Blackpill Chad benefits from literally any configuration of society

[puanewb]

Sexually monogamous? Chad wins
Sexually liberated? Chad wins
Sexually repressed? Chad still wins
Sexually prohibited? Chad will win somehow.

The ultimate blackpill is that it you may think in the back of your head that scaffolding of society is just not ideal for a more "fairer" world. But in reality Chad dominates them all, and all you're changing is aggregate fairness.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

The goal is to make Chad benefit as little as possible

 

[vic624]

"Chad" is getting to be used like fundie Christians use "the Devil" or Muslims use "Jinn."

 

[TINMAN]

The goal is to make Chad benefit as little as possible

 

[puanewb]

"Chad" is getting to be used like fundie Christians use "the Devil" or Muslims use "Jinn."

No it's not, the Jews still do everything, despite Chad

The goal is to make Chad benefit as little as possible

LOL just think for one moment in your life

 

[DeepSea]

Sexually monogamous? Chad wins
Sexually liberated? Chad wins
Sexually repressed? Chad still wins
Sexually prohibited? Chad will win somehow.

The fact that most men alive today are normies proves you are wrong.

If Chad was always more successful than anyone else in every type of society, then every single man alive today would a Chad and unattractive genes would have disappeared from the gene pool thousands of years ago. Short men would be just as rare as short giraffes.

 

[puanewb]

The fact that most men alive today are normies proves you are wrong.

If Chad was always more successful than anyone else in every type of society, then every single man alive today would a Chad and unattractive genes would have disappeared from the gene pool thousands of years ago. Short men would be just as rare as short giraffes.

You do realise a Chad doesn't always produce a Chad right? You're literally not accounting for 50% of the human race that is not evolutionarily accountable. (women)

 

[Deleted member 21714]

On the other hand, the only alternative the incel doesn’t lose in is #1, but there he still comes second place after chad.

 

[DeepSea]

You do realise a Chad doesn't always produce a Chad right? You're literally not accounting for 50% of the human race that is not evolutionarily accountable. (women)

Males pass on their X chromosome to their daughters. If Chad has always been more reproductively successful than anyone else, then with each passing generation, women would become more and more genetically similar to Chad and their male offspring would increasingly have the same phenotype as Chad.

All male peacocks look similar to each other because they are products of tens of thousands of years of intense female sexual selection. They all have attractive sexually dimorphic traits. Some are more attractive than others, but they are all endowed with attractive traits that female peacocks lack. All of them have the potential of being attractive to females. The fact that female peacocks have never been subject to strong sexual selection pressure themselves in no way prevents them from giving birth to attractive male offspring.

Unlike male peacocks, men all look very different from each other and most are physically unattractive to women. That is because men have not always evolved under intense sexual selection. Until the modern era, women did not have the right to freely choose their sexual partners and pick Chad above anyone else.

 

[zangano1]

Chad always wins

 

[puanewb]

Males pass on their X chromosome to their daughters. If Chad has always been more reproductively successful than anyone else, then with each passing generation, women would become more and more genetically similar to Chad and their male offspring would increasingly have the same phenotype as Chad.

All male peacocks look similar to each other because they are products of tens of thousands of years of intense female sexual selection. They all have attractive sexually dimorphic traits. Some are more attractive than others, but they are all endowed with attractive traits that female peacocks lack. All of them have the potential of being attractive to females. The fact that female peacocks have never been subject to strong sexual selection pressure themselves in no way prevents them from giving birth to attractive male offspring.

Unlike male peacocks, men all look very different from each other and most are physically unattractive to women. That is because men have not always evolved under intense sexual selection. Until the modern era, women did not have the right to freely choose their sexual partners and pick Chad above anyone else.

You're suggesting attractiveness is an entirely and ONLY sexually dimorphic trait.

 

[Glokta]

Some people can't lose, while some people can't win. Some men are born as living failures, some men suffer failure in life, and some men have failure thrust upon them.