Freixel
Revolutionary Socialist National
★★★
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2023
- Posts
- 5,273
- Online time
- 3d 5h
I was thinking about this... the history of mathematics...
The first 9 numbers are the basic ones, and all the remaining numbers are modifications, additions, multiplications, etc. of these 9 primordial numbers.
All numbers after 9 can be reduced to one of them, for example, 11 = 1 + 1 = 2.
But who established that these basic numbers had to be 9? Why didn't someone create a symbol to represent a number following 9 that wasn't a repetition of the originals (10)?
For example, I could create a mathematical sequence like this: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-*
* It's the basic number that follows 9 (not 10).
It's obvious that mathematical laws are accepted by scientific consensus or whatever... but that doesn't mean they're an immutable and infallible truth, just a human creation.
The first 9 numbers are the basic ones, and all the remaining numbers are modifications, additions, multiplications, etc. of these 9 primordial numbers.
All numbers after 9 can be reduced to one of them, for example, 11 = 1 + 1 = 2.
But who established that these basic numbers had to be 9? Why didn't someone create a symbol to represent a number following 9 that wasn't a repetition of the originals (10)?
For example, I could create a mathematical sequence like this: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-*
* It's the basic number that follows 9 (not 10).
It's obvious that mathematical laws are accepted by scientific consensus or whatever... but that doesn't mean they're an immutable and infallible truth, just a human creation.





