Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Chadstralian fights 5-6 ricecel policemen in Changi airport singapore.

Why did he fight them ? Jfl
 
Sory it wasn't two. One Chadstralian vs 5 or 6 Ricecels. :feelshaha::feelskek:
 
@Cayden Zhang
@Made in Heaven
@DarkStar
@VersoffenerAssi
@Ron.Belgrade
@WorthlessSlavicShit
@VideoGameCoper
 
rices are weak and small, almost every race can physically dominate them bar SEAs and curries
 
rices are weak and small, almost every race can physically dominate them bar SEAs and curries
Curries who grew up in America with a good diet mog rices. No fate worse than rice.
 
rices are weak and small, almost every race can physically dominate them bar SEAs and curries
Not really tamils in Singapore are taller and stronger then Ricemen. Those other airport stuff was Tamil, if it wasn't for them he wouldn't have stopped fighting. But most other Curries are weaker.
 
@ilieknothing
 
Rices as a race are a failed experiment. High IQ, high inhib, short, little body hair or odour, low-T, etc. They are viable on their own and in isolation (e.g. north korea) but under globalism/multiculturalism the men get mogged physically and neurotypically, and the women crave whittu cocku even if the only exposure they get it on TV. Finally having high IQs is only good if rices are in Africa or something, in a country with millions of rices you only need so many STEMcels and they become less successful as they dilute each others work options.
 
Not really tamils in Singapore are taller and stronger then Ricemen. Those other airport stuff was Tamil, if it wasn't for them he wouldn't have stopped fighting. But most other Curries are weaker.
@Rapist Tamils are fakecels, Just go to Singapore or Malaysia to slay hard. You are fakecel wtf are doing here :feelsseriously:
 
I think in the age of AI where automation is slowly going to take away many high IQ jobs blacks are going to start doing better and better. Giga low-inhib and physically dominant; it's more a niche in such a world than what rices offer.
 
in a country with millions of rices you only need so many STEMcels and they become less successful as they dilute each others work options.
Yeah they kill themselves the most also, because the high competition in their countries
 
Rices as a race are a failed experiment. High IQ, high inhib, short, little body hair or odour, low-T, etc. They are viable on their own and in isolation (e.g. north korea) but under globalism/multiculturalism the men get mogged physically and neurotypically, and the women crave whittu cocku even if the only exposure they get it on TV. Finally having high IQs is only good if rices are in Africa or something, in a country with millions of rices you only need so many STEMcels and they become less successful as they dilute each others work options.
Completely Agree. That's why Korea and Japan dying out is a good thing.
 
Yeah they kill themselves the most also, because the high competition in their countries
Rices should go to Africa. An IQ of 105 in China is 50th percentile, but in Africa it's 95th percentile. Just need to get business savy; labor is very cheap, etc.
 
Rices as a race are a failed experiment. High IQ, high inhib, short, little body hair or odour, low-T, etc. They are viable on their own and in isolation (e.g. north korea) but under globalism/multiculturalism the men get mogged physically and neurotypically, and the women crave whittu cocku even if the only exposure they get it on TV. Finally having high IQs is only good if rices are in Africa or something, in a country with millions of rices you only need so many STEMcels and they become less successful as they dilute each others work options.
Characteristically, their civilizations & societies have always essentially been hyper-collectivist, whilst also being governed by a few individuals(let’s say 2-5%) who are capable of thought in the sense Whites are, whilst having most of the population as essentially serf-classes

This is in contrast to European civilizations/societies, which have always had populations with a wide-variety of traits, especially those in NW Europe.
 
Characteristically, their civilizations & societies have always essentially been hyper-collectivist, whilst also being governed by a few individuals(let’s say 2-5%) who are capable of thought in the sense Whites are, whilst having most of the population as essentially serf-classes

This is in contrast to European civilizations/societies, which have always had populations with a wide-variety of traits, especially those in NW Europe.
white nationlists also say muh asians are less creative as cope when asains have same iq stormfrontcels are a joke
 
white nationlists also say muh asians are less creative as cope when asains have same iq stormfrontcels are a joke
Their thinking patterns are different though, they’re more convergent in terms of thinking, hence why they are hyper collectivist. Whites are more divergent in thinking, allowing for multiple possibilities to be theorized

And i don’t think you can throw around an epithet such as that-calling others a “joke” when you’ve just joined & can hardly spell.
 
