Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blonde HBBs are SCARED of currycels

and all those subhuman Hindu practices like child sacrifice or burning widows alive would have stopped centuries ago.
Yeah, here is a mind colonized sand nigger that believes in pommy Christian missionary propaganda. All the "evil practices" in India that you mentioned are fucking false and were invented by Christian missionaries.
 
OK. Even if you exclude outliers, the average Arab still mogs the average black
I agree, the data backs this up. But it seems many sand nigresses I’ve seen are dating black dudes (as well as white) while I have not seen many sand males dating women of other races. BBCpill is becoming less of a meme overtime it seems.

Yeah, here is a mind colonized sand nigger that believes in pommy Christian missionary propaganda. All the "evil practices" in India that you mentioned are fucking false and were invented by Christian missionaries.
Sati (widow burning) was not invented by christians jfl. It was also documented by Greek travellers who went to India millennia ago.
 
You're actually so demented, it's pathetic. If anything, Islam would have helped you dumbass pajeets stop being so subhuman. You would have started eating beef, you would have racemixed with superior iranians/turks
Indians have Ancient Iranian Neolithic Farmers DNA in them.

The only reason sandniggers could invade India is because the Northerners were cucked with Rajputs and Buddhists. Sandniggers couldn't even enter South India. They brutally lost the battles to vijayanagara empire
 
We sandniggers and curries should not fight among ourself. We should fight against whites together
No thanks. I'm more white than I am indian by a long shot

Screenshot 20240309 174713 Samsung Internet

You sand niggers didn't invent shit.
We have done more than you, especially considering bow our numbers are way lower. Only 600 million Arabs VS like 2 billion Indians

Screenshot 20240216 135412 Samsung Internet
Screenshot 20240216 135321 Samsung Internet

We invented the number system you are using right now. Algebra and trigno functions like sin and cos were invented by India.
JFL no they weren't. Algebra literally is an arab origin word
Posting random shit on internet people who do that for attention doesn't prove a point.

I can do that too


View: https://twitter.com/TheHarrisSultan/status/1648671793211916288


View: https://twitter.com/krewatikoo/status/1767475023714168988

Yeah,the difference is that these Arabs doing this is not necessarily part of our religion, unlike yours.

And even then, there is actual science (not pajeet science) to show that camel urine does have medicinal properties
Never denied pajeets don't have their accomplishments, if anything, this just proves you guys would genuinely be a super power if you abandoned that shitty Demon religion instead of just fantasizing about super proper 2020.

Hinduism does an amazing job at holding India back. That's why sri lanka, which is Buddhist, and Bangaldesh, which is Muslim, both have higher HDI than India, despite both also being pajeets racially
 
OK. Even if you exclude outliers, the average Arab still mogs the average black
Idk man Indians and Arabs aren't that far
Orientalid
Orientalidm

Arabid
Arabidm

Indid
Indidm

They don't look that far.
 
Indians have Ancient Iranian Neolithic Farmers DNA in them.
Yes, the good looking ones do. In fact, research shows the upper castes in india are genetically closer to iranians/afghans lmao
The only reason sandniggers could invade India is because the Northerners were cucked with Rajputs and Buddhists. Sandniggers couldn't even enter South India. They brutally lost the battles to vijayanagara empire
Conquering 90% of a continent full of 1 billion people at the time is still an amazing feat.
 
I trust western scholarship infinitely more than curries. Curries (especially Hindus) have absolutely no ability to discern actual history instead of jerking off their retarded hindu nationalist narrative.
:feelskek:
 
I trust western scholarship infinitely more than curries. Curries (especially Hindus) have absolutely no ability to discern actual history instead of jerking off their retarded hindu nationalist narrative.
Your academics believe in CRT and transgenderism. They are all Marxist dumbfucks. Do you really trust them?
 
I agree, the data backs this up. But it seems many sand nigresses I’ve seen are dating black dudes (as well as white) while I have not seen many sand males dating women of other races. BBCpill is becoming less of a meme overtime it seems.
American Blacks have halo, most full Blacks looks subhuman which makes the American Blacks look like Chads. So they slay more ofc.
 
