Brown men are the lowest of the low in the West.

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

Indians get ass for days in the UK

This this this

There are numerous studies showing that race is more important than face and height. A 2000s study showed that Asians needed to make an additional 250K per year to compete with white men. Adjusted for inflation, this would be $407,000 a year. Another study showed that 98% of white women outright exclude Indians in dating and 97% exclude Middle Easterners. Nearly 100%. There was a study that placed a dollar value on height and face. You can find it on this forum but it was nowhere near as dramatic as race. Race is by far the most important variable in dating success. All women want white men including ethnic women. Ethnic women rate White men as more attractive than their own men.

Proof of all studies

View attachment 1669359

Who has higher SMV? Curry, rice, sand, beaners? Blacks have the highest SMV of non-whites.

 

[Sub5failure]

the dynamic is different in the uk as opposed to other western countries like america because curries have been there for generations.

curries don’t have that kind of ‘exotic’ or ‘normal’ appeal they do in the uk as opposed to some shit like america or canada

Bruh the data doesnt not even make any sense, Curry jeets are getting approached way more than white women? ??

 

[160cmbloop]

Bruh the data doesnt not even make any sense, Curry jeets are getting approached way more than white women? ??

minority norm is a real thing, they need to approach too obviously but they don’t get much social failo as they do in somewhere like america. it’s the same reason you’d see white women date fat ugly illegal mexicans in america. same thing applies to white women that get with subhuman curries in the uk. very bizarre but it’s a real thing

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

minority norm is a real thing, they need to approach too obviously but they don’t get much social failo as they do in somewhere like america. it’s the same reason you’d see white women date fat ugly illegal mexicans in america. same thing applies to white women that get with subhuman curries in the uk. very bizarre but it’s a real thing

That data goes against all of the studies I showed. It's fake or has faulty methodology. No woman is going to take a jeet over a white man in any country in the world.

 

[160cmbloop]

That data goes against all of the studies I showed. It's fake or has faulty methodology. No woman is going to take a jeet over a white man in any country in the world.
View attachment 1669458View attachment 1669459View attachment 1669460View attachment 1669461View attachment 1669462

i’m not denying any evidence shown that a white woman will pick a white man over a curry. those rare instances you see of a white woman with a curry or even with a mexican are a very small minorities. they don’t represent the majority preference. the majority still desire white men. the real difference comes down to location and exposure. in places where mexicans or blacks make up a big portion of the population (think parts of the us southwest, certain big cities, etc) white women grow up around them. they’re the norm, not seen as weird or foreign. when a white woman ends up with a mexican, it’s still uncommon compared to white with white. but it’s not ‘alien’ to the environment. she’s “used to” them being part of the scenery. familiarity breeds a bit more openness, even if it’s still not the top choice. same exact logic applies to curries in the uk. in certain areas, london, birmingham, leicester, etc ‘jeets are everywhere. they’re seen as local. you’ll sometimes see white woman with a curry more often there. even in those high dominated ‘jeet zones, those couples are still rare, still very much the exception, not the rule.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

i’m not denying any evidence shown that a white woman will pick a white man over a curry. those rare instances you see of a white woman with a curry or even with a mexican are a very small minorities. they don’t represent the majority preference. the majority still desire white men. the real difference comes down to location and exposure. in places where mexicans or blacks make up a big portion of the population (think parts of the us southwest, certain big cities, etc) white women grow up around them. they’re the norm, not seen as weird or foreign. when a white woman ends up with a mexican, it’s still uncommon compared to white with white. but it’s not ‘alien’ to the environment. she’s “used to” them being part of the scenery. familiarity breeds a bit more openness, even if it’s still not the top choice. same exact logic applies to curries in the uk. in certain areas, london, birmingham, leicester, etc ‘jeets are everywhere. they’re seen as local. you’ll sometimes see white woman with a curry more often there. even in those high dominated ‘jeet zones, those couples are still rare, still very much the exception, not the rule.

