RageFuel Being sadistic towards animals is savagery

[RealSchizo]

The first man to pass a law against the abuse of animals - Saint Hitler.

You would think that such a man would enjoy torturing cats and dogs to death, but he did the opposite.

Can't say the same about the pig Churchil and his jewish lapdogs like Stalin and Truman.

If you inflict pain on a creature that did nothing wrong to you then you're a savage simple as.

Cats mind their own business for example but some psychos take pleasure in running them over , poisoning or shooting them.

I like to think of cats as white people because they really just mind their own business ngl but then then some nigger humans decide to end their lives for no reason? How is that not a savagery?

 

[lnceI]

The issue here is that you see "savage" as a bad thing

 

[RealSchizo]

The issue here is that you see "savage" as a bad thing

I see it as in uncivilized and psychopatic. We are no longer savages. Why kill animals for fun? Only some tribal nigger would do this and believe he's doing God's work or something.

 

[Grodd]

Humans are the worst creatures on this planet

 

[zd60]

I view everything and everyone as nothing more but a creature with no value

 

[lnceI]

I see it as in uncivilized and psychopatic. We are no longer savages. Why kill animals for fun? Only some tribal nigger would do this and believe he's doing God's work or something.

yeah it is uncivilized, which is a good thing

 

[KoldKlimateKoala]

agreed, only synths deserve to be exterminated

 

[plastic chewer]

yeah it is uncivilized, which is a good thing

 

[RealSchizo]

Humans are the worst creatures on this planet

Agreed. They dont value nature and often hunt for the thrill of it and not for food which is a way of expressing their psychopathic dominance over every living being on earth.

 

[ESL]

I see it as in uncivilized and psychopatic. We are no longer savages. Why kill animals for fun? Only some tribal nigger would do this and believe he's doing God's work or something.

humans unlike animals have the choice to control their desires and insticts

 

[lnceI]

humans unlike animals have the choice to control their desires and insticts

No they dont

Agreed. They dont value nature and often hunt for the thrill of it and not for food which is a way of expressing their psychopathic dominance over every living being on earth.

so what? whats the problem with it ?

 

[Jealous Freak]

I honestly wouldn't hurt any stray animal, as they are like me, alone and unwanted.
Hurting defenceless animals is not a truecel trait, it's a bully chad scumbag normietard trait.

 

[ESL]

Hurting defenceless animals is not a truecel trait, it's a bully chad scumbag normietard trait.

exactly

 

[Sonicfancel]

Dogpill. Giving rights to animals is the same thing as giving rights to robots.

 

[RealSchizo]

I honestly wouldn't hurt any stray animal, as they are like me, alone and unwanted.
Hurting defenceless animals is not a truecel trait, it's a bully chad scumbag normietard trait.

they're trying to survive like us. Why make it harder for them we've also forced them to live in a very unnatural habitat because we cut down the trees and pollute the air.

 

[Max90]

The problem is that such people cannot build a well-functioning society and worsen and impoverish the experience of everyone around them.

That is, this planet will turn into an ever greater hell for those who live here.

This may not interest an individual, but then society will do to him what is in its interests - through violence and restriction of freedom.

 

[RealSchizo]

Dogpill. Giving rights to animals is the same thing as giving rights to robots.

retarded tier take.

 

[Sonicfancel]

retarded tier take

Why?

 

[The Chronicle]

Abusing animals is a normie trait.

I've always been against it.

 

[RealSchizo]

Why?

It's stupid. Animals are living beings not robots. They express emotions and communicate in their own way like humans do. Our brains are also primitive and we're not more than animals with super powers.

 

[Sonicfancel]

They express emotions and communicate in their own way like humans do

So do robots. If your definition of life is sentience then advanced AI is alive.

 

[The Chronicle]

It's stupid. Animals are living beings not robots. They express emotions and communicate in their own way like humans do. Our brains are also primitive and we're not more than animals with super powers.

I'd understand if animals actually hated us but just aren't able to express it.

Killing animals for food is justified but not for meaningless sport.

 

[RealSchizo]

So do robots. If your definition of life is sentience then advanced AI is alive.

 

[The Chronicle]

Humans are the worst creatures on this planet

Humanity deserves to be wiped out and replaced with another intelligent species tbh.