I agree, the data backs this up. But it seems many sand nigresses I’ve seen are dating black dudes (as well as white) while I have not seen many sand males dating women of other races. BBCpill is becoming less of a meme overtime it seems.
Well,this is just anecdote at this point. I could also mention how my brothers have both been asked out by white/hapa girls or how many latina/black women seem to be into arab men.

Although I don't deny man arab women do go for black/white guys. But that still doesn't change SMV ultimately.
 
Yeah, here is a mind colonized sand nigger that believes in pommy Christian missionary propaganda. All the "evil practices" in India that you mentioned are fucking false and were invented by Christian missionaries.
This is a hilarious cope, pajeet. Just yesterday I saw a video on Twitter of indians carrying around a corpse of a child cut in half in a child sacrifice ritual
 
I trust western scholarship infinitely more than curries. Curries (especially Hindus) have absolutely no ability to discern actual history instead of jerking off their retarded hindu nationalist narrative.
Don't argue with him he is
No, gulf arabs have longer faces, better jaws, and bigger/thinner noses. It makes them more masculine.

View attachment 1089063View attachment 1089064

And this is just Gulf arabs, I'm talking all arabs/menas

View attachment 1089058View attachment 1089059View attachment 1089060View attachment 1089061View attachment 1089062
Orientalids and arabids refers to all MENAs and Indid refers to all Indians. By that standard Indo Nordics mog all of them
Indonordicm
 
There was a collaboration between Hindus Sikhs and Muslims to fight the British. It was the Muslim scholars that fought the British in 1857, employing large groups of locals jihadists and regiments of suicide attackers.

India would be much better off Islamic.
Muslim indians put up the most resistance against Anglo chimps. It's why these anglos, like the jews that they are, had to invent a subversive new branch of Islam, Ahamdism, to subvert the jihad of the indian muslims
 
We have done more than you, especially considering bow our numbers are way lower. Only 600 million Arabs VS like 2 billion Indians
Agreed. Suicide bomb vest is a amazing invention
JFL no they weren't. Algebra literally is an arab origin word
1710346943616

Yeah,the difference is that these Arabs doing this is not necessarily part of our religion, unlike yours.

And even then, there is actual science (not pajeet science) to show that camel urine does have medicinal properties
Ok camel urine drinker. Cow shit is thing the north most does. It's NOT present in any of our religious scriptures
Yes, the good looking ones do. In fact, research shows the upper castes in india are genetically closer to iranians/afghans lmao

Conquering 90% of a continent full of 1 billion people at the time is still an amazing feat.
You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. All the castes are WELL mixed in DNA.

You couldn't reach the South
Hinduism does an amazing job at holding India back. That's why sri lanka, which is Buddhist, and Bangaldesh, which is Muslim, both have higher HDI than India, despite both also being pajeets racially
Sri Lanka literally lives of our money dipshit. We are underdeveloped because of 60 years of socialism

India's development in a freer market and Hinduism
1710347296474
 
Your academics believe in CRT and transgenderism. They are all Marxist dumbfucks. Do you really trust them?
No, but there are degrees of trustworthiness. If there are literal Greek writings talking about Indians burning widows then there’s not much to debate about. Proper recording of history as study came from the Greeks mostly, and Indians (along with most cultures) never had a tradition of looking back to record objective history. Hindus are notoriously some of the most retarded and delusional when it comes to historical revisionism even today.
 
Hinduism does an amazing job at holding India back. That's why sri lanka, which is Buddhist, and Bangaldesh, which is Muslim, both have higher HDI than India, despite both also being pajeets racially
Each states has its unique culture in india, its not just north and south. It's like country hopping like Europe, if you go more to the south part of India, they will be more accepting of Muslims eventhough being more hindus , I've seen it myself. You can see some states are more or par with srilanka or Bangladesh. It's not about religion, it's about development bro...

