Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Soy Average Soyditter IS baiter.

B

blackedpiller

SPICcel
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Posts
2,401
Screenshot 20230918 114030 kindlephoto 54895402
 
"I'm objective":soy::soy::soy:
 
:feelzez: Getting reddit gold is kinda like winning the special olympics while being morbidly obese and gay :feelshaha:
 
:feelzez: Getting reddit gold is kinda like winning the special olympics while being morbidly obese and gay :feelshaha:
Is it even an achievement to be proud of?
 
:feelzez: Getting reddit gold is kinda like winning the special olympics while being morbidly obese and gay :feelshaha:
JFL they think we're losers but still wanna loose time to "mogg" us the cognitive dissonance is ovER 9000 :feelskek:
 
Is it even an achievement to be proud of?
For a redditard yes man :feelshaha: .. i would say for some it’s the highlight of their entire Jabba the hut life.
 
r/Inceltear moment
 
Source? Source? Source?Do you have a source on that?Source?A source. I need a source.Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.Do you have a degree in that field?A college degree? In that field?Then your arguments are invalid.No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.Correlation does not equal causation.CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.Nope, still haven't.I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron. :soy: :soy: :soy:
 
Source? Source? Source?Do you have a source on that?Source?A source. I need a source.Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.Do you have a degree in that field?A college degree? In that field?Then your arguments are invalid.No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.Correlation does not equal causation.CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.Nope, still haven't.I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron. :soy: :soy: :soy:
Every far Leftard today.
 

Similar threads

Lv99_BixNood
Replies
87
Views
3K
Last2025cel
Last2025cel
Hoodpreet
Replies
13
Views
972
Hoodpreet
Hoodpreet
Skoga
Replies
34
Views
1K
Skoga
Skoga
VλREN
Replies
11
Views
676
onetwothree
O
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
3
Views
403
DoomThreeKoala
DoomThreeKoala

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top