Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Being religious is being in denial of the blackpill

Abrahamic religions for all their faults are the objectively best way to keep. foid hypergamy in check, only with the rise of secularism has it truly gone off the rails. Paganism is objectively chad worship at its finest
True, the fact that you have literally drawing's of pagan god's and they are all chads epitomizes that it's chad worshipping.
 
The biggest morons in this "community" are the religious and racists, your god abandoned you, and so did your people.
 
Abrahamic religions for all their faults are the objectively best way to keep. foid hypergamy in check, only with the rise of secularism has it truly gone off the rails. Paganism is objectively chad worship at its finest
Islam is hypergamous to the point of dysfunction, Judaism is an ethno-supremacist cult, Christianity, the most abhorrent of them all, is cuck control at its finest, shaped by over 1600 years of Euro aristocracy.
How I see, a genetic loser shouldn't abide by rules or dogma, what are you going to lose for disobeying? certainly you're not gaining anything.
 
Islam is hypergamous to the point of dysfunction, Judaism is an ethno-supremacist cult, Christianity, the most abhorrent of them all, is cuck control at its finest, shaped by over 1600 years of Euro aristocracy.
How I see, a genetic loser shouldn't abide by rules or dogma, what are you going to lose for disobeying? certainly you're not gaining anything.
islam hypergamous really? and why is control bad? objectively look at the fruits of secularist and libertarian thinking that is separated from some type of religion. The exact things you are complaining about were prevented under strict rules and dogmas. the genetic losers werent benefited from a decrease in religious strength of their societies they were the ones most harmed. cause guess what happened? they were no safe barriers or control.
Athiesm is chad worship. in a world without rules you wont even be able to enjoy the scraps
 
islam hypergamous really? and why is control bad? objectively look at the fruits of secularist and libertarian thinking that is separated from some type of religion. The exact things you are complaining about were prevented under strict rules and dogmas. the genetic losers werent benefited from a decrease in religious strength of their societies they were the ones most harmed. cause guess what happened? they were no safe barriers or control.
Athiesm is chad worship. in a world without rules you wont even be able to enjoy the scraps
Muhammad cucked his adoptive son, and installed polygamy which is the male complimentary side of toilets hypergamy, men's sexual misery is the highest in aloha snackbar countries, they're the biggest consumers of porn, and have frequent incidents of male zoophilia, that's what being lead by the hallucinations of an illiterate goat herder from 1400 years ago amounts to, you get priced out of marriage by Shad and Shady (actual names in some neck of the dunes) who get fuck to their dicks content and have many wives and side pieces, even slaves and boy toys back in the day, and cockblocked from exogamy even after you worked your way up because consanguinity was heavily promoted by the goat herder in command.
If my sexual life was bound to be arid like this wretched desert either way, I'd rather be free of totalitarian know-it all dark ages dogma, the last thing I need is to be face down ass up 50 times a day to a revamped moon goddess.
I don't claim secularism was good, most of its iteration were just as bad or worse than theocracy however it might be, but at least the core principals are just and rational, can work something decent with it, no can do with the word of gawd, as it was written by chad for himself.
 
Muhammad cucked his adoptive son, and installed polygamy which is the male complimentary side of toilets hypergamy, men's sexual misery is the highest in aloha snackbar countries, they're the biggest consumers of porn, and have frequent incidents of male zoophilia, that's what being lead by the hallucinations of an illiterate goat herder from 1400 years ago amounts to, you get priced out of marriage by Shad and Shady (actual names in some neck of the dunes) who get fuck to their dicks content and have many wives and side pieces, even slaves and boy toys back in the day, and cockblocked from exogamy even after you worked your way up because consanguinity was heavily promoted by the goat herder in command.
If my sexual life was bound to be arid like this wretched desert either way, I'd rather be free of totalitarian know-it all dark ages dogma, the last thing I need is to be face down ass up 50 times a day to a revamped moon goddess.
I don't claim secularism was good, most of its iteration were just as bad or worse than theocracy however it might be, but at least the core principals are just and rational, can work something decent with it, no can do with the word of gawd, as it was written by chad for himself.
First of all, im not Muslim and i don't personally like Muhammed or most of his teachings. I also dont think his degenerate sexual past is relevant when examining my general claim that Abrahamic religions or other religions which share similar enough doctrines. Are quite effective in the suppression of female hypergamy through slut shaming, male ownership and the suppression of female rights. Which have historically only ever been successfully carried out by countries/governments that adopted some type of religious structure. I'm just saying china, ussr and usa were the leading bastions of secularism and their reigns have been marked by feminism and baal worship. Leave alone those european countries that have vast atheistic populations that are currently depleting to such a high rate they rely on migrants for labour.
But we can agree to disagree not like it truly matters
 