This is the hdi;
1710347273181
 
if you go more to the south part of India, they will be more accepting of Muslims eventhough being more hindus
That because they were not invaded. North Muslims are radicalized. South Indian muslims except Kerala are good people. Hyderabadi mulims are cool
 
No, but there are degrees of trustworthiness. If there are literal Greek writings talking about Indians burning widows then there’s not much to debate about. Proper recording of history as study came from the Greeks mostly, and Indians (along with most cultures) never had a tradition of looking back to record objective history. Hindus are notoriously some of the most retarded and delusional when it comes to historical revisionism even today.
That's only royals. The missionaries are claiming as if millions of people were emulated. British killed people in famines like this. More people dies in this


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/zihk1b/people_shrunk_to_their_skeletons_man_made_famine
 
Muslim indians put up the most resistance against Anglo chimps. It's why these anglos, like the jews that they are, had to invent a subversive new branch of Islam, Ahamdism, to subvert the jihad of the indian muslims
Don't argue he is a Hindu nationalist who believes India is a utopia. He would never accept bad things about India. And drinking cow piss and sati(in ancient times it's abolished now) is as rare as those Arabs drinking camel piss.
 
Don't argue with him he is

Orientalids and arabids refers to all MENAs and Indid refers to all Indians. By that standard Indo Nordics mog all of them
View attachment 1089089
Wait he’s a Hindu?

That's only royals. The missionaries are claiming as if millions of people were emulated. British killed people in famines like this. More people dies in this


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/zihk1b/people_shrunk_to_their_skeletons_man_made_famine

You are resorting to a whataboutism now. Just because the British East India Company caused a famine doesn’t take away anything from British scholarship, nor does it legitimize hindu history revisionism in any way jfl.
 
Don't argue he is a Hindu nationalist who believes India is a utopia. He would never accept bad things about India. And drinking cow piss and sati(in ancient times it's abolished now) is as rare as those Arabs drinking camel piss.
Some parts indian cultures are bad, but yeah man Europeans also used unhealthy medivel practices that could be considered crime now until they civilized. I won't deny it. Cultural shift is important
 
You are resorting to a whataboutism now. Just because the British East India Company caused a famine doesn’t take away anything from British scholarship, nor does it legitimize hindu history revisionism in any way jfl.
He always resorts to what aboutism
 
Some parts indian cultures are bad, but yeah man Europeans also used unhealthy medivel practices that could be considered crime now. I won't deny it. Cultural shift is important
True
 
You are resorting to a whataboutism now. Just because the British East India Company caused a famine doesn’t take away anything from British scholarship, nor does it legitimize hindu history revisionism in any way jfl.
Not famine but famineS. They were claiming millions were killed in Sati that which is untrue.

After independence only 20 committed sati. But untouchablity is still present in India. Both are outlawed

Untouchablity was present in India but Sati was not.
 
Last edited:
This is a hilarious cope, pajeet. Just yesterday I saw a video on Twitter of indians carrying around a corpse of a child cut in half in a child sacrifice ritual
Proof or didn't happen and also in from which scripture did they base that practice from?
 
India is a shit hole.

No, the cow shit part is rare in South but is present in North but it isn't present in our scriptures

“One should always bathe, using cow-dung at the time. One should sit on dried cowdung. One should never cast one's urine and excreta and other secretions on cowdung. One should never obstruct kine in any way. One should eat, sitting on a cowhide purified by dipping it in water, and then cast one's eyes towards the west,”



63D8C0DA 5593 4656 A3CE A15ACAE624B9


“Pañca-gavya, the five products received from the cow, namely milk, yogurt, ghee, cow dung and cow urine, are required in all ritualistic ceremonies performed according to the Vedic directions. Cow urine and cow dung are uncontaminated, and since even the urine and dung of a cow are important, we can just imagine how important this animal is for human civilization…”
-Srimad Bhagavatam 8.8.11

