Blackpill Braindead feminist goes on an incoherent rant against 'surplus males' while exposing herself as totally clueless on the subject matter

[lifesucksandyoudie]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP94-nMow1Y


This video has been making the rounds recently and it's baffling how nobody has seemingly read the original article this chinlet hag is parroting because feminists are too busy circlejerking over their confirmation bias supposedly being affirmed to push their inane obviously incorrect narratives.
The speaker in the video herself appears to be missing some brain cells and can't tell the difference between definitions of the jargon employed while demonstrating astounding lapses in judgement.

Surplus men just means there are more men than women in the sex ratio of a country and the original way the phrase 'surpass male population' was used in the very publication this feminist is referencing didn't refer to men that women aren't attracted to/men who won't reproduce.
In the paper this midwit reads off in the above linked video, the authors of the paper use the word 'surplus males' to refer to men in the a given country's population when there are more men than women and the authors of that journal don't use the phrase 'surpass males' to refer to incels (men who can't reproduce) since your country can obviously have a population that has an even split of males/females while not having everyone be able to reproduce for both men and women.
This is just more proof how intrinsically retarded all women are, since they can't even read a paper correctly as evident by how they're taking a paper analyzing gender dynamics in Asian countries with highly skewed gender ratios and extrapolating that paper's conclusions to America where the gender ratio is nowhere near as skewed.
Funny thing is she has a husband like every feminist that claims to hate men.

Population of the U.S. by sex| Statista

As of July 1, 2024, there were 168.34 million males and 171.77 million females living in the United States.

www.statista.com

To add even more insult to injury, there's actually MORE women than men in the United States right now as of 2025 and it's been like this for years now. So this era of 'democratic backsliding' this vapid pseudointellectual complains about in the video is occurring when the sex ratio is imbalanced in favor of women which would go against her narrative claiming excess men cause authoritarianism. By her own logic, excess females correlates with decreased democratic rights so this must mean the erosion of our sacred "democratic" institutions must have been caused by women all along . As always, every accusation is merely a projection from them, this can be seen as yet another case of women blaming men for doing something bad which women did instead. As if we needed more evidence that these failures are allergic to accepting responsibility for the consequences of their own actions.

It cannot be understated how shallow and devoid of substance all feminist criticisms are. They're all riddled with inconsistencies or self contradictions, which is a sign of the cognitively subhuman female minds who made them. They always out themselves.

 

[Cuckoja]

With foids its always projecting and evading, if she accuse you of something or says she didn't do it, its exactly what she does.

 

[Grodd]

"Surplus Men" is another term created to justify hatred towards ugly men.

I hope this foid gets raped and killed.

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

The fucking authors of the paper explicitly state you cannot make a comparison between Asia and the West because the situations in the sex ratios of those two places aren't remotely comparable.

"Who are these young surplus males? First, they are not equivalent to the bachelors of the West. Single men in the West are not surplus males."

Despite this outright admission by the authors, the negative IQ whore in the video still tries to make a comparison between Asia and the West anyways and extrapolates gender dynamics from one to the other in spite of this going against her very own sources she's using.
She's either ignoring the essential inconvenient details that get in the way of conforming to her agenda or she's actually so stupid she can't even read her own sources that she used as evidence to back her propaganda. You can't make this shit up. You can't take morons like this seriously. At this point any opinion she possesses has less worth than zero value and should be be disregarded immediately for failing basic quality control measures.

 

[Poopless One]

Dnw

 

[AdolfRizzler]

"Surplus Men" is another term created to justify hatred towards ugly men.

I hope this foid gets raped and killed.

exess male= 90% of male population that are short and ugly, not chad, basically she would kill 90% of men in the first second possible if she has this chance

 

[endoftheskies]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP94-nMow1Y


This video has been making the rounds recently and it's baffling how nobody has seemingly read the original article this chinlet hag is parroting because feminists are too busy circlejerking over their confirmation bias supposedly being affirmed to push their inane obviously incorrect narratives.
The speaker in the video herself appears to be missing some brain cells and can't tell the difference between definitions of the jargon employed while demonstrating astounding lapses in judgement.

Surplus men just means there are more men than women in the sex ratio of a country and the original way the phrase 'surpass male population' was used in the very publication this feminist is referencing didn't refer to men that women aren't attracted to/men who won't reproduce.
In the paper this midwit reads off in the above linked video, the authors of the paper use the word 'surplus males' to refer to men in the a given country's population when there are more men than women and the authors of that journal don't use the phrase 'surpass males' to refer to incels (men who can't reproduce) since your country can obviously have a population that has an even split of males/females while not having everyone be able to reproduce for both men and women.
This is just more proof how intrinsically retarded all women are, since they can't even read a paper correctly as evident by how they're taking a paper analyzing gender dynamics in Asian countries with highly skewed gender ratios and extrapolating that paper's conclusions to America where the gender ratio is nowhere near as skewed.
Funny thing is she has a husband like every feminist that claims to hate men.

Population of the U.S. by sex| Statista

As of July 1, 2024, there were 168.34 million males and 171.77 million females living in the United States.

www.statista.com

To add even more insult to injury, there's actually MORE women than men in the United States right now as of 2025 and it's been like this for years now. So this era of 'democratic backsliding' this vapid pseudointellectual complains about in the video is occurring when the sex ratio is imbalanced in favor of women which would go against her narrative claiming excess men cause authoritarianism. By her own logic, excess females correlates with decreased democratic rights so this must mean the erosion of our sacred "democratic" institutions must have been caused by women all along . As always, every accusation is merely a projection from them, this can be seen as yet another case of women blaming men for doing something bad which women did instead. As if we needed more evidence that these failures are allergic to accepting responsibility for the consequences of their own actions.

