Serious Can i get windows 10 for free?

[CursedCel]

Any high iq cel who can help me get windows 10 free

 

[Yamete]

Stop using proprietary garbage, install any linux distribution instead.

Here is a good beginner one: https://system76.com/pop

 

[Six]

Steal a laptop.

 

[CursedCel]

Stop using proprietary garbage, install any linux distribution instead.

Here is a good beginner one: https://system76.com/pop

I cant play games on linux

 

[Deleted member 19971]

Why do you want to upgrade?

 

[Yamete]

I cant play games on linux

Yes you can! for your non native games you can use steam proton, lutris or playonlinux (do it in that order)

The number of natives games are increasing a lot thanks to vulkan and linux in general being finally ready for the public.

You can also play emulators or free and open source games like 0ad, the dark mod,xonotic, etc

 

[zangano1]

I don't know

 

[Leblid]

Buy a cheap oem license, i'm using windows 10 worth only 10 dollars. 1.5 years and everything is fine, i can upgrade and all.
You don't even need to buy windows 10, all will happen is that you can't personalize and will get a watermark, that is all.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

I don't know

 

[Uglyme]

Steal a laptop.

 

[Deleted member 21514]

Download it on internet

 

[Emba]

Just get a bloated os that uses all your processor bro!

 

[Dionysus]

I don't know

 

[holyweeb]

Stop using proprietary garbage, install any linux distribution instead.

Here is a good beginner one: https://system76.com/pop

Linux is gay

 

[pp183]

1337x.to
thepiratebay.org

 

[FinnCel]

I cant play games on linux

It has Windows emulator

 

[Blacktarpill]

Just get a bloated os that uses all your processor bro!

@Hail The Bloatlord
I felt like i had to do that.

 

[1680]

Just don't enter an activation code once you download it

You'll be seeing this in the bottom right corner but its not really noticable in my opinion

 

[Emba]

@Hail The Bloatlord
I felt like i had to do that.

I considered it tbh

 

[Vermilioncore]

Download it on internet

 

[Indari]

Just don't enter an activation code once you download it
View attachment 171682
You'll be seeing this in the bottom right corner but its not really noticable in my opinion

I paid $109 to make that chit go away

 

[Legendarywristcel]

Win 10 is necessary to play the latest games though.

 

[Yamete]

Linux is gay

No, linux is all about the end user having total control/ power of his system.

"Since 1983, the Free Software Movement has campaigned for computer users' freedom—for users to control the software they use, rather than vice versa. When a program respects users' freedom and community, we call it “free software.”

We also sometimes call it “libre software” to emphasize that we're talking about liberty, not price. Some proprietary (nonfree) programs, such as Photoshop, are very expensive; others, such as Flash Player, are available gratis—but that's a minor detail. Either way, they give the program's developer power over the users, power that no one should have.

Those two nonfree programs have something else in common: they are both malware. That is, both have functionalities designed to mistreat the user. Proprietary software nowadays is often malware because the developers' power corrupts them. That directory lists around 400 different malicious functionalities (as of April, 2019), but it is surely just the tip of the iceberg.

With free software, the users control the program, both individually and collectively. So they control what their computers do (assuming those computers are loyal and do what the users' programs tell them to do).

With proprietary software, the program controls the users, and some other entity (the developer or “owner”) controls the program. So the proprietary program gives its developer power over its users. That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer to mistreat the users in other ways.

Even when proprietary software isn't downright malicious, its developers have an incentive to make it addictive, controlling and manipulative. You can say, as does the author of that article, that the developers have an ethical obligation not to do that, but generally they follow their interests. If you want this not to happen, make sure the program is controlled by its users.

Freedom means having control over your own life. If you use a program to carry out activities in your life, your freedom depends on your having control over the program. You deserve to have control over the programs you use, and all the more so when you use them for something important in your life.

Users' control over the program requires four essential freedoms.

(0) The freedom to run the program as you wish, for whatever purpose.
(1) The freedom to study the program's “source code”, and change it, so the program does your computing as you wish. Programs are written by programmers in a programming language—like English combined with algebra—and that form of the program is the “source code”. Anyone who knows programming, and has the program in source code form, can read the source code, understand its functioning, and change it too. When all you get is the executable form, a series of numbers that are efficient for the computer to run but extremely hard for a human being to understand, understanding and changing the program in that form are forbiddingly hard.
(2) The freedom to make and distribute exact copies when you wish. (It is not an obligation; doing this is your choice. If the program is free, that doesn't mean someone has an obligation to offer you a copy, or that you have an obligation to offer him a copy. Distributing a program to users without freedom mistreats them; however, choosing not to distribute the program—using it privately—does not mistreat anyone.)

(3) The freedom to make and distribute copies of your modified versions, when you wish.

The first two freedoms mean each user can exercise individual control over the program. With the other two freedoms, any group of users can together exercise collective control over the program. With all four freedoms, the users fully control the program. If any of them is missing or inadequate, the program is proprietary (nonfree), and unjust.

Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities, including recipes for cooking, educational works such as textbooks, reference works such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, fonts for displaying paragraphs of text, circuit diagrams for hardware for people to build, and patterns for making useful (not merely decorative) objects with a 3D printer. Since these are not software, the free software movement strictly speaking doesn't cover them; but the same reasoning applies and leads to the same conclusion: these works should carry the four freedoms.

