Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Blaming simps instead of women is female hypoagency

mlcurrycel

mlcurrycel

Marxist-Rodgerist
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Posts
6,527


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBgcjtE0xrE



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejTZJamw1Tw


To transfer blame for the current state of affairs from women to their simps is alleviating female humans of their moral responsibility to not be complete whores and harlots.

Is it completely unrealistic to expect women to stop their dysgenic behaviour of their own accord? Yes. They will continue to enjoy the bluepill system until it collapses on them. Women cannot be expected to do the right thing.

However, blaming simps and white knights for women's behaviour is no different than normies telling incels to "just volcelmaxx bro". Yes, simps are enabling their behaviour, but even without simping, you can still have incel love deserts like Japan where sex work is rampant and women use prostitution to fund their Chad chasing.

At the end of the day, telling simps to go MGTOW will never fix the issue. They are closer to dogs than philosophers anyways. Only enacting enforced monogamy can solve this issue.

Remember your ABCs - Always Blame Cunts
 
dont care

i hate soys
 
Women lack grey matter in their brains, we men shouldn't have allowed this cucked postmodernist shit in the first place
 
@blackpillscience
 
Last edited:
Women lack grey matter in their brains, we men shouldn't have allowed this cucked postmodernist shit in the first place
You are what OP is talking about.
 
Both are problematic, but men are stronger and have a duty to control foids in a societal level, yet they liberate them and let themselves be weakened

Remember, men created TikTok, Instagram, and tinder
 
Women lack grey matter in their brains, we men shouldn't have allowed this cucked postmodernist shit in the first place
I agree. But every empire becomes feminist just before collapse. That's because empires create banking industries / kresitwirtschaft, combined with women inheriting property.

You are what OP is talking about.
I don't disagree with simp blamers, I just want them to understand that mgtowmaxxing is an individual solution and not a systemic one.
 
You are what OP is talking about.
I know. We are still the smarter sex, when being in full control of politics we decided to allow feminist shit because we chose to. Women have the power men allow them to have.

No wonder Afghanis go full paranoid :feelsjuice:
 
when being in full control of politics
Which we aren't right now.
Women have the power men allow them to have
Yeah, and they deserve the blame for how they use it. Until their rights are revoked, they should be treated the same as men when it comes to consequences of their actions.
 
Both are problematic, but men are stronger and have a duty to control foids in a societal level, yet they liberate them and let themselves be weakened

Remember, men created TikTok, Instagram, and tinder
Men never intended to undermine themselves. Their optimism, male mother need, and women are wonderful effect caused them to make these mistakes.
 
Women lack grey matter in their brains, we men shouldn't have allowed this cucked postmodernist shit in the first place
They allowed it because there are more foids than males in this fucked up planet
 
Men never intended to undermine themselves. Their optimism, male mother need, and women are wonderful effect caused them to make these mistakes.
Men are stupidly competitive, and I use "stupidly" not in the meaning of "very" but rather the meaning of "dumb"

See, the men supports foid rights benefit from them, even if it's a little conversation with a female.

A group of foids would share a cake among themselves, while a group of men rather either have one guy taking all of the cakes, or trash the cake and thus no one gets to eat it.

The reality is, if men controlled society again all of them would benefit, maybe chads would sacrifice a little and CEOs of tinder would lose their income, but most men would benefit
 
I know. We are still the smarter sex, when being in full control of politics we decided to allow feminist shit because we chose to. Women have the power men allow them to have.

No wonder Afghanis go full paranoid :feelsjuice:
You have to understand the chain of causality that lead us to this point. Male disposability and intra-sexual competition combine to cause both a surplus of women as well as a general distrust of men.

This leads to rich men losing all of their sons in wars and pandemics and deciding to give their inheritance to their daughters instead of male relatives. These daughters start funding gynocentric movements, whether feminist or traditional.

Trade and banking also allows those who own property to accumulate wealth instead of those who work. This helps daughters of rich men to accumulate power.
 
You have to understand the chain of causality that lead us to this point. Male disposability and intra-sexual competition combine to cause both a surplus of women as well as a general distrust of men.

This leads to rich men losing all of their sons in wars and pandemics and deciding to give their inheritance to their daughters instead of male relatives. These daughters start funding gynocentric movements, whether feminist or traditional.

