
The Incel Decade
Banned
-
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
- Posts
- 2,110
True, but in the past men could just tell them to fuck off and go out and do male stuff.
Chads could. Maybe 100 years ago but In reality most men are whimps when it comes to women.
True, but in the past men could just tell them to fuck off and go out and do male stuff.
Spoken like a truecel with no friends, I'm sorry mate but you are coping to make yourself feel better about having no friends by claiming female friendships are better than male ones.
Friendship and brotherhood among men is much stronger and deeper than female friends,
Humans eat meat though. Brains are very resource intensive. We need animal fat and protein to power our bodies.We don't need much strength to climb trees and eat tropical fruits. It's not like humans are carnivores or something.
How much of this is due to society though? Was this true 100 years ago? If not, what changed?JFL at calling yourself incels and thinking you have friends.
You can cope all you want but statistics don't lie.
White, heterosexual men have the fewest friends of anyone in America, according to a 2006 analysis of two decades of data published in the American Sociological Review.
Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades on JSTOR
Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, Matthew E. Brashears, Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades, American Sociological Review, Vol. 71, No. 3 (Jun., 2006), pp. 353-375www.jstor.org
1. I was in different social circles, when I moved on to other things the contact with those people faded away completely. We stopped calling each other. Like I said, male friendships almost always revolve around a specific activity. They don't last and they aren't particularly deep. I never discussed any personal things with those friends.
2. Well there you go.
It's not about amount of friends, it's about the quality. Your post claimed that females had better friendships not more friendships.White, heterosexual men have the fewest friends of anyone in America,
Humans eat cooked meat, not raw meat like other carnivores or omnivores do. Try eating raw meat and you'll have pain in your stomach for 5 days. This is due to the fact that the PH in our stomach is designed to digest plant foods.Humans eat meat though. Brains are very resource intensive. We need animal fat and protein to power our bodies.
It's not about amount of friends, it's about the quality. Your post claimed that females had better friendships not more friendships.
Again, this is prehistorical humanity. Modern humans have evolved diets based on agriculture. Early hominids were omnivores by necessity. We've been hunting for thousands of years prior to agriculture. Why did humans evolve hunting behavior if getting the required nutrients were as simple as climbing trees? Think critically. How many trees are there in the vast savannas and grasslands of Africa and Asia? And part of the reasons our brains evolved to such large proportions is that we learned to cook meat.Humans eat cooked meat, not raw meat like other carnivores or omnivores do. Try eating raw meat and you'll have pain in your stomach for 5 days. This is due to the fact that the PH in our stomach is designed to digest plant foods.
Our body doesn't care whether the protein we get is animal protein or plant protein. It's the same thing. Anyway, humans don't need that much strength to climb trees and collect food (fruits).
So you just said yourself that you never developed deep friendships, it onyl revolved around specific activities, and you never discussed any personal things.
1. How is that an indictment on men as a whole? That sounds just like an indictment on your experiences, on your friends.
You never discussed anything personal? Ok... why not?
Ok.... Are you suggesting that he should have not pursued a wife/family or not buy a house somewhere where he could afford to live just so we could still go out for beers every Friday night?
How does that prove your point? If anything, it proves MY point. That even after him getting married and buying a house and moving away, things that happen in life.... we still talk all the time and are good friends.
You keep dodging my question/point. How much of this is influenced by society? Why is it considered acceptable for a woman to have this much say in the first place? This wasn't true 100 years ago.This just proves that men value wives more than their male friends. Meanwhile Stacy forces her betabuxxer husband to buy a house somewhere near her female friends.
To be fair, what people consider as a friend differs between individuals. Females seem to have a much lower standard for one to be recognised as a friend, I still stand by my initial points.The studies also proved that female friendships last longer and have more friendships that last for life. Men move on to other things and lose their previous circle of friends.
he probably didn't realize he was repeating feminist propaganda when he made this thread. that's why he's not addressing this pointYou keep dodging my question/point. How much of this is influenced by society? Why is it considered acceptable for a woman to have this much say in the first place? This wasn't true 100 years ago.
First of all, statistics prove that males have fewer friends and that even those friends are very temporary and based on activities.
Secondly, I'm not speaking for myself only but for other men I knew as well. Even the popular social men never had any deep friendships with anyone, just large circles of friends and they constantly talked shit to each other.
Because if you admit personal things to other men that you're for example an incel/virgin or similar things you will be seen as a lesser man to them and they will taunt you and tell other people. Nowadays I'm open about being a virgin because I don't give a shit about making friends anyway, but back then that would be a social suicide.
