Busy so this will be less detailed than previous threads on this topic.
I really can't be bothered to re-summarize the events leading up to his arrest and prosecution so just read the previous thread:
incels.is
Judge Susan J. Dlott granted a motion to suppress Tres Genco's handwritten notes found during a warrantless search of his bedroom, noting that Ohio police deliberately violated the incel's Fourth Amendment rights. But she declined to extend the suppression to evidence found pursuant to the search warrant, noting that the underlying affidavit was sufficient on its face to establish probable cause, or in the alternative, that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.
Judge Dlott also declined to dismiss either charge outright.
This decision is largely but not entirely a win for the government. You can read it here:
What's next? Well, would be interesting if the Sixth Circuit considers this issue. Also depends on how willing the parties are to reach a plea agreement.
I really can't be bothered to re-summarize the events leading up to his arrest and prosecution so just read the previous thread:
Ohio incel Tres Genco faces federal hate crime charges: legal discussion thread for Nov/Dec 2021
I now realize that this case is going to drag on for a while, so I'm going to emulate the way I'm following the Larson case and create a thread every two months instead of creating a new thread every time I have an update This is a case that seems destined for appellate review. The legal...
incels.is
Judge Susan J. Dlott granted a motion to suppress Tres Genco's handwritten notes found during a warrantless search of his bedroom, noting that Ohio police deliberately violated the incel's Fourth Amendment rights. But she declined to extend the suppression to evidence found pursuant to the search warrant, noting that the underlying affidavit was sufficient on its face to establish probable cause, or in the alternative, that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.
Judge Dlott also declined to dismiss either charge outright.
This decision is largely but not entirely a win for the government. You can read it here:
What's next? Well, would be interesting if the Sixth Circuit considers this issue. Also depends on how willing the parties are to reach a plea agreement.
@Infinity @Fat Link @IengZengCel @Lonely4Ever @mNFwTJ3wz9 @BlackPilledNeet @SlutLiberationFront @Rotter @Mecoja @FrothySolutions @Arabcel9
