News attraction to extremely large breasts is actually homosexual in nature TBH

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

The reasoning for this is very easy to understand if you study le science as I do.

1) boobies grow bigger during pregnancy​

2) pregnancy is from chads ejaculating into vaginas​

​

3) when chads ejaculate into vaginas it turns the women into male-female chimeras​

​

4) ergo sex-having women who get creampied by Chad are masculinized as cum transforms them into hermaphrodite chimeras, with male DNA traveling all around their body, even up to their brain​

​

Microchimerism

Microchimerism is a term that refers to the phenomena of cells or genetic material from another organism being present and integrated into an organism's body. Specifically...

incels.wiki

2002 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12351394/​

2005 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/​

2005 https://www.researchgate.net/public...ssment_and_correlation_with_pregnancy_history​

2012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23049819/
2012 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592​

2017 https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lif...n-keep-dna-from-men-she-has-had-sex-with.html​

2017 https://davissciencesays.ucdavis.edu/blog/nevertheless-foreign-dna-persisted​

So by being attracted to larger-than-normal breasts, you have a subconscous preggo fetish thus a chimera-fetish which is actually like having a hermaphrodite/tranny fetish TBH you should get analyzed.

Healthy male sexuality is one of subtlety: it's being attracted to breasts, yeah, but ones of a moderate size. The subtler they are compared to male chests, the higher IQ you need to actually distinguish them.

Faggots love big tits: https://www.outfrontmagazine.com/trending/culture/stuff-gay-people-like-breasts/

I also have a theory about closeted faggots and big tits.

Closeted faggots aren't legit aroused by tits, but they want to APPEAR that way, so they will overcompensate by going for the biggest ones possible because they figure "the bigger I go the more normal I seem, nobody will question me" (ie Roosh V and Dmitri the Lover)

If you're actually heterosexual you will have more of a concern about being attracted to what you're legitimately attracted to, not fitting in. So you will be comfortable expressing disgust towards excessively large breasts seen in implants, landwhales and preggos.

I think that's also why MTF trannies eventually tend to get HUGE breasts: they're overcompensating, and also I think on some level they realize that it will be primarily closeted fags who will tranny-chase and so they'll go for the pregnant-looking (masculine) GIANT ones.

In short: if you aren't a homo you will go for DFC and respect lolis as the ideal.

This isn't to say you couldn't hypothetically get married, impregnate wife, and still love your wife and be attracted to her and fuck her. It's just that your arousal should be because of who she is, not what she's transformed into while carrying your brood. Getting aroused by a foid's milk-swollen jugs is like getting aroused by her swollen feet TBH it's disgusting and homoerotic in nature.

 

[Mainländer]

But many foids have huge knockers without being pregnant. Seems very far-fetched.

 

[Deleted member 16390]

There was some study that conclude breast size preference is inversely proportional to one's iq.

 

[FamilyGuy1999]

very far-fetched.

 

[Deleted member 1039]

Dont care. Still prefer huge tits and asses.

 

[Over_this_Life]

Dont care. Still prefer huge tits and asses.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

many foids have huge knockers without being pregnant

Huge is subjective.

Obviously 50% of women have below-average breasts and 50% of women have above-average breasts, so I need to emphasize that "extremely large" is referring to a smaller percentile.

I'm not exactly sure where to place it TBH. Lemme look at some stats... https://trueandco.com/average-bra-size/

According to a survey conducted between 1992 and 2013, the average bra size in the U.S. has increased from a 34B to a 34DD, and now just six years later, the average has shot up to a DDD

Given that B-cup was the healthy average before women started becoming landwhales en-masse and pulling up the average, let's posit that attraction to A/B/C cup is healthy, while attraction to D+ is basically pregnancy fetishism which is disguised eroticization of hermaphrodite chimeras.

Which unfortunately means that due to mass obesity, being attracted to the average modern obese foid is actually gay.

Therefore you shouldn't be condemned as volcel for not being attracted to D+ landwhales on the same grounds you shouldn't be condemned as volcel for not being attracted to males.

Dont care. Still prefer huge tits and asses.

TBH this should be a bannable offense like someone saying they like dickgirls, both are degenerate and homo as fuck

 

[based_meme]

Nigga you gay. 100%

Last time you got banned for redefining incel to include even gay dudes not wanting you and volcel for rejecting gay dudes who do want you.

All of this weird shit you fap to is fucking with your brain.