I don't know your situation, but if I had a friend who I would consider a great friend and like a brother then yeah, I would expect him to stay somewhere close, if he was such a good good friend.
This just proves that men value wives more than their male friends. Meanwhile Stacy forces her betabuxxer husband to buy a house somewhere near her female friends.
All he has to do is look outside of the west to societies in the mideast and SEA to see proper male bonding behavior. Shit, look at street gangs and mafias. The vast majority of what he's talking about is due to a purposeful and systematic destruction of the ability of males to bond, whether that be demonizing and belittling male friendships in general (tell men to man up and satisfy their shrill wives) or destroying male spaces (men's lodges, country clubs, etc). Its obvious this all stems from artificially influenced social changes, not inherent male bonding behavior.he probably didn't realize he was repeating feminist propaganda when he made this thread. that's why he's not adressing this point
Because female hypergamy prevents incels from getting laid at all. Chad couldn't get you laid even if he wanted to. There was a vid posted a few weeks ago that showed that.His male friend thinks less of him now, taunts him and talks shit to him, tells other people in the social circle who all talk trash as well.
There is no such thing as a "femcel". Females can get laid easily. Chad will fuck anything with pussy.Female admits to her female friend Stacy that she is a virgin femcel who has trouble finding a man she likes. Stacy consoles her, "awww don't cry, I will help to find you a nice boyfriend!" Stacy proceeds to find a Chad boyfriend for her virgin female friend.
False. I post here because this place is filled with people like me. I talk IRL about this all the time.The reason why you all post here anyway is because you have zero male friends to talk this with.
You keep dodging my question/point. How much of this is influenced by society? Why is it considered acceptable for a woman to have this much say in the first place? This wasn't true 100 years ago.
Except that the first part isn't true. By elevating women to be equal to men, society has forced these men into paying attention to their wives, lest they lose everything in divorce. Women now have power to dictate what a man can and can't do. In addition, even if the man wasn't married, he still has to play the game lest he lose his breeding hole. In the past, the breeding hole would be left at home with children/other breeding holes while the male went to socialize at a bar or men's club.Of course this had a lot to do with it but ultimately no one is actually forcing men to follow these trends yet men still do it because they're thirsty cucks chasing that used up pussy.
All he has to do is look outside of the west to societies in the mideast and SEA to see proper male bonding behavior. Shit, look at street gangs and mafias.
The vast majority of what he's talking about is due to a purposeful and systematic destruction of the ability of males to bond, whether that be demonizing and belittling male friendships in general (tell men to man up and satisfy their shrill wives) or destroying male spaces (men's lodges, country clubs, etc). Its obvious this all stems from artificially influenced social changes, not inherent male bonding behavior.
Because female hypergamy prevents incels from getting laid at all. Chad couldn't get you laid even if he wanted to. There was a vid posted a few weeks ago that showed that.
There is no such thing as a "femcel". Females can get laid easily. Chad will fuck anything with pussy.
Like I said, male friendships almost always revolve around a specific activity. They don't last and they aren't particularly deep. I never discussed any personal things with those friends.
It's not about only prehistorical, it's about the ancestors of humans as well. Remember Gigantopithecus, a prehistoric ape.Again, this is prehistorical humanity.
Because it wasn't as simple as climbing trees. Civilization meant forcing ourselves out of our natural environment [tropical rainforests where our nutritious natural food (tropical fruits) resides] so we needed to settle for sub-optimal food (even if that meant long-term health problems). Early hominids as you say, never ate raw meat, they cooked it. If after so many thousands of years the hominids ate raw meat, surely the modern humans would have evolved to be able to digest it.Why did humans evolve hunting behavior if getting the required nutrients were as simple as climbing trees?
Raw fish is actually bad for you, even if theoritically you could digest it:And you can actually eat raw meat. Sushi is raw fish, and beef/lamb, when prepped properly, are edible raw with no ill effects. I'm sure smaller game animals like rabbits are also edible this way.
That seems incredibly unrealistic and selfish of you to think that a great friend "owes" you something as massive as not getting married or not having a family just because "you are bros." I would never hold it against someone who wants to get married and start a family (the one real thing two friends cannot provide eachother) and if you honestly think that is some sort of betrayal, then you're just flat out wrong.
Again, we are still friends and his marriage and moving away did not end that. We constantly text/talk about life and life goals, video games, movies/shows, work, eachothers lives, we even talk about blackpill stuff all the time (he is more mgtow mindset ironically)
I really don't know what more you could reasonably expect out of a friend than that.
Then you've never had any real friends, unfortunately. Granted, a lot of the people you meet and call friends are only associating with you for selfish reasons, like access to resources, status, sexual mates, or a new social circle.
