Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Best country during ww3?

H

Hopesavedme

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 4, 2025
Posts
39
what would be the best country to be in during ww3
From my research its either NZ or Chile
bonus question: best country for off grid?
I think its new zeland
 
Iceland Argentina NZ
 
ww3 is cope never happening
 
Fr, since nukes exist no contry will do a shit more than Twitter insults each others in twitter
Israel will probably nuke the world with their samson option
 
what would be the best country to be in during ww3
From my research its either NZ or Chile
bonus question: best country for off grid?
I think its new zeland
If the WW3 begin, I will be the happiest guy in this earth
 
IMG 8132
america and israel during ww3
 
Israel will probably nuke the world with their samson option
israel only nuke arabs shithole, they don't need to bomb us goyims in west cuz the rothchilds agendas that we have are alredy destroying west
 
Seychelles, Mauritius and new Zealand.
 
israel only nuke arabs shithole, they don't need to bomb us goyims in west cuz the rothchilds agendas that we have are alredy destroying west
Uss liberty
 
israel only nuke arabs shithole, they don't need to bomb us goyims in west cuz the rothchilds agendas that we have are alredy destroying west
Look up the samson option
 
what would be the best country to be in during ww3
From my research its either NZ or Chile
bonus question: best country for off grid?
I think its new zeland
newzealand is a member of the anglo 5 eyes group and will not be spared from chineese nukes so no.
 
geopolitically irrelevant south america,southern africa,antarctica in the southern hemisphere are the places you want to be in an all out global nuclear war.The northern hemisphere will just become an irradiated wasteland from nuclear fallout.
 
newzealand is a member of the anglo 5 eyes group and will not be spared from chineese nukes so no.
China doesn't have much of strategic nuclear weapons, they won't waste precious ICBMs and SLBMs on New Zealand
 
China doesn't have much of strategic nuclear weapons, they won't waste precious ICBMs and SLBMs on New Zealand
Newzealand is politically and militarily aligned with Australia and Australia has recently announced to procurre nuclear subs so that makes Australia a legitimate nuke target and the chineese wont spare NZ too for the above reason.
 
Last edited:
Poland

Because we're going to die within first days (not only frontline fight)
 
South Africa, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, and most countries in South America. Central Asia.
 
Newzealand is militarily aligned with Australia and Australia has recently announced to procurre nuclear subs so the chineese wont spare NZ too.
Limited amount of nuclear strikes won't destroy even New Zealand, they will target military bases mostly. And modern nuclear warheads are not like 50 megaton tsar bomb, it's much less powerful, most warheads are below 1 megaton, priority in favor of accuracy. Even if you live somewhere in U.S or russia, and you don't have any military bases, ICBM silos, military industry and other important places which may be a target, your major problem at first would be radiation (although it's nothing like Chernobyl because warheads have less plutonium and other radioactive elements) and then lack of food, clean water, anarchy, marauders.
 
Newzealand is politically and militarily aligned with Australia and Australia has recently announced to procurre nuclear subs so that makes Australia a legitimate nuke target and the chineese wont spare NZ too for the above reason.
high iq
 
what would be the best country to be in during ww3
From my research its either NZ or Chile
bonus question: best country for off grid?
I think its new zeland
probably argentina ,uruguay or southern chile
africa is starving and having civil wars due to aid disruption
northern hemisphere is burning due to nukes
most latam countries and south east asia wont be able to resist the global supply chain collapsing
 
Limited amount of nuclear strikes won't destroy even New Zealand, they will target military bases mostly. And modern nuclear warheads are not like 50 megaton tsar bomb, it's much less powerful, most warheads are below 1 megaton, priority in favor of accuracy. Even if you live somewhere in U.S or russia, and you don't have any military bases, ICBM silos, military industry and other important places which may be a target, your major problem at first would be radiation (although it's nothing like Chernobyl because warheads have less plutonium and other radioactive elements) and then lack of food, clean water, anarchy, marauders.
but what if china attacks nz to gain resources
 
probably argentina ,uruguay or southern chile
africa is starving and having civil wars due to aid disruption
northern hemisphere is burning due to nukes
most latam countries and south east asia wont be able to resist the global supply chain collapsing
what do you think about nz? the only problem is it may get nuked by china but in return it has much better nature for off grid living than south america also much cleaner less pesticides and air pollution
 
what do you think about nz? the only problem is it may get nuked by china but in return it has much better nature for off grid living than south america also much cleaner less pesticides and air pollution
its might work but if they decide to join the war they are getting at least one nuke
argentina might not be targeted so a government might be able to help prevent complete social collapse.
also nz is preety libtard country at the moment so i wont trust them in case of ww3
 
its might work but if they decide to join the war they are getting at least one nuke
argentina might not be targeted so a government might be able to help prevent complete social collapse.
also nz is preety libtard country at the moment so i wont trust them in case of ww3
yeah one nuke isnt really gonna hurt if you live away which i plan to live off grid but as i said latin america is just so poluted except chile
 
yeah one nuke isnt really gonna hurt if you live away which i plan to live off grid but as i said latin america is just so poluted except chile
and uruguay but they gotta give you shots for residency haha im good
 
yeah one nuke isnt really gonna hurt if you live away which i plan to live off grid but as i said latin america is just so poluted except chile
argentina is not really latam.
from what I know they mostly med immigrants.
basically med usa.
just compare the living conditions in argentina vs brazil
 
argentina is not really latam.
from what I know they mostly med immigrants.
basically med usa.
just compare the living conditions in argentina vs brazil
yea i meant south america, argentina is better but its not as good as chile
 
yea i meant south america, argentina is better but its not as good as chile
chile might have a food problem since its all mountains + the global climate willl get colder so better go to the lowlands althought i agree some parts of chile are probably peak in case of ww3
 
chile might have a food problem since its all mountains + the global climate willl get colder so better go to the lowlands althought i agree some parts of chile are probably peak in case of ww3
ive done some quick research argentina is really good but pesticide usage is a problem also air pollution from urban areas but no country is perfect
 
ive done some quick research argentina is really good but pesticide usage is a problem also air pollution from urban areas but no country is perfect
most of the world has pestice problems
just move to patagonia theres like 3 ppl there and also fertile land
 
Iraq because it’s already destroyed
 
true.. where would u move?
Not much difference its empty wilderness basically Siberia or smth: The total population of the Patagonia region in South America is approximately 2 million people, spread across parts of Argentina and Chile. This makes it one of the most sparsely populated regions in the world, with a population density of about 1-2 people per square kilometer. The majority of the population lives in the Argentinian portion, and major cities include Neuquén (Argentina) and Coyhaique (Chile).
 
Not much difference its empty wilderness basically Siberia or smth: The total population of the Patagonia region in South America is approximately 2 million people, spread across parts of Argentina and Chile. This makes it one of the most sparsely populated regions in the world, with a population density of about 1-2 people per square kilometer. The majority of the population lives in the Argentinian portion, and major cities include Neuquén (Argentina) and Coyhaique (Chile).
but siberia will get nuclear fallout and youll freeze to death
 
There will be no safety if war breaks out full on
 
but siberia will get nuclear fallout and youll freeze to death
comparing pre war siberia to patagonia i meant.
ofc siberia is a hellhole in case of a nuclear war
literally metro irl
 

Similar threads

brootalcel
Replies
1
Views
651
plplp5
P
L
Replies
4
Views
801
rope2cope
R
David1033
Replies
9
Views
675
Animecel2D
Animecel2D
Matrix0_
Replies
34
Views
2K
Matrix0_
Matrix0_

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →