Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Being leftist/marxist/communist/socialist while being an Incel is a huge cope

Blackpincel

Blackpincel

Veteran
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 11, 2018
Posts
1,425
Being Incel and marxist/communist/socialist/leftist is something that makes little sense to me. One can't call himself "Blackpilled" in that case.
To be Blackpilled you must understand and fully embrace that the world is an unfair place, and true equality can never be achieved.
You either give in to the norm/standards or you'll be left behind. The world has little time and patience for any kind of social "revolution".
Privileged people enjoy their privilege and will hardly renounce it to give more unfortunate people a chance... And that also applies to relationships: women won't give up on hypergamy just because "unattractive men aren't getting laid", they enjoy their privilege, it's and advantage they will never give up to, as empathetic as they are.

Imbalance/inequality will always exist one way or another, especially in relationships. Whitecels usually give up on white women because of their absurd demands, and decides to SEAmaxx... But once they slay SEA chicks, there's a rice/SEAcel crying in the corner because his looksmatch is rejecting him, as her ego and SMV increased because she dated a richer man that could give her a visa, a better life, and produce "whiter" children.

Almost every foid is "capitalistic" as fuck when it comes to relationships, even the ones that claim, through virtue signaling, to be liberal/socialist/leftists. To them, everyone deserves a chance at life, regardless of ethnicity, gender, or wealth, but when it comes to THEIR personal dating preferences, they will prioritize rich white Chads instead of a plain looking wageslave curry with an "amazing personality".

If anything, maybe Chads are to blame for hypergamy being a thing.
If Chads had their sexual urges in check and ONLY/exclusively dated Staceys and rejected anything below that, hypergamy wouldn't be so much of a problem, because women wouldn't feel so entitled and their egos would be under control, as they wouldn't date up.
In the end, it's easier to convince other men to have a greater sense of self worth and don't date down, than convincing women to stop dating up.

tl;dr: real blackpilled incels must embrance the idea that they need to have the upper hand instead of "fighting for equality" or "ugly acceptance", and some Chads that date down are part of the problem that generates inequality in relationships.


Bonus:

155025631181915502563475071550256379951
 
Last edited:
Strong 90th post.

Seriously though, I agree that Chad's are the problem. They are no better than a cuck.
 
Communists get the rope
 
Privileged people enjoy their privilege and will hardly renounce it to give more unfortunate people a chance...
Thats why unprivilleged people make revolutions and take all their shit :)
 
National socialism is the only way.
269F08C1 E86E 4FDB B99A 01927C746EDF
 
Thats why unprivilleged people make revolutions and take all their shit :)
You won't stop hypergamy from your mom's basement or apartment. "Revolution" is cope.
 
You won't stop hypergamy from your mom's basement or apartment. "Revolution" is cope.
I dont even believe in hypergamy. I believe that a minority of man are incels, not 50% of them.

I dont believe in sub8 law. Average man are perfectly able to get laid.
 
I dont even believe in hypergamy. I believe that a minority of man are incels, not 50% of them.

I dont believe in sub8 law. Average man are perfectly able to get laid.

Incels being a minority (we don't really have stats for that) doesn't make hypergamy any less real. There are a lot of ugly men dating even uglier and uninsteresting women.
 
Pure socialism isn't good but the market needs to be regulated.
The sexual market is a good parallel to show us how unregulated free market is bad for many people
 
Incels being a minority (we don't really have stats for that) doesn't make hypergamy any less real. There are a lot of ugly men dating even uglier and uninsteresting women.
Ugly man dating even uglier woman = 4/10 males.

Incels = sub4 males.

Those man who are 5-6 are perfectly able to get their looksmatches unless they are ethnics/non-NT's/manlets.
 
Pure socialism isn't good but the market needs to be regulated.
The sexual market is a good parallel to show us how unregulated free market is bad for many people

Sexual "market" regulation = preventing Chads from dating down and causing an "inflation"


Ugly man dating even uglier woman = 4/10 males.

Incels = sub4 males.

Those man who are 5-6 are perfectly able to get their looksmatches unless they are ethnics/non-NT's/manlets.

