I've already ruined sensitivity due to too much fapping
LifeFuel Circumcision is the universal blackpill for Americans and those mutilated right after birth
Cutting baby dicks has to be the most inhumane thing I can think of and yet it's normalized in western society. Studies showing increased rates of autism correlating with mutilated boys. (((They))) can't help inflicting ptsd and brain damage on young boys to grow up and become ineffectual NEET incels. Fuck this gay earth.
literally. asked parents why and they said cleanliness wtf more like they did it because everyone else does without thinking for themselves
I am circumsized. I am a rape victim.
They weren't just anecdotal posts, though. I asked a real life friend of mine who got cut, albeit it was for medical reasons. He also said there is no loss in sensitivity.And others have committed suicide after getting cut. What's your point? I bet most of those anecdotal posts about not losing sensitivity after having part of their dick cut off are actually LARPing butthurt jew fags.
'My son killed himself after circumcision'
Why did a young man kill himself two years after being circumcised?www.bbc.com
I have the option to get JEWed, but I like having a foreskin. I can simulate what it's like to be circumcised by pulling the skin back and it does not feel good having the head of my dick getting all dried out and rubbing against my clothing. Masturbation also feels better when you have more skin to glide up and down your shaft. Cut boys can only mini-wank or use lube.
B
I`m glad I still have my skin to cope with
Stop coping, just accept that we are ugly mutilated freaks.
JFL, our dicks look a lot better than uncut dicks, this is a fact.
Giga ant-eater dick cope, there's no loss in sensitivity. Enjoy your ugly penis with the same sensitivity as me.
Keep coping with your ugly dick dude, mine will always look superior to yours and my sensitivity isn't any less than yours.
That's the very definition of anecdotal evidence and doesn't objectively or scientifically prove that cutting dick bits off = zero loss of sensitivity. Also how old was he when he got cut? Circumcision is rarely necessary. Stretching usually fixes adult phimosis.
For a child the foreskin is actually supposed to be stuck to the glans(head) until they've hit puberty and it should not be forcibly retracted during this time. You shouldn't be concerned about it until age 17+, but a lot of American's don't know this. Scheming jewish doctors will pressure parents into believing that getting them cut is necessary when it is not.
Last edited:
Keep coping. It is the opposite for me.
But it stems from numerous sources and it is nor just one account. Therefore it is not something that should be questioned.
Honestly thats the one thing that sucks about not being circumcised, also guess (((who))) owns the porn industry as well
Muh sensitive skin
Literally no loss in sensitivity whatsoever. But keep coping with your disgusting dick.
G
why not just no one is circumcised?
But there are opposite claims therefore the validity should be questioned. I don't understand why you're being so defensive about how great it is to get circumcised. If I wanted to be a jewboy I'd go get one, but I don't. 'hurrdurr it looks better' is a retarded and subjective reason.
Also you never answered my question about how old your friend was when he got cut. I'll assume you don't know the answer.
Last edited:
Actually he was between 18-20 years old. The reason I did not answer it is because I had not read it.
Also it is not really subjective, is it? Everyone prefers a cut penis except for uncut men themselves. I keep bringing the sensitivity issue up because every uncut male keeps coping with "but m-muh sensitivity is intact."
I
If someone mutilated my baby for some jewish ritual I'd chop off their limbs and gauge out their eyes, then leave them to rot...just saying, lol @ americucks who get tehir boys mutilated at birth
Thank goodness.
I didn´t have my dick mutilated at birth.
I didn´t have my dick mutilated at birth.
I
You literally remove nerve endings and frenulum area during this procedure. Saying it does not affect sensitivity is akin to saying: "My friend walked in fire and said he didn't burn".
Those who perform circumcision on newborns and encourage it should be fucking tortured and murdered.
Those who perform circumcision on newborns and encourage it should be fucking tortured and murdered.
Gee... I wonder why... and I guess your 'everyone' claim doesn't include Europeans, Russians, Indians, Mexicans, South Americans, Asians, Etc.
Only the opinions of Jews, Blacks, Muslims, Canadacucks, and Jewmericucks count according to you.