 

[OwlGod]

 

[bigantennaemay1]

Dont care. Still prefer huge tits and asses.

Nigga you gay. 100%

Last time you got banned for redefining incel to include even gay dudes not wanting you and volcel for rejecting gay dudes who do want you.

All of this weird shit you fap to is fucking with your brain.

Yeah, OP is fucked and needs his medication.

 

[Words2_live_bye]

BIG MOMMY MILKERS MUST SUCK MOMMIES MILKIES

 

[OwlGod]

Nigga you gay. 100%

Last time you got banned for redefining incel to include even gay dudes not wanting you and volcel for rejecting gay dudes who do want you.

All of this weird shit you fap to is fucking with your brain.

he's trying to justify his pedophilia, since little girls have no secondary sexual characteristics so no breasts and can easily be mistaken with little boys (which is funny since he made this thread to not sound suspicious after spamming the forum with disgusting images), so yes you're probably right, he's a closet faggot, a little boy lover predator, his preference to little girls is due to their resemblance to the male body since they didn't develop sexual characteristics yet.

 

[HyperVersager_4EVER]

So many things just wrong here. It's okay to prefer small tits but don't ramble like this about it.

All of this weird shit you fap to is fucking with your brain.

I like some of your coomfuel posts but you should tone it down apparently

BIG MOMMY MILKERS MUST SUCK MOMMIES MILKIES

High IQ reply

 

[incelerated]

I like everything average anyway.

 

[Capable_Onion]

no

 

[based_meme]

he's trying to justify his pedophilia, since little girls have no secondary sexual characteristics so no breasts and can easily be mistaken with little boys (which is funny since he made this thread to not sound suspicious after spamming the forum with disgusting images), so yes you're probably right, he's a closet faggot, a little boy lover predator, his preference to little girls is due to their resemblance to the male body since they didn't develop sexual characteristics yet.

True or not, he wouldn't be the first to try and pass that off as something else.

Incel communities attract some major oddballs. I think they somehow believe they can carve a small niche they can latch onto and feel like they belong somewhere. I don't have the data to speculate, since it's hard to say how many true pedophiles are out there trolling various forums, but it's not like there are public forums for pedophiles for them to congregate to, so it's safe to assume they would find loosely adjacent communities (not implying that incels are even remotely related to pedophiles).

 

[kikecel]

wtf no its not

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

 

[Mountainbikecel]

if youre attracted to extremely tight pussy ure gay

 

[Pain And Hatred]

Dont care. Still prefer huge tits and asses.

BASED.

 

[Darkenzo]

Flawless logic.

 

[Jungle]

Not a problem for me anyway, I always preferred ass.

 

[Deleted member 18193]

I don't think anyone needs a high IQ to distinguish a flat-chested female from a male.

 

[waste matter]

Nope it ain't gay.

 

[Dregster]

View attachment 414786

Tbh

 

[bigantennaemay1]

I have to comment again for how idiotic this post is. Females have boobs/enlarged breasts, men don't. It is quite literally the opposite of gay to like boobs, including big boobs.

 

[Deleted member 31364]

Dont care. Still prefer huge tits and asses.

Indeed, wtf is this gay thread

 

[Linesnap99]

Extremely large looks fake. Might as well be plastic inside

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Nigga you gay. 100%

I believe heterosexuality should be about focus on the female form, and we begin to lose that when it's deformed via landwhaleism or 50lb silicone implants.

There are a lot of megamilk chars who I love, for example...

I just don't like them BECAUSE of their tits. It's a combination of their effeminate personalities, personal histories, cute face, great torso/limbs, etc.

last time you got banned for redefining incel to include even gay dudes not wanting you and volcel for rejecting gay dudes who do want you.

Redefine implies we have a decent coherent concrete consistent definition to begin with.

My point has only ever been that we should apply more adjectives (like involuntary) or prefixes if you abbreviate them (like "in-") to more accurately convey the meanings we attach to a term.

I think that way about a lot of stuff. For example I think "heterosexual" should be "hetereosexualerotic" for context if used alone because the literal meaning is just "opposite sex" but not for what you're opposite-sex. It's fine to say "my romantic persuation is heterosexual" because preceding words add context, but "I'm heterosexual" actually doesn't mechanically work for me because it's contextless and relies on people knowing the usage rather than the word's mechanics.

All of this weird shit you fap to is fucking with your brain.

