![copemaxx9002](/data/avatars/m/57/57289.jpg?1721840831)
copemaxx9002
Luminary
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2023
- Posts
- 11,113
No he wasn't retard Jesus was a fucking Chad.Jesus was a beta cuck who let himself get tortured to death.
kys low iq sandnigger. It's not philosophy it's logicnone of this nerd philosophy shit is gonna save you from hell, find allah asap
follow allah and go to heaven, what could be more logical than that?kys low iq sandnigger. It's not philosophy it's logic
Kys muslim sandniggerfollow allah and go to heaven, what could be more logical than that?
have fun in hell buddy
dont care you faggotHow is it possible that people in the 21st century still believe in God?
There are several paradoxes, some even dating back to the ancient greeks, that argue against the existence of a christian/jewish/muslim God (and by christian/jewish/muslim God I mean a god who possesses the attributes mentioned in the respective Holy Books, like omnipotence, omnibenevolence and omniscience).
EPICUREAN PARADOX: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicurean_paradox
OMNIPOTENCE PARADOX: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnipotence_paradox
How is it possible that some people 2000 years ago were smart enough to argue against the existence of God, while some people today are still blinded by their faith, no matter what proof you give them.
So fucking happy that that low iq chimp @Samurai was banned, honestly people like him give us a bad rep and make us look ridiculous and stupid.
GrAYceldont care you faggot
There is. You obviously didn't care to spend the time and look and study it. You just want to rant here, that's OK, IDGAF.There isn't any response for the paradoxes
They aren't, you jite. JFLand kikes and chinks are both smarter than whites
Kikes are Just as smart as whites. Chinks are smarter than both. And I say this as a white personThere is. You obviously didn't care to spend the time and look and study it. You just want to rant here, that's OK, IDGAF.
They aren't, you jite. JFL
Also there isn't a response to the paradoxes I cited. If you think there is then link them to me you low iq christcuckThere is. You obviously didn't care to spend the time and look and study it. You just want to rant here, that's OK, IDGAF.
They aren't, you jite. JFL
You don't care enough to use your own time to find them.Also there isn't a response to the paradoxes I cited.
I'm not irreligious, you fucking Mongoloid. JFLIf you think there is then link them to me you low iq christcuck
Chinks just copy and rip off Whites. They hardly produce anything original compared to us.Kikes are Just as smart as whites. Chinks are smarter than both. And I say this as a white person
Haha haha jajajajaThere's nothing wrong with being a Christian. God gave people free will which explains why he never intervenes with the world.
God who? Who made god?There's nothing wrong with being a Christian. God gave people free will which explains why he never intervenes with the world.
What caused creation of God then?What caused the big bang?
What caused you being Sub5?What caused the big bang?
BrutalWhat caused you being Sub5?
Answer the question, what caused the big bang & why did an explosion not destroy things & instead create things?What caused creation of God then?
Genetics. Even if there is some higher power it's not his fault for Inceldom. It's dating apps & social media fault & most importantly femoids & simps fault.What caused you being Sub5?
The coping is abismalAnswer the question, what caused the big bang & why did an explosion not destroy things & instead create things?
I'm not a creationist or evolutionist. The problem with both of them is that you are putting your faith in theories that have holes in them & can't be proven. I'm agnostic.
Genetics. Even if there is some higher power it's not his fault for Inceldom. It's dating apps & social media fault & most importantly femoids & simps fault.
Answer my question retard. Ad hominems are not an argumentThe coping is abismal
Let's just forget about it all and pray to God for making our life miserable. Just Like good Cuck.Answer my question retard. Ad hominems are not an argument
If you're not irreligious then it is your best interest to send me those links you low iq chimpYou don't care enough to use your own time to find them.
I'm not irreligious, you fucking Mongoloid. JFL
Chinks didn't live in the same developed society as whites, they didn't have many opportunities. Also there have been studies proving that the average chink brain is bigger than the average white brainChinks just copy and rip off Whites. They hardly produce anything original compared to us.
It's not that if we don't have a answer for what caused the Big Bang it automatically proves the existence of God. We accept the Big Bang by empirical evidence, science strongly suggests it existed. We don't have any evidence for God's existence, however you wanna define God. Science has never failed us, whereas religion has. Earth is flat, birds can fly because of Allah, human evolution, Earth was created a few thousand years ago etc.Answer the question, what caused the big bang & why did an explosion not destroy things & instead create things?
I'm not a creationist or evolutionist. The problem with both of them is that you are putting your faith in theories that have holes in them & can't be proven. I'm agnostic.
Genetics. Even if there is some higher power it's not his fault for Inceldom. It's dating apps & social media fault & most importantly femoids & simps fault.
ExactlyLet's just forget about it all and pray to God for making our life miserable. Just Like good Cuck.
"Science has never failed us"It's not that if we don't have a answer for what caused the Big Bang it automatically proves the existence of God. We accept the Big Bang by empirical evidence, science strongly suggests it existed. We don't have any evidence for God's existence, however you wanna define God. Science has never failed us, whereas religion has. Earth is flat, birds can fly because of Allah, human evolution, Earth was created a few thousand years ago etc.
