possible moment, according to the mods:

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

I remember

 

[Yerberito]

 

[Incellectual]

we need agile mods tbh @Incellectual

tbh

 

[Yerberito]

Brutal boyo, rest in peace now

 

[TheSecondComing]

Yeah I broke the rules I will be smited soon. Didn't mean to brag rules might have been different back then which is why the thread is up. Explaining myself any further will insult you guys more. I liked this community because my views aligned with them. I don't like lookmaxxx for reasons Atavistic wrote. I liked a lot of the users here and made friends. It's over now, time to take the long sleep.

it’s over

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I wonder about this rule:

What does "indistinguishable" mean here? Well, Zyros never even tried to be indistinguishable and he was allowed here for a long time. Is it when people start going into all of their threads/posts and bringing up their past sexual encounters? Well, that happens for a certain very popular user here.

Even though it's not fully of their doing clearly they're not indistinguishable on the site and it's brought up constantly.

The rules were not always the same I'm guessing. The odd thing about the rules says that you are not allowed to LARP, but then you are also allowed to be "indistinguishable", which sounds like LARPing

 

[GoffSystemQB]

The rules were not always the same I'm guessing. The odd thing about the rules says that you are not allowed to LARP, but then you are also allowed to be "indistinguishable", which sounds like LARPing

I think the difference is if someone asks you, you can't deny it or acknowledge it. I've seen guys like Weed and others get pressed and I always wondered why they just didn't lie tbh.

I guess that's why. Napoleon too although he said "Damo was a storyteller" in response.

But by that point they're not really "indistinguishable" either.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I think the difference is if someone asks you, you can't deny it or acknowledge it. I've seen guys like Weed and others get pressed and I always wondered why they just didn't lie tbh.

so if someone asks if you got laid, you can't deny it?

 

[GoffSystemQB]

so if someone asks if you got laid, you can't deny it?

If the mods have evidence that you did. I'm guessing you can't.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

If the mods have evidence that you did. I'm guessing you can't.

if the mods have evidence you got laid they're supposed to ban you

 

[Tallcel]

This place has changed. Originally people were accepted here if they got laid in college or something but couldn't get laid ever since into their 30s. I was told this was not exclusively a virgin site. What changed?

 

[GoffSystemQB]

if the mods have evidence you got laid they're supposed to ban you

As far as I know only if you reveal it/brag. There are users that they know have gotten laid, but they haven't banned them.

I don't know it's really confusing. Apparently there's a lot of discretion there and sometimes someone gets the banhammer very quickly (I'm sure somebody can come up with an example) and other times they keep on going on and on (like Zyros).

 

[Deleted member 22999]

He’s banned now I see

 

[Personalityinkwell]

As far as I know only if you reveal it/brag. There are users that they know have gotten laid, but they haven't banned them.

I don't know it's really confusing. Apparently there's a lot of discretion there and sometimes someone gets the banhammer very quickly (I'm sure somebody can come up with an example) and other times they keep on going on and on (like Zyros).

odd rules tbh

This place has changed. Originally people were accepted here if they got laid in college or something but couldn't get laid ever since into their 30s. I was told this was not exclusively a virgin site

It's not actually. It's just people hate getting mogged by other losers. They think all losers are created equal.

The funny thing is this forum is accepting of those who reject landwhales but not of those who got laid with a landwhale. So ironically it encourages you to stay incel so you have a cool forum to cope on as opposed to being the biggest loser who isn't welcome here.

 

[Tallcel]

As far as I know only if you reveal it/brag. There are users that they know have gotten laid, but they haven't banned them.

I don't know it's really confusing. Apparently there's a lot of discretion there and sometimes someone gets the banhammer very quickly (I'm sure somebody can come up with an example) and other times they keep on going on and on (like Zyros).

What about escort"cels"?

 

[GoffSystemQB]

What about escort"cels"?

No, I've seen a lot of people mention/talk about it. Only unpaid sex.

Although it's not mentioned in the rules. I'm sure there's some narcissistic troll here who keeps bragging about past unpaid sexual encounters under the guise of it being from an "escort" though. Which kind of makes it ironic because it's very easy to circumvent.

 

[zangano1]

Sexhavers.co

 

[Numb]

js it was never allowed to brag on here

 

[RollD20]

But for some reason, mods deleted the thread soon after
Has anyone seen this shit?

Yes happened before, some user talked about have two one night stands once during plane trip. Thread got deleted right after.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

He’s banned now

 

[Deleted member 16023]

I hope that gym , no fap and healthy diet bring my hair back and I become a Chad after getting a six packs. I wish I was a Chad fakecel.