This makes me want to fight 10 ricecels on my own :feelsdevil:
 
Poor ricecels. It took like 6 of them to stop him
 
white nationlists also say muh asians are less creative as cope
They patentmog pretty badly:worryfeels:.

1721249346384


 
Brutal, it’s like the Netflix movie Extraction
 
Their thinking patterns are different though, they’re more convergent in terms of thinking, hence why they are hyper collectivist. Whites are more divergent in thinking, allowing for multiple possibilities to be theorized

And i don’t think you can throw around an epithet such as that-calling others a “joke” when you’ve just joined & can hardly spell.
Cope
 
And what are you going to say to disprove this?

I never said they can't be creative, it's just their thinking pattern is more linear.
I don’t need to prove a negative.
 
I don’t need to prove a negative.
How is this a negative.

Asiatics have more linear thinking patterns & think in a manner far more logic & single-problem driven, they can still be creative, but it's a different type of it.
 
How is this a negative.

Asiatics have more linear thinking patterns & think in a manner far more logic & single-problem driven, they can still be creative, but it's a different type of it.
No evidence of this claim whatsoever.
Their anime/manga stories are far more creative than anything coming out of faggywood, so I think that’s evidence enough for me to say it’s a cope.
 
No evidence of this claim whatsoever.
Their anime/manga stories are far more creative than anything coming out of faggywood, so I think that’s evidence enough for me to say it’s a cope.
Look at their entire history, their civilizations have all followed a similar pattern which is much more collectivist, follows a much more uniform & rigid standard, etc.

You do realize also a lot of Manga & Anime as inspired by early Disney?

Also, look at this:


Cultural psychological research has compellingly demonstrated that reliable East-West differences exist in basic cognitive styles: in contrast to the analytic, focal, linear thinking prevalent in the West, East Asians prefer to engage in more holistic, contextual, and intuitive thinking. However, despite the consensus on these cultural differences in thinking style, the literature on cross-cultural variation in actual cognitive biases is far more equivocal.
 
Look at their entire history, their civilizations have all followed a similar pattern which is much more collectivist, follows a much more uniform & rigid standard, etc.

You do realize also a lot of Manga & Anime as inspired by early Disney?

Also, look at this:



Why does it matter what they were inspired by in the past? The fact they are much more creative than anything pedowood produces now is proof enough they are creative if they want to be.
As for history I can’t really comment because I don’t know enough about the totality of rice history to assess that statement. But I would assume if that’s true (big IF), then maybe they simply didn’t have an incentive to be creative back then like they do now where they have an outlet for it and succeed.
 
white nationlists also say muh asians are less creative as cope when asains have same iq stormfrontcels are a joke
Why havent chinks ever created anything of meaning? why are all chink countries shitholes like africa?
 
Why does it matter what they were inspired by in the past?
Because they took something that they didnt originally conceive?
The fact they are much more creative than anything pedowood produces now is proof enough they are creative if they want to be.
Never denied they can't be creative, I just said it's a very different form of it.
As for history I can’t really comment because I don’t know enough about the totality of rice history to assess that statement. But I would assume if that’s true (big IF),
Why "big if?"

I'm mainly versed in European & American history, but I do know a bit of rice history. They have always held a far more socially-collective view of factors, and also have valued working towards a unified single-goal. Now yes, you can argue Europeans did this in a way, but our societies allowed for more individualistic pursuits, thinking manners etc.

Asian societies have always had a few elites at the top, and by elites I don't just mean leaders, I mean thinkers, writers, etc. whereas European, especially Germanic societies, allowed for their to be a wide array of individuals with certain manners & traits for thinking, creativity, etc.
then maybe they simply didn’t have an incentive to be creative back then like they do now where they have an outlet for it and succeed.
Pedowood also has been under certain influences for quite some time.
 