Trade and banking also allows those who own property to accumulate wealth instead of those who work. This helps daughters of rich men to accumulate power.
I don't blame wars. Countries that barely sees war, such as Nordic countries, are also very gynocentric

On the contray, war countries like Russia and Syria are less gynocentric
 
They allowed it because there are more foids than males in this fucked up planet
Yes.
Men are stupidly competitive, and I use "stupidly" not in the meaning of "very" but rather the meaning of "dumb"

See, the men supports foid rights benefit from them, even if it's a little conversation with a female.

A group of foids would share a cake among themselves, while a group of men rather either have one guy taking all of the cakes, or trash the cake and thus no one gets to eat it.

The reality is, if men controlled society again all of them would benefit, maybe chads would sacrifice a little and CEOs of tinder would lose their income, but most men would benefit
Yes.
 
Which we aren't right now.

Yeah, and they deserve the blame for how they use it. Until their rights are revoked, they should be treated the same as men when it comes to consequences of their actions.
toilets rights will never be revoked. At best we will get things like abortion banned.

We are at a point of no return, cuck culture is everywhere except Afghanistan and maybe some sub Saharian countries, and they behave like animals :feelzez:
 
I don't blame wars. Countries that barely sees war, such as Nordic countries, are also very gynocentric

On the contray, war countries like Russia and Syria are less gynocentric
1. Russia and Syria are gynocentric.
2. Western Europe became cucked after losing millions of men in both World Wars.
 
toilets rights will never be revoked. At best we will get things like abortion banned.

We are at a point of no return, cuck culture is everywhere except Afghanistan and maybe some sub Saharian countries, and they behave like animals :feelzez:
We must walk away and create Incelistan.
 
toilets rights will never be revoked
So stop averting blame from them. They should be treated the same as men, isn't that what they want?
 
toilets rights will never be revoked. At best we will get things like abortion banned.

We are at a point of no return, cuck culture is everywhere except Afghanistan and maybe some sub Saharian countries, and they behave like animals :feelzez:
It's a good start. Better than nothing.
 
So stop averting blame from them. They should be treated the same as men, isn't that what they want?
It's silly for men to point out women are animals without also admitting that men are also animals. I don't care who gets blamed as long as Incels focus on Incelistan.
 
@blackpillscience
How do you get custom images in your signature? Mine wont let me copy and paste images ive created or enter the image adress
 
You have to understand the chain of causality that lead us to this point. Male disposability and intra-sexual competition combine to cause both a surplus of women as well as a general distrust of men.

This leads to rich men losing all of their sons in wars and pandemics and deciding to give their inheritance to their daughters instead of male relatives. These daughters start funding gynocentric movements, whether feminist or traditional.

Trade and banking also allows those who own property to accumulate wealth instead of those who work. This helps daughters of rich men to accumulate power.
Rich man's kids didn't use to die in wars. Feminism started with shit like liberalism and socialism :feelskek:

If you have lack of tradition but also lack of science this is what happens. No Marxism Rodgerism for a point of no return :feelsjuice:
 
How do you get custom images in your signature? Mine wont let me copy and paste images ive created or enter the image adress
Upload on imgur and paste link in signature
 
I agree. Simps and foids share the blame. One is the enabler and the other the evil doer.
 
Rich man's kids didn't use to die in wars. Feminism started with shit like liberalism and socialism :feelskek:

If you have lack of tradition but also lack of science this is what happens. No Marxism Rodgerism for a point of no return :feelsjuice:
Come on bro, Ancient Rome had cavalry recruited from rich families. Medieval knights were the rich men of the time. Even today, rich kids are more likely to join Air Force than incel infantry.
 
I agree. Simps and foids share the blame. One is the enabler and the other the evil doer.
Society must be ruled by a minority of high IQ blackpill incels. The majority of men are closer to oxen or dogs than philosopher kings.
 
Come on bro, Ancient Rome had cavalry recruited from rich families. Medieval knights were the rich men of the time. Even today, rich kids are more likely to join Air Force than incel infantry.
You'll never see daddy's boy on the front lines :feelsseriously:

No marxism rodgerism ever, not even close. I have assumed humanity is doomed so I will at least enjoy watching this shit show till I die :feelsPop:
 
Rich man's kids didn't use to die in wars. Feminism started with shit like liberalism and socialism :feelskek:

If you have lack of tradition but also lack of science this is what happens. No Marxism Rodgerism for a point of no return :feelsjuice:
Long before liberalism, many ancient empires gave women power right before collapsing.
 