I don't care if your circumcised or not, but what does rustle my jimmies is when people think it's okay to do it to a child without their consent and without anesthesia. It can be botched or cause permanent damage to the child for no reason. Not getting circumcised on the other hand has never damaged anything. Some infants have lost entire penises in the process of circumcision, and others need reconstructive surgery. All because some man in the sky once said (((FORESKIN BAD))) (((DONT MASTURBATE))).
Complications
oh wait I forgot... you don't read stuff.
Last edited:
Dude, are you ok? You don't even have your facts straight: circumcision was considered the norm in America (not just Jewish-Americans). That only changed since recent times. Besides, why do you even think about other people's baby's penises? That's really weird. That damn baby wouldn't even be on this planet if it weren't for their parents, so I think the least the parents can do is decide whether or not they want to circumcise their sons. And why wouldn't they? There are zero cons to it when done correctly. One more thing: I was circumcised as a baby and I am very glad that it happened. Because that has saved me the trouble of getting it done myself in the future - as an adult, filled with unimaginable anxiety. At least I don't remember how it felt when it happened when I was a baby.Gee... I wonder why... and I guess your 'everyone' claim doesn't include Europeans, Russians, Indians, Mexicans, South Americans, Asians, Etc.
Only the opinions of Jews, Blacks, Muslims, Canadacucks, and Jewmericucks count according to you.
I don't care if your circumcised or not, but what does rustle my jimmies is when people think it's okay to do it to a child without their consent and without anesthesia. It can be botched or cause permanent damage to the child for no reason. Not getting circumcised on the other hand has never damaged anything. Some infants have lost entire penises in the process of circumcision, and others need reconstructive surgery. All because some man in the sky once said (((FORESKIN BAD))) (((DONT MASTURBATE))).
^ read through this list in its entirety and tell me you're still in favor of mass circumcision.Complications
med.stanford.edu
oh wait I forgot... you don't read stuff.
D
Imagine having your penis mutilated and being glad for it
I have a foreskin, I love rubbing my penis head after I orgasm because it is so sensitive, when I do more cum seeps out because of the pleasure, I could only imagine a foids tongue running along it.
Imagine having a disgusting ant-eater dick.
You skip past a lot of what I say because your mind is made up. Logic and reason won't affect your viewpoint because your view is an irrational one. I cannot change your mind. I can address each and every one of your points and you'll discard it.
"has saved me the trouble of getting it done myself in the future - as an adult"
FYI you wouldn't need to or want to. You only think you'd need to get circumcised later because of your current bias, but if you were born intact you'd more than likely keep it... assuming you aren't cutting it for religious reasons.
There's no reason to hack it off later because 1) your an incel so why would you even be self conscious about something no one looks at? 2) it's a totally awesome masturbation aid, and 3) it's very comfortable... the skin of your dick is supposed to be covered and not dried out. Having your dick skin exposed to the elements is like forcing the skin on the inside of your mouth to stay dry and rub against clothing material... ouch, or having your eyelids removed so you can't keep your eyes moisturized. It just wasn't designed for that. The skin there is very different from our ordinary skin. Even women have foreskin-like skin that covers their clit to protect it.
BTW
Would you be okay with parents deciding to permanently cut parts of their daughters vagina off without painkillers or anything? (like their labia & clitoris hood) It's only skin, right? You wouldn't want her to grow up looking like a roastie now would you. If done correctly there's zero cons! except ya'know now her clit is rubbing on her clothes constantly and will bother her for the rest of her life except she won't know any better... no biggie
Last edited:
I
If you decide that a baby should be mutilated against its will you literally deserve to have your hands chopped off, tied across your neck and liquid metal poured into your eyes. If a kid doesn't like his ant-eater dick he can get circumsition himself as an adult.
LMAO, and the con of losing your cock if done incorrectly, which is a risk. Yes, let's take that chance, because reasons:
Baby has penis amputated after 'botched circumcision by nurse pretending to be doctor'
A BABY boy had to have his penis amputated after an alleged botched circumcision performed by a nurse who was “pretending to be a doctor”. Ashraf Helmi claims he originally took his one…
www.thesun.co.uk
Baby has penis amputated after nurse botches circumcision
The nurse has been detained pending a full investigation.
metro.co.uk
Botched Circumcision Leads to Penis Amputation for Baby Boy
A father in Cairo, Egypt is devastated after his son's penis had to be removed, allegedly after a botched circumcision performed by a nurse.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