There's nothing fucked with acknowledging there's something fucked about making giant tits the primary focus. For example if that were true then this would be the most straight thing in the world to want to fuck

I'm not saying I wouldn't consider it, but I don't think I'm wrong in saying that at a certain point excess adipose can move women away from femininity.

Just because women tend to be 5% fatter than men doesn't mean more fat = more feminine.

Any extreme deviation from a healthy ideal in either direction begins to raise questions if that's the reason someone zeroes in on it, as opposed to something they tolerate/understand because of being attracted to other criteria.

In the above 2 girls for example, their cute facial expressions do more for me than the tits.

I guess that could be tested if they suddenly had no tits whatsoever, but that's more because it would throw off their ratios. Girls who are A-cub despite being landwhales are weird while it's perfectly fine if they're svelte girls.
Looks like you faggots need a geometry lesson

Yeah, OP is fucked and needs his medication.

Actually quote some specific sentences and tell me where I'm wrong though.

BIG MOMMY MILKERS MUST SUCK MOMMIES MILKIES

TBH they do have their place

he's trying to justify his pedophilia, since little girls have no secondary sexual characteristics so no breasts and can easily be mistaken with little boys

OG relying on the secondary sexual characteristics grown during puberty to discern biological sex is pretty low-IQ

Do you not realize there are preexisting differences in bone structure even prior to this?

Bone structure is much more difficult to change compared to fleshy bits (like what trannies do with implants or hormones) so my focus is on the more immutably effeminate qualities.

are you really not able to discern which is which sans boobies?

(which is funny since he made this thread to not sound suspicious after spamming the forum with disgusting images)

There is no way you can believe I believe that this thread would make immune to others' suspicions.

so yes you're probably right, he's a closet faggot, a little boy lover predator, his preference to little girls is due to their resemblance to the male body since they didn't develop sexual characteristics yet.

In this century faggots are probably more accepted by mainstream western society than guys who want to marry jailbait so I don't really see what the incentive would be to hide one's love for cocks under a facade of love for lolis.

There's a reason they call them SECONDARY characteristics bro, they're not there from the outset and they're not what the primary focus should be. It's a dumbing-down to think that only genitalia qualifies as primary characteristics IMO. The personality/skeleton of foids is observably different and it's just harder to define so people avoid it, but I think that's the bread-and-butter of our lust.

So many things just wrong here. It's okay to prefer small tits but don't ramble like this about it.

This isn't about preferring small, it's saying if you prefer D over ABC there's something unhealthy about that.
It's like being attracted to giant clits.
If you like big-tittied or big-clitted women because of other stuff about them, it doesn't alarm me.
You can for example be attracted to a one-armed woman without having an amputee fetish.

it's not like there are public forums for pedophiles for them to congregate to

Actually there are and it's cringey as fuck full of purity-spiraling ad hom BS

so it's safe to assume they would find loosely adjacent communities
(not implying that incels are even remotely related to pedophiles).

The primary difference would seem to be that hypothetically adult foids could consent to fuck us and society would have no problem with this.
Except it probably would, despite the technical legality, and the foid would be shamed for fucking ugly men.

wtf no its not

Did you only read the title or do you have any rebuttals to the body?

if youre attracted to extremely tight pussy ure gay

What's your lgoic for this MBC?

Pregnant women get loose pussies so per my logic, since loose pussy correlates with hermaphoditic chimeras, fetishizing loose pussy falls in the same boat as fetishizing big clits or large breasts or hairy arms.

I don't think anyone needs a high IQ to distinguish a flat-chested female from a male.

high is always relative, average IQ is higher than below-average IQ after all

I really think that society is becoming so dumbed down and conformist that the skill needed to do this basic task is actually degrading to the point where we can't expect normies (including normie-esque incels) to be capable of such a basic skill

Nope it ain't gay.

I bet you think it's not gay to fetishizing big-clitted hairy-armed women too, lel

I have to comment again for how idiotic this post is. Females have boobs/enlarged breasts, men don't. It is quite literally the opposite of gay to like boobs, including big boobs.

You are doing what is called arguing a straw man, or moving the goalposts.

I never said it was gay to like boob, or even "big" ones. Check the title, I said "extremely large".