Canada is filled with pajeets and it has only made white women hate them more. White women are more anti-immigration in Canada than white men.

63% of men were against immigration compared to 71% of women. I have never seen a white woman with an Indian man in my 30+ years of living in this country, and I was born here. Not once. Not a single time have I seen a white foid with a pajeet guy. The UK likes pajeets because of the empire but even there they are below other ethnics.

 

[160cmbloop]

Canada is filled with pajeets and it has only made white women hate them more. White women are more anti-immigration in Canada than white men.

63% of men were against immigration compared to 71% of women. I have never seen a white woman with an Indian man in my 30+ years of living in this country, and I was born here. Not once. Not a single time have I seen a white foid with a pajeet guy. The UK likes pajeets because of the empire but even there they are below other ethnics.

View attachment 1669475

curries in general overall have a bad perception with all the negative stereotypes stacked on. if it was mexicans flooding in through immigration, white women in canada wouldn’t be rallying against being anti immigration. mexicans are seen as the pity victim group. curries get hit with the opposite, the “taking over,” smelly, clannish, job stealing, housing crisis, causing stereotypes that blow up online and in real life. even with curries making up a huge chunk of recent immigration. they haven’t been there for generations like in the uk, where south asians have had 70+ years of deeper roots post post ww2 (even if the big waves started mid 20th century, not 200 years exactly more like post 1940s labor migration). in canada, it’s mostly newer waves, especially indians in the last couple decades, so no long multi generational familiarity to soften the edges. that lack of history makes the stereotypes stick harder and the backlash sharper no “they’ve always been here” buffer.

bad optics + recent mass arrival + stacked stereotypes = way tougher road than groups that get the “victim” or “model” pass.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

curries in general overall have a bad perception with all the negative stereotypes stacked on. if it was mexicans flooding in through immigration, white women in canada wouldn’t be rallying against being anti immigration. mexicans are seen as the pity victim group. curries get hit with the opposite, the “taking over,” smelly, clannish, job stealing, housing crisis, causing stereotypes that blow up online and in real life. even with curries making up a huge chunk of recent immigration. they haven’t been there for generations like in the uk, where south asians have had 70+ years of deeper roots post post ww2 (even if the big waves started mid 20th century, not 200 years exactly more like post 1940s labor migration). in canada, it’s mostly newer waves, especially indians in the last couple decades, so no long multi generational familiarity to soften the edges. that lack of history makes the stereotypes stick harder and the backlash sharper no “they’ve always been here” buffer.

bad optics + recent mass arrival + stacked stereotypes = way tougher road than groups that get the “victim” or “model” pass.

Indians are one of the oldest if not the oldest non-white ethnic groups in Canada. They have been here ever since Canada opened itself to immigration after World War Two. They existed before that but in much smaller numbers. I said I am in my 30s and I experienced this country back in the 1990s. Indians have always been hated here. White women have always rejected curries and I have never seen one curry with a white woman going back to the 90s. My dad has been here since the 1980s and curries were a low-status group even back then.

The hate picked up dramatically in the past few years because so many were let in such a short period but white foids were mass rejecting curries well before Trudeau took power.

I think with the UK, it's because India was part of the empire as I previously stated. They see Pajeets as part of them in a way.

Canada has had. ZERO historic relationship with pajeets. Canadians' attitude toward them is purely based on looks, smell, and culture (all trash).

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

curries in general overall have a bad perception with all the negative stereotypes stacked on. if it was mexicans flooding in through immigration, white women in canada wouldn’t be rallying against being anti immigration. mexicans are seen as the pity victim group. curries get hit with the opposite, the “taking over,” smelly, clannish, job stealing, housing crisis, causing stereotypes that blow up online and in real life. even with curries making up a huge chunk of recent immigration. they haven’t been there for generations like in the uk, where south asians have had 70+ years of deeper roots post post ww2 (even if the big waves started mid 20th century, not 200 years exactly more like post 1940s labor migration). in canada, it’s mostly newer waves, especially indians in the last couple decades, so no long multi generational familiarity to soften the edges. that lack of history makes the stereotypes stick harder and the backlash sharper no “they’ve always been here” buffer.

bad optics + recent mass arrival + stacked stereotypes = way tougher road than groups that get the “victim” or “model” pass.