It cannot be understated how shallow and devoid of substance all feminist criticisms are. They're all riddled with inconsistencies or self contradictions, which is a sign of the cognitively subhuman female minds who made them. They always out themselves.

she didn't even read the paper. sometimes people need to be butchered or killed. foids are retarded idiots terrible people you know.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

The fucking authors of the paper explicitly state you cannot make a comparison between Asia and the West because the situations in the sex ratios of those two places aren't remotely comparable.
View attachment 1555164

Despite this outright admission by the authors, the negative IQ whore in the video still tries to make a comparison between Asia and the West anyways and extrapolates gender dynamics from one to the other in spite of this going against her very own sources she's using.

Foids will really look at her and think she's high IQ.

 

[Namtriz912]

This is why Afghanistan is superior, no foids are important to educate because this is the end result.

 

[deleted fren]

Women don't understand words.

For whatever reason they assume that surplus means an unnecessary excess that needs to be disposed of.

 

[deleted fren]

she didn't even read the paper. sometimes people need to be butchered or killed. foids are retarded idiots terrible people you know.

Normies and women especially are headline monkeys.

 

[SmhChan]

Women don't understand words.

View attachment 1569819

For whatever reason they assume that surplus means an unnecessary excess that needs to be disposed of.

Foids are the surplus. After giving birth, they have no reason to exist and hog men's resources.

 

[deleted fren]

Foids are the surplus. After giving birth, they have no reason to exist and hog men's resources.

They have no reason to exist if they don't have children.
They're a net negative on society.

 

[SmhChan]

They have no reason to exist if they don't have children.
They're a net negative on society.

Yup! Men tolerate foids' existence because they want an intimate relationship with them. The idea of an intimate relationship doesn't exist anymore. If men didn't desire it, foids would be put down like animals and that'd be logical. We put down animals all the time after we are done with it's use.

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

Im just gonna ignore the retarded video and say this:

She is so fucking ugly that if she was male she would've been arrested just for being in the eye view of a female

Ugly evil bitch face

 

[endoftheskies]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP94-nMow1Y


This video has been making the rounds recently and it's baffling how nobody has seemingly read the original article this chinlet hag is parroting because feminists are too busy circlejerking over their confirmation bias supposedly being affirmed to push their inane obviously incorrect narratives.
The speaker in the video herself appears to be missing some brain cells and can't tell the difference between definitions of the jargon employed while demonstrating astounding lapses in judgement.

Surplus men just means there are more men than women in the sex ratio of a country and the original way the phrase 'surpass male population' was used in the very publication this feminist is referencing didn't refer to men that women aren't attracted to/men who won't reproduce.
In the paper this midwit reads off in the above linked video, the authors of the paper use the word 'surplus males' to refer to men in the a given country's population when there are more men than women and the authors of that journal don't use the phrase 'surpass males' to refer to incels (men who can't reproduce) since your country can obviously have a population that has an even split of males/females while not having everyone be able to reproduce for both men and women.
This is just more proof how intrinsically retarded all women are, since they can't even read a paper correctly as evident by how they're taking a paper analyzing gender dynamics in Asian countries with highly skewed gender ratios and extrapolating that paper's conclusions to America where the gender ratio is nowhere near as skewed.
Funny thing is she has a husband like every feminist that claims to hate men.

Population of the U.S. by sex| Statista

As of July 1, 2024, there were 168.34 million males and 171.77 million females living in the United States.

www.statista.com

To add even more insult to injury, there's actually MORE women than men in the United States right now as of 2025 and it's been like this for years now. So this era of 'democratic backsliding' this vapid pseudointellectual complains about in the video is occurring when the sex ratio is imbalanced in favor of women which would go against her narrative claiming excess men cause authoritarianism. By her own logic, excess females correlates with decreased democratic rights so this must mean the erosion of our sacred "democratic" institutions must have been caused by women all along . As always, every accusation is merely a projection from them, this can be seen as yet another case of women blaming men for doing something bad which women did instead. As if we needed more evidence that these failures are allergic to accepting responsibility for the consequences of their own actions.

It cannot be understated how shallow and devoid of substance all feminist criticisms are. They're all riddled with inconsistencies or self contradictions, which is a sign of the cognitively subhuman female minds who made them. They always out themselves.

Its ALWAYS YOUR FAULT. ITS NEVER MINE. ITS YOUR FAULT. YOU SHOULD BE KILLED FOR IT. TEE-HEEE. DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING IS YOUR FAULTTTTT

 

[Argenfarker]

"Surplus Men" is another term created to justify hatred towards ugly men.

I hope this foid gets raped and killed.

 

[IWWorkER]

"Surplus Men" is another term created to justify hatred towards ugly men.

I hope this foid gets raped and killed.

The fucking authors of the paper explicitly state you cannot make a comparison between Asia and the West because the situations in the sex ratios of those two places aren't remotely comparable.
View attachment 1555164

Despite this outright admission by the authors, the negative IQ whore in the video still tries to make a comparison between Asia and the West anyways and extrapolates gender dynamics from one to the other in spite of this going against her very own sources she's using.
She's either ignoring the essential inconvenient details that get in the way of conforming to her agenda or she's actually so stupid she can't even read her own sources that she used as evidence to back her propaganda. You can't make this shit up. You can't take morons like this seriously. At this point any opinion she possesses has less worth than zero value and should be be disregarded immediately for failing basic quality control measures.

True.

Also, I didnt read the paper yet but I assume "surplus" only refers to necessity for reproduction, these whores seem to forget that if they wiped out 90% men, their world would collapse and they would all starve and freeze to death...
Now that I think of it, this may not be a bad thing...