4/10~3/10 or not, it's not acceptable to be limited to only date down. 3/10's deserves 3/10 foids, not 1/10 foids.
 
Being right wing as an incel makes no sense if anything. In fact you are an incel largely because you live in a "free" society. Inceldom wasn't a problem in the USSR and Lenin himself opposed free love so your pic made no sense:

Lenin points out that “in modern society the most talkative and noisy ‘top strata’ mean by ‘free love’” such things as “freedom from earnestness in love,” “freedom from childbirth,” and “freedom to commit adultery.” Therefore, he finds the slogan of “free love” to be a demand of bourgeois women.
 
4/10~3/10 or not, it's not acceptable to be limited to only date down. 3/10's deserves 3/10 foids, not 1/10 foids.
I think that's really strange. Who decides what a 3 or what a 1 is? When it comes to looks, I find that really stupid because people have different tastes or preferences. For example, I find chubby girls more attractive than skinny girls, while most guys prefer skinny girls. What applies to someone else as "ugly" I could find very pretty.
 
I think that's really strange. Who decides what a 3 or what a 1 is? When it comes to looks, I find that really stupid because people have different tastes or preferences. For example, I find chubby girls more attractive than skinny girls, while most guys prefer skinny girls. What applies to someone else as "ugly" I could find very pretty.
That's nice, too bad most women are NPCs and have an almost homogeneous preference about men (tall, white, lean and muscular)
There isn't really a monopoly of preferences among men, some like short girls, some like tall girls, some like thin girls, some like chubby girls and so on



Being right wing as an incel makes no sense if anything. In fact you are an incel largely because you live in a "free" society. Inceldom wasn't a problem in the USSR and Lenin himself opposed free love so your pic made no sense:

Lenin points out that “in modern society the most talkative and noisy ‘top strata’ mean by ‘free love’” such things as “freedom from earnestness in love,” “freedom from childbirth,” and “freedom to commit adultery.” Therefore, he finds the slogan of “free love” to be a demand of bourgeois women.
Lookism, at least, was a thing back then, check this Soviet Blackpill from 1942:

1550259739195
 
Last edited:
That's nice, too bad most women are NPCs and have an almost homogeneous preference about men (tall, white, lean and muscular)
There isn't really a monopoly of preferences among men, some like short girls, some like tall girls, some like thin girls, some like chubby girls and so on
The lean and muscular thing is not correct imo. There are many girls who like chubby men but yeah you are right about the tall and white thing. Pretty much all women pay strong attention to height and prefer white men.
 
The lean and muscular thing is not correct imo. There are many girls who like chubby men but yeah you are right about the tall and white thing. Pretty much all women pay strong attention to height and prefer white men.
Cope. There are women that tolerate slightly overweight men, but actually liking , as in, fetishing specifically about them is kinda rare.
 
Cope. There are women that tolerate slightly overweight men, but actually liking , as in, fetishing specifically about them is kinda rare.
That was not a cope of mine. I'm underweight so I would not benefit from it anyway xD. But I've heard from some women that they find chubby men more attractive. Clearly, those are less than those who prefer lean or muscular men, but they exist.
 
That was not a cope of mine. I'm underweight so I would not benefit from it anyway xD. But I've heard from some women that they find chubby men more attractive. Clearly, those are less than those who prefer lean or muscular men, but they exist.
Never validate a woman's opinion about women or womanhood. Ever. That's a prime example of virtue signaling, they appear to be tolerant and simpathetic to attract more orbiters.
 
I dont even believe in hypergamy. I believe that a minority of man are incels, not 50% of them.

I dont believe in sub8 law. Average man are perfectly able to get laid.

A common misconception about sub8 law is the idea that sub8's are incel. In truth, most incels acknowledge that sub8's still get relationships, marry, etc. It's just that those women SETTLE for those sub8 men because they can't get 8+ men to commit to them. A lot of women value the socioeconomic benefits that come with commitment more than love/mutual attraction, and they're willing to date men they're NOT sexually attracted to, for those benefits. Female settling in the looks department is a major factor behind so many relationship problems - cheating, lack of affection, demanding expectations (it takes a LOT to "compensate" for the lack of physical attraction), resentment, constant nagging, bitchy behavior, drama, etc. Once she feels she has the guy locked down, the sex stops and the meanness starts.
 