According to your theory, it's just a matter of time until Indians are liked. The longer Indians have been in Canada the more hated they have become. They are more hated now than a decade ago and they will be more hated in the years and decades to come than they are right now (they are really hated right now).

 

[Goofygoober007]

Asians are well above us. We are lower than dogshit in the eyes of White women who absolutely detest us. We are the only race of men who are genuinely hated. White women aren't attracted to Asians but they don't hate them. They honestly, loathe us. If you are born brown prepare for a life of celibacy and exclusion with no release. I would rather be any other race than a brown (Curry and Sand). Make me black.

Skinny Asian in good health vs 300 pounder MAGA or Ork looking liberal lol. Theres good and bad people with every race, I judge by character not race.

 

[160cmbloop]

Indians are one of the oldest if not the oldest non-white ethnic groups in Canada. They have been here ever since Canada opened itself to immigration after World War Two. They existed before that but in much smaller numbers. I said I am in my 30s and I experienced this country back in the 1990s. Indians have always been hated here. White women have always rejected curries and I have never seen one curry with a white woman going back to the 90s. My dad has been here since the 1980s and curries were a low-status group even back then.

The hate picked up dramatically in the past few years because so many were let in such a short period but white foids were mass rejecting curries well before Trudeau took power.

I think with the UK, it's because India was part of the empire as I previously stated. They see Pajeets as part of them in a way.

Canada has had. ZERO historic relationship with pajeets. Canadians' attitude toward them is purely based on looks, smell, and culture (all trash).

looks and negative stereotypes beforehand. curries in the uk are also better look on average because they’ve been practicing eugenics there as opposed to in canada. curries in general even if they’re subhuman don’t have that same social leverage as they would in the uk too. even if curries stayed long enough in canada, been there from a very long time, they still were a small minority over there, didn’t get any major cultural shift or power overtime as opposed to in the uk. uk curries at least get a slight pass on looks sometimes. more mixed in, some blending, longer history means less “othering” on pure appearance. time + selective pressures in the uk give a slight edge on average presentation

 

[160cmbloop]

According to your theory, it's just a matter of time until Indians are liked. The longer Indians have been in Canada the more hated they have become. They are more hated now than a decade ago and they will be more hated in the years and decades to come than they are right now (they are really hated right now).

most likely, yes. the cultural shift will happen overtime for curries to be seen as a ‘norm’ but why even wait that long? america/canada is genuinely some of the worst countries for a curry to live in unless you’re rich or pass med/latino, maybe have insane height halo, if you don’t have any of these then all these negative stereotypes get stacked on you. in the us and canada right now, the rapid influx means the average curry guy is still viewed as the “new guy taking over,” the one blamed for housing prices, job competition, “not assimilating,” the whole package. there’s no generational buffer to normalize you. you’re not “canadian” or “american” in people’s heads even, you’re the immigrant wave that’s changing the neighborhood. especially the shit you see online about curries. i’m not saying if you move to the uk you’ll definitely get white women there easily. still rare as fuck, still the exception, but the quality of life is way better there since you’re not seen as ‘foreign,’ you’re seen as a local. south asians have been in british society for 70+ year, multiple generations, born and raised brummies, londoners, mancs.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

curries in the uk are also better look on average because they’ve been practicing eugenics there as opposed to in canada.

