And it's only going to get worse, most Normies don't realise this, because, they're busy dancing on tiktok, videos from Ukraine/gaza are brutal. The fact that you can die from loitering munition is crazy.
being infantry has always sucked, cavalry was tall fuckers riding inn to war. charging enemy that was routing or from behind. infantry is normie or incel job. cavalry was chad role
I'd imagine being an active participant in ANY war sucks.
Best job in war is being Jody.
Being an infantryman sucks.
Fixed it for you
It sucks even more now
Notice how Normies only talk about cavalry charges when discussing history? Brutal blackpill
Except it's gotten worse. There were no FPV drones in world war 2
thankfully the maxim gun made cavalry obsolete , no more horse chad
What does chad do these days?
play ill and get out of service
If artillery strikes near you, you have a chance to hide in fortified positions or somewhere else, if FPV drone/regular drone with HE grenades attached/loitering munition operator spotted you, there's 80% chance you're dead, if not higher.
Ot maybe, they won't go to the frontlines at all? Because, Chad's dad will just pay the officials.
Yeah, losing your arms or legs is brutal. I would rather be dead tbh
if you play ill you dont even get too the frontline. but if you want clout you play ill at the frontline
Such grenades made for grenade launchers are attached to drones, if this thing hit human body it explodes and rip you off completely in parts, 100% lethal. It's better when it explodes near you, there's a chance to survive if you won't get finished.
W
Normies won't know until they get hit and taken out. As normies lost interest in the Ukraine war 2 weeks in as their attention spans aren't long enough. They wanted the Hollywood ending where the Ukrainians won within 2 weeks.
When that didn't happen the normies were butthurt and went back to TikTok videos that are 20 seconds in length and still watching those TikTok videos 2 years later.
When that didn't happen the normies were butthurt and went back to TikTok videos that are 20 seconds in length and still watching those TikTok videos 2 years later.
How much damage do these do to tanks? I have heard the munition in Russian tanks is right below the occupants, hence, if it hits the right place the whole, tanks explodes. Munition on Western tanks like the Abrams on the other hand are placed behind, that's why there's no explosion, and everyone inside survives even if the tank is damaged.
Such grenades made for grenade launchers are attached to drones, if this thing hit human body it explodes and rip you off completely in parts, 100% lethal. It's better when it explodes near you, there's a chance to survive if you won't get finished.
Yeah, there's extremely good war footage right now, barely, anyone even views those anymore.
Infantry hasn't been causing most of enemy casualties for a very long time in warfare by now. It's projectile weaponry that kills most of the enemy and advancements in artillery/rockets/drones only made the dependence on projectiles even more pronounced. Riflemen are meant to hold territory and meant to soak up damage or distract an enemy. Most of the small arms bullets you fire will never hit anything. You're just a diversion for the roles that really shift the balance of power in a battle.
Yes, I'm aware that all infantrymen do is suppress enemy fire. I was talking about infantrymen dying from loitering munitions and stuff, it's crazy how you can die from a small drone carrying a grenade. There has never been something like this in history.
Ones on pictures can't do any serious damage to a tank, even APC/IFV. At best you can destroy optics. Only by dropping one inside you can explode ammo storage.
All Soviet tanks like T-64,T-72, T-80, T-90 and most of their modifications have this problem.
Abrams have it's ammo stored in ammo rack in the back of a turret, it closes with a door and has blowout panels, but there's no 100% chance crew survives. Also a reason why Abrams is less likely to throw a turret is because it doesn't carry as much HE ammo as soviet tanks do + The explosives in Western shells are less likely to explode if hit. Most Soviet/Russian tanks are used as artillery, they carry HE shells mostly.
For example Leopard and Challenger do have some of its ammo stored inside a hull and not ammo storage in the back of a turret, it's very dangerous if penetration happens.
Yes, some stats says only 10-12% of casualties are caused by small arms in Ukraine. Most damage is from artillery, drones, bombs, some others.
Most incels are better adapted to be drone operators. Hopefully if anyone gets drafted here they can offer their technical know how and skills for maintaining and fixing electronics to avoid being enlisted as a foot soldier. Chads and normies would be more likely to be cannon fodder compared to incels that have more experience on handling precise delicate hardware and software.
Anticlimactic but a good amount die before even reaching the frontline trenches.
So they're mainly used to Target soldiers in Trenches?
I don't think the T-90 has this problem. The ones exploding in Ukraine are all T-72s.
I wish that was true. A lot of drone operators in Ukraine are foids, these sadistic holes probably, take pleasure in killing poor Slavcels, some of these drone operators can be extremely cruel. I have seen videos where they try their best to delay the Slavcels's death.
View: https://youtu.be/Sxyu94x0SLw?si=GEH51S23EU2mAPro
@supersoldier
A lot of people don't know this. But these FPV drones were given to Syria by Russia to kill rebels. It's extremely effective, but it's terrifying when you're on the receiving end.
Being an Infantrymen has always sucked. The Cavalry niggas used to take all glory during Medieval times.
All of them have this problem. T-90 is just a modification of T-72. T-90M has new turret and slightly better protected autoloader, with some of the extra ammo stored in the back of the turret, previously extra ammo outside autoloader was stored in the hull.
Iirc ISIS started using drones in around 2013, then in Donbass it seen limited use, but still war was old fashioned back then.
Sometimes they also talk about Naval Landings and stuff and Artillery regiments if discussing early mordern history
Artillery regiments are not not considered infantry. That's why even foids are allowed to serve in them. Naval landings are talked about because, it looks cool
I'm a sniper and I can't pick the ants out of my nose...
Noblemen were cavalry
noblemen were the chads of old. they got a better start with food of higher quality, wealth and power. they were the chads of old
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