A common misconception about sub8 law is the idea that sub8's are incel. In truth, most incels acknowledge that sub8's still get relationships, marry, etc. It's just that those women SETTLE for those sub8 men because they can't get 8+ men to commit to them. A lot of women value the socioeconomic benefits that come with commitment more than love/mutual attraction, and they're willing to date men they're NOT sexually attracted to, for those benefits. Female settling in the looks department is a major factor behind so many relationship problems - cheating, lack of affection, demanding expectations (it takes a LOT to "compensate" for the lack of physical attraction), resentment, constant nagging, bitchy behavior, drama, etc. Once she feels she has the guy locked down, the sex stops and the meanness starts.
Still wrong.

You are able to LEGIT attract a female even if you are 5/10 or 6/10. You just cannot be Non-NT/Ethnic/Manlet/NEET. Most SLAYERS who i knew in my life were 5/10 TALL white guys and 6/10 white guys, not chads. Chads (8/10 white males) are like 5% of the white male population, they simply are not enought to supply the female demand.

The official betabux looks is the 4/10.

The only sense where i see that sub8 law applies in fact is when you want to attract a woman having several negative features in your life, like being a manlet NEET autist. In this case yes, you will need to be 8/10 to get woman.
 
If anything, maybe Chads are to blame for hypergamy being a thing.
If Chads had their sexual urges in check and ONLY/exclusively dated Staceys and rejected anything below that, hypergamy wouldn't be so much of a problem, because women wouldn't feel so entitled and their egos would be under control, as they wouldn't date up.
In the end, it's easier to convince other men to have a greater sense of self worth and don't date down, than convincing women to stop dating up.

tl;dr: real blackpilled incels must embrance the idea that they need to have the upper hand instead of "fighting for equality" or "ugly acceptance", and some Chads that date down are part of the problem that generates inequality in relationships.
high iq

Normie/ugly foids fuck chads because they can. If you could have a harem of 9's and 10' you would NOT settle down for looksmatch.
Hypergamy existed since the dawn of humanity, it's unchecked promiscuity that needs to be reigned in.
 
T.has no fucking idea what socialism is.

Socialism is economic. I want stock trader and CEO chad to get shot and us poor NEET incels to get entry level jobs with promotion opportunities for non NT people(the free market prevents that) and low pension age. Economic socialism will give us the side effect of us unemployable low IQ autists(fuck you richcels) having better cope as in having more money.

ALso in Eastern Europe during socialism monogamy was enforced and NT bragging was discouraged. Also slutty behavior was brutally punished.

Exposing foid hypocrisy doesnt justify me supporting the free market.
exactly, National Socialism has all off the advantages and none of the problems, capitalims and communism are both jewish inventions designed to bring globalism, corruption and eventual collapse
T. profile pic of jewish free market puppet
Being right wing as an incel makes no sense if anything. In fact you are an incel largely because you live in a "free" society. Inceldom wasn't a problem in the USSR and Lenin himself opposed free love so your pic made no sense:

Lenin points out that “in modern society the most talkative and noisy ‘top strata’ mean by ‘free love’” such things as “freedom from earnestness in love,” “freedom from childbirth,” and “freedom to commit adultery.” Therefore, he finds the slogan of “free love” to be a demand of bourgeois women.
 
Pure socialism isn't good but the market needs to be regulated.
The sexual market is a good parallel to show us how unregulated free market is bad for many people
Economic market is good but we need to abolish the sexual market in favor of sexual marxist
 
Low iq OP

Lefties give neetbux

Righties say Get a job bucko
 
Being Incel and marxist/communist/socialist/leftist is something that makes little sense to me. One can't call himself "Blackpilled" in that case.
According to the definition of the blackpill on this site,
"the blackpill claims being attractive is far more important than personality or attitude; while the latter can be improved, they are marginal in comparison to natural appearance https://incels.is/threads/intro-to-incels.15406/ "

There is nothing in there that has anything to do with whether or not womens selection can be changed or whether a left wing or right wing government would be better at doing so. At the very least it implies an authoritiarian gvmt or very socially conservative society would be the only effective method to change womens selection, but neither big government nor social conservatism is inherently right wing or left wing.