In the urine of cows dwells the Ganges, prosperity (dwells) in the dust (rising from their couch), good fortune in cow dung, and virtue in saluting them. Therefore should they be constantly saluted.
Vishnu Smriti 23.61

 

“One should always bathe, using cow-dung at the time. One should sit on dried cowdung. One should never cast one's urine and excreta and other secretions on cowdung. One should never obstruct kine in any way. One should eat, sitting on a cowhide purified by dipping it in water, and then cast one's eyes towards the west,”



View attachment 1089114

“Pañca-gavya, the five products received from the cow, namely milk, yogurt, ghee, cow dung and cow urine, are required in all ritualistic ceremonies performed according to the Vedic directions. Cow urine and cow dung are uncontaminated, and since even the urine and dung of a cow are important, we can just imagine how important this animal is for human civilization…”
-Srimad Bhagavatam 8.8.11

In the urine of cows dwells the Ganges, prosperity (dwells) in the dust (rising from their couch), good fortune in cow dung, and virtue in saluting them. Therefore should they be constantly saluted.
Vishnu Smriti 23.61

I am a Jain :cool:
 
“One should always bathe, using cow-dung at the time. One should sit on dried cowdung. One should never cast one's urine and excreta and other secretions on cowdung. One should never obstruct kine in any way. One should eat, sitting on a cowhide purified by dipping it in water, and then cast one's eyes towards the west,”
:feelskek: good laughs
 
Not famine but famineS.
And? That’s still a whataboutism.

They were claiming millions were killed in Sati that which is untrue.

After independence only 20 committed sati. But untouchablity is still present in India. Both are outlawed
Yeah, cause the British abolished it. Even caste untouchability is not encouraged now because it went against British values. Before that, all things that were against caste discrimination were because of the Muslims, Buddhists, and other religions in India.

I am a Jain :cool:
Idk why you are defending hindu nationalist retardation then. Jains are pretty based from what I know.
 
Thus phenotype is almost exclusively in Afghanistan, North Pakistan, and Iran. Afghans are genetically closer to MENAs than to pajeets
It's Kashmiri and Nothern Pakistani and they are not genetically closer to MENAs
Images   2024 03 13T215254645
 
Thus phenotype is almost exclusively in Afghanistan, North Pakistan, and Iran. Afghans are genetically closer to MENAs than to pajeets
This is actually not true. Afghans are just like other curries but with more steppe ancestry. Iranians have lots of Mediterranean and arab mixture due to history.
 
Yeah, cause the British abolished it. Even caste untouchability is not encouraged now because it went against British values. Before that, all things that were against caste discrimination were because of the Muslims, Buddhists, and other religions in India.
I don't know about Buddhism and other religions, but I have more trust on Buddhism religion in abolishing caste system. Islam still had some kind of caste system for new converts, I can assure you.

In South Asian Muslim society a distinction is made between the ashrāf (Arabic, plural of shārīf, “nobleman”), who are supposedly descendants of Muslim Arab immigrants, and the non-ashrāf, who are Hindu converts. The ashrāf group is further divided into four subgroups: (1) Sayyids, originally a designation of descendants of Muhammad through his daughter Fāṭimah and son-in-law ʿAlī, (2) Shaykhs (Arabic: “Chiefs”), mainly descendants of Arab or Persian immigrants but also including some converted Rājputs, (3) Pashtuns, members of Pashto-speaking tribes in Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan, and (4) Mughals, persons of Turkish origin, who came into India with the Mughal armies.
I link you this study;h

 
Idk why you are defending hindu nationalist retardation then. Jains are pretty based from what I know.
Hindutva = hindu nationalist
Hinduism is shit agreed. But still people are spread lies in the name of it's criticisms.

Hindutva is more than that Hindusism. It's like comparing Nazism and Christianity. We call for decoloniality in our institutions mainly the courts
 
Yeah, cause the British abolished it. Even caste untouchability is not encouraged now because it went against British values. Before that, all things that were against caste discrimination were because of the Muslims, Buddhists, and other religions in India.
Buddha was castist

1710349310286
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top