Can Anti-Natalism Save the Earth?

[Elliot Eric Auvinen]

If we understand that overpopulation is the big problem, we can say that the drop in fertility, associated with a greater mortality during the older stages, will cause a faster decline than we think of the population. the idea of not having children in an overpopulated world is more than sensible. only a few really capable people should have children. and this quantity must be 2, for balance. our world comfortably supports less than 1 billion people, so we already know what our goal is.

 

[vidyacel]

Too many retards.
Not possible.

Unless a dwarf planet hits destroying all life on Earth.

Best case scenario.
The Sun enters into a Supernova state, and the entire galaxy gets blown to smithereens except Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

 

[Elliot Eric Auvinen]

the earth is a closed system based on the recycling of materials. overpopulation of any kind is a deviation from the natural balance which tends to break down. the existence of Inceldom is an example of this.

 

[Elliot Eric Auvinen]

Everything is interconnected. the more people, the less value humanity has and soon, its basic attributes are denied, quickly leading to things that generate population decay.

 

[Elliot Eric Auvinen]

that means yes, unless you really have the capabilities, you don't need and shouldn't have children.

 

[verzetn]

my parents dont deserve grandchildren