Blackpill Incel subhumanity vs. Chad/Stacy hypersexual barbarism. Stunning contrast of divergent evolution in action.

[wereq]

Stunning contrast of divergent evolution in action. Completely different trajectories of living creating vast unbreachable inequality!

K selective rice and curry subhumans are finding CRISPR cures to diseases in high school while R selective rugby barbarians are pulling up wedgies over their teammates' asses

 

[cursed]

they aren't supposed to be pulling them up like this as you can notice these are practice matches it should be by the hip. i spent a month watching female rugby matches. i never researched the game in itself but i've notice this is not common and they should pull each other up by the hip but sometimes mistakes happen and they end up in these situations. i'm convinced many of these females may be lesbos.

 

[wereq]

i'm convinced many of these females may be lesbos.

 

[TooSomething]

Would turn them straight again.

 

[packardD]

Stunning contrast of divergent evolution in action. Completely different trajectories of living creating vast unbreachable inequality!

K selective rice and curry subhumans are finding CRISPR cures to diseases in high school while R selective rugby barbarians are pulling up wedgies over their teammates' asses

View attachment 1736942

True r lifestyle / fast life is not possible without the contribution of K assets (cumulative genetic capital). True slayers come from strong families with a history of K selection. K selection leads to r lifestyle. r lifestyle is unachievable without K’s contribution

 

[packardD]

True r lifestyle / fast life is not possible without the contribution of K assets (cumulative genetic capital). True slayers come from strong families with a history of K selection. K selection leads to r lifestyle. r lifestyle is unachievable without K’s contribution

In humans

 

[WizardInTraining]

I want to lick the sweat off those buns

 

[wereq]

r lifestyle is unachievable without K’s contribution

Its possible. Examples include sub-saharan african and ice age european hunter gatherers.

 

[wereq]

I want to lick the sweat off those buns

 

[wereq]

@BasedGoyslopReviews thoughts?

 

[BasedGoyslopReviews]

im jealous as fuck. imagine casually playing with centaur sized asses of peak athletic foids

 

[wereq]

imagine casually playing with centaur sized asses of peak athletic foids

 

[BasedGoyslopReviews]

its also annoying ERfuel
those ricecels contribute a lot and get nothing
sportsball chads and stacies contribute nothing and get everything

 

[wereq]

im jealous as fuck.

Are you jealous of the rice and curry STEM kids?

 

[BasedGoyslopReviews]

they are so thick hairless and shiny I bet when fully nude they would blow 90% of pornstars out the water

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/I_wpdQR2lQs

 

[wereq]

its also annoying ERfuel
those ricecels contribute a lot and get nothing
sportsball chads and stacies contribute nothing and get everything

 

[wereq]

I bet when fully nude they would blow 90% of pornstars out the water

They know this which is why we are now seeing the rise of OnlyFans athletes!

 

[packardD]

Its possible. Examples include sub-saharan african and ice age european hunter gatherers.

r in its purest form is impossible without K’s contribution by definition. You are confusing lifestyle with precursor. r lifestyle (early sex, promiscuity, risk taking, asserting dominance etc.) is fundamentally impossible without the supreme genetic traits (you can’t have sex in middle school if you are ugly or short or low status bullied kid; you can’t become rich if you are low iq, etc.). You need the K level genetics to lead the r lifestyle, because r requires access. No height = no access. No face = no access, and so on

 

[wereq]

r in its purest form is impossible without K’s contribution by definition. You are confusing lifestyle with precursor. r lifestyle (early sex, promiscuity, risk taking, asserting dominance etc.) is fundamentally impossible without the supreme genetic traits (you can’t have sex in middle school if you are ugly or short or low status bullied kid; you can’t become rich if you are low iq, etc.). You need the K level genetics to lead the r lifestyle, because r requires access. No height = no access. No face = no access, and so on

Its possible to get r-selective environment where there's a lot of disturbance from predators. These environments cause animals to develop, mature and reproduce early, and they are also primed for chaos, violence, and predation. They don't rely on parental investment to build themselves up, but rather their genetics. Sexual competition is fierce and dominance and mate guarding signals provide cues to females to reproduce. Humans have these environments as well like Black dominant inner cities in Chicago with gang violence.

 

[packardD]

Its possible to get r-selective environment where there's a lot of disturbance from predators. These environments cause animals to develop, mature and reproduce early, and they are also primed for chaos, violence, and predation. They don't rely on parental investment to build themselves up, but rather their genetics. Sexual competition is fierce and dominance and mate guarding signals provide cues to females to reproduce. Humans have these environments as well like Black dominant inner cities in Chicago with gang violence.

You are still confusing the lifestyle with the prerequisite , which is the genetic quality / certain favorable genetic traits . K and r operate on different levels, r is a lifestyle, K is both a lifestyle and the heritage. The parental investment part is largely wrong as well, the only thing you got right is that the environment can alter the overall outlook of a person, for example in Latin countries many short men can still get a girlfriend if they thugmaxx, but you still need that low inhibition and risk taking ability which is not present in everyone. It’s just that K assets are often associated with quietness, shyness, material wealth, when in reality it is a very broad spectrum. The definition of K-selection :“ K-selection produces traits that maximize competitive effectiveness in high-competition environments.“

 

[wereq]

K is both a lifestyle and the heritage.

