Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel College jocks—not nerds—turn out to have more successful careers and earn $220,000 more, new research finds

G

Ghost

Major
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
2,037

It’s an age-old tale that the jock gets the girl, experiences immense school popularity, and makes prom king. Meanwhile, the nerds often endure their high school years being sidelined with the promise that they’ll get the last laugh—perhaps, by going on to become a Fortune 500 CEO. But as it turns out, it’s all a lie. Really, being that sporty kid at school is likely to result in bringing home $220,000 more in cumulative wages than your nerdy peers.

At least, that’s according to a recent study that followed the career outcomes of 400,000 athletes and non-athletes attending America’s notoriously competitive Ivy League colleges, like Harvard University, from 1970 to 2021.

The researchers found that sporty students were significantly more likely to land finance- or business-related jobs after college. They were also statistically more likely to do an MBA—as well as an MBA from an elite institution—than non-athletic students.

What’s more, being a jock—or a soccer player, wrestler, or basketballer, for that matter—means you’re more likely to attain a more senior position at work and outearn your clever but not sporty classmates.

Overall, the paper, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, concluded that workers with an athletic background earn 3.4% more during their working lives than non-athletes from the same college who work in the same industry.

In real terms, due to their higher ranking and status at work, athletic students earned cumulative wages of $1.82 million over their career, peaking at $135,000 a year, while their non-athletic counterparts earned (a still sizable) $1.60 million in cumulative wages and $126,000 annually at their peak.

Want to up your LinkedIn game? Join the varsity team
Of course, some sports cost more to play than others, with the likes of lacrosse and horseback riding synonymous with elite private prep schools.

Therefore, it could be easy to assume that the reason athletic students are earning more and gaining a higher ranking in offices than their non-athletic peers is because they’re from a more privileged background with better connections.

However, the researchers found that even athletes from more socioeconomically diverse sports teams and from teams that have lower academic admissions thresholds have better career outcomes than non-athletes.

This could be because, by dedicating their downtime to practicing and competing in a sport—which often relies on teamwork, communication, and dedication—athletic students are banking skills that are highly desirable in the corporate world.

In fact, while looking at athletic students’ LinkedIn profiles, the NBER’s research found that they were far more likely than their non-athletic counterparts to be endorsed for management-related skills such as management, leadership, and strategic planning.

Assumptions that nerds are analytical and athletes are confident in high school seemingly follow them into the working world, with the researchers highlighting that athletic students were slightly less likely to be endorsed for their research and data analysis skills.

What’s more, those playing sports from a lower socioeconomic background were the most likely to get praise on their LinkedIn profiles for their management skills.

“At least a portion of the superior outperformance of athletes over their careers is due to development of specific types of human capital that may be valued in the labor market,” the paper concludes.

CEOs who played sports in college
It's not hard to see NBER's theory play out in reality—just look at some of America's top chief executives and you'll soon take stock that many played some form of sports growing up.

In 2011, Fortune even rounded up the Fortune 500 CEOs who were most successful on the playing field, with Samuel J. Palmisano, IBM's former CEO; Walter E. Robb, Whole Foods former CEO; and Boeing's ex-chief James McNerney all making the impressive list.


The CEO turned politician Meg Whitman, who led eBay before becoming United States ambassador to Kenya, once wrote about how she uses sports lingo in the boardroom in her book The Power of Many.

“I liked team sports the best," she wrote. "When I’m pulling a business team together, I still use those basketball aphorisms I learned as a young person: ‘Let’s pass the ball around a little before game time.’ ‘Do we need man-to-man or zone defense?’”

Meanwhile, Bank of America's longstanding boss Brian Moynihan, who played rugby as an undergrad at Brown and during law school at Notre Dame, echoed that the experience influenced his later success as a CEO.

"The lessons of leadership do transfer—how to motivate people, how to try to get people to do more than a team can do apart," Moynihan told the Brown Daily Herald. "You can only win in rugby if you play as a team. I mean, every person has to carry the ball, every person has to tackle, every person has to pass the ball, so you have to work as a team."

A version of this story was originally published on Fortune.com on October 18, 2023.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
 
No surprises, anyone who legit believes the ugly incel nerd glow up after college is on massive cope drugs.
 
1732998697769
 

It’s an age-old tale that the jock gets the girl, experiences immense school popularity, and makes prom king. Meanwhile, the nerds often endure their high school years being sidelined with the promise that they’ll get the last laugh—perhaps, by going on to become a Fortune 500 CEO. But as it turns out, it’s all a lie. Really, being that sporty kid at school is likely to result in bringing home $220,000 more in cumulative wages than your nerdy peers.

At least, that’s according to a recent study that followed the career outcomes of 400,000 athletes and non-athletes attending America’s notoriously competitive Ivy League colleges, like Harvard University, from 1970 to 2021.

The researchers found that sporty students were significantly more likely to land finance- or business-related jobs after college. They were also statistically more likely to do an MBA—as well as an MBA from an elite institution—than non-athletic students.