Because they took something that they didnt originally conceive?
That’s like saying no civilizational achievement by anyone else mean anything because sand niggers made civilization first and almost everyone else based their models off that originally.

Never denied they can't be creative, I just said it's a very different form of it.
How so?

Why "big if?"
Seem quite silly to me. The few things I have read about super ancient rice culture like the Tao Te Ching or Zen Koans seem super creative and not conformist at all in nature.

I'm mainly versed in European & American history, but I do know a bit of rice history. They have always held a far more socially-collective view of factors, and also have valued working towards a unified single-goal. Now yes, you can argue Europeans did this in a way, but our societies allowed for more individualistic pursuits, thinking manners etc.
In Europe there has more recently in history been clashed of the individualist liberal attitude with collectivist ideas like communism, fascism, nazism, etc. The same seems to be true in Chinese history with the more creative “flow like water” Taoism ideas vs the rigid Confucius systemization of life. Ricecels seemed very creative when it came to warfare, like creating gun powder, Mongols using biological warfare with corpses to spread diseases, or the Art of War. But Europe had a much better way to explore these creative avenues due to the industrial revolution to mass produce any newly innovated good, capitalism to make money off them, and scientific innovation research funded by the elites of society (to feed into helping the other factors).

Asian societies have always had a few elites at the top, and by elites I don't just mean leaders, I mean thinkers, writers, etc. whereas European, especially Germanic societies, allowed for their to be a wide array of individuals with certain manners & traits for thinking, creativity, etc.
Can you go more into depth into this, I’m curious.

Pedowood also has been under certain influences for quite some time.
That influence has been there since the beginning, just look at this list.
Jewish directors have been very influential since the silent film era.
 
In America hed be a pile of guts on the floor before you know it
 
That’s like saying no civilizational achievement by anyone else mean anything because sand niggers made civilization first and almost everyone else based their models off that originally.
Fair enough, but the point I was trying to make is if they were that creative, why did they have to borrow so heavily from European art in this regard?
As I explained, their thinking is more convergent, linear, and analytical.
Seem quite silly to me. The few things I have read about super ancient rice culture like the Tao Te Ching or Zen Koans seem super creative and not conformist at all in nature.
Those are just some interpretations of various beliefs which were present at the time.

Confucianism has essentially been one of, if not, the primary form of governance for most of East Asia.
In Europe there has more recently in history been clashed of the individualist liberal attitude with collectivist ideas like communism, fascism, nazism, etc.
This goes back to antiquity & even before that, European societies such as the Germanic ones valued everyone sort of being individualistic in a sense, but with co-operation. Essentially, everyone found their place if that makes sense.
The same seems to be true in Chinese history with the more creative “flow like water” Taoism ideas vs the rigid Confucius systemization of life. Ricecels seemed very creative when it came to warfare, like creating gun powder, Mongols using biological warfare with corpses to spread diseases, or the Art of War. But Europe had a much better way to explore these creative avenues due to the industrial revolution to mass produce any newly innovated good, capitalism to make money off them, and scientific innovation research funded by the elites of society (to feed into helping the other factors).


Can you go more into depth into this, I’m curious.
I can offer some biological reasons:
“We know of a gene that may play a part in this story: the 7R (for 7-repeat) allele of the DRD4 (dopamine receptor D4) gene. It is associated with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), a behavioral syndrome best characterized by actions that annoy elementary school teachers: restless-impulsive behavior, inattention, distractibility, and the like.


“The polymorphism is found at varying but significant levels in many parts of the world, but is almost totally absent from East Asia. Interestingly, alleles derived from the 7R allele are fairly common in China, even though the 7R alleles themselves are extremely rare there. It is possible that individuals bearing these alleles were selected against because of cultural patterns in China. The Japanese say that the nail that sticks out is hammered down, but in China it may have been pulled out and thrown away.”
The 10,000 Year Explosion
How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution

“Parents who believe that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder makes their kids more creative got a little more scientific support recently.
“A new study in the Journal of Personality and Individual Differences found adults with ADHD enjoyed more creative achievement than those who didn’t have the disorder.

