If someone conducts exhaustive research to fully understand the Blackpill, it will become obvious that the Blackpill can't be debunked.
The Blackpill is the foundation of reality. Lookism sits deep down inside us.
It's like a primordial force of nature.
It can't be argued against.
It's like arguing against the shape of the Earth or pedophilia within the government. It's an objective truth.
A person who says this word doesn't disprove the fact that looks don't matter. On the contrary, this person is proving the Blackpill because they agree that looks are important.
This argument also confirms the Blackpill. Why should a person lower their standards? Because otherwise, they have a low chance of finding a girlfriend, aka the Blackpill.
By saying that someone must lower their standards, this person is admitting that most people are beyond their reach, which means they have a harder time finding a girlfriend, aka the Blackpill.
What if someone is a 3/10? People who are 3/10 as a whole are rare, so not only are people above their tier beyond their reach, but people who are equal are few and far between, aka the Blackpill again.
This is also the Blackpill. If someone needs to take care of themselves, that means their natural look is insufficient, so they need to rely on looksmaxing.
If someone needs a barber to cover their balding, a gym to compensate for short height, etc., then they are admitting the Blackpill because their natural look is not enough.
If the view of an unattractive man with a girlfriend is so shocking, that means it's very rare and doesn't happen too often. People who use this argument fall for survivorship bias and are ignoring hordes of unfortunate men who weren't lucky and didn't meet women with low standards.
The Blackpill can be fake only when one of these two situations occurs:
The Blackpill is the foundation of reality. Lookism sits deep down inside us.
It's like a primordial force of nature.
It can't be argued against.
It's like arguing against the shape of the Earth or pedophilia within the government. It's an objective truth.
A person who says this word doesn't disprove the fact that looks don't matter. On the contrary, this person is proving the Blackpill because they agree that looks are important.
This argument also confirms the Blackpill. Why should a person lower their standards? Because otherwise, they have a low chance of finding a girlfriend, aka the Blackpill.
By saying that someone must lower their standards, this person is admitting that most people are beyond their reach, which means they have a harder time finding a girlfriend, aka the Blackpill.
What if someone is a 3/10? People who are 3/10 as a whole are rare, so not only are people above their tier beyond their reach, but people who are equal are few and far between, aka the Blackpill again.
This is also the Blackpill. If someone needs to take care of themselves, that means their natural look is insufficient, so they need to rely on looksmaxing.
If someone needs a barber to cover their balding, a gym to compensate for short height, etc., then they are admitting the Blackpill because their natural look is not enough.
If the view of an unattractive man with a girlfriend is so shocking, that means it's very rare and doesn't happen too often. People who use this argument fall for survivorship bias and are ignoring hordes of unfortunate men who weren't lucky and didn't meet women with low standards.
The Blackpill can be fake only when one of these two situations occurs:
- Looks are completely meaningless in finding a partner. The existence of the words "ugly" and "handsome/pretty/beautiful" confirms the existence of the dichotomy of looks and the Blackpill.
- Every man has an equal chance of finding a woman. A bald, short man with a recessed chin has an equal chance as a tall, sharp-jawed guy with full hair.
