What??!?!?!
bait
he sucks his jewish master's cock
real
Its just taken out of context
gass all jews
Juden Peterstein
He is an incel.
Racist!
He hates us, listen to what he has to say about incels. It's this. It's identical to any typical Liberal/Leftist/Woke/Feminist. Just an attitude of individual blame. Only normies distinguish Jordan Peterson from any of these other figures. How anyone talks about us is the litmus test. I assume most people here understand this.
We are the most unfortunate men in modern society, so there is actually less in the way of us confronting the truth about everything, the way people and society are, and being genuinely progressive as a result than anyone else. (all foids are against us, and most men are because they're middle/upper-class and/or with a foid.)
Last edited:
I know, its a funny thing that redditors tie him to us.
Jordan Peterson if he was based
I doubt that he said this. He is a massive Zionist bootlicker and notorious for his globally pro Semitic remarks.
I've had the displeasure of reading his most recent book "We who wrestle with God" and it is such a letdown.... Mind you I have only skimped the book however I have seen no attempts to objectively argue that the Abrahamic god or any godly being exists.
That being said Peterstein opnely hates on inkwells so fuck that sexhaver faggot! His suits are an eyesore and he raised a whore of a daughter.
I've had the displeasure of reading his most recent book "We who wrestle with God" and it is such a letdown.... Mind you I have only skimped the book however I have seen no attempts to objectively argue that the Abrahamic god or any godly being exists.
That being said Peterstein opnely hates on inkwells so fuck that sexhaver faggot! His suits are an eyesore and he raised a whore of a daughter.
He did say it, I just took it out of context
He looks at God from a psychological view point you dip
Yes and that is retarded for a book at was marketed to be the ultimate proof of God's existence, the end of an have old debate.
Either his marketing was fraudulent or he can't deliver. In both cases he's a pseud
An objective argument of course. I am only interested in the objective truth. Aren't you?
What would an objective argument look like?
Clean your room
Something logically consistent and based on objective truths only. Do you not know what an objective argument is or are you using Münchhausens paradox? Because I honestly don't have the time, I need to take a nap soon.
Juden Peterstein
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