It is still simps fault though, without simps we could simply accept women are low iq whores incapable of deep unbiased thought and let them slut out, but then also not allow them to vote or be in leadership positions.
You don't blame a child for the influence inflicted on them
 
You'll never see daddy's boy on the front lines :feelsseriously:

No marxism rodgerism ever, not even close. I have assumed humanity is doomed so I will at least enjoy watching this shit show till I die :feelsPop:
Theodore Roosevelt III (/ˈroʊzəvɛlt/ ROH-zə-velt; September 13, 1887 – July 12, 1944), often known as Theodore Jr.,[1][Note 1] was an American government, business, and military leader. He was the eldest son of President Theodore Roosevelt and First Lady Edith Roosevelt. Roosevelt is known for his World War II service, including the directing of troops at Utah Beach during the Normandy landings, for which he received the Medal of Honor.
 
It is still simps fault though, without simps we could simply accept women are low iq whores incapable of deep unbiased thought and let them slut out, but then also not allow them to vote or be in leadership positions.
You don't blame a child for the influence inflicted on them
That's why I mentioned Japan
 
You'll never see daddy's boy on the front lines :feelsseriously:

No marxism rodgerism ever, not even close. I have assumed humanity is doomed so I will at least enjoy watching this shit show till I die :feelsPop:
Quentin Roosevelt I (November 19, 1897 – July 14, 1918) was the youngest son of President Theodore Roosevelt and First Lady Edith Roosevelt. Inspired by his father and siblings, he joined the United States Army Air Service where he became a pursuit pilot during World War I.[1] He was killed in aerial combat over France on Bastille Day (July 14), 1918. He is the only child of a U.S. president to have died in combat.[2]
 
Theodore Roosevelt III (/ˈroʊzəvɛlt/ ROH-zə-velt; September 13, 1887 – July 12, 1944), often known as Theodore Jr.,[1][Note 1] was an American government, business, and military leader. He was the eldest son of President Theodore Roosevelt and First Lady Edith Roosevelt. Roosevelt is known for his World War II service, including the directing of troops at Utah Beach during the Normandy landings, for which he received the Medal of Honor.
Not immune to death, just less likely.
 
Not immune to death, just less likely.
Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt (April 9, 1894 – October 13, 1979) was a distinguished U.S. Army officer and commander of U.S. forces in both World War I and II, and the fifth child of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. In both conflicts he was wounded. He earned the Silver Star with three oak leaf clusters, Purple Heart with oak leaf cluster and the French Croix de Guerre. After World War II, he became a successful businessman and the founder of a New York City bond brokerage house, as well as a spokesman for conservative political causes.[1]
 
Not immune to death, just less likely.
Kermit Roosevelt MC (October 10, 1889 – June 4, 1943) was an American businessman, soldier, explorer, and writer. A son of Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, Kermit graduated from Harvard College, served in both World Wars (with both the British and U.S. Armies), and explored two continents with his father. He fought a lifelong battle with depression and died by suicide while serving in the US Army in Alaska during World War II.[1]
 
Not immune to death, just less likely.
Prince Joachim Franz Humbert of Prussia (17 December 1890 – 18 July 1920) was the youngest son and sixth child of Wilhelm II, German Emperor, by his first wife, Augusta Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein. He committed suicide at age 29. Prince Joachim was educated as an officer and participated in the First World War. During the war, he was considered a candidate for several newly established monarchies in Europe.
 
Not immune to death, just less likely.
Raised at the cadet corps of Plön Castle, Prince Eitel was in the front line from the beginning of World War I and was wounded at Bapaume, where he commanded the Prussian First Foot Guards. He temporarily relinquished command to Count Hans von Blumenthal, but returned to duty before the end of the year. The following year, he was transferred to the Eastern Front. During the summer of 1915, he was out in a field in Russia when he had a chance encounter with Manfred von Richthofen, who had just crashed with his superior officer, Count Holck. The two men were hiding in a nearby tree line from what they thought was the advancing Russian army and who turned out to be the grenadiers, guardsmen, and officers of Prince Eitel.
 
