Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Autism is not a spectrum

Sir Silentium

Sir Silentium

Deus Vult †
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Posts
11,041
Online time
6d 7h
Inspired by this article:

The modern idea of the Autism spectrum has become so broad that it's no longer clinically useful.


Main points​

- Autism was originally defined as a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition involving difficulties with social communication and restricted or repetitive behaviours.
- Over time, diagnostic criteria expanded to include more people with milder or less typical presentations. And often with people that barely show traces at all.
- The "spectrum" has been stretched so far that it groups together people with very different underlying conditions and needs.


Key argument​

There may be at least two major groups currently being labelled autistic:

1. People diagnosed in early childhood, often with more obvious developmental differences and sometimes intellectual disability.
2. A rapidly growing group diagnosed later in life, especially adolescents and women, who may have anxiety, hypersensitivity, or social difficulties but not the classic features traditionally associated with autism.

These groups may not have the same underlying condition and may need different forms of support.


What should occur​

Rather than one broad spectrum, the articles suggests autism may eventually be divided into more specific subgroups with clearer definitions. Which will improve research and help target the support.

Supporters argue that the autism label has become so broad that it now covers people with very different levels of impairment and support needs, making the diagnosis less useful.



TLDR​

Autism diagnoses have expanded so much that the term "autism spectrum" may no longer describe a single, coherent condition, and the articles suggests future research may need to split it into more clearly defined categories. Autism should be divided into subgroups rather than spectrumising it.
 
If you're looking for further reads on the topic:
 
Inspired by this article:

The modern idea of the Autism spectrum has become so broad that it's no longer clinically useful.


Main points​

- Autism was originally defined as a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition involving difficulties with social communication and restricted or repetitive behaviours.
- Over time, diagnostic criteria expanded to include more people with milder or less typical presentations. And often with people that barely show traces at all.
- The "spectrum" has been stretched so far that it groups together people with very different underlying conditions and needs.


Key argument​

There may be at least two major groups currently being labelled autistic:

1. People diagnosed in early childhood, often with more obvious developmental differences and sometimes intellectual disability.
2. A rapidly growing group diagnosed later in life, especially adolescents and women, who may have anxiety, hypersensitivity, or social difficulties but not the classic features traditionally associated with autism.

These groups may not have the same underlying condition and may need different forms of support.


What should occur​

Rather than one broad spectrum, the articles suggests autism may eventually be divided into more specific subgroups with clearer definitions. Which will improve research and help target the support.

Supporters argue that the autism label has become so broad that it now covers people with very different levels of impairment and support needs, making the diagnosis less useful.



TLDR​

Autism diagnoses have expanded so much that the term "autism spectrum" may no longer describe a single, coherent condition, and the articles suggests future research may need to split it into more clearly defined categories. Autism should be divided into subgroups rather than spectrumising it.
I agree.
 
If you're looking for further reads on the topic:
Psychiatry is a foid thing so don't expect it to reflect reality.
 
If I was diagnosed during childhood does it mean it’s ovER?
 
i have the real type because diagnosed in childhood
 

Similar threads

Orbit
Replies
8
Views
886
Solid State
Solid State
AdExpress
Replies
32
Views
671
TheSlavicCel
TheSlavicCel
aggelaras
Replies
7
Views
470
captchawaffen
captchawaffen
four1298
Replies
5
Views
625
Chud Norris72
Chud Norris72

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top