Last edited:
First of all, im not Muslim and i don't personally like Muhammed or most of his teachings. I also dont think his degenerate sexual past is relevant when examining my general claim that Abrahamic religions or other religions which share similar enough doctrines. Are quite effective in the suppression of female hypergamy through slut shaming, male ownership and the suppression of female rights. Which have historically only ever been successfully carried out by countries/governments that adopted some type of religious structure. I'm just saying china, ussr and usa were the leading bastions of secularism and their reigns have been marked by feminism and baal worship. Leave alone those european countries that have vast atheistic populations that are currently depleting to such a high rate they rely on migrants for labour.
But we can agree to disagree not like it truly matters
Rose tainted glasses, most men in history were genetic dead-ends, the middle ages weren't an outlier, if anything men from the last two centuries had it easier objectively speaking, in all facets of life including sexuality.
Lastly, I want to clarify a point I think you've misunderstood, my dear protestant-cel, I didn't reprove Christianity's intent to control society as a whole, but its focus on men of lower birth, the founding myth of this religion is an insult to masculinity, and the European institutions of this religion were in charge of keeping the third estate dull, impoverished, and submissive to a small minority who ruled and fornicated an entire continent and much more later on, on the grounds of high birth, sound familiar? an institutionalised rule of chad perdured for almost 2 millennia because of this "turn the other ass cheek" charade forced only on the weak and destitute.
Yes, we can agree to disagree, because nothing ultimately matters.
 
Islam is hypergamous to the point of dysfunction, Judaism is an ethno-supremacist cult, Christianity, the most abhorrent of them all, is cuck control at its finest, shaped by over 1600 years of Euro aristocracy.
How I see, a genetic loser shouldn't abide by rules or dogma, what are you going to lose for disobeying? certainly you're not gaining anything.
IMG 5918
 
God loves you, but we are not all equal in regards to appearance. Of course there are going to be objective differences, and I'm grateful I don't look identical to everyone else, imagine how boring that would be.
I don't mean to offend you but this is what an iqlet chad would say
 
Religion is for low iq bluepilled mutt niggers. Muh god will give you 72 virgins. Muh god is testing you.
 
I don't mean to offend you but this is what an iqlet chad would say
Nothing about IQ, this is Gods word that I follow.


But another point that I didn't mention:
Christ is the truth
Blackpill is the truth (collection of facts)

The blackpill would not exist without Christ, and nor would we.

So being "religious" is proving the blackpill if you follow Christ. (completely contradictory to this post)


And I know that Real Schizo probably doesn't even believe this himself as he has been going through heaps in life, but Lord willing maybe soon he will turn his life around upon his return to .is.
 
Being a christcuck, islamcuck, you name it is basically like denying basic biology and logic, foids choose the alphas, alphas are measured as in how big, strong and intimidating they look like as opposed to betas (weak bones, tiny in comparison to the alpha), all foid mammals including foid humans choose their breeding partner based on looks, there is no loving God, it's all basic biology.
God has nothing to do with biology, we are not special in any way, animals operate on the same instincts and desires as humans do.
Christcucks say that humans are "special", no they're not any different to chimps when it comes to the preselective breeding, we are the same.
God is cope, ban religion, bluepill in its highest form and denial of the blackpill.
I'm perpetually fatigued by christcucks spewing their nonsense on this forum. Muh come to Christ, cope.
Not in the sense that without Christ we have no hope. The red and blue bill are both about wordly hope .Christ is about Gods kingdom.
 
Western religions are so dull and rigid, it's all superfluous philosophical suicide to commit your entire life to faith.

Faith may satisfy turbulent emotions but it gives no pathways to truth.
 
Taoism, Confucianism, Buddhism, Shintoism.

These religions have more fluidity and often don't even require faith. No rigid deities, no afterlife.

Confucius gave us the golden rule hundreds of years before Jesus and its not like this was even a very profound statement. Pro-social behaviors evolved with humans as they progressed from living in small villages to the discovery of agriculture. It means don't steal from you literal neighbor, if you thieve crops that are aimed to feed the whole village, then obviously we need morals and ethics.
 
Last edited:
Being a christcuck, islamcuck, you name it is basically like denying basic biology and logic, foids choose the alphas, alphas are measured as in how big, strong and intimidating they look like as opposed to betas (weak bones, tiny in comparison to the alpha), all foid mammals including foid humans choose their breeding partner based on looks, there is no loving God, it's all basic biology.
God has nothing to do with biology, we are not special in any way, animals operate on the same instincts and desires as humans do.
Christcucks say that humans are "special", no they're not any different to chimps when it comes to the preselective breeding, we are the same.
God is cope, ban religion, bluepill in its highest form and denial of the blackpill.
I'm perpetually fatigued by christcucks spewing their nonsense on this forum. Muh come to Christ, cope.
Theres plenty of biblical verses condemning women
 
First of all no one deny's the :blackpill: on here otherwise we wouldn't be here :feelskek:

always uneducated mfs talking about sum muh religion = :bluepill:
 
religion is cope
 
not a religionfag but taoism has some interesting concepts. hell the bible itself contains a lot of wisdom regarding morality, living, society etc once you get past the creationism slop
Jews and their agents want you to belive they have a monopoly on morality and putting foids in their place. They want you to fear the mythical toll gate where you have to sacrifice your foreskin to them in order to have societal stability and the ability to regulate females. The world needs to know that there is no such thing.
 
Jews and their agents want you to belive they have a monopoly on morality and putting foids in their place. They want you to fear the mythical toll gate where you have to sacrifice your foreskin to them in order to have societal stability and the ability to regulate females. The world needs to know that there is no such thing.
ain't even near what I'm talking about
 
Humans weren't able to cope with nature after the agricultural revolution so they began to turn away from animism and start creating Gods in their minds to cope, it's what happens when you stop trying to adapt to nature and try to control it, first bluepill
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top