Imbalance/inequality will always exist one way or another, especially in relationships. Whitecels usually give up on white women because of their absurd demands, and decides to SEAmaxx... But once they slay SEA chicks, there's a rice/SEAcel crying in the corner because his looksmatch is rejecting him, as her ego and SMV increased because she dated a richer man that could give her a visa, a better life, and produce "whiter" children.

How does inequality being natural make reducing inequality a pointless endeavor???

Almost every foid is "capitalistic" as fuck when it comes to relationships, even the ones that claim, through virtue signaling, to be liberal/socialist/leftists. To them, everyone deserves a chance at life, regardless of ethnicity, gender, or wealth, but when it comes to THEIR personal dating preferences, they will prioritize rich white Chads instead of a plain looking wageslave curry with an "amazing personality".

tl;dr: real blackpilled incels must embrance the idea that they need to have the upper hand instead of "fighting for equality" or "ugly acceptance", and some Chads that date down are part of the problem that generates inequality in relationships.

Well I already addressed this, but Ill add that selfish temporarily embarassed alpha types have no place in communities and can kindly stop being temporarily embarassed alphas. Temporarily embarassed alphas just serve to further a crabs-in-a-bucket-mental dynamic here, and tend to just drag everyone they come in contact with down.
 
Last edited:
They make for good meatshields. I don't mind them, but I hate all commies w/o exception.
 
Being right wing as an incel makes no sense if anything. In fact you are an incel largely because you live in a "free" society. Inceldom wasn't a problem in the USSR and Lenin himself opposed free love so your pic made no sense:

Lenin points out that “in modern society the most talkative and noisy ‘top strata’ mean by ‘free love’” such things as “freedom from earnestness in love,” “freedom from childbirth,” and “freedom to commit adultery.” Therefore, he finds the slogan of “free love” to be a demand of bourgeois women.
There is a large spectrum of what is considered 'Right-Wing'.A libertarian(FreeSocietycels) is just one of the many aspects of the right.
(Which actually do makes sense;because if women are not being protected with NEETbuxx by the goverment they will turn to men,increasing our SMV)
 
Jfl at this libertarian / right-wing cuck shilling.
 
There is a large spectrum of what is considered 'Right-Wing'.A libertarian(FreeSocietycels) is just one of the many aspects of the right.
(Which actually do makes sense;because if women are not being protected with NEETbuxx by the goverment they will turn to men,increasing our SMV)
To men with money*

They'd all flock to young Dan Bilzerians

monogamy has to be enforced
 
Being Incel and marxist/communist/socialist/leftist is something that makes little sense to me. One can't call himself "Blackpilled" in that case.
To be Blackpilled you must understand and fully embrace that the world is an unfair place, and true equality can never be achieved.
You either give in to the norm/standards or you'll be left behind. The world has little time and patience for any kind of social "revolution".
Privileged people enjoy their privilege and will hardly renounce it to give more unfortunate people a chance... And that also applies to relationships: women won't give up on hypergamy just because "unattractive men aren't getting laid", they enjoy their privilege, it's and advantage they will never give up to, as empathetic as they are.

Imbalance/inequality will always exist one way or another, especially in relationships. Whitecels usually give up on white women because of their absurd demands, and decides to SEAmaxx... But once they slay SEA chicks, there's a rice/SEAcel crying in the corner because his looksmatch is rejecting him, as her ego and SMV increased because she dated a richer man that could give her a visa, a better life, and produce "whiter" children.

Almost every foid is "capitalistic" as fuck when it comes to relationships, even the ones that claim, through virtue signaling, to be liberal/socialist/leftists. To them, everyone deserves a chance at life, regardless of ethnicity, gender, or wealth, but when it comes to THEIR personal dating preferences, they will prioritize rich white Chads instead of a plain looking wageslave curry with an "amazing personality".

