Serious British patriachy colonized woke tribes

[AsiaCel]

It pains me to write this thread, as my own people has been colonized by the British themselves.

But one must not turn an blind eye to the opposition, after all, that mentality is as good as burying your head on the sand.

There is a reason why so many "First nations" got colonized by the British. One aspect was that they were egalitarian! For example, let's read these articles for an reference

The Colonial Roots of Violence Against Native American Women

Native American women in the United States are experiencing a crisis of violence and sexual abuse. Understanding the violence requires acknowledging the colonial roots of this crisis.

www.publichealth.columbia.edu

Indigenous tribes embraced gender fluidity prior to colonisation, but Europeans enforced specific gender roles

Ethnographic research reveals therefore, that prior to the European dominance, there were absolutely no monolithic gender systems in place. The construction of two specific gender identities as non-interchangeable absolutes, was in fact, the invention of the Euro-Western society.

indianexpress.com

How colonialism affects sexuality | Feeld

The effect of colonialism on politics is well-documented - but what about on sex and relationships? Here's what you need to know

feeld.co

This violence has its roots in colonial history, starting with Columbus’s 1492 expedition. Prior to that time, Whyatt writes, Native American women were honored and important in tribal life. Violence against women was rare and tribes were usually egalitarian. “Leadership was viewed as a shared responsibility,” according to Whyatt, with women taking an active role in the political process and occasionally becoming tribal chiefs.

If we apply an intersectional lens to our understanding of the full spectrum of sexuality, it becomes all too obvious that most cultures with views on sex, relationships and marriage that differ from the nuclear family set-up have been, and continue to be, wilfully suppressed. And if we look back at history with a critical eye, we can see how the imposition of the gender binary of ‘man’ and ‘woman’, with the accompanying hierarchy of men above women, was itself a mechanism of colonialism.

You see, many pre-colonial societies and indigenous peoples did not view gender as binary – that is, they had more than two genders – and had varying social roles and norms around family structures, household living arrangements and child rearing.

Before the advent of Europeans, Native Americans, embraced gender fluidity. There were no gender binaries. There were men and women, and then there were feminine men and manly women, and transgendered individuals. In native North American societies, these individuals were considered to be ‘normal’. In fact, those who adopted fluid gender roles were called Two Spirit female and Two Spirit male; and were considered supremely gifted, having the knowledge and ability to understand two opposing sides. There were no defined rules, no distinct binaries. In these societies, men and women frequently assumed opposite gender identities, occasionally cross-dressing, but almost always adopting the universal occupational roles assigned to each sex.

Britain in early 1900s If you looked at the video, it might as well be Iran or Pakistan, but that isn't the case.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbElEqm1TQ


Today, this trend is happening again, but backwards; While the first world abandons gender norms, being subject to a low birth rate, ultraconserative migrants are flooding in enforcing gender norms. Just this time, it is not done through force (actually sometimes it may be considering how peaceful those people are) but through replacement.

The point of this post is not to glorify British colonization, but to demonstrate what would happen if a culture adapts wokeness, and this time, Britain is being colonized.

 

[illumizoldyck]

violence comes later broski
as mayo cucks get their countries stolen by deathnics, they'll fight back eventually
there are areas in canada which have so many curries that any non-curry spewing racism or some other nonsense against curries would get lynched
no different that what happens when a non-black goes to ghettos

humans are very tribalistic and have strong ingroup preference even foids can be

 

[NormiesRretarded]

It pains me to write this thread, as my own people has been colonized by the British themselves.

But one must not turn an blind eye to the opposition, after all, that mentality is as good as burying your head on the sand.

There is a reason why so many "First nations" got colonized by the British. One aspect was that they were egalitarian! For example, let's read these articles for an reference

The Colonial Roots of Violence Against Native American Women

Native American women in the United States are experiencing a crisis of violence and sexual abuse. Understanding the violence requires acknowledging the colonial roots of this crisis.

www.publichealth.columbia.edu

Indigenous tribes embraced gender fluidity prior to colonisation, but Europeans enforced specific gender roles

Ethnographic research reveals therefore, that prior to the European dominance, there were absolutely no monolithic gender systems in place. The construction of two specific gender identities as non-interchangeable absolutes, was in fact, the invention of the Euro-Western society.

indianexpress.com

How colonialism affects sexuality | Feeld

The effect of colonialism on politics is well-documented - but what about on sex and relationships? Here's what you need to know

feeld.co

Britain in early 1900s If you looked at the video, it might as well be Iran or Pakistan, but that isn't the case.
View attachment 1087955

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbElEqm1TQ


Today, this trend is happening again, but backwards; While the first world abandons gender norms, being subject to a low birth rate, ultraconserative migrants are flooding in enforcing gender norms. Just this time, it is not done through force (actually sometimes it may be considering how peaceful those people are) but through replacement.

