Anguish
Banned
-
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2021
- Posts
- 58
Imagine if we had to give up some luxury goods to stop climate change, who do you think would be most affected? An incel who never leaves his house and chills online all day, or the Chads and Stacies who go out all the time, driving their gas guzzlers, and travelling the world every year? It's clear. To take action against climate change would mean making Chad and Stacies life a tad bit more unpleasant, and that's why no serious action has been taken.
And when the ice caps melt and our shores are flooded with ocean water, who do you think will be escorted to safe dry land up North? Who do you think will get the privileges of reallocation? It's the Chads and the Stacies. In the event of a climate emergency, it's WOMEN who are relocated to safer lands and the men they find attractive will be brought with them. Meanwhile the incels will be deemed useless parasites and left to rot and drown in the ocean currents.
When one truly thinks about it, climate change and incelism are one in the same.
And when the ice caps melt and our shores are flooded with ocean water, who do you think will be escorted to safe dry land up North? Who do you think will get the privileges of reallocation? It's the Chads and the Stacies. In the event of a climate emergency, it's WOMEN who are relocated to safer lands and the men they find attractive will be brought with them. Meanwhile the incels will be deemed useless parasites and left to rot and drown in the ocean currents.
When one truly thinks about it, climate change and incelism are one in the same.