If anything, maybe Chads are to blame for hypergamy being a thing.
If Chads had their sexual urges in check and ONLY/exclusively dated Staceys and rejected anything below that, hypergamy wouldn't be so much of a problem, because women wouldn't feel so entitled and their egos would be under control, as they wouldn't date up.
In the end, it's easier to convince other men to have a greater sense of self worth and don't date down, than convincing women to stop dating up.

tl;dr: real blackpilled incels must embrance the idea that they need to have the upper hand instead of "fighting for equality" or "ugly acceptance", and some Chads that date down are part of the problem that generates inequality in relationships.


Bonus:

View attachment 89420View attachment 89422View attachment 89424
Only bluepilled people are leftist. This includes normies, Brads, Chads and all foids (Stacies, Beckies whatever) despite the facts that foids are hypocrites for thinking this way as they will never accept us subhumans as a part of society
 
The irony in all of this is the only way for an incel to ascend is to fuck a liberal polyam roastie, because no right-wing woman would touch an incel with a ten foot pole.
 
and true equality can never be achieved
Of course not. The only way there could be a completely egalitarian society if we would all be clones of each other.

I have views that most likely make me leftist by your standards. I have decided to keep my political views and my blackpill theories separate. Too often, I find, that the blackpill leads to (political) nihilism, which is not healthy for anyone with even a slight interest in politics.

I want a "leftist" society because I truly feel it's the best, not because I feel I can benefit (which I will, everone benefits from a "leftist" soiety). And by leftist I mean something like the Nordic countries.
 
Being a right wing fascist is cope cause you're a fucking midget was the face like a back of a bus. Master race only. Inferior genes = take a long shower son
 
High IQ

Socialism is only for foids, anyway - single mothers, healthcare, affirmative action. JFL if you think leftists want to help ugly men.

Patriarchal Conservatism is the only way.
 
The irony in all of this is the only way for an incel to ascend is to fuck a liberal polyam roastie, because no right-wing woman would touch an incel with a ten foot pole.
Forget the right and the left, and go anarchist.
 
Being Incel and marxist/communist/socialist/leftist is something that makes little sense to me. One can't call himself "Blackpilled" in that case.
To be Blackpilled you must understand and fully embrace that the world is an unfair place, and true equality can never be achieved.
You either give in to the norm/standards or you'll be left behind. The world has little time and patience for any kind of social "revolution".
Privileged people enjoy their privilege and will hardly renounce it to give more unfortunate people a chance... And that also applies to relationships: women won't give up on hypergamy just because "unattractive men aren't getting laid", they enjoy their privilege, it's and advantage they will never give up to, as empathetic as they are.

Imbalance/inequality will always exist one way or another, especially in relationships. Whitecels usually give up on white women because of their absurd demands, and decides to SEAmaxx... But once they slay SEA chicks, there's a rice/SEAcel crying in the corner because his looksmatch is rejecting him, as her ego and SMV increased because she dated a richer man that could give her a visa, a better life, and produce "whiter" children.

Almost every foid is "capitalistic" as fuck when it comes to relationships, even the ones that claim, through virtue signaling, to be liberal/socialist/leftists. To them, everyone deserves a chance at life, regardless of ethnicity, gender, or wealth, but when it comes to THEIR personal dating preferences, they will prioritize rich white Chads instead of a plain looking wageslave curry with an "amazing personality".

If anything, maybe Chads are to blame for hypergamy being a thing.
If Chads had their sexual urges in check and ONLY/exclusively dated Staceys and rejected anything below that, hypergamy wouldn't be so much of a problem, because women wouldn't feel so entitled and their egos would be under control, as they wouldn't date up.
In the end, it's easier to convince other men to have a greater sense of self worth and don't date down, than convincing women to stop dating up.

tl;dr: real blackpilled incels must embrance the idea that they need to have the upper hand instead of "fighting for equality" or "ugly acceptance", and some Chads that date down are part of the problem that generates inequality in relationships.


Bonus:

View attachment 89420View attachment 89422View attachment 89424

I'm sorry but Chad isn't the problem, women are, Chad fucks down and on his own league, he has reasonable standards, how is chad the bad one in this situation for having reasonable standards, if women would simply select mates like Chad does, we'd all be getting laid, comparing Chad to the average woman and saying they are equally at fault or Chad is somehow more at fault is ridiculous.

