Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Can a subsaharan born in Germany become German?

To be German you must belong to the Germanic tribes.
 
Yeah they totally can, because you can clearly see how German they look like. Just look at those blue eyes, fair skin, light hair. Adolf Hitler would be proud for sure! Right? :lul:

@DarkStar
 
They look Aryan
 
You need to become doctor first and own a car.
 
same with Africans in the US
 
They look like pure aryans to me.
 
To be German you must belong to the Germanic tribes.
so why they call themsleves black Germans? Is it like the "we waz kangz" bunch?
 
does a mouse born in a stable become a horse?
 
so why they call themsleves black Germans? Is it like the "we waz kangz" bunch?
It's because of globohomo propaganda that says anyone from anywhere in the world has a right to claim Germany as theirs.

It is not like the "we wuz kangz" people. These Africans know that Germany had 0 Africans living there until very recently.
 
It's because of globohomo propaganda that says anyone from anywhere in the world has a right to claim Germany as theirs.

It is not like the "we wuz kangz" people. These Africans know that Germany had 0 Africans living there until very recently.
who are the enforcers of globohomo?
 
I dont know. As you can see in the video they say they are black Germans
I can say I'm a cool 6'5" nordic Chad. does that make me one?
 
Yes, if whites can be South African or Zimbabwean then I don’t see why not.
 
who are the enforcers of globohomo?
Supranational organisations, nation states/parliaments/political parties, banks and corporations (especially in the media business), universities, think-tanks, NGOs and powerful individuals like the ones that meet in Davos/Bilderberg meetings etc.
 
Supranational organisations, nation states/parliaments/political parties, banks and corporations (especially in the media business), universities, think-tanks, NGOs and powerful individuals like the ones that meet in Davos/Bilderberg meetings etc.
That means nothing because those very same things you mentioned can be islamic or hindu theocracies, they can be christian democrats, they can be fachsists.


Who are the majority of organisers and foot soldiers, what is their ideology thats what i meant
 
Whites cannot be South African or Zimbabwean.
There are millions of whites that consider themselves to be, including white supremacist ones
 
That means nothing because those very same things you mentioned can be islamic or hindu theocracies, they can be christian democrats, they can be fachsists.


Who are the majority of organisers and foot soldiers, what is their ideology thats what i meant
I was talking about what they ARE not what they can be.
 
There are millions of whites that consider themselves to be, including white supremacist ones
those have been in South Africa since 400 years though. Those days the land was still empty. The Bantu was there also on the coast but not on the land the whites settled and created their republics arounf Johannesburg, Pretoris etc etcwhich the Brits used brute force of war to join together with the Bantu lands to form South Africa. Thats the history one should also know why they call themselves "African"
 
those have been in South Africa since 400 years though. Those days the land was still empty. The Bantu was there also on the coast but not on the land the whites settled and created their republics arounf Johannesburg, Pretoris etc etcwhich the Brits used brute force of war to join together with the Bantu lands to form South Africa. Thats the history one should also know why they call themselves "African"
The dutch in South Africa call themselves Afrikaners which refers to their specific ethnic group. It does not matter how long they have been there or what they built, Africa belongs to Africans and Europeans can never be Africans (or anything else). The same applies to the Americas and Australia+New Zealand (or wherever else there are Europeans that are in places they shouldn't be).
 
The dutch in South Africa call themselves Afrikaners which refers to their specific ethnic group. It does not matter how long they have been there or what they built, Africa belongs to Africans and Europeans can never be Africans (or anything else). The same applies to the Americas and Australia+New Zealand (or wherever else there are Europeans that are in places they shouldn't be).
If that is the case what becomes of the Amazigh in North Africa even the Ethiopiods are more none "Bantu" and closer related to Sands. How do we deal with them?


Also since when does been "Bantu" make one an "original" African?

Just asking because there are Khoisan, Pygmys, Cushites in Ethiopia, Amazigh in the North etc etc etc
 
Yes, if whites can be South African or Zimbabwean then I don’t see why not.
Are they South African and Zimbabwean or Boer and Rhodesian?
 
Supranational organisations, nation states/parliaments/political parties, banks and corporations (especially in the media business), universities, think-tanks, NGOs and powerful individuals like the ones that meet in Davos/Bilderberg meetings etc.
and? I am waiting
 
If that is the case what becomes of the Amazigh in North Africa even the Ethiopiods are more none "Bantu" and closer related to Sands. How do we deal with them?


Also since when does been "Bantu" make one an "original" African?

