lmao at 15 year olds bragging
fucking hate this world
bragging should result in an instant permaban tbh.
fucking hate this world
bragging should result in an instant permaban tbh.
Like I said ban all teenagers and I was right @SergeantIncel age requirement when?
What did he brag about, his looks?Not youA ban appeal user.
EDIT: Nevermind, he just bragged. Perma'd.
Me too! When he will be unbanned?Glad @IntolerantSocialist is not perma'd
D
in three days.
Glad @IntolerantSocialist is not perma'd
I think it's hypocritical to not allow teenagers because while yes, some of them may go on to ascend in college or are just going through a phase, every oldcel here was an incel in high school and might have wanted to participate in this community if they had the opportunity to do so.
I haven't seen him bragging, just checked his posts. Did you delete them?
D
of course.
I see, that makes sense, boyos.
I support banning ALL kids bellow 19yo.
Especially those who already had non-paid sex.
Especially those who already had non-paid sex.
D
@Moustachcel
What happened to him? I wasn't quick enough to click the thread.
What happened to him? I wasn't quick enough to click the thread.
D
it's temporary.
D
Why does it not always say if it's permanent or temporary?
Last edited:
Because if they have a custom line under their profile picture that they set themselves, the forum doesn't automatically change it when they are banned.
Me and my SO were putting their kids to bed, and then I drank my soy lent EDIT: R.I.P. INBOX. EDIT2: Thanks for the gold stranger!
That’s a
on the spot
Lots of people getting reaped recently
knajjd probably having a bad day againLots of people getting reaped recently
Glad @IntolerantSocialist is not perma'd
Glad @IntolerantSocialist is not perma'd
We are waiting for your ban to expire! @IntolerantSocialist
True we were all that "underaged incel" before we found this site, but if one "ascends", I think it should be a rule of courtesy that they do so quietly, as in don't make it known, because then it just seems like trolling, and makes people take all incel teens less seriously. Protocol should be the privately message a mod to have their account deleted, not make a thread to announce their ascension and its time to say "good bye guiiiz, it was fun", that shit would piss me off.
@Moustachcel ?
D
it's temporary.
You should make a ban megathread in which you always write down who got banned for what for how long.
Too much work br0
D
A notice board if it were. I think that would be good to know. I just don't like it when peoples names are lined & you don't know whether they're temp banned or permanent banned.
I think it says so in their title.
This is not a bad idea but I don't think that it is viable. Firstly, listing "for what" would potentially make people targets for harassment in the future, which isn't something we support. Secondly, I don't believe there is a feature we can just flip on that would do anything like this - in my experience with such features on other forums, it requires a script and ghost user that has special privileges to post in a designated thread using an automated script, which is too much work for too little benefit. Thirdly, we have other reasons beyond convenience for having the rules we have in the OP, namely: ask the person who got banned what they got banned for if you're curious, for how long they are gone, etc., and that we are not obligated to divulge such information.
Only if they didn't manually set one themselves. For example, if you ever got banned, your "title" wouldn't change.
That feature is actually just an extension of a regular warning, and has to be typed in manually each time. I used it in cases where it didn't make sense to just remove the post, as it had been quoted multiple times and would take more work to remove each post than to put a public notice on it, but after further discussions with the mod team we've agreed to not use public notices and delete content instead.
What happened to @Random Acts of Jihad ? He was the newest user and is already banned?
Foid, infiltrator or alt. Newest 3 members suffered the same fate kek.What happened to @Random Acts of Jihad ? He was the newest user and is already banned?
Happens with every shooting I guess.
What happened to @Random Acts of Jihad ? He was the newest user and is already banned?
This was explained on the previous page.
We have a new filtering process that allows us a more thorough vetting process for some applicants. This involves accepting them as members but not letting them post until they pass the second filter. This isn't the norm, it is only for exceptions. In between those 3 banned members, there were probably others who were outright rejected.
What was the reason for @overlystinkypants s ban? Its been a few months, i rly liked him. Was it because of his gay posts?
Is Leucosticte's ban perm or nah
Notafed has returned boyos
new account
@Ritalincel @Insomniac
new account
@Ritalincel @Insomniac
U
How do I know you're the REAL @notafed and not just some poser?
Are you seriously outing yourself as a ban evasion alt?
18-1-9-19-9-14 2-18-1-14 = Raisin Bran
You are going to work at a domino's pizza store
@notanalt
U
Oh my @God, it really is you. Welcome home, old friend.
If he has 5k posts by tomorrow we'll know it's him.
Right, warnings would be more complicated to give and whatnot.
Similar threads
Emba
Toxic Femininity
North Dakota Judge Says Abortion Ban Unconstitutional Because Abortion Makes Women Happy
- Shaktiman
- The Lounge
Lurkercel_678
Users who are viewing this thread