Like anything else in life, the things worth doing and worth having are hard to come by. The same goes for friendship. You have to meet and learn about a lot of different people to find a diamond in the rough and separate the fake people from the virtuous ones with principles and integrity.
The thirsty men you describe who would throw you under the bus for a whiff of stacy's thousand cock cave are examples of weak men with no honor, integrity or principles. Those are the type of weak, lowlife beta faggots that will turn on their own blood to improve their lot in life. Someone like that can never be your friend.
You are correct in that female friendships are alot more supportive.
Male friendships are a perpetual pissing contest. Sometimes it's good comradery and women aren't capable of that dynamic but it's mostly rare
Comradery is a massive cope.
Contrary to people claiming I didn't have friends I actually did have something resembling comradery.
Comradery is this same perpetual pissing contest you talk about but on steroids because now you have an entire group of men competing who is more alpha. Most of this "friendly" banter is such group is just subtle display of dominance, for exampla you're allowed to make this and that jokes about a particular guy who is lower on the hierarchy, but you're not supposed to joke about the alphas of the group, but those alphas make jokes about other guys all the time.
Yeah, those "comrades" will help you out with practical things like in war or other types of situation, but then again you're also helping the group yourself so it's not like they're doing charity work. Those same comrades actually also monitor your life closely and constantly give you shit about things that are not in line with whatever they think it's cool. Or they make a joke out of it like "this guy does this and that" and then you're some sort of meme.
Men then say women's friendships are a "lie" because they just compliment and support each other instead, but then again men's friendhips are also a "lie". So I'd rather prefer the feminine version of friendship then when you're at least encouraging someone else even if you don't really think so but at least it boosts your friend's confidence. Because this is ultimately the point of this overrated concept of friendship, making someone feel good. All this bullshit about friends having to give you "tough love" and be honest is just BS. If you're not capable of being critical of yourself you're already a lost case anyway. I don't need my "friends" to tell me negative shit about me that I already figured out myself.
True that's a huge cope tbh.
This pill is hard to swallow.If your male friends really cared about you, you would not be posting here.
I originally disagreed with you but I've changed my mind. Fuck humanity.Comradery is a massive cope.
Contrary to people claiming I didn't have friends I actually did have something resembling comradery.
Comradery is this same perpetual pissing contest you talk about but on steroids because now you have an entire group of men competing who is more alpha. Most of this "friendly" banter is such group is just subtle display of dominance, for exampla you're allowed to make this and that jokes about a particular guy who is lower on the hierarchy, but you're not supposed to joke about the alphas of the group, but those alphas make jokes about other guys all the time.
Yeah, those "comrades" will help you out with practical things like in war or other types of situation, but then again you're also helping the group yourself so it's not like they're doing charity work. Those same comrades actually also monitor your life closely and constantly give you shit about things that are not in line with whatever they think it's cool. Or they make a joke out of it like "this guy does this and that" and then you're some sort of meme.
Men then say women's friendships are a "lie" because they just compliment and support each other instead, but then again men's friendhips are also a "lie". So I'd rather prefer the feminine version of friendship then when you're at least encouraging someone else even if you don't really think so but at least it boosts your friend's confidence. Because this is ultimately the point of this overrated concept of friendship, making someone feel good. All this bullshit about friends having to give you "tough love" and be honest is just BS. If you're not capable of being critical of yourself you're already a lost case anyway. I don't need my "friends" to tell me negative shit about me that I already figured out myself.
They can and do, even now in this society which ironically stifles genuine male development and masculinity more than in the past. The issues are the hilariously contradictory pressures being put on young men today, often stemming from those same all-knowing feminine thinkers who pretend to care about male issues only when they can be blamed on the nefarious "patriarchy" or "toxic masculinity", in addition to attempts to feminize/neuter males in the name of empowerment, and I'm sure most of us are aware of how this affects various aspects of mens lives including how they socialise.What the hell has this got to do with what I said? The fact is men can't discuss their personal problems that make them look weak with other men. Whatever the cause of this problems is is irrelevant. Men don't have intimate relationships, they can't openly talk about the kind of problems that make them look weak and lesser men in the eyes of society.
This sounds to me a lot like bluepilled stuff. Just replace friends with "girlfriends" and it's something a bluepiller would tell you. "Put yourself out there", "you will find somebody", "the men you describe are shallow, they don't represent all men" etc.
Meanwhile I'm basing things on a simple statistical fact that the vast majority of males have no friends. It's actually easier for a man to find a girlfriend in 2019 than it is to find this real meaningful friendship and considering how hard it is to get a girlfriend, this is saying something.
