Autistic social drifter without purpose or home
- Nov 8, 2017
- 67d 40m
Before the series went to shit.
enjoy being forced to go on dates with drug dealer chad and get revenge on incel misogynists lol. Bet you the entire missions will be based around that shitNo freaking way I'm buying this woke piece of rubbish. Most Rockstar employees who created the stories of GTA 5 and 4 have actually left the company. Another dead franchise
They'll also make fewer culturally sensitive jokes. Like, jeez what are they going to make fun of now? Short men and dicklets?enjoy being forced to go on dates with drug dealer chad and get revenge on incel misogynists lol. Bet you the entire missions will be based around that shit
You do realise that a Jewish father doesn't make you Jewish, right? It comes from the mother and Blazkowicz's wife is Polish non-Jewish.Doomguy is a great great grandson of William ((Blazkowicz)) from wolfenstein. Doomguy is kiked!
Female badass is an oxymoron, and stretches suspension of disbelief too far that even normies don't want to see that shit.Based . They actually made a Woke movie (DOOM Annihilation) featuring a FEMALE Doomguy (id Software wasn't involved with it and twitted it the moment it released) and it flopped hard no joke.
the only classes in society that aren't protected, obviously. So billionaires and celebrity's will still be a target by rockstar, but no more race or gender jokes i guess. Fucking soysThey'll also make fewer culturally sensitive jokes. Like, jeez what are they going to make fun of now? Short men and dicklets?
When movies write female protagonists for action movies, they essentially make them men (mentality wise) in women's bodies.Female badass is an oxymoron, and stretches suspension of disbelief too far that even normies don't want to see that shit.
That's a failing formula. They should stick to a more realistic approach: I'm thinking the Melvin "As good as it gets" approach:
Oh, I see what you mean. I have noticed over the years that females keep getting roles that should have been given to a man, but weren't.What I meant is that in 90% of films with female protagonists, you could switch the female protagonist to a male and it would make zero difference to the plot. So since, the roles of the female protagonist are traditionally male roles, why have a woman in the first place?
Based postOh, I see what you mean. I have noticed over the years that females keep getting roles that should have been given to a man, but weren't.
And there really is no reason to have a woman in that role; women have their role, it's as support, caretaker, building up the male characters, as they should be doing in real life, as well. But, this is a new age, as we all know. They want to feel empowered and strong, and yet, real life proves them wrong at every turn, when they still rely on white knights coming to their rescue, daddy government and affirmative action guaranteeing they'll never face any hardship, getting all the same rights as men with none of the responsibility, and being factually, physically weaker than men at every turn. But they gotta have their power trip fantasies, taking the place of men in our media, despite the lack of realism, and to have a woman in the role she belongs in would be decried as "muh soggy knees."