
SIR ETHNICCEL
Lord of grannys and landwhales
-
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2021
- Posts
- 13,900
You need to become doctor first and own a car.
so why they call themsleves black Germans? Is it like the "we waz kangz" bunch?To be German you must belong to the Germanic tribes.
I dont know. As you can see in the video they say they are black Germansdoes a mouse born in a stable become a horse?
It's because of globohomo propaganda that says anyone from anywhere in the world has a right to claim Germany as theirs.so why they call themsleves black Germans? Is it like the "we waz kangz" bunch?
who are the enforcers of globohomo?It's because of globohomo propaganda that says anyone from anywhere in the world has a right to claim Germany as theirs.
It is not like the "we wuz kangz" people. These Africans know that Germany had 0 Africans living there until very recently.
I can say I'm a cool 6'5" nordic Chad. does that make me one?I dont know. As you can see in the video they say they are black Germans
Supranational organisations, nation states/parliaments/political parties, banks and corporations (especially in the media business), universities, think-tanks, NGOs and powerful individuals like the ones that meet in Davos/Bilderberg meetings etc.who are the enforcers of globohomo?
Okay i get your point.Yes, if whites can be South African or Zimbabwean then I don’t see why not.
That means nothing because those very same things you mentioned can be islamic or hindu theocracies, they can be christian democrats, they can be fachsists.Supranational organisations, nation states/parliaments/political parties, banks and corporations (especially in the media business), universities, think-tanks, NGOs and powerful individuals like the ones that meet in Davos/Bilderberg meetings etc.
Whites cannot be South African or Zimbabwean.Yes, if whites can be South African or Zimbabwean then I don’t see why not.
you just need a passportTo be German you must belong to the Germanic tribes.
There are millions of whites that consider themselves to be, including white supremacist onesWhites cannot be South African or Zimbabwean.
I was talking about what they ARE not what they can be.That means nothing because those very same things you mentioned can be islamic or hindu theocracies, they can be christian democrats, they can be fachsists.
Who are the majority of organisers and foot soldiers, what is their ideology thats what i meant
They are wrong.There are millions of whites that consider themselves to be, including white supremacist ones
those have been in South Africa since 400 years though. Those days the land was still empty. The Bantu was there also on the coast but not on the land the whites settled and created their republics arounf Johannesburg, Pretoris etc etcwhich the Brits used brute force of war to join together with the Bantu lands to form South Africa. Thats the history one should also know why they call themselves "African"There are millions of whites that consider themselves to be, including white supremacist ones
The dutch in South Africa call themselves Afrikaners which refers to their specific ethnic group. It does not matter how long they have been there or what they built, Africa belongs to Africans and Europeans can never be Africans (or anything else). The same applies to the Americas and Australia+New Zealand (or wherever else there are Europeans that are in places they shouldn't be).those have been in South Africa since 400 years though. Those days the land was still empty. The Bantu was there also on the coast but not on the land the whites settled and created their republics arounf Johannesburg, Pretoris etc etcwhich the Brits used brute force of war to join together with the Bantu lands to form South Africa. Thats the history one should also know why they call themselves "African"
If that is the case what becomes of the Amazigh in North Africa even the Ethiopiods are more none "Bantu" and closer related to Sands. How do we deal with them?The dutch in South Africa call themselves Afrikaners which refers to their specific ethnic group. It does not matter how long they have been there or what they built, Africa belongs to Africans and Europeans can never be Africans (or anything else). The same applies to the Americas and Australia+New Zealand (or wherever else there are Europeans that are in places they shouldn't be).
Are they South African and Zimbabwean or Boer and Rhodesian?Yes, if whites can be South African or Zimbabwean then I don’t see why not.
and? I am waitingSupranational organisations, nation states/parliaments/political parties, banks and corporations (especially in the media business), universities, think-tanks, NGOs and powerful individuals like the ones that meet in Davos/Bilderberg meetings etc.
I did not say Bantus are the "original" Africans. I am saying Europeans are not Africans under any circumstance (and vice versa). I do not see how the existence of the groups you mention has anything to do with that.If that is the case what becomes of the Amazigh in North Africa even the Ethiopiods are more none "Bantu" and closer related to Sands. How do we deal with them?
Also since when does been "Bantu" make one an "original" African?
Just asking because there are Khoisan, Pygmys, Cushites in Ethiopia, Amazigh in the North etc etc etc
What are you waiting for here? You want a list of every corporation and NGO that is part of globohomo?and? I am waiting
so those blacks can never ever be German?I did not say Bantus are the "original" Africans. I am saying Europeans are not Africans under any circumstance (and vice versa). I do not see how the existence of the groups you mention has anything to do with that.
I asked who exactly are the msjority of the people enforcing their policies, who are the majority of their foot soldiers? Maybe Rice, maybe currys , maybe Germans? Who?What are you waiting for here? You want a list of every corporation and NGO that is part of globohomo?
Yes, and those whites can never be African.so those blacks can never ever be German?
It is the white nations that are enforcing globohomo policies, especially the white nations with a colonial past.I asked who exactly are the msjority of the people enforcing their policies, who are the majority of their foot soldiers? Maybe Rice, maybe currys , maybe Germans? Who?
why? What is the goal?Yes, and those whites can never be African.
It is the white nations that are enforcing globohomo policies, especially the white nations with a colonial past.
A "better world" which for these people means a world without borders or races where people have no history or traditions. Just a collection of (racemixed) individuals with nothing in common who share the same geographical space.why? What is the goal?
Thats international socialism what you discribed i.e Marxism.A "better world" which for these people means a world without borders or races where people have no history or traditions. Just a collection of (racemixed) individuals with nothing in common who share the same geographical space.
White people built South Africa and Rhodesia.Whites cannot be South African or Zimbabwean.
Yeah they totally can, because you can clearly see how German they look like. Just look at those blue eyes, fair skin, light hair. Adolf Hitler would be proud for sure! Right?
@DarkStar
That is true, but irrelevant.White people built South Africa and Rhodesia.
I am curious why you think the land should be reverted. Also the tribal nogs in Rhodesia started killing eachother almost immediately after whitey was removed from power.If blacks want the land it should be reverted back to the state it was before whites settled.
Then they can have fun with tribal warfare and ethnic genocides like the good old days.
Because blacks want the cake and to eat it at the same time.That is true, but irrelevant.
I am curious why you think the land should be reverted. Also the tribal nogs in Rhodesia started killing eachother almost immediately after whitey was removed from power.
Gukurahundi - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
why you say that?maybe most people on this forum really are retarded
blacks in Zimbabwe say whites destroyed their development path with colonisation and shit which is bullshit . Its the Brits that had to end the slave trade in the region. See David Livingstone. Quick AI search summarised -----> David Livingstone, a Scottish missionary and explorer, played a significant role in exposing the East African slave trade, particularly in what is now Zimbabwe.Because blacks want the cake and to eat it at the same time.
Blacks say they hate living with whites yet they want everything that whites built.
If whites never built Rhodesia or South Africa no blacks would want to live there, instead they would try to illegally migrate to where the whites are and leech off whites there.