I hate Chad in the same way that I hate pain, or a wall block my part, its an annoyance but it isn't malicious, women go out of their way to be unfair in their selections and have unrealistic standards, we don't need less Chad's, we need more women that select mates like Chad. The onus is on women doing the selecting, not the Chads taking whatever they can get.

Think about how unrealistic and retarded your proposition is, Chad is supposed to get pussy of all leagues thrown at him, and only select specifically from his league and above, that doesn't make sense.

You do realize that the irony of your post is that you are requesting that CHADS BECOME LIKE WOMEN, you are kind of indirectly validating women's current selection patterns.

Like I said before, we don't need less Chads, we need more women selecting mates like Chad. If we have less Chads were still below average/average men, and women not having access to men of a certain standard doesn't magically erase the concept of that standard from their minds, they'll still be selective, they'll go for the next best thing, can't get Chad, well I can still get a 6/10 that makes a decent 5 figures, still don't have to fuck average/below average men.

The problem doesn't end of you regulate things on the male end, this is a female problem, modifying things on the male end does nothing to solve the actual problem.
 
"Seize the means of reproduction"
-Incel Marx
 
crabs-in-a-bucket
I'm sorry but Chad isn't the problem, women are, Chad fucks down and on his own league, he has reasonable standards, how is chad the bad one in this situation for having reasonable standards, if women would simply select mates like Chad does, we'd all be getting laid, comparing Chad to the average woman and saying they are equally at fault or Chad is somehow more at fault is ridiculous.

I hate Chad in the same way that I hate pain, or a wall block my part, its an annoyance but it isn't malicious, women go out of their way to be unfair in their selections and have unrealistic standards, we don't need less Chad's, we need more women that select mates like Chad. The onus is on women doing the selecting, not the Chads taking whatever they can get.

Think about how unrealistic and retarded your proposition is, Chad is supposed to get pussy of all leagues thrown at him, and only select specifically from his league and above, that doesn't make sense.

You do realize that the irony of your post is that you are requesting that CHADS BECOME LIKE WOMEN, you are kind of indirectly validating women's current selection patterns.

Like I said before, we don't need less Chads, we need more women selecting mates like Chad. If we have less Chads were still below average/average men, and women not having access to men of a certain standard doesn't magically erase the concept of that standard from their minds, they'll still be selective, they'll go for the next best thing, can't get Chad, well I can still get a 6/10 that makes a decent 5 figures, still don't have to fuck average/below average men.

The problem doesn't end of you regulate things on the male end, this is a female problem, modifying things on the male end does nothing to solve the actual problem.

I do realize the main culprit for inceldom (for instance) are females, because, well, they are the choosers and unfortunately men don't get to chose these days. The thing is, what do you think it's easier, to persuade women into lowering their standards, or to have Chads enabling more women to be available for sub8 men? Of course the latter, because like us, they are men and they are more rational than women will ever be.

But you can't deny that the fact that some Chads that fucks landwhales makes things harder for "lesser" men. The "landwhale" will now very likely think that they are attractive and entitled to fuck Chads just like the last one who fucked her, they'll hardly realize that they were just lucky that one time, and will reject anyone below that Chad's level.
 
Last edited:
what do you think it's easier, to persuade women into lowering their standards, or to have Chads enabling more women to be available for sub8 men?

What do you think is easier, teaching a penguin how to fly, or teaching a fish how to walk?

Neither, they are both impossible, we can't convince either side to do anything because its to their benefit and at no cost to their own lives, why would they give a fuck. But women can more easily be intimidated than Chads, so if were going with the violence strategy women would still be the target.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
16
Views
588
Julaybib
Julaybib
S
Replies
63
Views
1K
Antifem Lord
Antifem Lord
A
Replies
2
Views
136
adn
A
fallenghost
Replies
1
Views
128
Nagisa_Shingetsu
Nagisa_Shingetsu
Lifeisbullshit95
Replies
7
Views
231
copemaxx9002
copemaxx9002

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top