Just asking because there are Khoisan, Pygmys, Cushites in Ethiopia, Amazigh in the North etc etc etc
I did not say Bantus are the "original" Africans. I am saying Europeans are not Africans under any circumstance (and vice versa). I do not see how the existence of the groups you mention has anything to do with that.
 
I did not say Bantus are the "original" Africans. I am saying Europeans are not Africans under any circumstance (and vice versa). I do not see how the existence of the groups you mention has anything to do with that.
so those blacks can never ever be German?
 
What are you waiting for here? You want a list of every corporation and NGO that is part of globohomo?
I asked who exactly are the msjority of the people enforcing their policies, who are the majority of their foot soldiers? Maybe Rice, maybe currys , maybe Germans? Who?
 
so those blacks can never ever be German?
Yes, and those whites can never be African.
I asked who exactly are the msjority of the people enforcing their policies, who are the majority of their foot soldiers? Maybe Rice, maybe currys , maybe Germans? Who?
It is the white nations that are enforcing globohomo policies, especially the white nations with a colonial past.
 
Yes, and those whites can never be African.

It is the white nations that are enforcing globohomo policies, especially the white nations with a colonial past.
why? What is the goal?
 
why? What is the goal?
A "better world" which for these people means a world without borders or races where people have no history or traditions. Just a collection of (racemixed) individuals with nothing in common who share the same geographical space.
 
A "better world" which for these people means a world without borders or races where people have no history or traditions. Just a collection of (racemixed) individuals with nothing in common who share the same geographical space.
Thats international socialism what you discribed i.e Marxism.
 
Whites cannot be South African or Zimbabwean.
White people built South Africa and Rhodesia.
If blacks want the land it should be reverted back to the state it was before whites settled.
Then they can have fun with tribal warfare and ethnic genocides like the good old days.
 
Yeah they totally can, because you can clearly see how German they look like. Just look at those blue eyes, fair skin, light hair. Adolf Hitler would be proud for sure! Right? :lul:

@DarkStar
:lul:
 
White people built South Africa and Rhodesia.
That is true, but irrelevant.
If blacks want the land it should be reverted back to the state it was before whites settled.
Then they can have fun with tribal warfare and ethnic genocides like the good old days.
I am curious why you think the land should be reverted. Also the tribal nogs in Rhodesia started killing eachother almost immediately after whitey was removed from power.
 
That is true, but irrelevant.

I am curious why you think the land should be reverted. Also the tribal nogs in Rhodesia started killing eachother almost immediately after whitey was removed from power.
Because blacks want the cake and to eat it at the same time.
Blacks say they hate living with whites yet they want everything that whites built.
If whites never built Rhodesia or South Africa no blacks would want to live there, instead they would try to illegally migrate to where the whites are and leech off whites there.
 
Last edited:
maybe most people on this forum really are retarded
 
Because blacks want the cake and to eat it at the same time.
Blacks say they hate living with whites yet they want everything that whites built.
If whites never built Rhodesia or South Africa no blacks would want to live there, instead they would try to illegally migrate to where the whites are and leech off whites there.
blacks in Zimbabwe say whites destroyed their development path with colonisation and shit which is bullshit . Its the Brits that had to end the slave trade in the region. See David Livingstone. Quick AI search summarised -----> David Livingstone, a Scottish missionary and explorer, played a significant role in exposing the East African slave trade, particularly in what is now Zimbabwe.




The blacks were killing each other and they lived in mud huts, no cities, no technology. That was brought by whites


blacks had less than 2 million population in total because of disease and malnutrition. Infact today the staple food is corn meal brought from USA by Brits and the population in Zimbabwe is ever rising almost 20 million today because of the food Brits for the locals to feed their starving children . quick AI search summarised-----> According to the search results, the staple food of Zimbabwe is Sadza, a thick cornmeal porridge similar to polenta.



Blacks complain about whites :soy::foidSoy::feels:because they are low IQ . They could very well have been still malnourished, living in disease and slavery , slaughtering each other in mud huts surrounded by native bush and wild animals wearing animal skin only around the sexual organs and nothing else.
 
Last edited:
1734847513478
 

Similar threads

Dr. Autismo
Replies
23
Views
817
DeadOnArrivalCel
DeadOnArrivalCel
Krobus
Replies
6
Views
485
laanda
laanda
Fantasea
Replies
13
Views
300
Sheogorath
Sheogorath
Dr. Autismo
Replies
5
Views
425
Dr. Autismo
Dr. Autismo

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top