Just because it's gay to be attracted a male chest does not mean that it's the culmination of heterosexuality to fetishize 50lb watermelons.

one fact worth acknowledging here is at a certain point excess breast size actually obscures the female torso.
You can't even see the bone structure to see if there's a female ribcage/pelvis under there instead of a male one.
If boobs are so big you can't even see if there's a cock or a vagina underneath then I have to question your judgement if that's your preference.

hypothetically they're cute (moreso in anime) but if they're oversized to the point of distracting you from the rest of her body then I have a concern you don't care about whether her bone structure is female, whether her face is female, etc.

Extremely large looks fake. Might as well be plastic inside

I don't have a problem with fake/plastic women though, least not in concept.

the problem is not artifice, but extreme deviation from effeminate form
it's tolerable in isolated aspects (ie a 6'9" tall woman has a masculine height, but she might still have feminine bone structure, feminine personality, feminine face, etc) but it's still a concern if you begin to fetishize it for its own value

When I experiment with stuff like "it might be fun to have a tall GF" it's usually not because "tall is sexy" but moreso stuff like "I bet she's shy about her height and that would be cute" or something like that, in which case it's about the effeminate personality dealing with the challenge of having less feminine characteristics she's uncomfortable with.

Women are meant to be nurturers and when they become burdens due to landwhaleish or oversized breasts, that's moving away from the nurturer purpose.

I guess you could argue that having hands/feet also helps you nurture others (I'm obviously skirting with ableism here) and that lacking extremities/limbs would make you less feminine.

I think that's technically true: but you can obviously have other aspects which are feminine for us to focus on. Foid personality would manifest itself in mannerisms in the remaining body parts. It gets more challenging as they approach "brain in a jar" status but still possible.

 

[based_meme]

I believe heterosexuality should be about focus on the female form, and we begin to lose that when it's deformed via landwhaleism or 50lb silicone implants.

There are a lot of megamilk chars who I love, for example...
View attachment 415495View attachment 415496
View attachment 415497View attachment 415498

I just don't like them BECAUSE of their tits. It's a combination of their effeminate personalities, personal histories, cute face, great torso/limbs, etc.


Redefine implies we have a decent coherent concrete consistent definition to begin with.

My point has only ever been that we should apply more adjectives (like involuntary) or prefixes if you abbreviate them (like "in-") to more accurately convey the meanings we attach to a term.

I think that way about a lot of stuff. For example I think "heterosexual" should be "hetereosexualerotic" for context if used alone because the literal meaning is just "opposite sex" but not for what you're opposite-sex. It's fine to say "my romantic persuation is heterosexual" because preceding words add context, but "I'm heterosexual" actually doesn't mechanically work for me because it's contextless and relies on people knowing the usage rather than the word's mechanics.


There's nothing fucked with acknowledging there's something fucked about making giant tits the primary focus. For example if that were true then this would be the most straight thing in the world to want to fuck
View attachment 415501

I'm not saying I wouldn't consider it, but I don't think I'm wrong in saying that at a certain point excess adipose can move women away from femininity.

Just because women tend to be 5% fatter than men doesn't mean more fat = more feminine.

Any extreme deviation from a healthy ideal in either direction begins to raise questions if that's the reason someone zeroes in on it, as opposed to something they tolerate/understand because of being attracted to other criteria.

In the above 2 girls for example, their cute facial expressions do more for me than the tits.

I guess that could be tested if they suddenly had no tits whatsoever, but that's more because it would throw off their ratios. Girls who are A-cub despite being landwhales are weird while it's perfectly fine if they're svelte girls.
Looks like you faggots need a geometry lesson
View attachment 415521

Actually quote some specific sentences and tell me where I'm wrong though.

TBH they do have their place
View attachment 415506
View attachment 415507
View attachment 415508
View attachment 415510

OG relying on the secondary sexual characteristics grown during puberty to discern biological sex is pretty low-IQ

Do you not realize there are preexisting differences in bone structure even prior to this?
View attachment 415512View attachment 415513
Bone structure is much more difficult to change compared to fleshy bits (like what trannies do with implants or hormones) so my focus is on the more immutably effeminate qualities.

View attachment 415514View attachment 415515

are you really not able to discern which is which sans boobies?


There is no way you can believe I believe that this thread would make immune to others' suspicions.


In this century faggots are probably more accepted by mainstream western society than guys who want to marry jailbait so I don't really see what the incentive would be to hide one's love for cocks under a facade of love for lolis.