Science always changes Whilst God doesn'tIt's not that if we don't have a answer for what caused the Big Bang it automatically proves the existence of God. We accept the Big Bang by empirical evidence, science strongly suggests it existed. We don't have any evidence for God's existence, however you wanna define God. Science has never failed us, whereas religion has. Earth is flat, birds can fly because of Allah, human evolution, Earth was created a few thousand years ago etc.
Exactly. With science I will have access to innovative technologies that will make me a 6'5" chad, while you still pray to your imaginary God like the good little cuck you are"Science has never failed us"![]()
Science doesn't change. Why are all of you so low iq really? And how did you get access to the forum? You give us a bad repScience always changes Whilst God doesn't
How is that the case? One example is the covid vaccine. The science said it worked in the beginning, then they said it didn't work. So it clearly changesScience doesn't change. Why are all of you so low iq really? And how did you get access to the forum? You give us a bad rep
Where they said it didn't work? Science doesn't change. If that was the case we wouldn't have the advanced modern world we have todayHow is that the case? One example is the covid vaccine. The science said it worked in the beginning, then they said it didn't work. So it clearly changes
If science doesn't change, then why does my browser's ai say this when i look up "does science change"Where they said it didn't work? Science doesn't change. If that was the case we wouldn't have the advanced modern world we have today
What caused the big bang?
Your browser's ai citing Quora is funny as hell. Nevertheless, we both know what you meant by "science changes". By "science changes" you meant that science one day will tell you something and the day after will tell you its opposite. Some theories like the theory of evolution or the theory of genetics are so well established that they will never be proven untrue. Sure, they may get updated as we make further progress in understanding them, buy they will never be proven untrue. If science was some bullshit (like religion) that one day tells you one thing and the day after tells you its opposite then we wouldn't have passed from riding horses in the 19th century to creating spaceships that can reach speeds of 40 000 km/h.If science doesn't change, then why does my browser's ai say this when i look up "does science change"
Does science change
Yes, science changes. The search results demonstrate that scientists and experts acknowledge that scientific knowledge and theories evolve over time. Here are key points that support this conclusion:
These points collectively demonstrate that science is not static, but rather a dynamic and iterative process that continually updates and refines our understanding of the world.
- Theories change: Even well-established theories, like heliocentric astronomy and the Periodic Table, can be modified or replaced as new evidence emerges (Quora, 2020).
- Science is a work in progress: Theories are accepted as long as they explain existing data and can be modified or replaced as new evidence arises (Understanding Science, 2022).
- Knowledge updates and expands: Science challenges and changes what we know, and through observation, experimentation, and data analysis, our understanding grows (The National Academies Press, 2021).
- Scientific change is a delicate process: It requires balance, persistence, and a willingness to adapt, as exemplified by Lakatos’ heuristic for describing and explaining scientific change (Scientific Change, n.d.).
- The pace of science has accelerated: The rapid dissemination of information and advancements in technology have sped up the scientific process, allowing for quicker scrutiny, replication, and building upon new findings (Understanding Science, 2022).
- Science adapts to societal changes: As society evolves, so does science, incorporating new perspectives, technologies, and communication methods (As the world changes, science does too, 2021).
That was a typo (should be "not religious). I don't follow any religion. And like I said, put in the effort yourself, if you care. Kys, if you expect me to spoonfeed it to you.If you're not irreligious then it is your best interest to send me those links you low iq chimp
I put in the effort and didn't find any. Neck yourself stupid niggerThat was a typo (should be "not religious). I don't follow any religion. And like I said, put in the effort yourself, if you care. Kys, if you expect me to spoonfeed it to you.
How fucking stupid can you be when you can't even use a search engine properly? JFLI put in the effort and didn't find any.
Neck yourself stupid nigger
Chat GPT, really? The same Chat GPT that can't answer basic calculus questions?You can literally use Chat GPT to do the work for you, you absolute fucking fuel sniffer.
Fucking hell.
Nigger, the problem of evil has been debated for literally thousands of years. There is more than enough literature on it. The time you've wasted nigging here could have been wisely used to educate yourself on the subject.Chat GPT, really? The same Chat GPT that can't answer basic calculus questions?
Why don't you use Chat GPT to find the nearest bridge to you and then jump?
Imagine you believe in someone who puts obstacles in your way because they think you are strong enough to overcome them. Then you admire this "god". CUCKED
Problem of evil??? I didn't even mention it What are you on you guttersnipe nigger???Nigger, the problem of evil has been debated for literally thousands of years. There is more than enough literature on it. The time you've wasted nigging here could have been wisely used to educate yourself on the subject.
The Epicurean paradox is a type of argument that falls under the umbrella of the problem of evil, which is a broader philosophical question.Problem of evil??? I didn't even mention it What are you on you guttersnipe nigger???
Neck yourself stupid nigger
The paradox of omnipotence doesn't even mention the problem of evil you undeveloped orangutan niggerThe Epicurean paradox is a type of argument that falls under the umbrella of the problem of evil, which is a broader philosophical question.
>Posts thread using an argument for the problem of evil.
>Doesn't even know what the problem of evil is.
>Calls religious people retarded.
Just another arrogant ignoramus. Fucking KEK.