[Bluepill] This might be cope but

[_incelinside]

I believe being a generic chad means that most women will be somewhat attracted to you which is why they can slay on tinder (mainstream appeal). But when it comes to individual women a single chad won't be the most atractive to them personally, they have their individual traits and niches that they prefer in men. Specific phenotypes may not have the mainstream chad appeal but they may be more attractive then a generic chad to a specific subset of women who like those traits.

Is there some truth to this or am I coping too hard?

 

[Deleted member 3291]

Chad is chad

 

[ICanOnlyFapToBDSM]

 

[Robtical]

Maybe, I don't like model looking femoids as much as some of the regular looking ones I see outside.

 

[armentho]

Maybe, I don't like model looking femoids as much as some of the regular looking ones I see outside.

I believe being a generic chad means that most women will be somewhat attracted to you which is why they can slay on tinder (mainstream appeal). But when it comes to individual women a single chad won't be the most atractive to them personally, they have their individual traits and niches that they prefer in men. Specific phenotypes may not have the mainstream chad appeal but they may be more attractive then a generic chad to a specific subset of women who like those traits.

Is there some truth to this or am I coping too hard?

well there is some true

there is something i call ''average beaty''

romantic and social relations depend of a the average beetwen several factors
some more valueble than other depending the individual preferences

(some people will like more ,the muscles than face,other the social skills etc)

but we can predict this personal preferences,so we predict the general and objetive traits that we know the average and majority of poeple like
(looks,money,charisma)

and this individual preferences arent distribuited equally,some parts of the world have more density of some preferences than others

a good example is western,when ''chads'' are a likeble trait
but in other cultures or country can be diferent

 

[kantero]

Maybe, I don't like model looking femoids as much as some of the regular looking ones I see outside.

Agree.

 

[guerillahubris]

females either like opry's/gandy's or chico prettyboys. not much variety to be seen

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

I believe being a generic chad means that most women will be somewhat attracted to you which is why they can slay on tinder (mainstream appeal). But when it comes to individual women a single chad won't be the most atractive to them personally, they have their individual traits and niches that they prefer in men. Specific phenotypes may not have the mainstream chad appeal but they may be more attractive then a generic chad to a specific subset of women who like those traits.

Is there some truth to this or am I coping too hard?

I see a lot of truth in this tbh. Skinny musician looking guys aren’t typically “Chad” but do extremely well within the new-age-hippy / hipster subset of women.

 

[Incelibate anarchist]

I dont think this is a cope. Girls will like an lower tier male more in person.

 

[Itsoverboyos]

Of course females can like a specific niche in a guy, but there always has to be physical attraction. And when you count in the fact that the average woman finds the AVERAGE man UNATTRACTIVE, this really only leaves Chadlites and Chads the possibility to fill a "niche":

So yes there are different types of Chadlites/Chads that femoids might "prefer":
1) Nerd-Chad: wears glasses, plays vidya (Overwatch, Fortnite, CoD), watches some normie animes like DBZ, likes Marvel movies

2) Jock-Chad: very common, athletic, often played sports since he was younger

3) Music-Chad: plays an instrument (mostly guitar or drums) or in a small band, goes to music festivals and concerts, wears generic Band T-Shirts

4) "Bad Boy"-Chad: treats women badly or at least doesn't care about them, has the "IDGAF"-attitude, smokes, has tattoos, aka jerk or "fuckboy", will cheat, often involved in crime (low-tier) or even gangs

5) "Pretty Boy"-Chad: lean, doesn't go to the gym because he doesn't need it to slay, young looking, loved especially among jailbaits

6) Hipster-Chad: has a beard, wears alternative clothes and listens to alternative music

7) Emo-Chad: edgy, wears dark clothing, keeps to himself and is seen as "mysterious", very rare / most Chads are not like this

8) Tyrone: likes basketball, BBC, cucks white betabux soyboys with their wifes and girlfriends, sometimes runs thug game even though he doesn't need it

9) Chang: runs K-Pop game, taller than average Asian, weaboo bitches (often jailbaits) are all over him

There's a few more, but this is already a pretty comprehensive list

 

[seclod]

I believe being a generic chad means that most women will be somewhat attracted to you which is why they can slay on tinder (mainstream appeal). But when it comes to individual women a single chad won't be the most atractive to them personally, they have their individual traits and niches that they prefer in men. Specific phenotypes may not have the mainstream chad appeal but they may be more attractive then a generic chad to a specific subset of women who like those traits.

Is there some truth to this or am I coping too hard?

You are coping with misconstrued ideas.

General attractivness is a sum of individual attractivness.
In mammal populations the alpha is desired by ALL women.

There is always this one guy in every classroom/school situation for instance that EVERY girl wishes they could get with. The alpha.
Think back to your school days and youl'l realise it's true.

Sure they might date separately and as they age they might settle for someone specific. But in the rawest most primal sense it's a one to many relationship.

 

[Robtical]

in the rawest most primal sense it's a one to many relationship.

That's why a lot of dumb femoids need their friend's opinion on how attractive a man is before they can decide themselves. This shows whores have so many options they don't know what they want anymore.

 

[_incelinside]

You are coping with misconstrued ideas.

General attractivness is a sum of individual attractivness.
In mammal populations the alpha is desired by ALL women.

There is always this one guy in every classroom/school situation for instance that EVERY girl wishes they could get with. The alpha.
Think back to your school days and youl'l realise it's true.

Sure they might date separately and as they age they might settle for someone specific. But in the rawest most primal sense it's a one to many relationship.

This is what I meant by mainstream appeal. I doubt there is such thing as a man that can have a 100 percent success/attraction rate with women though as certain opposing features can be attractive or unattractive depending on the individual womans psychology, and general hormone chemistry. If all women were genetically identical then maybe their attraction switches would converge to a single ideal where 1 man is attractive to 100 percent of women. I do agree there is a strong general trend though.

 

[iblamemyself]

I believe that is correct. Some femoids find happiness with an average man. They are not Chad chasers for different reasons, unfortunately most already had a Chad in bed and realized they can't have him/ keep him so a beta will do fine.

 

[Dispair]

Some women love men with green eyes.
That means that they will prefer Chad with green eyes over Chad with blue/brown eyes.
If they can't get Chad they will prefer an average looking guy with green eyes over an average looking guy with blue/brown eyes.
But will they ever prefer an average looking guy with green eyes over Chad with blue/brown eyes? I highly doubt that.