This is just plain wrong. If anything our curries should be better looking because they are tall Northerners.

looks and negative stereotypes beforehand. curries in the uk are also better look on average because they’ve been practicing eugenics there as opposed to in canada. curries in general even if they’re subhuman don’t have that same social leverage as they would in the uk too. even if curries stayed long enough in Canada, been there from a very long time, they still were a small minority over there, didn’t get any major cultural shift or power overtime as opposed to in the uk. uk curries at least get a slight pass on looks sometimes. more mixed in, some blending, longer history means less “othering” on pure appearance. time + selective pressures in the uk give a slight edge on average presentation

Curries in Canada are becoming more hated the longer they are here. It's not an issue of staying in the country for a long time. Canada has had mass non-white immigration since 1967. The bulk of those non-white immigrants were Indian and Chinese. We were the first country to officially adopt multiculturalism way back in 1971.

Hatred toward Indians is only stronger now compared to five years ago. Canadians are more against Indian immigration now than at any point in the history of this country. White women have always rejected Indian men for as long as I can remember and well before then. They are being "othered" at a higher level than in any previous era.

It's not an issue of being a larger minority. You said they were a smaller minority in the past so they were never accepted into the national fabric. The bigger their numbers the more white people hate them. The more of them there are the more intensely white foids reject them. They probably had an easier time dating in the 1980s.

Brits accept them because they are nostalgia gooning over the empire. They are still the lowest SMV deathniks over there. Here nobody even thinks of the empire. We are America's hat.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

most likely, yes. the cultural shift will happen overtime for curries to be seen as a ‘norm’ but why even wait that long? america/canada is genuinely some of the worst countries for a curry to live in unless you’re rich or pass med/latino, maybe have insane height halo, if you don’t have any of these then all these negative stereotypes get stacked on you. in the us and canada right now, the rapid influx means the average curry guy is still viewed as the “new guy taking over,” the one blamed for housing prices, job competition, “not assimilating,” the whole package. there’s no generational buffer to normalize you. you’re not “canadian” or “american” in people’s heads even, you’re the immigrant wave that’s changing the neighborhood. especially the shit you see online about curries. i’m not saying if you move to the uk you’ll definitely get white women there easily. still rare as fuck, still the exception, but the quality of life is way better there since you’re not seen as ‘foreign,’ you’re seen as a local. south asians have been in british society for 70+ year, multiple generations, born and raised brummies, londoners, mancs.

Lmao no. We are about 5 years away from pajeet pogroms. I am not even a jeet but I will be dragged into it. Indians have always been the second largest ethnic minority after East Asians until recently. Nobody hates East Asians. All Canadians hate jeets.

They are judged honestly here because Canadians don't have nostalgia empire goggles clouding their vision. Indians will always be hated here and it will only get worse. As I previously stated White Canadians have had zero historical relationships with pajeets, so there is no incentive to like them because they are genuinely unlikable as a race.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

most likely, yes. the cultural shift will happen overtime for curries to be seen as a ‘norm’ but why even wait that long? america/canada is genuinely some of the worst countries for a curry to live in unless you’re rich or pass med/latino, maybe have insane height halo, if you don’t have any of these then all these negative stereotypes get stacked on you. in the us and canada right now, the rapid influx means the average curry guy is still viewed as the “new guy taking over,” the one blamed for housing prices, job competition, “not assimilating,” the whole package. there’s no generational buffer to normalize you. you’re not “canadian” or “american” in people’s heads even, you’re the immigrant wave that’s changing the neighborhood. especially the shit you see online about curries. i’m not saying if you move to the uk you’ll definitely get white women there easily. still rare as fuck, still the exception, but the quality of life is way better there since you’re not seen as ‘foreign,’ you’re seen as a local. south asians have been in british society for 70+ year, multiple generations, born and raised brummies, londoners, mancs.

East Asians have been in Canada in larger numbers for just as long as Indians and everyone loves Asians, but everyone hates pajeets. They are never going to be liked because of looks, smell, personality, and culture.

 

[160cmbloop]

This is just plain wrong. If anything our curries should be better looking because they are tall Northerners.


