Deleted member 60
.
-
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2017
- Posts
- 17,120
- Online
- 2d 17h 17m
Ritalincel said:
save the frogsInsomniac said:
Ritalincel said:
save the frogsInsomniac said:
temporaryRitalincel said:
The day the likes of you gets banned im rioting. FreeRegisterUserName said:Free@Insomniac or I will shut this site down!
Never thought the day would come...
Fuck da feds!
Eskimocel said:Free @FrailPaleStaleMale free @Smallframecel free @Insomniac
it is temporary.Ritalincel said:
Eskimocel said:Free fucking@Insomniac wtf is this bullshit. I bet I have cucks that report posts randomly to get "Muh mod". I will do the same snitching bullshit like a numale.
RegisterUserName said:Free@Insomniac or I will shut this site down!
Never thought the day would come...
Fuck da feds!
cucktearslol said:@Insomniac
FREE HIM
FREE HIM
FREE HIM
i've banned you for actively and severely hitting on me and another user in our discord PMs. with very little tact, seemingly hinting in our PMs that you've masturbated to/fantasised about me, and while knowing that we were both completely straight.
cucktearslol said:@Insomniac
FREE HIM
SuperSaiyanGymcel said:I thought I would ever see the day@Insomniac was banned. free my nigga!!1 they locked him up for no reason!!!
"Low effort"Michael15651 said:Same, he was a quality poster and I liked having him around. He kept the site alive. I don't understand what he could've done
I wouldn’t be surprised if the pulled that with him. WHats funny is that he wasn’t necessarily a shitposter, he just had a lot to say on any given topicRegisterUserName said:"Low effort"
I PMed him and that is the reason...StaroRavager said:I wouldn’t be surprised if the pulled that with him.
This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.RegisterUserName said:"Low effort"
Well putRitalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.
I could tell your rage suppression programming was under pressure when insomniac got banned.Ritalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.
Give it 1 week and people will be back to posting "its over" and "rope". Just like the ER rule.. people say "Eat Rice" and other shitRegisterUserName said:I could tell your rage suppression programming was under pressure when insomniac got banned.
The rules need to be more precise, with examples, although it is to be expected with the recent crackdown on low effort. It'll blow over in 3 weeks or so.
commit Exothermic ReactionEskimocel said:Give it 1 week and people will be back to posting "its over" and "rope". Just like the ER rule.. people say "Eat Rice" and other shit![]()
That’s ridiculous. I knew that rule was going to cause trouble eventuallyRegisterUserName said:I PMed him and that is the reason...
Yes like the worshipping rule, I remember when chad avis were banned butStaroRavager said:That’s ridiculous. I knew that rule was going to cause trouble eventually
I saw this coming from a mile away. Even the less controversial rules are enforced in this way
It's only going to get worse as time goes on. This is the way of the future for all online platformsRitalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.
This cant be the reason, no way..REALLY?StaroRavager said:That’s ridiculous. I knew that rule was going to cause trouble eventually
I saw this coming from a mile away. Even the less controversial rules are enforced in this way
Eskimocel said:This cant be the reason, no way..REALLY?
It sense that the reasoning for bans and temp bans are becoming increasingly arbitrary as times goes on.Anonymous26 said:Yes like the worshipping rule, I remember when chad avis were banned but@Templarcel421 is still here so it must of been vague.
That's what Insomniac said apparentlyEskimocel said:This cant be the reason, no way..REALLY?
Yep, he confirmed it for me. If you are going to enforce a rule you might as well go all out. Not let it slide one day and then ban the other.StaroRavager said:It sense that the reasoning for bans and temp bans are becoming increasingly arbitrary as times goes on.
That's what Insomniac said apparently
One thing I learned years ago is that the ideal will never be achieved, especially when vested interests are involved in the equationEskimocel said:Yep, he confirmed it for me. If you are going to enforce a rule you might as well go all out. Not let it slide one day and then ban the other.
No!Ritalincel said:
fukmylyf said:this low effort rule is such bullshit. May as well ban the whole forum. Fucking faggots
Are you volunteering to go first?fukmylyf said:this low effort rule is such bullshit. May as well ban the whole forum. Fucking faggots
Anonymous26 said:Yes like the worshipping rule, I remember when chad avis were banned but@Templarcel421 is still here so it must of been vague.
fukmylyf said:this low effort rule is such bullshit. May as well ban the whole forum. Fucking faggots
Mogs meTemplarcel421 said:JFLif you think Gambler is a Chad. Also I got banned for having Orb in my sig.
half the rules are misinterpretable vague bullshit which just give the mods outs to ban anyone for any reason.fukmylyf said:this low effort rule is such bullshit. May as well ban the whole forum. Fucking faggots
Ritalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.
fukmylyf said:this low effort rule is such bullshit. May as well ban the whole forum. Fucking
ICanOnlyFapToBDSM said:half the rules are misinterpretable vague bullshit which just give the mods outs to ban anyone for any reason.
does legit nobody else here know enough programming to run a site that isnt a spastic non-fuck-giver like@Leucosticte?
incel v2 when?
faggots
He's too confrontational towards the mods. Same mistakeKilluminoidBR said:Why is there people crying for Insomniac ban here??? The guy is a ultra low effort spammer, half of his posts are "[Irrelevant shit] tbhtbhtbhtbh". It was obvious that he would get temped in question of time.
The ban was fair and that rule is great. Just stop spamming and stop crying.
tbhRitalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.
commie scum, Insomniac was a higher IQ poster than you and you know it.KilluminoidBR said:Why is there people crying for Insomniac ban here??? The guy is a ultra low effort spammer, half of his posts are "[Irrelevant shit] tbhtbhtbhtbh". It was obvious that he would get temped in question of time.
The ban was fair and that rule is great. Just stop spamming and stop crying.
Quadruple digit IQRitalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.
FACEandLMS said:I forgot about the woman-worship rule. Posting hot women counts as this. Also, someone baited me into defending myself on some issue about my inceldom and I went too in-depth, apparently.
are you, of all people, really trying to argue that you're not a trash posting spammer? jesus christ. you should be grateful that you haven't been banned yet, if anything.Ritalincel said:This is a vague, ambiguous rule that he can use to justify deleting whatever he wants. He's already done it to me, and probably will do so with this post. Serge has learned well from (((social media))) like Youtube, Twitter, etc... that constantly make ""rules"" like this.