R selection is also a lifestyle and the heritage is more reliant on genetics rather than accumulated weath.

If you believe that there can be no r without k, explain Blacks then. Blacks are r-selective even though they are poor and have no k-selective background or history.

The parental investment part is largely wrong as well, the only thing you got right is that the environment can alter the overall outlook of a person, for example in Latin countries many short men can still get a girlfriend if they thugmaxx, but you still need that low inhibition and risk taking ability which is not present in everyone. It’s just that K assets are often associated with quietness, shyness, material wealth, when in reality it is a very broad spectrum. The definition of K-selection :“ K-selection produces traits that maximize competitive effectiveness in high-competition environments.“

K-selective competitiveness is in clean, controlled, and pristine environments without any chaos. K-selective people cannot handle chaos and random acts of threats, violence, or predation. K-selective people compete on wealth hoarding through high IQ pursuis; they don't compete with their physicality. These people are largely asexual.

R selective people are comfortable with chaos. They are natural hustlers, gamblers, opportunistic and predatory. They thrive on risk and unpredictability. They compete physically through warfare, violence, and sexual competition.

 

[packardD]

R selection is also a lifestyle and the heritage is more reliant on genetics rather than accumulated weath.

If you believe that there can be no r without k, explain Blacks then. Blacks are r-selective even though they are poor and have no k-selective background or history.

K-selective competitiveness is in clean, controlled, and pristine environments without any chaos. K-selective people cannot handle chaos and random acts of threats, violence, or predation. K-selective people compete on wealth hoarding through high IQ pursuis; they don't compete with their physicality. These people are largely asexual.

R selective people are comfortable with chaos. They are natural hustlers, gamblers, opportunistic and predatory. They thrive on risk and unpredictability. They compete physically through warfare, violence, and sexual competition.

R selective people are comfortable with chaos because their ancestors adapted to the environment and allowed for the offspring to be this way. Note what I said in my previous reply, K is a broad spectrum of genetic assets. You associate K with control, pristine environment and zero entropy, when in reality K is by definition “traits that maximize competitive effectiveness in high-competition environments”. So where is the contradiction ? Blacks adapted to this particular form of competitive environment. It isnt intellectual competitiveness, it is a primal form of competitiveness. If you frame K as a distinct system with distinct signs and attributes which according to you are pristine environment, absence of chaos and so on, then yes, your logic has its place. But it is not so correct in the actual coordinate system the term operates in. If you want a formal proof (the Chicago niggers example):

1. Your premise: high disturbance environments produce r-selection independently of K-genetics

2. In high competition environments, reproductive success concentrates in the highest phenotype males (documented across all high-competition human populations)

3. Highest phenotype males are defined by physical formidability, dominance credibility, cognitive capacity, hormonal expression

4. These traits require significant developmental and genetic investment to produce (biological fact)

5. Significant developmental and genetic investment = K-genetic contribution (definitional)

6. Therefore reproductive success in Chicago concentrates in K-genetic males (from 2-5)

7. The environment selected WHICH K-genetic males won — it did not generate the capacity they won with

8. Therefore the Chicago environment is a K-genetics sorting mechanism, not an independent r-selection generator (from 6-7)

 

[packardD]

R selection is also a lifestyle and the heritage is more reliant on genetics rather than accumulated weath.

If you believe that there can be no r without k, explain Blacks then. Blacks are r-selective even though they are poor and have no k-selective background or history.

K-selective competitiveness is in clean, controlled, and pristine environments without any chaos. K-selective people cannot handle chaos and random acts of threats, violence, or predation. K-selective people compete on wealth hoarding through high IQ pursuis; they don't compete with their physicality. These people are largely asexual.

R selective people are comfortable with chaos. They are natural hustlers, gamblers, opportunistic and predatory. They thrive on risk and unpredictability. They compete physically through warfare, violence, and sexual competition.

Basically you associate K with Chinese stem nerds and malnourished Reddit users. Which is fundamentally incorrect (or at least this is what I got out of your replies)

 

[SubhumanOldcel]

Whores shouldn’t be allowed to play sports.

 

[wereq]

Basically you associate K with Chinese stem nerds and malnourished Reddit users. Which is fundamentally incorrect (or at least this is what I got out of your replies)

No, K selection is scarcity based risk averse living that is characterized by minimization of chaos and competition that relates to physicality and sexuality. Its about seeking safety and security, overcoming scarcity through wealth hoarding and accumulation. Its a scarcity-driven risk averse form of asexual living.

 

[parbate2025]

Stunning contrast of divergent evolution in action. Completely different trajectories of living creating vast unbreachable inequality!

K selective rice and curry subhumans are finding CRISPR cures to diseases in high school while R selective rugby barbarians are pulling up wedgies over their teammates' asses

View attachment 1736942

The bottom ones are more happy in their life

 

[wereq]

reality K is by definition “traits that maximize competitive effectiveness in high-competition environments”.