Curries in Canada are becoming more hated the longer they are here. It's not an issue of staying in the country for a long time. Canada has had mass non-white immigration since 1967. The bulk of those non-white immigrants were Indian and Chinese. We were the first country to officially adopt multiculturalism way back in 1971.

Hatred toward Indians is only stronger now compared to five years ago. Canadians are more against Indian immigration now than at any point in the history of this country. White women have always rejected Indian men for as long as I can remember and well before then. They are being "othered" at a higher level than in any previous era.

It's not an issue of being a larger minority. You said they were a smaller minority in the past so they were never accepted into the national fabric. The bigger their numbers the more white people hate them. The more of them there are the more intensely white foids reject them. They probably had an easier time dating in the 1980s.

Brits accept them because they are nostalgia gooning over the empire. They are still the lowest SMV deathniks over there. Here nobody even thinks of the empire. We are America's hat.

Lmao no. We are about 5 years away from pajeet pogroms. I am not even a jeet but I will be dragged into it. Indians have always been the second largest ethnic minority after East Asians until recently. Nobody hates East Asians. All Canadians hate jeets.

They are judged honestly here because Canadians don't have nostalgia empire goggles clouding their vision. Indians will always be hated here and it will only get worse. As I previously stated White Canadians have had zero historical relationships with pajeets, so there is no incentive to like them because they are genuinely unlikable as a race.

East Asians have been in Canada in larger numbers for just as long as Indians and everyone loves Asians, but everyone hates pajeets. They are never going to be liked because of looks, smell, personality, and culture.

issue was the negative stereotypes curries had beforehand before the mass immigration of curries happened. this didn’t happen in the uk before everything went online. back in the uk, the big waves started in the 50s/60s/70s, pre internet, the community had decades to settle, build businesses, have british born kids, blend accents and styles without the internet turning every awkward encounter into eternal proof of “why curries suck.” in canada, the stereotypes were already stacked already before the huge recent wave even hit full throttle. online spaces already see ‘jeets as smelly, creepy, socially inept, beta, scamming call centers, etc long before the student visa boom turned brampton and surrey into mini punjab. when the numbers exploded in immigration, it wasn’t a blank slate; it landed on top of a pre loaded negativity pile that the internet had of curries. every new arrival got judged through that lens instantly, no grace period. either way they’d be seen as the new ‘norm’ eventually in canada since they’re taking over slowly big positions over there, doctors, engineers, tech, small business owners, even some political seats starting to stack up. numbers keep climbing, second gen kids are born here, accents fade, they integrate more on the surface. maybe not the same kind of ‘norm’ seen in the uk. white men are still the preference by default even in the uk but the quality of life would be better in the future for curries in canada whether or not they’re pure or mixed by then. though many of us here probably won’t live long enough to see it happen either way.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

The issue was the negative stereotypes curries had beforehand before the mass immigration of curries happened. this didn’t happen in the uk before everything went online. back in the uk, the big waves started in the 50s/60s/70s, pre internet, the community had decades to settle, build businesses, have british born kids, blend accents and styles without the internet turning every awkward encounter into eternal proof of “why curries suck.” in canada, the stereotypes were already stacked already before the huge recent wave even hit full throttle. online spaces already see ‘jeets as smelly, creepy, socially inept, beta, scamming call centers, etc long before the student visa boom turned brampton and surrey into mini punjab. when the numbers exploded in immigration, it wasn’t a blank slate; it landed on top of a pre loaded negativity pile that the internet had of curries. every new arrival got judged through that lens instantly, no grace period. either way they’d be seen as the new ‘norm’ eventually in canada since they’re taking over slowly big positions over there, doctors, engineers, tech, small business owners, even some political seats starting to stack up. numbers keep climbing, second gen kids are born here, accents fade, they integrate more on the surface. maybe not the same kind of ‘norm’ seen in the uk. white men are still the preference by default even in the uk but the quality of life would be better in the future for curries in canada whether or not they’re pure or mixed by then. though many of us here probably won’t live long enough to see it happen either way.