There's a reason they call them SECONDARY characteristics bro, they're not there from the outset and they're not what the primary focus should be. It's a dumbing-down to think that only genitalia qualifies as primary characteristics IMO. The personality/skeleton of foids is observably different and it's just harder to define so people avoid it, but I think that's the bread-and-butter of our lust.

This isn't about preferring small, it's saying if you prefer D over ABC there's something unhealthy about that.
It's like being attracted to giant clits.
If you like big-tittied or big-clitted women because of other stuff about them, it doesn't alarm me.
You can for example be attracted to a one-armed woman without having an amputee fetish.

Actually there are and it's cringey as fuck full of purity-spiraling ad hom BS


The primary difference would seem to be that hypothetically adult foids could consent to fuck us and society would have no problem with this.
Except it probably would, despite the technical legality, and the foid would be shamed for fucking ugly men.

Did you only read the title or do you have any rebuttals to the body?

What's your lgoic for this MBC?

Pregnant women get loose pussies so per my logic, since loose pussy correlates with hermaphoditic chimeras, fetishizing loose pussy falls in the same boat as fetishizing big clits or large breasts or hairy arms.

high is always relative, average IQ is higher than below-average IQ after all

I really think that society is becoming so dumbed down and conformist that the skill needed to do this basic task is actually degrading to the point where we can't expect normies (including normie-esque incels) to be capable of such a basic skill

I bet you think it's not gay to fetishizing big-clitted hairy-armed women too, lel

You are doing what is called arguing a straw man, or moving the goalposts.

I never said it was gay to like boob, or even "big" ones. Check the title, I said "extremely large".

Just because it's gay to be attracted a male chest does not mean that it's the culmination of heterosexuality to fetishize 50lb watermelons.

View attachment 415525
one fact worth acknowledging here is at a certain point excess breast size actually obscures the female torso.
You can't even see the bone structure to see if there's a female ribcage/pelvis under there instead of a male one.
If boobs are so big you can't even see if there's a cock or a vagina underneath then I have to question your judgement if that's your preference.
View attachment 415527
hypothetically they're cute (moreso in anime) but if they're oversized to the point of distracting you from the rest of her body then I have a concern you don't care about whether her bone structure is female, whether her face is female, etc.

I don't have a problem with fake/plastic women though, least not in concept.

View attachment 415532

the problem is not artifice, but extreme deviation from effeminate form
it's tolerable in isolated aspects (ie a 6'9" tall woman has a masculine height, but she might still have feminine bone structure, feminine personality, feminine face, etc) but it's still a concern if you begin to fetishize it for its own value

When I experiment with stuff like "it might be fun to have a tall GF" it's usually not because "tall is sexy" but moreso stuff like "I bet she's shy about her height and that would be cute" or something like that, in which case it's about the effeminate personality dealing with the challenge of having less feminine characteristics she's uncomfortable with.

Women are meant to be nurturers and when they become burdens due to landwhaleish or oversized breasts, that's moving away from the nurturer purpose.

I guess you could argue that having hands/feet also helps you nurture others (I'm obviously skirting with ableism here) and that lacking extremities/limbs would make you less feminine.

I think that's technically true: but you can obviously have other aspects which are feminine for us to focus on. Foid personality would manifest itself in mannerisms in the remaining body parts. It gets more challenging as they approach "brain in a jar" status but still possible.

Only you could defend a dissertation on big tits being gay.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Only you could defend a dissertation on big tits being gay.

My own dissertation?

I see you're actually ignoring the content of the argument though, why not make an effort?

Needing/preferring women to have exaggerated traits to recognize them as female is actually worse than low-IQ because even low-IQ guys can still have instincts. They might not know why they prefer non-pregnant women but they still do.

The question is basically why do guys want to fuck mother/crone types over maiden types.

Maidens with big tits are still emulating mommies pregnant from Chad's cum, so wanting to fuck some EE megamilker for that reason of her bust (rather than in spite of it) is basically you subconsciously wanting to fuck Chad's used roasties growing mini-chads inside him, to bathe your dicks in Chad's pre-douched cavernes.

If I'm fucking Orihime yeah I'll play with her tits and stuff but that's more about enjoying how she'd respond to that than for it's own sake.

Big tits wouldn't do anything for me if they were attached to a man but when guys focus on big tits to extreme importance, I get the impression they'll tunnel-vision on them to the degree that they'd be fine if it were on a tranny.