What’s more, being a jock—or a soccer player, wrestler, or basketballer, for that matter—means you’re more likely to attain a more senior position at work and outearn your clever but not sporty classmates.

Overall, the paper, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, concluded that workers with an athletic background earn 3.4% more during their working lives than non-athletes from the same college who work in the same industry.

In real terms, due to their higher ranking and status at work, athletic students earned cumulative wages of $1.82 million over their career, peaking at $135,000 a year, while their non-athletic counterparts earned (a still sizable) $1.60 million in cumulative wages and $126,000 annually at their peak.

Want to up your LinkedIn game? Join the varsity team
Of course, some sports cost more to play than others, with the likes of lacrosse and horseback riding synonymous with elite private prep schools.

Therefore, it could be easy to assume that the reason athletic students are earning more and gaining a higher ranking in offices than their non-athletic peers is because they’re from a more privileged background with better connections.

However, the researchers found that even athletes from more socioeconomically diverse sports teams and from teams that have lower academic admissions thresholds have better career outcomes than non-athletes.

This could be because, by dedicating their downtime to practicing and competing in a sport—which often relies on teamwork, communication, and dedication—athletic students are banking skills that are highly desirable in the corporate world.

In fact, while looking at athletic students’ LinkedIn profiles, the NBER’s research found that they were far more likely than their non-athletic counterparts to be endorsed for management-related skills such as management, leadership, and strategic planning.

Assumptions that nerds are analytical and athletes are confident in high school seemingly follow them into the working world, with the researchers highlighting that athletic students were slightly less likely to be endorsed for their research and data analysis skills.

What’s more, those playing sports from a lower socioeconomic background were the most likely to get praise on their LinkedIn profiles for their management skills.

“At least a portion of the superior outperformance of athletes over their careers is due to development of specific types of human capital that may be valued in the labor market,” the paper concludes.

CEOs who played sports in college
It's not hard to see NBER's theory play out in reality—just look at some of America's top chief executives and you'll soon take stock that many played some form of sports growing up.

In 2011, Fortune even rounded up the Fortune 500 CEOs who were most successful on the playing field, with Samuel J. Palmisano, IBM's former CEO; Walter E. Robb, Whole Foods former CEO; and Boeing's ex-chief James McNerney all making the impressive list.


The CEO turned politician Meg Whitman, who led eBay before becoming United States ambassador to Kenya, once wrote about how she uses sports lingo in the boardroom in her book The Power of Many.

“I liked team sports the best," she wrote. "When I’m pulling a business team together, I still use those basketball aphorisms I learned as a young person: ‘Let’s pass the ball around a little before game time.’ ‘Do we need man-to-man or zone defense?’”

Meanwhile, Bank of America's longstanding boss Brian Moynihan, who played rugby as an undergrad at Brown and during law school at Notre Dame, echoed that the experience influenced his later success as a CEO.

"The lessons of leadership do transfer—how to motivate people, how to try to get people to do more than a team can do apart," Moynihan told the Brown Daily Herald. "You can only win in rugby if you play as a team. I mean, every person has to carry the ball, every person has to tackle, every person has to pass the ball, so you have to work as a team."

A version of this story was originally published on Fortune.com on October 18, 2023.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Whats the fucking point anymore of this clown ass life
 
I knew it was true but its better to have confirmation. Also fuck this world
 
Saved. The more the Just World delusion gets destroyed in all of its forms, the better.
 
Nothing new. Studied like these have confirmed this multiple times.

Also be a Rat. Be a Rat and a poser in Highschool and college and your chances of success are higher.
 
Nothing new. Studied like these have confirmed this multiple times.

Also be a Rat. Be a Rat and a poser in Highschool and college and your chances of success are higher.
 
Saved. The more the Just World delusion gets destroyed in all of its forms, the better.
I'm all for blackpill studies, but this one is way too selective. Like only the most exceptional students go to these Unis. And of course mainly charismatic figures would be considered for a position like CEO which might inflate the average. I can't take these studies seriously when I see all these nerds making almost half a million a year at these FAANG companies.
 
I'm all for blackpill studies, but this one is way too selective. Like only the most exceptional students go to these Unis. And of course mainly charismatic figures would be considered for a position like CEO which might inflate the average. I can't take these studies seriously when I see all these nerds making almost half a million a year at these FAANG companies.
Fair enough. Though it's still a nice little nugget I'd say, especially since we do have better studies.

And of course mainly charismatic figures would be considered for a position like CEO which might inflate the average.
And we know what being charismatic very much correlates with:feelsthink:.

 

It’s an age-old tale that the jock gets the girl, experiences immense school popularity, and makes prom king. Meanwhile, the nerds often endure their high school years being sidelined with the promise that they’ll get the last laugh—perhaps, by going on to become a Fortune 500 CEO. But as it turns out, it’s all a lie. Really, being that sporty kid at school is likely to result in bringing home $220,000 more in cumulative wages than your nerdy peers.

At least, that’s according to a recent study that followed the career outcomes of 400,000 athletes and non-athletes attending America’s notoriously competitive Ivy League colleges, like Harvard University, from 1970 to 2021.