A free program allows you to tinker with it to make it do what you want (or cease to do something you dislike). Tinkering with software may sound ridiculous if you are accustomed to proprietary software as a sealed box, but in the Free World it's a common thing to do, and a good way to learn programming. Even the traditional American pastime of tinkering with cars is obstructed because cars now contain nonfree software."

Free Software Is Even More Important Now - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation

www.gnu.org

 

[holyweeb]

No, linux is all about the end user having total control/ power of his system.

"Since 1983, the Free Software Movement has campaigned for computer users' freedom—for users to control the software they use, rather than vice versa. When a program respects users' freedom and community, we call it “free software.”

We also sometimes call it “libre software” to emphasize that we're talking about liberty, not price. Some proprietary (nonfree) programs, such as Photoshop, are very expensive; others, such as Flash Player, are available gratis—but that's a minor detail. Either way, they give the program's developer power over the users, power that no one should have.

Those two nonfree programs have something else in common: they are both malware. That is, both have functionalities designed to mistreat the user. Proprietary software nowadays is often malware because the developers' power corrupts them. That directory lists around 400 different malicious functionalities (as of April, 2019), but it is surely just the tip of the iceberg.

With free software, the users control the program, both individually and collectively. So they control what their computers do (assuming those computers are loyal and do what the users' programs tell them to do).

With proprietary software, the program controls the users, and some other entity (the developer or “owner”) controls the program. So the proprietary program gives its developer power over its users. That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer to mistreat the users in other ways.

Even when proprietary software isn't downright malicious, its developers have an incentive to make it addictive, controlling and manipulative. You can say, as does the author of that article, that the developers have an ethical obligation not to do that, but generally they follow their interests. If you want this not to happen, make sure the program is controlled by its users.

Freedom means having control over your own life. If you use a program to carry out activities in your life, your freedom depends on your having control over the program. You deserve to have control over the programs you use, and all the more so when you use them for something important in your life.

Users' control over the program requires four essential freedoms.

(0) The freedom to run the program as you wish, for whatever purpose.
(1) The freedom to study the program's “source code”, and change it, so the program does your computing as you wish. Programs are written by programmers in a programming language—like English combined with algebra—and that form of the program is the “source code”. Anyone who knows programming, and has the program in source code form, can read the source code, understand its functioning, and change it too. When all you get is the executable form, a series of numbers that are efficient for the computer to run but extremely hard for a human being to understand, understanding and changing the program in that form are forbiddingly hard.
(2) The freedom to make and distribute exact copies when you wish. (It is not an obligation; doing this is your choice. If the program is free, that doesn't mean someone has an obligation to offer you a copy, or that you have an obligation to offer him a copy. Distributing a program to users without freedom mistreats them; however, choosing not to distribute the program—using it privately—does not mistreat anyone.)

(3) The freedom to make and distribute copies of your modified versions, when you wish.

The first two freedoms mean each user can exercise individual control over the program. With the other two freedoms, any group of users can together exercise collective control over the program. With all four freedoms, the users fully control the program. If any of them is missing or inadequate, the program is proprietary (nonfree), and unjust.

Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities, including recipes for cooking, educational works such as textbooks, reference works such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, fonts for displaying paragraphs of text, circuit diagrams for hardware for people to build, and patterns for making useful (not merely decorative) objects with a 3D printer. Since these are not software, the free software movement strictly speaking doesn't cover them; but the same reasoning applies and leads to the same conclusion: these works should carry the four freedoms.

A free program allows you to tinker with it to make it do what you want (or cease to do something you dislike). Tinkering with software may sound ridiculous if you are accustomed to proprietary software as a sealed box, but in the Free World it's a common thing to do, and a good way to learn programming. Even the traditional American pastime of tinkering with cars is obstructed because cars now contain nonfree software."

Free Software Is Even More Important Now - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation

www.gnu.org

ok....

linux is not gay

 

[Yamete]

It has Windows emulator

Wine (originally an acronym for "Wine Is Not an Emulator") is a compatibility layer capable of running Windows applications on several POSIX-compliant operating systems, such as Linux, macOS, & BSD. Instead of simulating internal Windows logic like a virtual machine or emulator, Wine translates Windows API calls into POSIX calls on-the-fly, eliminating the performance and memory penalties of other methods and allowing you to cleanly integrate Windows applications into your desktop.

 

[FUCKITALLREEE]

If you are on a activated windows 7, just download windows 10 upgrade tool and run it, you will end up with a legit windows 10. If you are on linux and want to get windows 10 legit, download windows 7 iso with the activator on 1337x, then run the windows 10 upgrade tool.

 

[M12Comic]

Just crack it pepega

Wine (originally an acronym for "Wine Is Not an Emulator") is a compatibility layer capable of running Windows applications on several POSIX-compliant operating systems, such as Linux, macOS, & BSD. Instead of simulating internal Windows logic like a virtual machine or emulator, Wine translates Windows API calls into POSIX calls on-the-fly, eliminating the performance and memory penalties of other methods and allowing you to cleanly integrate Windows applications into your desktop.

Linux is gay as fuck

 

[Deleted member 20987]

If you have Windows 7 installed.....................................

Upgrade Windows 7: Download Windows 10 For Free [How to]

How to Download Windows 10 and Upgrade Windows 7 for Absolutely Free! This Free Windows 10 Upgrade Offer Is Legit and Official.

wccftech.com

 

[gymletethnicel]

If you have windows 7, 8 or 8.1 you can with a Windows 10 installer.