I just looked up the statistics and the UK was only 1% more South Asian than Canada until 2011. It was always 1% or a little above it going back to 1980. The demographics were similar.

We can go back and forth on this but Indians have always been a low-status group that foids rejected well before Trudeau came to power. I am just repeating myself at this point but I think an Indian would have an easier time dating in 1980s Canada than now. Their reputation and SMV are rapidly declining. It's not going up like you keep saying. They are more hated now than in the 1980s, 1990s, and any other previous decade. The more of them there are the more brutally white foids reject them and the more their SMV plummets to the floor.

I think curries are just easy to hate, especially by white women. Hating curries is the norm across every country and the entire internet. They are hated in the UK too, but less so than in other places because of the empire. India was the Jewel in the crown of the British empire so the Brits see them as part of the Commonwealth. Canada and America don't care about any of that. They don't have nostalgia goggles over a long-lost empire clouding their vision. It's simply the empire gooning on the part of the British which explains their tolerance of curries.

As for curries taking over and becoming the elite in Canada, nothing could be further from the truth. Indian immigrants from the past 10 years or so are 70 IQ slave labor working at Tim-Hortons or Uber Eats. They all share a basement with 20 other pajeets. They are de-facto slaves to such a degree that the United Nations is accusing the Canadian government of slavery. They occupy the lowest rung in both the labor market and dating market. They are the socioeconomic equivalent of Arab immigrants in Europe if not even worse. They are not taking over anything. Their kids can't integrate because the dominant society hates their guts and whites refuse to even look at them let alone associate with them.

East Asians have been in Canada in larger numbers for just as long yet they are loved and accepted by Canadian society. Indians are just easy to hate for reasons I have already stated so they will continue to be hated until the universe comes to an end.

The UN says Canada is using pajeets as slaves. They are never taking over elite positions in society.

UN expert sounds alarm over ‘contemporary forms of slavery’ in Canada

An independent UN human rights expert on Wednesday expressed concern over Canada's temporary foreign worker programmes, describing them as “a breeding ground for contemporary forms of slavery”.

news.un.org

 

[160cmbloop]

I just looked up the statistics and the UK was only 1% more South Asian than Canada until 2011. It was always 1% or a little above it going back to 1980. The demographics were similar.

We can go back and forth on this but Indians have always been a low-status group that foids rejected well before Trudeau came to power. I am just repeating myself at this point but I think an Indian would have an easier time dating in 1980s Canada than now. Their reputation and SMV are rapidly declining. It's not going up like you keep saying. They are more hated now than in the 1980s, 1990s, and any other previous decade. The more of them there are the more brutally white foids reject them and the more their SMV plummets to the floor.

I think curries are just easy to hate, especially by white women. Hating curries is the norm across every country and the entire internet. They are hated in the UK too, but less so than in other places because of the empire. India was the Jewel in the crown of the British empire so the Brits see them as part of the Commonwealth. Canada and America don't care about any of that. They don't have nostalgia goggles over a long-lost empire clouding their vision. It's simply the empire gooning on the part of the British which explains their tolerance of curries.

As for curries taking over and becoming the elite in Canada, nothing could be further from the truth. Indian immigrants from the past 10 years or so are 70 IQ slave labor working at Tim-Hortons or Uber Eats. They all share a basement with 20 other pajeets. They are de-facto slaves to such a degree that the United Nations is accusing the Canadian government of slavery. They occupy the lowest rung in both the labor market and dating market. They are the socioeconomic equivalent of Arab immigrants in Europe if not even worse. They are not taking over anything. Their kids can't integrate because the dominant society hates their guts and whites refuse to even look at them let alone associate with them.

East Asians have been in Canada in larger numbers for just as long yet they are loved and accepted by Canadian society. Indians are just easy to hate for reasons I have already stated so they will continue to be hated until the universe comes to an end.