Let evolution take it's course and wipe us out.

 

[Max90]

So do robots. If your definition of life is sentience then advanced AI is alive.

Mr. Robotnik, as expected, defends robots.

 

[RealSchizo]

Mr. Robotnik, as expected, defends robots.

He's probably ragebaiting unless genuinely retarded.

 

[Max90]

Humanity deserves to be wiped out and replaced with another intelligent species tbh.

Let evolution take it's course and wipe us out.

Why do we need evolution for this? The future will belong to intelligent mechanisms. Unlike us, they will be able to conquer space, and will not be locked on this planet.

 

[Midnight Animal]

View: https://youtu.be/4KnThuKaAVY?feature=shared

 

[Max90]

He's probably ragebaiting unless genuinely retarded.

No, I understand what he's saying. The difference between the living and the non-living is speculative. Machines can become intelligent, that's not really a question. The only question is whether they can become conscious. And no one knows the answer to that.

 

[RealSchizo]

View: https://youtu.be/4KnThuKaAVY?feature=shared

Cruel.

 

[Max90]

It is cruel to feed people this jumble of meat, feathers, bones, cartilage and shells.

 

[RealSchizo]

No, I understand what he's saying. The difference between the living and the non-living is speculative. Machines can become intelligent, that's not really a question. The only question is whether they can become conscious. And no one knows the answer to that.

Well its obvious that even if they did become intelligent and adopted emotions it would be clearly fake since machines are man-made. Machines do not consist of cells like animals and humans do. There would be many people getting attached to machines in the near future but that would be because of the lack of intimacy with other humans. I could see protests on how we must give them rights and that would be insane.

 

[The Chronicle]

Playing devil's advocate: Because we are animals, it is in our nature to act like it.

We are just smarter chimpanzees, so why wouldn't we act on this nature? Trying to insert morals assumes a greater purpose.

Like chimps, we fight over shiny things, food, and tribalism.

 

[Max90]

Well its obvious that even if they did become intelligent and adopted emotions it would be clearly fake since machines are man-made. Machines do not consist of cells like animals and humans do. There would be many people getting attached to machines in the near future but that would be because of the lack of intimacy with other humans. I could see protests on how we must give them rights and that would be insane.

Who said it was important to be made of cells? If something is conscious and intelligent, then it deserves rights.

I want to remind you that if you get closer and closer and look at you with an electron microscope, you can see that 99.9999999% of you are made of emptiness. The rest will be quarks and gluons and so on.

Cells may not be the only form of matter organization that binds consciousness.

Of course, this will have to be proven. And if the opposite is proven, then non-conscious beings should have almost no rights.

Only limited ones and for the purpose of moral education.

 

[Max90]

We are just smarter chimpanzees, so why wouldn't we act on this nature?

Because we are smarter than chimpanzees?

 

[The Chronicle]

Because we are smarter than chimpanzees?

I think intelligence makes us greater but we share the same tendencies at our core.

Chimps sometimes conduct organized, violent raids on neighboring groups, killing rivals to gain territory.

Now imagine if they had machines and were smarter.

 

[Max90]

I think intelligence makes us greater but we share the same tendencies at our core.

Chimps sometimes conduct organized, violent raids on neighboring groups, killing rivals to gain territory.

That sounds exactly like us and it isn't surprising.

But we are aware of them, unlike chimpanzees. We are able to think not only about the present, but about the past and the future. Not only about the concrete, but also about the abstract.

Moreover, in this field we are not alone, we live in societies, and the societies themselves compete. The rejection of morality will destroy our society from within and all the "shiny things" will go to a united and more moral (in relation to their fellows) society.

Rome rose because the Romans were valiant and brave. Rome fell because they became corrupt and petty.

People have many more needs than chimpanzees. And more elevated ones, connected with self-realization and creativity.

In addition, I want to remind you that initially life has two vectors - one is aimed at reproduction, and the other at life expectancy. People have sought and are seeking eternal life. First through religion, magic and alchemy, and now through science and technology.

Society is interested in self-reproduction, and man in overcoming his finitude.

You can't do without morality here, otherwise you will lose the competition and won't be able to work together (which requires trust).

 

[Jimb0]

Cruelty to animals is the ultimate fakecel trait. Animals will never judge you for your appearance