This retarded shit again.
Any insistence that "jud jeens" come in packages betrays an addled and baseless understanding of the architecture of the human genome (a single pleiotropic gene is not a "package" and not everything is pleiotropic). A botched study on children has "discovered" a link between facial attractiveness and IQ by using population metrics, but, like most complex traits, there has not been a complete elaboration of the myriad intersecting molecular determinants of intelligence. To claim you know that "Chad is hi eye Q" without even a basic background in genetics is just wishful masochism.
In matters of personal experience, it is hard to believe that attractiveness and intelligence are linked when most Chads come across as cripplingly stupid. Good-looking people are very underrepresented in the top stratum of intelligence and achievement. "B-b-but actors and CEOs!" What is that, <0.001% of the male population? - an exception. "Cope just betas and Chad doesn't having waste his time do that" - i.e. if human beings lived "ideally", they would just fornicate without restraint and shit out perfect kids everywhere like Chad does. Why haven't Chad's features come to predominate in human beings if he has a monopoly on all objectively good ones and why do foids, when given a choice, tend to mate with stupid and impulsive men? How do you reconcile experience, which contradicts all of this idle speculation as to Chad's superlative mental acuity, with Chad worship?
Neither am I coping. At 6'3", I know for a fact that I am not short and I don't even believe myself to be ugly (trying to be as objective as possible, I think I am a PSL 6. You can take issue with that obviously, but I have no outstandingly poor features. No recessed chin, no arched eyebrows, no long philtrum, etc). That doesn't mean I am any more desirous of handing out unearned accolades to fratscum.