The researchers found that sporty students were significantly more likely to land finance- or business-related jobs after college. They were also statistically more likely to do an MBA—as well as an MBA from an elite institution—than non-athletic students.

What’s more, being a jock—or a soccer player, wrestler, or basketballer, for that matter—means you’re more likely to attain a more senior position at work and outearn your clever but not sporty classmates.

Overall, the paper, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, concluded that workers with an athletic background earn 3.4% more during their working lives than non-athletes from the same college who work in the same industry.

In real terms, due to their higher ranking and status at work, athletic students earned cumulative wages of $1.82 million over their career, peaking at $135,000 a year, while their non-athletic counterparts earned (a still sizable) $1.60 million in cumulative wages and $126,000 annually at their peak.

Want to up your LinkedIn game? Join the varsity team
Of course, some sports cost more to play than others, with the likes of lacrosse and horseback riding synonymous with elite private prep schools.

Therefore, it could be easy to assume that the reason athletic students are earning more and gaining a higher ranking in offices than their non-athletic peers is because they’re from a more privileged background with better connections.

However, the researchers found that even athletes from more socioeconomically diverse sports teams and from teams that have lower academic admissions thresholds have better career outcomes than non-athletes.

This could be because, by dedicating their downtime to practicing and competing in a sport—which often relies on teamwork, communication, and dedication—athletic students are banking skills that are highly desirable in the corporate world.

In fact, while looking at athletic students’ LinkedIn profiles, the NBER’s research found that they were far more likely than their non-athletic counterparts to be endorsed for management-related skills such as management, leadership, and strategic planning.

Assumptions that nerds are analytical and athletes are confident in high school seemingly follow them into the working world, with the researchers highlighting that athletic students were slightly less likely to be endorsed for their research and data analysis skills.

What’s more, those playing sports from a lower socioeconomic background were the most likely to get praise on their LinkedIn profiles for their management skills.

“At least a portion of the superior outperformance of athletes over their careers is due to development of specific types of human capital that may be valued in the labor market,” the paper concludes.

CEOs who played sports in college
It's not hard to see NBER's theory play out in reality—just look at some of America's top chief executives and you'll soon take stock that many played some form of sports growing up.

In 2011, Fortune even rounded up the Fortune 500 CEOs who were most successful on the playing field, with Samuel J. Palmisano, IBM's former CEO; Walter E. Robb, Whole Foods former CEO; and Boeing's ex-chief James McNerney all making the impressive list.


The CEO turned politician Meg Whitman, who led eBay before becoming United States ambassador to Kenya, once wrote about how she uses sports lingo in the boardroom in her book The Power of Many.

“I liked team sports the best," she wrote. "When I’m pulling a business team together, I still use those basketball aphorisms I learned as a young person: ‘Let’s pass the ball around a little before game time.’ ‘Do we need man-to-man or zone defense?’”

Meanwhile, Bank of America's longstanding boss Brian Moynihan, who played rugby as an undergrad at Brown and during law school at Notre Dame, echoed that the experience influenced his later success as a CEO.

"The lessons of leadership do transfer—how to motivate people, how to try to get people to do more than a team can do apart," Moynihan told the Brown Daily Herald. "You can only win in rugby if you play as a team. I mean, every person has to carry the ball, every person has to tackle, every person has to pass the ball, so you have to work as a team."

A version of this story was originally published on Fortune.com on October 18, 2023.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
There seems to be a big correlation between facial attractiveness alongside height with being a jock. But I wonder what percentage of jocks are ugly or short.
 
Not surprising. In my experience, the classmates who practiced some competitive sport, especially foids, in many cases also had the best grades. They simply had the will to live and work that outcasted nerds who played videogames all day like me lacked. By the end of high school they were far more mature, having experienced social relationship, competitiveness, training coaches, daily discipline, and so on.
 
Wow what a shocker, the popular; better looking, can beat you up mob get a better life? Amazing.
 
This might be a hot take, but good athletes, particularly in team sports, are actually higher IQ than the general population. There's a lot of variables and mental math involved and you have to be really good at thinking on the fly.

Meanwhile with nerds, they're on both ends of the IQ spectrum. You have the high IQ studious nerds who have a lot of passion for a specific field of science. Those do really well in the workplace. Then you have the low IQ (and sometimes midwit) nerds who binge watch anime and mindlessly grind in MMOs all day. Naturally these guys do poorly career-wise even if they somehow manage to get a degree.

Connections and IQ are the two most important variables when it comes to workplace success. Successful athletes usually have both. The good types of nerds have at least one (IQ) and sometimes have both. The bad types of nerds have neither.
 

Similar threads

Abou Baldiaby
Replies
2
Views
600
Abou Baldiaby
Abou Baldiaby
U
Replies
27
Views
360
CelibacySurvivor21
CelibacySurvivor21
Dollfucker
Replies
65
Views
1K
Emba
Emba
LonelyATM
Replies
6
Views
605
anotherwastedlife
anotherwastedlife

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top