It's just heavily suspicious and like a fake charicature of what heterosexuality actually is.

 

[based_meme]

My own dissertation?

I see you're actually ignoring the content of the argument though, why not make an effort?

Because some things are just not worth the effort (I don't mean you, but your claim). I don't need to read an entire book to know it's ridiculous when I read the synopsis and first 10 pages, before I put it down and go, "yup, that was crap."

 

[Deleted member 28148]

 

[Hail The Bloatlord]

I suspect OP is a closeted faggot

 

[Deleted member 27159]

 

[Idotms]

no

 

[based_meme]

I suspect OP is a closeted faggot

I suspect you may be correct.

 

[OwlGod]

OG relying on the secondary sexual characteristics grown during puberty to discern biological sex is pretty low-IQ

Do you not realize there are preexisting differences in bone structure even prior to this?
View attachment 415512View attachment 415513
Bone structure is much more difficult to change compared to fleshy bits so my focus is on the more immutably effeminate qualities.

There's a reason they call them SECONDARY characteristics bro, they're not there from the outset and they're not what the primary focus should be. It's a dumbing-down to think that only genitalia qualifies as primary characteristics IMO. personality/skeleton of foids is observably different and it's just harder to define so people avoid it, but I think that's the bread-and-butter of our lust.

I know you would mention the bone structure that is different by biological sex.

>The anatomy images you posted are of full grown humans ›
>Bone structure isn't immutable (it's predetermined of how it's going to be when fully developed, which is different), they do change within puberty and so do the sexual characteristics, it's not mutually exclusive. Primary sexual trait is just the genitalia, it's literally its definition and anything else is development that falls as secondary sexual characteristics.

Females have no personality.

 

[based_meme]

I know you would mention the bone structure that is different by biological sex.

>The anatomy images you posted are of full grown humans ›
>Bone structure isn't immutable (it's predetermined of how it's going to be when fully developed, which is different), they do change within puberty and so do the sexual characteristics, it's not mutually exclusive. Primary sexual trait is just the genitalia, it's literally its definition and anything else is development that falls as secondary sexual characteristics.

Females have no personality.

KEK @ the way you ended that.

 

[Deleted member 19971]

Dnr

 

[ThisWorldIsAMess]

Wtf. Big ass and big titties ftw.

 

[Deleted member 21324]

TBH!

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

I know you would mention the bone structure that is different by biological sex.

>The anatomy images you posted are of full grown humans ›

valid point I guess but you can even see the diff in toddlers

and it's even more pronounced near adolescence

>Bone structure isn't immutable (it's predetermined of how it's going to be when fully developed, which is different)

Obviously puberty changes the bones but there are still pre-existing differences in bone structure, it's not like they're the same bone template and then suddenly puberty creates differences where there were none. Puberty just exaggerates the differences, but if you're high-IQ and attentive to subtlety you're already aware of them.

they do change within puberty and so do the sexual characteristics, it's not mutually exclusive. Primary sexual trait is just the genitalia, it's literally its definition and anything else is development that falls as secondary sexual characteristics.

Meh, who gets to determine what is though?

If it includes internal genitalia in addition to external, then is the womb primary?

If the womb is primary, then why not the pelvis built to pass a baby through it?

Females have no personality.

it's impossible not to have personality, it just holds no particularly impressive meaning

Wtf. Big ass and big titties ftw.

son ur sick

 

[Deleted member 17606]

Never was really into big tits, to each their own

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

Never was really into big tits, to each their own

what letter do you assign to big

my choosing ABC was a bit arbitrary, I might be flexible about Ds, not sure about Es or DDs or whatev

like past a certain point they would just be obstacles to getting to enjoy a foid's wonderful personality

that's largely why big boobies work mostly for anime foids because they have nice personalities which rarely exist IRL and even more rarely get perceived

 

[RollD20]

Flat is justice the thread.

 

[Deleted member 17606]

what letter do you assign to big

my choosing ABC was a bit arbitrary, I might be flexible about Ds, not sure about Es or DDs or whatev

like past a certain point they would just be obstacles to getting to enjoy a foid's wonderful personality

that's largely why big boobies work mostly for anime foids because they have nice personalities which rarely exist IRL and even more rarely get perceived

I dont care as long as they have some.

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

I suspect you may be correct.

Taking him seriously is the worst thing you could possibly do.

Its frothy solutions level bait.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

Unexpected post

 

[Indari]