This is r-selection vs. k-selection culture in action. R-selection culture is the culture of chads and hypergamous foids, while k-selection culture is the culture of incels and conservatives.
Blackpill Chad Baboons vs Incel Gibbons. Notice how much more masculine baboons look compared to gibbons.
NOT ONE REPLY?! 
lowiqcels.is
lowiqcels.is
N
2024cels already replaced all the user hereNOT ONE REPLY?!
Over
The problem aren't the fact that they're newcomers. Its the lack of intellectual curiosity, intuition, and spirit of inquiry. Its the lack of IQ that's tragic.
When I was really young, I used to just think of baboons as kinda big monkeys, till I saw one rip apart a flamingo.
I’ve noticed this r-selection dimorphism seems to be most pronounced in animals that live in troupes (like baboons) or groups in general (like lions, elephant seals, etc.), and less so in solitary species. While there’s obvious size differences in male and female leopards or male and female tigers, it’s harder to tell the gender of one just by looking at it (for the zoology uneducated like myself, anyway)
I’ve noticed this r-selection dimorphism seems to be most pronounced in animals that live in troupes (like baboons) or groups in general (like lions, elephant seals, etc.), and less so in solitary species. While there’s obvious size differences in male and female leopards or male and female tigers, it’s harder to tell the gender of one just by looking at it (for the zoology uneducated like myself, anyway)
Last edited:
Baboons have always appeared to me as very strong and aggressive looking due to their canines. brow ridges, and screaming. They literally "chimp out" all the time. This is what female hypergamy does to men (and males in general): it reduces us to the level of beasts and barbarians who only know how to kill but nothing more.
Living in groups = more competition and more violence.
The first cavefoid that became picky and sent our species into r-selection is burning in hell as I type this
Based. r-selection lifestyle creates hellish family and group environments of never-ending intraspecies competition.
I mean this in the sense that if I saw a random picture of a solo tiger or leopard, I probably wouldn’t be able to tell its sex. It becomes obvious who’s who though when you see a male and female leopard or male and female tiger together.
Group-based species seem to have the males and females not just differ in bone and body frame but in external features as well. Like male lions’ manes, male elephant seals’ huge noses, or how male and female baboons’ coats of fur look completely different:
True lol. Looking at their faces after getting blackpilled, they look high T asf.
Agreed. Seems like an obvious explanation
Presence of multiple young males of mating age in a hierarchical group automatically trigger competition and winning that competition for sexual access to mates means having to be aggressive, stronger, bigger, more powerful, and therefore more dimorphic.Group-based species seem to have the males and females not just differ in bone and body frame but in external features as well. Like male lions’ manes, male elephant seals’ huge noses, or how male and female baboons’ coats of fur look completely different:
By comparison, gibbons look like ricecels. Low bone mass, no brow ridge, no body size, no strength, and meek demeanor.
Common sense had us believe that being in groups meant that we're more social and therefore more likely to resolve disputes and challenges through passive means, but turns out, that's not always the case. High T males in groups always inspire competition for mates, territory, social status, etc.
If we look at the sheer difference in sexual dimorphism in species with hypergamous foids like primates, we notice that these foids don't have any attractiveness whatsoever, which means they just basically sat around doing nothing, making their men do all the work, and this is the current state of our culture.
Last edited:
From a biological standpoint, wouldn't K selection leading to hypergamy make more sense? Since reproductive rates are lower and there's more investment in offspring.
Based post highIQcels
Similar threads
Buried Alive 2.0
Users who are viewing this thread