“‘For the same reason that ADHD might create problems, like distraction, it can also allow an openness to new ideas,’ says Holly White, assistant professor of cognitive psychology at Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida and co-author of the paper. ‘Not being completely focused on a task lets the mind make associations that might not have happened otherwise….'”

Basically, they lack this gene which is tied in with ADHD & thus increases creativity.

Also look at this:
Rspb20091650f02


Figure 2. Results from correlation analysis between Hofstede's individualism–collectivism index (reverse scored) and frequency of S allele carriers of the 5-HTTLPR across 29 nations. Collectivistic nations showed higher prevalence of S allele carriers (r(29) = 0.70, p < 0.0001).

Geographical regions characterized by cultural collectivism exhibit a greater prevalence of S allele carriers of the serotonin transporter gene, even when cultural regions rather than nations served as the unit of analysis. Additionally, we show that global variability in historical pathogen prevalence predicts global variability in individualism–collectivism owing to genetic selection of the S allele of the serotonin transporter gene in regions characterized by high collectivism. Importantly, we also reveal a novel and surprising negative association between individualism–collectivism, frequency of S allele carriers of the serotonin transporter gene and global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorder. Across nations, both collectivism and allelic frequency of the S allele negatively predict global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders. Critically, our results further indicate that greater population frequency of S allele carriers is associated with decreased prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders due to increased cultural collectivism.

That influence has been there since the beginning, just look at this list.
Jewish directors have been very influential since the silent film era.
Disney, who was German-American founded one of the largest companies in the industry, I think that settles it.
 
Fair enough, but the point I was trying to make is if they were that creative, why did they have to borrow so heavily from European art in this regard?

As I explained, their thinking is more convergent, linear, and analytical.

Those are just some interpretations of various beliefs which were present at the time.

Confucianism has essentially been one of, if not, the primary form of governance for most of East Asia.
Yeah, I think back in those days both kinds of thinking were still present but a Confucius style regimented was probably more likely to being success. Kind of like comparing people trying to become an artist vs engineer/lawyer. Most artists fail, but a small number can become more successful than any grind-maxxing stemmaxxer ever can.

This goes back to antiquity & even before that, European societies such as the Germanic ones valued everyone sort of being individualistic in a sense, but with co-operation. Essentially, everyone found their place if that makes sense.
German civilization was semi-nomadic back in the day, so individualism didn’t seem to have many benefits in a civilization sense. The more collectivist Romans were much more successful.

I can offer some biological reasons:

The 10,000 Year Explosion
How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution



Basically, they lack this gene which is tied in with ADHD & thus increases creativity.

Also look at this:
View attachment 1202585




Interesting, but it seems pretty speculative still since there are probably hundreds if not thousands of genes involved in creativity.

Disney, who was German-American founded one of the largest companies in the industry, I think that settles it.
Settles what? Jews and Whites were both creative back in the day but both are failing now and just spamming reused garbage story lines like everyone else in Hollywood for cheap cash grabs (that’s even if you ignore all that woke nonsense).
 
Their thinking patterns are different though, they’re more convergent in terms of thinking, hence why they are hyper collectivist. Whites are more divergent in thinking, allowing for multiple possibilities to be theorized

And i don’t think you can throw around an epithet such as that-calling others a “joke” when you’ve just joined & can hardly spell.
It's interesting. I understand that IQ tests examine different areas and put each score together to produce the final score. If so, even though two people have the same IQ scores, each one's superiority can be different. This fact shows why people in Asia have similar IQ scores, but why the difference in thinking occurs. anyway what exactly does it mean Asians are collectivist? Does it mean that they follow other people's thoughts more easily? Also, do you know how black thinking patterns differ from other races? I think the modern world is so obsessed with race equality that there seems to be a lack of research on race intelligence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top