Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Call of Duty WW2 is bad (not really a surprise)

  • Thread starter OTaKu_WarrIOr_N
  • Start date
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N

OTaKu_WarrIOr_N

コイント
-
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Posts
2,083
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_0tGZRy-3E[/video]

Skip to 21:00 for the funniest comparison. They've dumbed down everything to generic shit in this game. They even managed to make LOOT BOXES worse.
 
How can you make loot boxes worse?
 
Roger_the_Ugly said:
How can you make loot boxes worse?

Instead of there being a variety, all you get are gun grips.
 
Can confirm. The Zombies are fun with friends but that's it. The campaign is boring and the multiplayer is pathetic. After you play games like battlefield and then you get on COD WWII with it's tiny maps it's a total joke.
 
Templarcel421 said:
Can confirm. The Zombies are fun with friends but that's it. The campaign is boring and the multiplayer is pathetic. After you play games like battlefield and then you get on COD WWII with it's tiny maps it's a total joke.
I liked other CODs, even Black Ops 3, but this one is just bad
 
I liked the call of duty series until ghosts was released. Everything after bo2 wasn't as good anymore.
 
I just buy treyarch games, since they are the only devolper that knows what they are doing
 
Tellem--T said:
I just buy treyarch games, since they are the only devolper that knows what they are doing
I mean, they're still cucked by Activision to implement gambling in their games
 
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
I mean, they're still cucked by Activision to implement gambling in their games

I know, but I myself but 200$ worth of cod points on bo3. That's how muched I love the game, I know I am I cuck for doing it, but I couldn't resist, I wanted that new smg, it turned out to be shit tho
 
I bought WWII on release and haven't played it since. 

I'm sticking to BO3 for now until the next CoD comes out.
 
Tellem--T said:
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
I mean, they're still cucked by Activision to implement gambling in their games
I know, but I myself but 200$ worth of cod points on bo3. That's how muched I love the game, I know I am I cuck for doing it, but I couldn't resist, I wanted that new smg, it turned out to be shit tho
I did it too. I feel guilty.


QuantumDummy said:
I bought WWII on release and haven't played it since.
I'm sticking to BO3 for now until the next CoD comes out.
Why'd you waste your money then?
 
Saving up for Dragon Ball FighterZ now tbh
 
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
Why'd you waste your money then?

Because I'm naive. 

I didn't buy Ghosts, AW, IW, or MW3. 

I needed a change of pace.
 
I've never owned a CoD game, but have watched all the storymodes on YouTube from MW1.

I thought only showing the Americans side of the war was trite and the incongruous use of a negro soldier (putting him on one of the game posters as well) reeked of modern SJW faggotry (they were segregated until the Korean War of 1950-53). Saving the jew was also predictable.
 
BlackPill47 said:
I've never owned a CoD game, but have watched all the storymodes on YouTube from MW1.

I thought only showing the Americans side of the war was trite and the incongruous use of a negro soldier (putting him on one of the game posters as well) reeked of modern SJW faggotry (they were segregated until the Korean War of 1950-53). Saving the jew was also predictable.

They didn't only show the American side in World at War. There was a Soviet campaign.
 
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
They didn't only show the American side in World at War. There was a Soviet campaign.
That's true. Of course they glorified the Soviets, despite them running an even more murderous totalitarian regime than the Germans ever did, then enslaving eastern Europe after the war anyway. The irony of WW2 was that Britain lost her Empire over Poland, which was gifted to Stalin anyway. The Cold War proved that the Soviets were the real threat. Incidentally, the Black Ops series was good, but it's a shame they went into the future with that and left the 1970s out of it.

They should have had much more from the British and French in CoD:WWII apart from that one mission in Paris.
 
BlackPill47 said:
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
They didn't only show the American side in World at War. There was a Soviet campaign.
That's true. Of course they glorified the Soviets, despite them running an even more murderous totalitarian regime than the Germans ever did, then enslaving eastern Europe after the war anyway. The irony of WW2 was that Britain lost her Empire over Poland, which was gifted to Stalin anyway. The Cold War proved that the Soviets were the real threat. Incidentally, the Black Ops series was good, but it's a shame they went into the future with that and left the 1970s out of it.
They should have had much more from the British and French in CoD:WWII apart from that one mission in Paris.
Didn't Stalin leave 10,000,000 citizens starving without food?
 
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
Didn't Stalin leave 10,000,000 citizens starving without food?
There was the Ukrainian famine in 1932-33. The Soviets committed many crimes on the peoples of the former Russian Empire between 1917-53 (The Red Terror, et al), but this is largely overlooked now. Stalin and Mao were the biggest mass murderers in history. They all got away with it too, like Pol Pot did.
 
BlackPill47 said:
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
Didn't Stalin leave 10,000,000 citizens starving without food?
There was the Ukrainian famine in 1932-33. The Soviets committed many crimes on the peoples of the former Russian Empire between 1917-53 (The Red Terror, et al), but this is largely overlooked now. Stalin and Mao were the biggest mass murderers in history. They all got away with it too, like Pol Pot did.
I don't know if this media outlet is to be trusted, but it's probably true
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/maos-great-leap-forward-killed-45-million-in-four-years-2081630.html
 
I stopped playing cod after black ops 2
 
zombie mode any good? That's the only reason I might get it.
 
fukmylyf said:
zombie mode any good? That's the only reason I might get it.

It's too easy and generic. Skip to 21:00 in the video. Also, what happened to not posting for a week?
 
OTaKu_WarrIOr_N said:
It's too easy and generic. Skip to 21:00 in the video. Also, what happened to not posting for a week?

oh shit
 
Guess I stick with BO3
 
BlackPill47 said:
I've never owned a CoD game, but have watched all the storymodes on YouTube from MW1.

I thought only showing the Americans side of the war was trite and the incongruous use of a negro soldier (putting him on one of the game posters as well) reeked of modern SJW faggotry (they were segregated until the Korean War of 1950-53). Saving the jew was also predictable.

As far as I remember the main place Negro soldiers saw action in WW2 was in Italy towards the end of the war because the Italian front was low priority and progress there was almost non existent. Its also kind of annoying that these things only ever focus on the Americans. I doubt most Americans even realise that D-Day was a British dominated operation and that the British and Canadian armies dominated the fighting in the early stages of the invasion.




Also. I'm not surprised it sucks balls. I haven't played the latest COD since BLOPS2 (and i regretted that). I played someone else's copy of Ghosts and gave up after half an hour.

The glory days of Modern Warfare will never be repeated and i always liked Halo more anyway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top