High IQ observation.JFL at this coping.
Men suck at being friends with other men. This is why most male loners out there are not just lonely because they don't have girlfriends/wives but also because they have hardly any or zero male friends.
Women form better friendships with each other. They often compliment each other and give each other validation, they talk about intimate things and trust each other more. MGTOW coper types mock this and say that they backstab a lot, but ultimately they still have friends and they seem to get along well. Also male "friends" will backstab you just the same too.
The only types of "friendships" men have with each other this days are centered around specific activities or when one is some sort of mentor and there is a clear dominant friend. Usually after you switch your environment and do some new hobby, you will lose your former friends as well after some time.
If you're an unattractive and low status man with not much to offer, other men will not give a shit about you. But it's not entirely the same dynamic with women, I remember there were popular Stacies who had "loser" female friends and helped them out. It doesn't really happen with men. Men bully low status men unless they can use them for something.
Even if you have some male friends, those male friends will value women over you as soon as they get a girlfriend or a wife. JFL if you think your "best friend" male wouldn't trade your friendship for a relationship with some Stacy. On the other hand women will easily dump you if her female friends don't like you and find a new male.
There were statistics that clearly showed that heterosexual males have by far the least friends.
Yes, we are...It's not like humans are carnivores or something.
The bio-availability is way different.Our body doesn't care whether the protein we get is animal protein or plant protein. It's the same thing.
Epic cope, bro. Women don't have friendships, they are selfish and narcissistic by nature, and don't care about others unless it benefits them one way or the other.
I had a friend who got up at 2am and drove 200km to pick me up cos I drove my car into a fucking boar. Another one literally saved my life.
I bailed a friend out of jail and physically fought countless times for friends who were attacked by gangs of feral ethnics.
In my 37 years, I've never seen a foid do anything similar. The best they can do is give a hug or make a cute comment on Instagram.
I'm sorry for you if you don't have friends but men do indeed form strong friendships and "bros before hoes" isn't simply a cute rhyme.
Yes, there are men who backstab of course, they usually end up as lonely fuckers unless they are rich and can buy attention, just like foids.
This, using the mafia as a good example of friendship has to be the most retarded comment i've seen in my lifeJFL at all the copers here. Like I said this is one of the toughest blackpills to swallow and a big myth that persists so I'm not even surprised at the bluepilled coping reaction.
Also LOL at people bringing up mafia as example of male "friendship". Those guys kill each other and rat on each other all the time. They'll send your best friend to kill you.
Brutal ngl. Guess you kinda proved your pointI'm now getting shamed for having no male friends on a fucking incel forum LMAO. Yeah, I'm a loner, who would have guessed. I'm sorry I forgot I post on chads.co.
Did you put the boar in trunk? It's a shame if you threw away the perfectly fine pieces of meat.Epic cope, bro. Women don't have friendships, they are selfish and narcissistic by nature, and don't care about others unless it benefits them one way or the other.
I had a friend who got up at 2am and drove 200km to pick me up cos I drove my car into a fucking boar. Another one literally saved my life.
I bailed a friend out of jail and physically fought countless times for friends who were attacked by gangs of feral ethnics.
In my 37 years, I've never seen a foid do anything similar. The best they can do is give a hug or make a cute comment on Instagram.
I'm sorry for you if you don't have friends but men do indeed form strong friendships and "bros before hoes" isn't simply a cute rhyme.
Yes, there are men who backstab of course, they usually end up as lonely fuckers unless they are rich and can buy attention, just like foids.
Cope look up sv3rige on youtubeHumans eat cooked meat, not raw meat like other carnivores or omnivores do. Try eating raw meat and you'll have pain in your stomach for 5 days. This is due to the fact that the PH in our stomach is designed to digest plant foods.
Our body doesn't care whether the protein we get is animal protein or plant protein. It's the same thing. Anyway, humans don't need that much strength to climb trees and collect food (fruits).
LifefuelI had a friend who got up at 2am and drove 200km to pick me up cos I drove my car into a fucking boar. Another one literally saved my life.
I bailed a friend out of jail and physically fought countless times for friends who were attacked by gangs of feral ethnics.
I'm afraid you're the one who's wrong here. Plants contain much more fiber and the pH in our stomach is between 4-5 and therefore designed to digest only plant foods.The bio-availability is way different.
Plants aren't easily digestible by humans, animal products are.
We're not allowed to eat them here, unless you're willing to pay a vet to certify the meat is good and that's quite expensive.Did you put the boar in trunk? It's a shame if you threw away the perfectly fine pieces of meat.