Prince Joachim Franz Humbert of Prussia (17 December 1890 – 18 July 1920) was the youngest son and sixth child of Wilhelm II, German Emperor, by his first wife, Augusta Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein. He committed suicide at age 29. Prince Joachim was educated as an officer and participated in the First World War. During the war, he was considered a candidate for several newly established monarchies in Europe.
Kermit Roosevelt MC (October 10, 1889 – June 4, 1943) was an American businessman, soldier, explorer, and writer. A son of Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, Kermit graduated from Harvard College, served in both World Wars (with both the British and U.S. Armies), and explored two continents with his father. He fought a lifelong battle with depression and died by suicide while serving in the US Army in Alaska during World War II.[1]
Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt (April 9, 1894 – October 13, 1979) was a distinguished U.S. Army officer and commander of U.S. forces in both World War I and II, and the fifth child of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. In both conflicts he was wounded. He earned the Silver Star with three oak leaf clusters, Purple Heart with oak leaf cluster and the French Croix de Guerre. After World War II, he became a successful businessman and the founder of a New York City bond brokerage house, as well as a spokesman for conservative political causes.[1]
Not immune to death, just less likely.
 
Society must be ruled by a minority of high IQ blackpill incels. The majority of men are closer to oxen or dogs than philosopher kings.
I agree, even though I'm a libertarian. If left unchecked, forces of evil (foids, kikes, simps, boomers) will use their freedom do end the freedom of others.
 
I agree. Simps and foids share the blame. One is the enabler and the other the evil doer.

It is still simps fault though, without simps we could simply accept women are low iq whores incapable of deep unbiased thought and let them slut out, but then also not allow them to vote or be in leadership positions.
You don't blame a child for the influence inflicted on them

I agree, even though I'm a libertarian. If left unchecked, forces of evil (foids, kikes, simps, boomers) will use their freedom do end the freedom of others.
High iq and based replies
 
I agree, even though I'm a libertarian. If left unchecked, forces of evil (foids, kikes, simps, boomers) will use their freedom do end the freedom of others.
I used to be a libertarian, used to go to Mises.org and read all the books and PDFs, etc.

I stopped being a libertarian when I realised some people are naturally followers, and that power vacuums would just be replaced by low IQ alpha violent degenerates. Government by incels is better than government by darktriadmaxxing gang bangers.

I think a patriarchal socialist society is the most benign form of government. I'll admit I'm scared what would happen if cuckolds infiltrate the government, so civil liberties are important, as well as the independence to afford those liberties.
 
I used to be a libertarian, used to go to Mises.org and read all the books and PDFs, etc.

I stopped being a libertarian when I realised some people are naturally followers, and that power vacuums would just be replaced by low IQ alpha violent degenerates. Government by incels is better than government by darktriadmaxxing gang bangers.

I think a patriarchal socialist society is the most benign form of government. I'll admit I'm scared what would happen if cuckolds infiltrate the government, so civil liberties are important, as well as the independence to afford those liberties.
Based and high IQ. You put it so clearly how libertarianism fails. There will always power hungry and corrupt politicians looking to take advantage of freedoms and a power vacuum.

I wouldn't go through the socialist route. There are forms of authoritarianism without centering the economy on the state. One of the most important liberties is the one to own guns. The state can't have a monopoly on violence because once it is corrupt there is no stopping it.
 
Based and high IQ. You put it so clearly how libertarianism fails. There will always power hungry and corrupt politicians looking to take advantage of freedoms and a power vacuum.

I wouldn't go through the socialist route. There are forms of authoritarianism without centering the economy on the state. One of the most important liberties is the one to own guns. The state can't have a monopoly on violence because once it is corrupt there is no stopping it.
2021 thefunhouseofideology meetup

Socialist Vietnam teaches highschool kids how to field strip AKs. Socialist countries were not as anti-gun as they are accused of being.

Rich men could betray us because they could get pussy without patriarchy. Billionaires get more whores today than what medieveal nobles could get in the Dark Ages. Rich men will want to weaken patriarchy to avoid international condemnation and increase consumerism which is female-led and makes them more profit.

Rich men cannot be trusted. Even if Incelistan is capitalist, we will need a wealth cap at the very least. I think patriarchal socialism is just safer in the long term.

Rome, France, England, America, they all became feminist. What will make us different?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top