That competition occurs after wealth hoarding but prior to wealth hoarding, the environment is scarce and there is desire to establish stability. In the case of r selection, this stability is not obtainable so the organism shifts to a different mode of operation entirely where it genetically adopts ways to deal with that chaos (hustler mentality, sexual dimorphism, strength, paranoia, dopaminergic living, short term maximization of gains). In the case of k-selection, dopaminergic activities are suppressed in favor of long term strategies for eliminating scarcity because there is a scarcity but no disturbance or chaos from predators or invader.

Blacks adapted to this particular form of competitive environment. It isnt intellectual competitiveness, it is a primal form of competitiveness.

 

[wereq]

2. In high competition environments, reproductive success concentrates in the highest phenotype males (documented across all high-competition human populations)

3. Highest phenotype males are defined by physical formidability, dominance credibility, cognitive capacity, hormonal expression

4. These traits require significant developmental and genetic investment to produce (biological fact)

Yeah but those traits aren't has pronounced in k-selective wealthy settings. Yes, k-selective wealth can give rise to r-selective traits like you're pointing out, but r-selective traits can be authentically born in the absence of k-selective wealth and abundance like I pointed out with Blacks in inner cities. Take Ice age europe for example. Similar to Sub-Saharan African hunter gatherers do practiced megafauna hunting, these Ice Age Europeans had pronounced masculinity and sexual dimophism from living a high-risk-high-reward dopaminergic lifestyle. They had to compete against predators and megafauna for survival daily and there was no wealth of grains to rely on for survivial. There was no buffer. Everyday was a fight. This is similar to how Viking raiders lived. They were poor in their homeland and had to sail and take on a risky sacrificial raider lifestyle to ensure their people could have things. This is true authentic r-selective living!

4. These traits require significant developmental and genetic investment to produce (biological fact)

5. Significant developmental and genetic investment = K-genetic contribution (definitional)

6. Therefore reproductive success in Chicago concentrates in K-genetic males (from 2-5)

No, the genetic adaptations and reproductive success favor those who are adapted for gang warfare and can avoid/overcome predators (police, rival gangs). They have genetic mutations that enable them to accumulate resources from zero sum games with their rivals and predators; they do not accumulate resources in the same way a k-selective person would, which includes wageslaving long hours for years or learning high tech skills because these r-selective hustling thugmaxxers simply don't have the time or stability to pursue those options. They accumulate through predation themselves, in response to predators in their hostile environment. This is why r-selective people like Vikings, Chads, Tyrones are such good soldiers and mercenaries. They are walking weapons who are designed to kill. r-selective people are known for explosive bursts of effort, not sustained grinding degrading long term effort like k-selective people are.

 

[packardD]

Yeah but those traits aren't has pronounced in k-selective wealthy settings. Yes, k-selective wealth can give rise to r-selective traits like you're pointing out, but r-selective traits can be authentically born in the absence of k-selective wealth and abundance like I pointed out with Blacks in inner cities. Take Ice age europe for example. Similar to Sub-Saharan African hunter gatherers do practiced megafauna hunting, these Ice Age Europeans had pronounced masculinity and sexual dimophism from living a high-risk-high-reward dopaminergic lifestyle. They had to compete against predators and megafauna for survival daily and there was no wealth of grains to rely on for survivial. There was no buffer. Everyday was a fight. This is similar to how Viking raiders lived. They were poor in their homeland and had to sail and take on a risky sacrificial raider lifestyle to ensure their people could have things. This is true authentic r-selective living!

No, the genetic adaptations and reproductive success favor those who are adapted for gang warfare and can avoid/overcome predators (police, rival gangs). They have genetic mutations that enable them to accumulate resources from zero sum games with their rivals and predators; they do not accumulate resources in the same way a k-selective person would, which includes wageslaving long hours for years or learning high tech skills because these r-selective hustling thugmaxxers simply don't have the time or stability to pursue those options. They accumulate through predation themselves, in response to predators in their hostile environment. This is why r-selective people like Vikings, Chads, Tyrones are such good soldiers and mercenaries. They are walking weapons who are designed to kill. r-selective people are known for explosive bursts of effort, not sustained grinding degrading long term effort like k-selective people are.

I see it now. I was wrong in expanding the classic definition / framework into a more broader system, although I think what I said can still be observed and makes logical sense, albeit not necessarily matching the established science literature. Maybe I should have called it something else

 

[wereq]

I was wrong in expanding the classic definition / framework into a more broader system

I wouldn't say that you were wrong. K-selective prosperity does give rise to r-selection because it mimics the environment of r-selection. K-selective traits are born out of scarcity so once that scarcity is solved and erased, it creates an r-selective environment which now fosters r-selective traits. In authentic r-selective settings, predations kills off populations so for the ones that survive, there's a relative abundance of resources which they try to harness to develop their physical strength to fight off predators/invaders.

 

[nihilum]

Whores shouldn’t be allowed to play sports.