The point of this post is not to glorify British colonization, but to demonstrate what would happen if a culture adapts wokeness, and this time, Britain is being colonized.

Sand niggs have never believed in the non-binary shit, so I don't know which group your posts refers to specifically that's "ultraconservative". Many beaners are gay too btw.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

Based thread. Wokeness makes for bad culture and a weak civilization. That said, the British are major cucks throughout history and the only reason they were the main world power is that they're an island, and so they developed strong navy. If they weren't they'd be part of France or Germany today.

 

[IncelCream]

Based thread. Wokeness makes for bad culture and a weak civilization. That said, the British are major cucks throughout history and the only reason they were the main world power is that they're an island, and so they developed strong navy. If they weren't they'd be part of France or Germany today.

Major cucks but dominated non white men? so what are non white men?

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

Another evidence that patriarchy = civilization and everything other = barbarism.

 

[slavcel11]

Based thread. Wokeness makes for bad culture and a weak civilization.

wokes can't build a functional soyciety, let alone authentic civilization. It's patriarchs who represent culture and civilization. Foids simply drift along like shit in the river.

 

[slavcel11]

If they weren't they'd be part of France or Germany today.

I wish we lived in more continental, gallocentric or german-centric world. Anglo-saxon dominance has been proven disastrous to europeans and whites in general.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

I wish we lived in more continental, gallocentric or german-centric world. Anglo-saxon dominance has been proven disastrous to europeans and whites in general.

Same. Although now germanic culture has been corrupted.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

wokes can't build a functional soyciety, let alone authentic civilization. It's patriarchs who represent culture and civilization. Foids simply drift along like shit in the river.

Matriarchal societies have all fallen.

 

[Buried Alive 2.0]

Major cucks but dominated non white men? so what are non white men?

Lower IQ or simply different cultures with different objectives.

 

[Chudpreet]

Patriarchal societies have been mogging and dominating matriarchal "societies" since the beginning of human history. All civilizational accomplishments have come from patriarchies, while matriarchy advocates feel the need to point to subhuman tribes in the middle of nowhere to say, "sEE, mAtRiArChY dOeS wOrK, yUo ChUd!"

There is no rational argument that anyone on planet Earth could make to suggest that matriarchy is a superior system to patriarchy. The most powerful nations in the world today may be matriarchies, but they were built on patriarchy (and foidists believe they're still hyperpatriarchal anyway, JFL)

 

[Chudpreet]

Based reply from a thread I made addressing the subject:

Matriarchy advocates using tribes that accomplished nothing and were stone age is a comical example I find. They completely fail to ask the simple questions of why did none of these societies ever move past the stone age and do societies tend to move away from matriarchy as they advance. The answer they'd not like and the reasons they'd like even less.

 

[faded]

It pains me to write this thread, as my own people has been colonized by the British themselves.

But one must not turn an blind eye to the opposition, after all, that mentality is as good as burying your head on the sand.

There is a reason why so many "First nations" got colonized by the British. One aspect was that they were egalitarian! For example, let's read these articles for an reference

The Colonial Roots of Violence Against Native American Women

Native American women in the United States are experiencing a crisis of violence and sexual abuse. Understanding the violence requires acknowledging the colonial roots of this crisis.

www.publichealth.columbia.edu

Indigenous tribes embraced gender fluidity prior to colonisation, but Europeans enforced specific gender roles

Ethnographic research reveals therefore, that prior to the European dominance, there were absolutely no monolithic gender systems in place. The construction of two specific gender identities as non-interchangeable absolutes, was in fact, the invention of the Euro-Western society.

indianexpress.com

How colonialism affects sexuality | Feeld

The effect of colonialism on politics is well-documented - but what about on sex and relationships? Here's what you need to know

feeld.co

Britain in early 1900s If you looked at the video, it might as well be Iran or Pakistan, but that isn't the case.
View attachment 1087955

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbElEqm1TQ


Today, this trend is happening again, but backwards; While the first world abandons gender norms, being subject to a low birth rate, ultraconserative migrants are flooding in enforcing gender norms. Just this time, it is not done through force (actually sometimes it may be considering how peaceful those people are) but through replacement.

The point of this post is not to glorify British colonization, but to demonstrate what would happen if a culture adapts wokeness, and this time, Britain is being colonized.

Stfu mongoloid