The UN says Canada is using pajeets as slaves. They are never taking over elite positions in society.

UN expert sounds alarm over ‘contemporary forms of slavery’ in Canada

An independent UN human rights expert on Wednesday expressed concern over Canada's temporary foreign worker programmes, describing them as “a breeding ground for contemporary forms of slavery”.

news.un.org

curries in general don’t have any niche they can lean onto compared to other ethnics who don’t get negated with such negative stereotypes of curries. other groups get to claim “hardworking immigrant,” “model minority,” “cultural enrichment,” “exotic appeal,” or even the “victim/oppressed.” you can be rich and a curry in either canada or america or someone that’s made it ‘big’ like kash patel and still be hit with ‘jeet stereotypes. all of it only gets negated if they don’t even look curry to begin with. every curry that wants to move to america/canada doesn’t know what’s waiting for them just lmao, they’re better off in the uk yet for some reason every single one of them wants to move to america/canada where they’re despised and hated everywhere LOLOLOLOL insane propaganda from hollywood, social media, family back home hyping “land of opportunity, american/canadian dream, make it big here.” no land of opportunity if you’re a curry, no one fucking likes you LOL they romanticize the west without realizing the uk already solved the “be seen as foreign forever” problem decades ago. america/canada might pay more, but the quality of life tax for being curry here is brutal. no amount of money you make will negate being despised everywhere

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

curries in general don’t have any niche they can lean onto compared to other ethnics who don’t get negated with such negative stereotypes of curries. other groups get to claim “hardworking immigrant,” “model minority,” “cultural enrichment,” “exotic appeal,” or even the “victim/oppressed.” you can be rich and a curry in either canada or america or someone that’s made it ‘big’ like kash patel and still be hit with ‘jeet stereotypes. all of it only gets negated if they don’t even look curry to begin with. every curry that wants to move to america/canada doesn’t know what’s waiting for them just lmao, they’re better off in the uk yet for some reason every single one of them wants to move to america/canada where they’re despised and hated everywhere LOLOLOLOL insane propaganda from hollywood, social media, family back home hyping “land of opportunity, american/canadian dream, make it big here.” no land of opportunity if you’re a curry, no one fucking likes you LOL they romanticize the west without realizing the uk already solved the “be seen as foreign forever” problem decades ago. america/canada might pay more, but the quality of life tax for being curry here is brutal. no amount of money you make will negate being despised everywhere

They scammed the international student and temporary foreign worker program. That's why there is such a steep decline in the quality of immigrants we are getting. India is not sending their best.

I agree that nearly every other race fills some niche which makes them tolerable. Indian stereotypes are all negative.

Mexicans: Catholic, hard working, good food, big booty women.
Blacks: Athletic, BBC, good music, extroverted, charisma.
Asians: High IQ, creates first world countries, hot women who love white men, clean, light skin, K-pop, anime.
Indians: Defecate in the street, unhygienic, scamming old ladies, eat with their hands, smell bad, no rizz, rapists, sexually frustrated, ugly, bad accent, it never ends.

Sands also have an awful reputation but they get by using raw intimidation and their victim status.

 

[WhitePilledRage]

They are dating within their socio-economic strata. Beaners are poor so they will be with poor white foids on average. Rich ones will date the upper class.
A huge number of whites are mixing with beaners especially in states with a large beaner population like California. You don't see other browns having that kind of success.

Yea, they get the upper class ugly and fat ones. And I'm sure it's oofy doofy type of relationships too as beaners have no big dick halo, they're just happy to lucky cheap labor monkeys that work hard to provide.

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

Yea, they get the upper class ugly and fat ones. And I'm sure it's oofy doofy type of relationships too as beaners have no big dick halo, they're just happy to lucky cheap labor monkeys that work hard to provide.

Yeah, they are getting the ugly ones because of the ethnic tax, but you have to remember that upper-class people are more attractive. So, rich beaners will have better-looking wives than poor beaners (the majority).